Making Credit Safer
Physical products, from toasters and lawnmowers, to infant car seats and toys, to meat and drugs, are routinely inspected and regulated for safety. Credit products, like mortgage loans and credit cards, on the other hand, are left largely unregulated, even though they can also be unsafe. Because fin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | University of Pennsylvania law review 2008-11, Vol.157 (1), p.1-101 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 101 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | University of Pennsylvania law review |
container_volume | 157 |
creator | Bar-Gill, Oren Warren, Elizabeth |
description | Physical products, from toasters and lawnmowers, to infant car seats and toys, to meat and drugs, are routinely inspected and regulated for safety. Credit products, like mortgage loans and credit cards, on the other hand, are left largely unregulated, even though they can also be unsafe. Because financial products are analyzed through a contract paradigm rather than a products paradigm, consumers have been left with unsafe credit products. These dangerous products can lead to financial distress, bankruptcy, and foreclosure, and, as evidenced by the recent subprime crisis, they can have devastating effects on communities and on the economy. In this Article, we use the physical products analogy to build a case, supported by both theory and data, for comprehensive safety regulation of consumer credit. We then examine the present state of consumer credit regulation, explaining why the current regulatory regime has systematically failed to provide meaningful safety regulations. We propose a fundamental restructuring of this regime, urging the creation of a new federal regulator that will have both the authority and the incentives to police the safety of consumer credit products. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/40041411 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58795246</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A190242940</galeid><jstor_id>40041411</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A190242940</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g340t-13c74b992c3dd261d65e643738e098352b286c8183562e6ba4108ab898f472db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0UtLw0AQAOBFFKxVEDwLRcFb6uwj-ziW4gsqHtTzskkmYWua1N304L93S_WglDnMMHwzDAwh5xSmjIO6FQCCCkoPyIgawTKdc3VIRttuZgyoY3IS4xIAZE7NiFw8uw_fNZN5wMoPk1dXYzglR7VrI5795DF5v797mz9mi5eHp_lskTVcwJBRXipRGMNKXlVM0krmKAVXXCMYzXNWMC1LTVMpGcrCCQraFdroWihWFXxMbnZ716H_3GAc7MrHEtvWddhvos21MjkTMsGrf3DZb0KXbrPUSCM4aJrQ9Q41rkXru7ofgiu3G-2MGmCCGQFJZXtUgx0G1_Yd1j61__jpHp-iwpUv9w5c7gaWceiDXQe_cuHL_r6FfwPx33hE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196943081</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Making Credit Safer</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Bar-Gill, Oren ; Warren, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Bar-Gill, Oren ; Warren, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>Physical products, from toasters and lawnmowers, to infant car seats and toys, to meat and drugs, are routinely inspected and regulated for safety. Credit products, like mortgage loans and credit cards, on the other hand, are left largely unregulated, even though they can also be unsafe. Because financial products are analyzed through a contract paradigm rather than a products paradigm, consumers have been left with unsafe credit products. These dangerous products can lead to financial distress, bankruptcy, and foreclosure, and, as evidenced by the recent subprime crisis, they can have devastating effects on communities and on the economy. In this Article, we use the physical products analogy to build a case, supported by both theory and data, for comprehensive safety regulation of consumer credit. We then examine the present state of consumer credit regulation, explaining why the current regulatory regime has systematically failed to provide meaningful safety regulations. We propose a fundamental restructuring of this regime, urging the creation of a new federal regulator that will have both the authority and the incentives to police the safety of consumer credit products.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-9907</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-8537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/40041411</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Law School</publisher><subject>Bank loans ; Banking regulation ; Bankruptcy ; Consumer credit ; Consumer goods ; Consumer protection ; Consumer protection regulation ; Contracts ; Credit ; Credit cards ; Credit risk ; Fees ; Foreclosures ; Government regulation of business ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Lenders ; Loans ; Mortgage loans ; Mortgages ; Products liability ; Regulation ; Safety</subject><ispartof>University of Pennsylvania law review, 2008-11, Vol.157 (1), p.1-101</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 University of Pennsylvania Law Review</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 University of Pennsylvania, Law School</rights><rights>Copyright University of Pennsylvania Law School Nov 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40041411$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40041411$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27842,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bar-Gill, Oren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Making Credit Safer</title><title>University of Pennsylvania law review</title><description>Physical products, from toasters and lawnmowers, to infant car seats and toys, to meat and drugs, are routinely inspected and regulated for safety. Credit products, like mortgage loans and credit cards, on the other hand, are left largely unregulated, even though they can also be unsafe. Because financial products are analyzed through a contract paradigm rather than a products paradigm, consumers have been left with unsafe credit products. These dangerous products can lead to financial distress, bankruptcy, and foreclosure, and, as evidenced by the recent subprime crisis, they can have devastating effects on communities and on the economy. In this Article, we use the physical products analogy to build a case, supported by both theory and data, for comprehensive safety regulation of consumer credit. We then examine the present state of consumer credit regulation, explaining why the current regulatory regime has systematically failed to provide meaningful safety regulations. We propose a fundamental restructuring of this regime, urging the creation of a new federal regulator that will have both the authority and the incentives to police the safety of consumer credit products.</description><subject>Bank loans</subject><subject>Banking regulation</subject><subject>Bankruptcy</subject><subject>Consumer credit</subject><subject>Consumer goods</subject><subject>Consumer protection</subject><subject>Consumer protection regulation</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Credit</subject><subject>Credit cards</subject><subject>Credit risk</subject><subject>Fees</subject><subject>Foreclosures</subject><subject>Government regulation of business</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Lenders</subject><subject>Loans</subject><subject>Mortgage loans</subject><subject>Mortgages</subject><subject>Products liability</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Safety</subject><issn>0041-9907</issn><issn>1942-8537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0UtLw0AQAOBFFKxVEDwLRcFb6uwj-ziW4gsqHtTzskkmYWua1N304L93S_WglDnMMHwzDAwh5xSmjIO6FQCCCkoPyIgawTKdc3VIRttuZgyoY3IS4xIAZE7NiFw8uw_fNZN5wMoPk1dXYzglR7VrI5795DF5v797mz9mi5eHp_lskTVcwJBRXipRGMNKXlVM0krmKAVXXCMYzXNWMC1LTVMpGcrCCQraFdroWihWFXxMbnZ716H_3GAc7MrHEtvWddhvos21MjkTMsGrf3DZb0KXbrPUSCM4aJrQ9Q41rkXru7ofgiu3G-2MGmCCGQFJZXtUgx0G1_Yd1j61__jpHp-iwpUv9w5c7gaWceiDXQe_cuHL_r6FfwPx33hE</recordid><startdate>20081101</startdate><enddate>20081101</enddate><creator>Bar-Gill, Oren</creator><creator>Warren, Elizabeth</creator><general>University of Pennsylvania Law School</general><general>University of Pennsylvania, Law School</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081101</creationdate><title>Making Credit Safer</title><author>Bar-Gill, Oren ; Warren, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g340t-13c74b992c3dd261d65e643738e098352b286c8183562e6ba4108ab898f472db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Bank loans</topic><topic>Banking regulation</topic><topic>Bankruptcy</topic><topic>Consumer credit</topic><topic>Consumer goods</topic><topic>Consumer protection</topic><topic>Consumer protection regulation</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Credit</topic><topic>Credit cards</topic><topic>Credit risk</topic><topic>Fees</topic><topic>Foreclosures</topic><topic>Government regulation of business</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Lenders</topic><topic>Loans</topic><topic>Mortgage loans</topic><topic>Mortgages</topic><topic>Products liability</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Safety</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bar-Gill, Oren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>University of Pennsylvania law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bar-Gill, Oren</au><au>Warren, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Making Credit Safer</atitle><jtitle>University of Pennsylvania law review</jtitle><date>2008-11-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>157</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>1-101</pages><issn>0041-9907</issn><eissn>1942-8537</eissn><abstract>Physical products, from toasters and lawnmowers, to infant car seats and toys, to meat and drugs, are routinely inspected and regulated for safety. Credit products, like mortgage loans and credit cards, on the other hand, are left largely unregulated, even though they can also be unsafe. Because financial products are analyzed through a contract paradigm rather than a products paradigm, consumers have been left with unsafe credit products. These dangerous products can lead to financial distress, bankruptcy, and foreclosure, and, as evidenced by the recent subprime crisis, they can have devastating effects on communities and on the economy. In this Article, we use the physical products analogy to build a case, supported by both theory and data, for comprehensive safety regulation of consumer credit. We then examine the present state of consumer credit regulation, explaining why the current regulatory regime has systematically failed to provide meaningful safety regulations. We propose a fundamental restructuring of this regime, urging the creation of a new federal regulator that will have both the authority and the incentives to police the safety of consumer credit products.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>University of Pennsylvania Law School</pub><doi>10.2307/40041411</doi><tpages>101</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0041-9907 |
ispartof | University of Pennsylvania law review, 2008-11, Vol.157 (1), p.1-101 |
issn | 0041-9907 1942-8537 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58795246 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; PAIS Index; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Bank loans Banking regulation Bankruptcy Consumer credit Consumer goods Consumer protection Consumer protection regulation Contracts Credit Credit cards Credit risk Fees Foreclosures Government regulation of business Laws, regulations and rules Lenders Loans Mortgage loans Mortgages Products liability Regulation Safety |
title | Making Credit Safer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T07%3A37%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Making%20Credit%20Safer&rft.jtitle=University%20of%20Pennsylvania%20law%20review&rft.au=Bar-Gill,%20Oren&rft.date=2008-11-01&rft.volume=157&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=1-101&rft.issn=0041-9907&rft.eissn=1942-8537&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/40041411&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA190242940%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196943081&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A190242940&rft_jstor_id=40041411&rfr_iscdi=true |