Affirmative Action and Desert
Examines desert claims related to the affirmative action debate, focusing on the University of Michigan Supreme Court Case, and concluding that, in fact, affirmative action holds up against desert. Following a review of the philosophical literature on desert, attention is given to the University of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Public affairs quarterly 2005-04, Vol.19 (2), p.81-94 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 94 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 81 |
| container_title | Public affairs quarterly |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Dieterle, J. M. |
| description | Examines desert claims related to the affirmative action debate, focusing on the University of Michigan Supreme Court Case, and concluding that, in fact, affirmative action holds up against desert. Following a review of the philosophical literature on desert, attention is given to the University of Michigan undergraduate and law school admission policies. Institutional and pre-institutional theories of desert claims as applicable to those admission policies are then scrutinized. It is argued that the desert claims do not stand up on either kind of desert theory. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58856353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40441403</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40441403</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j843-bbef2c13a36fa12a6837bf75914805a43a25bd5e0d8efdf6067431585a0725fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFzMtKxDAUgOEgCtbRRxjoyl3hJCcnOS7LeBsYcDP7krQJtPQyJh3Bt1cY967-zcd_JQolSVVAWl2LAphtBWjxVtzlPAAQWlaF2NYx9mlya_8Vyrpd-2Uu3dyVzyGHtN6Lm-jGHB7-uhHH15fj7r06fLztd_WhGlhj5X2IqpXo0EQnlTOM1kdLT1IzkNPoFPmOAnQcYhcNGKtREpMDqyh63IjHy_aUls9zyGsz9bkN4-jmsJxzQ8xkkPBfiCwNgKVfuL3AIa9Lak6pn1z6bjRoLTUg_gB5-lC_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38160075</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Affirmative Action and Desert</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Dieterle, J. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dieterle, J. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Examines desert claims related to the affirmative action debate, focusing on the University of Michigan Supreme Court Case, and concluding that, in fact, affirmative action holds up against desert. Following a review of the philosophical literature on desert, attention is given to the University of Michigan undergraduate and law school admission policies. Institutional and pre-institutional theories of desert claims as applicable to those admission policies are then scrutinized. It is argued that the desert claims do not stand up on either kind of desert theory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-0373</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2152-0542</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>North American Philosophical Publications</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Admission policy ; Affirmative action ; Affirmative action programs ; Civil rights ; College admission ; Constitutional law ; Decisions ; Education policy ; Ethnic minorities ; Grade point average ; Institutions ; Interpretation and construction ; Law ; Law schools ; Litigation ; Michigan ; Minority group students ; Petitioners ; School admission ; Students ; Supreme court ; Test scores ; U.S.A ; United States ; Universities</subject><ispartof>Public affairs quarterly, 2005-04, Vol.19 (2), p.81-94</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 Public Affairs Quarterly</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40441403$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40441403$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27842,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dieterle, J. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Affirmative Action and Desert</title><title>Public affairs quarterly</title><description>Examines desert claims related to the affirmative action debate, focusing on the University of Michigan Supreme Court Case, and concluding that, in fact, affirmative action holds up against desert. Following a review of the philosophical literature on desert, attention is given to the University of Michigan undergraduate and law school admission policies. Institutional and pre-institutional theories of desert claims as applicable to those admission policies are then scrutinized. It is argued that the desert claims do not stand up on either kind of desert theory.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Admission policy</subject><subject>Affirmative action</subject><subject>Affirmative action programs</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>College admission</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Ethnic minorities</subject><subject>Grade point average</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Interpretation and construction</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Law schools</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Minority group students</subject><subject>Petitioners</subject><subject>School admission</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Supreme court</subject><subject>Test scores</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>0887-0373</issn><issn>2152-0542</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFzMtKxDAUgOEgCtbRRxjoyl3hJCcnOS7LeBsYcDP7krQJtPQyJh3Bt1cY967-zcd_JQolSVVAWl2LAphtBWjxVtzlPAAQWlaF2NYx9mlya_8Vyrpd-2Uu3dyVzyGHtN6Lm-jGHB7-uhHH15fj7r06fLztd_WhGlhj5X2IqpXo0EQnlTOM1kdLT1IzkNPoFPmOAnQcYhcNGKtREpMDqyh63IjHy_aUls9zyGsz9bkN4-jmsJxzQ8xkkPBfiCwNgKVfuL3AIa9Lak6pn1z6bjRoLTUg_gB5-lC_</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>Dieterle, J. M.</creator><general>North American Philosophical Publications</general><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>Affirmative Action and Desert</title><author>Dieterle, J. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j843-bbef2c13a36fa12a6837bf75914805a43a25bd5e0d8efdf6067431585a0725fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Admission policy</topic><topic>Affirmative action</topic><topic>Affirmative action programs</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>College admission</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Ethnic minorities</topic><topic>Grade point average</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Interpretation and construction</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Law schools</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Minority group students</topic><topic>Petitioners</topic><topic>School admission</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Supreme court</topic><topic>Test scores</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dieterle, J. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Public affairs quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dieterle, J. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Affirmative Action and Desert</atitle><jtitle>Public affairs quarterly</jtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>81-94</pages><issn>0887-0373</issn><eissn>2152-0542</eissn><abstract>Examines desert claims related to the affirmative action debate, focusing on the University of Michigan Supreme Court Case, and concluding that, in fact, affirmative action holds up against desert. Following a review of the philosophical literature on desert, attention is given to the University of Michigan undergraduate and law school admission policies. Institutional and pre-institutional theories of desert claims as applicable to those admission policies are then scrutinized. It is argued that the desert claims do not stand up on either kind of desert theory.</abstract><pub>North American Philosophical Publications</pub><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0887-0373 |
| ispartof | Public affairs quarterly, 2005-04, Vol.19 (2), p.81-94 |
| issn | 0887-0373 2152-0542 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58856353 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; PAIS Index |
| subjects | Academic achievement Admission policy Affirmative action Affirmative action programs Civil rights College admission Constitutional law Decisions Education policy Ethnic minorities Grade point average Institutions Interpretation and construction Law Law schools Litigation Michigan Minority group students Petitioners School admission Students Supreme court Test scores U.S.A United States Universities |
| title | Affirmative Action and Desert |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T09%3A20%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Affirmative%20Action%20and%20Desert&rft.jtitle=Public%20affairs%20quarterly&rft.au=Dieterle,%20J.%20M.&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=81-94&rft.issn=0887-0373&rft.eissn=2152-0542&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40441403%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38160075&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40441403&rfr_iscdi=true |