status quo bias and reform of the Common Agricultural Policy: impact of voting rules, the European Commission and external changes
We develop a formal model of EU decision-making on the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The model is used to evaluate under what conditions CAP reform occurs and what the influence of the European Commission (Commission) is on CAP reform. We find that the voting and amendment rules in the Council o...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European review of agricultural economics 2006-12, Vol.33 (4), p.562-590 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 590 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 562 |
| container_title | European review of agricultural economics |
| container_volume | 33 |
| creator | Pokrivcak, Jan Crombez, Christophe Swinnen, Johan F.M |
| description | We develop a formal model of EU decision-making on the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The model is used to evaluate under what conditions CAP reform occurs and what the influence of the European Commission (Commission) is on CAP reform. We find that the voting and amendment rules in the Council of the European Union, the number of policy instruments and external changes have important impacts on the occurrence and extent of CAP reform and on the influence of the Commission. Stricter voting rules increase the status quo bias and reduce Commission influence, whereas stricter amendment rules increase both the status quo bias and Commission influence. More significant external change results in more reform and more Commission influence. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/erae/jbl027 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58753057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/erae/jbl027</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1192774911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-35a8dacfca62c723c2f503b7eb1a9596e2ba713dd692d1ac44d4cf6ad52923783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1TAURSMEEpfCiA_AYsAEQm2f2E6YVVeFIpVHBUUVE-vEcW5zSeLUD9RO-XKSBoHEpKMjS8vLx3tn2VNGXzNawaH1aA_3dU-5updtWCGLHCQr72cbyqTImSjVw-xRCHs6n0GoTfYrRIwpkKvkSN1hIDg2xNvW-YG4lsRLS7ZuGNxIjna-M6mPyWNPPru-MzdvSDdMaOJC_nSxG3fEp96GV7f3jpN3k8XxVtCF0M2SxW6vo_XjLDGXOO5seJw9aLEP9smfeZCdvz3-uj3JTz-9e789Os2NKCDmILBs0LQGJTeKg-GtoFArWzOsRCUtr1ExaBpZ8YahKYqmMK3ERvCKgyrhIHuxeifvrpINUc9bGdv3OFqXgp7DEUCFuhMEKSUHLmfw-X_g3qXla0FzCgK4gMX2coWMdyHM0erJdwP6G82oXlrTS2t6be3f2y5Nd4D5CnYh2uu_KPofWipQQp9cfNcfP5zxb_yM6YuZf7byLTqNc5dBn3_hlAGlCoQsSvgNzj6yoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203532537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>status quo bias and reform of the Common Agricultural Policy: impact of voting rules, the European Commission and external changes</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Pokrivcak, Jan ; Crombez, Christophe ; Swinnen, Johan F.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Pokrivcak, Jan ; Crombez, Christophe ; Swinnen, Johan F.M</creatorcontrib><description>We develop a formal model of EU decision-making on the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The model is used to evaluate under what conditions CAP reform occurs and what the influence of the European Commission (Commission) is on CAP reform. We find that the voting and amendment rules in the Council of the European Union, the number of policy instruments and external changes have important impacts on the occurrence and extent of CAP reform and on the influence of the Commission. Stricter voting rules increase the status quo bias and reduce Commission influence, whereas stricter amendment rules increase both the status quo bias and Commission influence. More significant external change results in more reform and more Commission influence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-1587</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbl027</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERAEDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press and the Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agricultural policy ; Agricultural production ; Agricultural subsidies ; Agriculture ; Bias ; Common Agricultural Policy ; Councils ; D72 ; D78 ; Decision making ; Economic models ; Economic statistics ; Economic theory ; Europe ; European Commission ; European Union - Agricultural policy ; Policy making ; policy reform ; Political economy ; political process ; Q18 ; Reform ; Reforms ; Studies ; Subsidies</subject><ispartof>European review of agricultural economics, 2006-12, Vol.33 (4), p.562-590</ispartof><rights>Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2006; all rights reserved. For permissions, please email journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2006</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Dec 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-35a8dacfca62c723c2f503b7eb1a9596e2ba713dd692d1ac44d4cf6ad52923783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-35a8dacfca62c723c2f503b7eb1a9596e2ba713dd692d1ac44d4cf6ad52923783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27842,27843,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pokrivcak, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crombez, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swinnen, Johan F.M</creatorcontrib><title>status quo bias and reform of the Common Agricultural Policy: impact of voting rules, the European Commission and external changes</title><title>European review of agricultural economics</title><description>We develop a formal model of EU decision-making on the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The model is used to evaluate under what conditions CAP reform occurs and what the influence of the European Commission (Commission) is on CAP reform. We find that the voting and amendment rules in the Council of the European Union, the number of policy instruments and external changes have important impacts on the occurrence and extent of CAP reform and on the influence of the Commission. Stricter voting rules increase the status quo bias and reduce Commission influence, whereas stricter amendment rules increase both the status quo bias and Commission influence. More significant external change results in more reform and more Commission influence.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural policy</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agricultural subsidies</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Common Agricultural Policy</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>D72</subject><subject>D78</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic statistics</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>European Commission</subject><subject>European Union - Agricultural policy</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>policy reform</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>political process</subject><subject>Q18</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><issn>0165-1587</issn><issn>1464-3618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctu1TAURSMEEpfCiA_AYsAEQm2f2E6YVVeFIpVHBUUVE-vEcW5zSeLUD9RO-XKSBoHEpKMjS8vLx3tn2VNGXzNawaH1aA_3dU-5updtWCGLHCQr72cbyqTImSjVw-xRCHs6n0GoTfYrRIwpkKvkSN1hIDg2xNvW-YG4lsRLS7ZuGNxIjna-M6mPyWNPPru-MzdvSDdMaOJC_nSxG3fEp96GV7f3jpN3k8XxVtCF0M2SxW6vo_XjLDGXOO5seJw9aLEP9smfeZCdvz3-uj3JTz-9e789Os2NKCDmILBs0LQGJTeKg-GtoFArWzOsRCUtr1ExaBpZ8YahKYqmMK3ERvCKgyrhIHuxeifvrpINUc9bGdv3OFqXgp7DEUCFuhMEKSUHLmfw-X_g3qXla0FzCgK4gMX2coWMdyHM0erJdwP6G82oXlrTS2t6be3f2y5Nd4D5CnYh2uu_KPofWipQQp9cfNcfP5zxb_yM6YuZf7byLTqNc5dBn3_hlAGlCoQsSvgNzj6yoA</recordid><startdate>20061201</startdate><enddate>20061201</enddate><creator>Pokrivcak, Jan</creator><creator>Crombez, Christophe</creator><creator>Swinnen, Johan F.M</creator><general>Oxford University Press and the Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061201</creationdate><title>status quo bias and reform of the Common Agricultural Policy: impact of voting rules, the European Commission and external changes</title><author>Pokrivcak, Jan ; Crombez, Christophe ; Swinnen, Johan F.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-35a8dacfca62c723c2f503b7eb1a9596e2ba713dd692d1ac44d4cf6ad52923783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural policy</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agricultural subsidies</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Common Agricultural Policy</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>D72</topic><topic>D78</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic statistics</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>European Commission</topic><topic>European Union - Agricultural policy</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>policy reform</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>political process</topic><topic>Q18</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pokrivcak, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crombez, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swinnen, Johan F.M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>European review of agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pokrivcak, Jan</au><au>Crombez, Christophe</au><au>Swinnen, Johan F.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>status quo bias and reform of the Common Agricultural Policy: impact of voting rules, the European Commission and external changes</atitle><jtitle>European review of agricultural economics</jtitle><date>2006-12-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>562</spage><epage>590</epage><pages>562-590</pages><issn>0165-1587</issn><eissn>1464-3618</eissn><coden>ERAEDA</coden><abstract>We develop a formal model of EU decision-making on the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The model is used to evaluate under what conditions CAP reform occurs and what the influence of the European Commission (Commission) is on CAP reform. We find that the voting and amendment rules in the Council of the European Union, the number of policy instruments and external changes have important impacts on the occurrence and extent of CAP reform and on the influence of the Commission. Stricter voting rules increase the status quo bias and reduce Commission influence, whereas stricter amendment rules increase both the status quo bias and Commission influence. More significant external change results in more reform and more Commission influence.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press and the Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics</pub><doi>10.1093/erae/jbl027</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0165-1587 |
| ispartof | European review of agricultural economics, 2006-12, Vol.33 (4), p.562-590 |
| issn | 0165-1587 1464-3618 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58753057 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); PAIS Index |
| subjects | Agricultural economics Agricultural policy Agricultural production Agricultural subsidies Agriculture Bias Common Agricultural Policy Councils D72 D78 Decision making Economic models Economic statistics Economic theory Europe European Commission European Union - Agricultural policy Policy making policy reform Political economy political process Q18 Reform Reforms Studies Subsidies |
| title | status quo bias and reform of the Common Agricultural Policy: impact of voting rules, the European Commission and external changes |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T18%3A30%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=status%20quo%20bias%20and%20reform%20of%20the%20Common%20Agricultural%20Policy:%20impact%20of%20voting%20rules,%20the%20European%20Commission%20and%20external%20changes&rft.jtitle=European%20review%20of%20agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Pokrivcak,%20Jan&rft.date=2006-12-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=562&rft.epage=590&rft.pages=562-590&rft.issn=0165-1587&rft.eissn=1464-3618&rft.coden=ERAEDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/erae/jbl027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1192774911%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203532537&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/erae/jbl027&rfr_iscdi=true |