Alternative Australian climate change plans: The public’s views
Climate change has come to the forefront of Australian politics and there is now an active on-going policy debate about how to best reach a commonly agreed long term goal. This paper looks at five major dimensions of this debate and constructs policy options based on them. A discrete choice experime...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Energy policy 2010-02, Vol.38 (2), p.902-911 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 911 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 902 |
| container_title | Energy policy |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Carson, Richard T. Louviere, Jordan J. Wei, Edward |
| description | Climate change has come to the forefront of Australian politics and there is now an active on-going policy debate about how to best reach a commonly agreed long term goal. This paper looks at five major dimensions of this debate and constructs policy options based on them. A discrete choice experiment approach was used with a representative sample from a major internet panel provider. Survey respondents made choices between pairs of policy options with different characteristics. They favored policies starting in 2010 rather than 2012, and spending 20% of revenue raised on energy-related R&D. They were almost evenly split on whether the plan should initially exempt the transport sector and two competing approaches that redistribute revenue from the plan, and, they opposed plans giving special treatment to energy-intensive sectors of the economy. A number of other policy relevant questions related to understanding Australian views and knowledge related to climate change also were asked. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.041 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58828683</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421509007885</els_id><sourcerecordid>37249316</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c602t-8c094da7cfb9eddb27e6ed78b1cc57f953cc126d25cc11ad5c449226634dc5253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMuKFEEQRQtxwHbGL3BTuHBXbb4fgotm8MmAm3GdZGdG29lkV5WZVS2z8zf8vfkSo2xx4cJJiIwguPcSnKZ5TsmaEqpeHdbQj0NeM0IsbtZE0EfNihrNO6W1ftysCCe0E4zKJ83TWg-EEGGsWDWbTZ6g9H5KJ2g3c52Kz8n3bcjp6Cdow973X6Eds-_r6_Z2j-O8zSnc__hZ21OC7_Wqudj5XOHZn37ZfHn39vb6Q3fz-f3H681NFxRhU2cCsSJ6HXZbCzFumQYFUZstDUHqnZU8BMpUZBI79VEGISxjSnERg2SSXzYvz7ljGb7NUCd3TDVAxstgmKuTxjCjDH9QyDUTllOFwhf_CA_DjCxydYxILqTiFkX8LAplqLXAzo0F0ZQ7R4lb4LuD-w3fLfCXJcJH16ezq8AI4a8F8PWwiE-Oe27wu8NiBG3cp2XEGrEsYc5S6vbTEcPenMMA8SLz4mpI0AeIqUCYXBzSf4_5BUVjp9U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205345639</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Alternative Australian climate change plans: The public’s views</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Carson, Richard T. ; Louviere, Jordan J. ; Wei, Edward</creator><creatorcontrib>Carson, Richard T. ; Louviere, Jordan J. ; Wei, Edward</creatorcontrib><description>Climate change has come to the forefront of Australian politics and there is now an active on-going policy debate about how to best reach a commonly agreed long term goal. This paper looks at five major dimensions of this debate and constructs policy options based on them. A discrete choice experiment approach was used with a representative sample from a major internet panel provider. Survey respondents made choices between pairs of policy options with different characteristics. They favored policies starting in 2010 rather than 2012, and spending 20% of revenue raised on energy-related R&D. They were almost evenly split on whether the plan should initially exempt the transport sector and two competing approaches that redistribute revenue from the plan, and, they opposed plans giving special treatment to energy-intensive sectors of the economy. A number of other policy relevant questions related to understanding Australian views and knowledge related to climate change also were asked.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.041</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Australia ; Climate ; Climate change ; Climate policy ; Climate policy Discrete choice modeling Preference heterogeneity ; Discrete choice modeling ; Economic models ; Energy efficiency ; Environmental policy ; Modelling ; Preference heterogeneity ; Preferences ; Public opinion ; R&D ; Research & development ; Revenue ; Strategic planning ; Studies ; Surveys ; Transport</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2010-02, Vol.38 (2), p.902-911</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c602t-8c094da7cfb9eddb27e6ed78b1cc57f953cc126d25cc11ad5c449226634dc5253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c602t-8c094da7cfb9eddb27e6ed78b1cc57f953cc126d25cc11ad5c449226634dc5253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421509007885$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,27842,27843,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeenepol/v_3a38_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a902-911.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carson, Richard T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louviere, Jordan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Edward</creatorcontrib><title>Alternative Australian climate change plans: The public’s views</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Climate change has come to the forefront of Australian politics and there is now an active on-going policy debate about how to best reach a commonly agreed long term goal. This paper looks at five major dimensions of this debate and constructs policy options based on them. A discrete choice experiment approach was used with a representative sample from a major internet panel provider. Survey respondents made choices between pairs of policy options with different characteristics. They favored policies starting in 2010 rather than 2012, and spending 20% of revenue raised on energy-related R&D. They were almost evenly split on whether the plan should initially exempt the transport sector and two competing approaches that redistribute revenue from the plan, and, they opposed plans giving special treatment to energy-intensive sectors of the economy. A number of other policy relevant questions related to understanding Australian views and knowledge related to climate change also were asked.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Climate policy Discrete choice modeling Preference heterogeneity</subject><subject>Discrete choice modeling</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Preference heterogeneity</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Transport</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMuKFEEQRQtxwHbGL3BTuHBXbb4fgotm8MmAm3GdZGdG29lkV5WZVS2z8zf8vfkSo2xx4cJJiIwguPcSnKZ5TsmaEqpeHdbQj0NeM0IsbtZE0EfNihrNO6W1ftysCCe0E4zKJ83TWg-EEGGsWDWbTZ6g9H5KJ2g3c52Kz8n3bcjp6Cdow973X6Eds-_r6_Z2j-O8zSnc__hZ21OC7_Wqudj5XOHZn37ZfHn39vb6Q3fz-f3H681NFxRhU2cCsSJ6HXZbCzFumQYFUZstDUHqnZU8BMpUZBI79VEGISxjSnERg2SSXzYvz7ljGb7NUCd3TDVAxstgmKuTxjCjDH9QyDUTllOFwhf_CA_DjCxydYxILqTiFkX8LAplqLXAzo0F0ZQ7R4lb4LuD-w3fLfCXJcJH16ezq8AI4a8F8PWwiE-Oe27wu8NiBG3cp2XEGrEsYc5S6vbTEcPenMMA8SLz4mpI0AeIqUCYXBzSf4_5BUVjp9U</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Carson, Richard T.</creator><creator>Louviere, Jordan J.</creator><creator>Wei, Edward</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Alternative Australian climate change plans: The public’s views</title><author>Carson, Richard T. ; Louviere, Jordan J. ; Wei, Edward</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c602t-8c094da7cfb9eddb27e6ed78b1cc57f953cc126d25cc11ad5c449226634dc5253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Climate policy Discrete choice modeling Preference heterogeneity</topic><topic>Discrete choice modeling</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Preference heterogeneity</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Transport</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carson, Richard T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louviere, Jordan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Edward</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carson, Richard T.</au><au>Louviere, Jordan J.</au><au>Wei, Edward</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Alternative Australian climate change plans: The public’s views</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>902</spage><epage>911</epage><pages>902-911</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>Climate change has come to the forefront of Australian politics and there is now an active on-going policy debate about how to best reach a commonly agreed long term goal. This paper looks at five major dimensions of this debate and constructs policy options based on them. A discrete choice experiment approach was used with a representative sample from a major internet panel provider. Survey respondents made choices between pairs of policy options with different characteristics. They favored policies starting in 2010 rather than 2012, and spending 20% of revenue raised on energy-related R&D. They were almost evenly split on whether the plan should initially exempt the transport sector and two competing approaches that redistribute revenue from the plan, and, they opposed plans giving special treatment to energy-intensive sectors of the economy. A number of other policy relevant questions related to understanding Australian views and knowledge related to climate change also were asked.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.041</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0301-4215 |
| ispartof | Energy policy, 2010-02, Vol.38 (2), p.902-911 |
| issn | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58828683 |
| source | RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; PAIS Index |
| subjects | Australia Climate Climate change Climate policy Climate policy Discrete choice modeling Preference heterogeneity Discrete choice modeling Economic models Energy efficiency Environmental policy Modelling Preference heterogeneity Preferences Public opinion R&D Research & development Revenue Strategic planning Studies Surveys Transport |
| title | Alternative Australian climate change plans: The public’s views |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T06%3A44%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Alternative%20Australian%20climate%20change%20plans:%20The%20public%E2%80%99s%20views&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Carson,%20Richard%20T.&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=902&rft.epage=911&rft.pages=902-911&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E37249316%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205345639&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421509007885&rfr_iscdi=true |