Quantity and quality in speaking test performance

Scores on speaking tests are used as evidence of both learner language ability and the second language acquisition process, and most speaking tests include scoring rubrics to help ensure that ratings are reliable and reflect a theoretical construct of speaking ability. Nevertheless, it may be that s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Language testing 1994-07, Vol.11 (2), p.125-144
1. Verfasser: Douglas, Dan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 144
container_issue 2
container_start_page 125
container_title Language testing
container_volume 11
creator Douglas, Dan
description Scores on speaking tests are used as evidence of both learner language ability and the second language acquisition process, and most speaking tests include scoring rubrics to help ensure that ratings are reliable and reflect a theoretical construct of speaking ability. Nevertheless, it may be that similar ratings on a speaking test in fact represent qualitatively different learner performances. Such a situation would mean that interpretations of ability or acquisition process based on such test scores may not be valid. The purpose of this article is to investigate the hypothesis that similar quantitative scores on a speaking test represent qualitatively different performances. The results of the study raise a number of issues for further investigation.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/026553229401100203
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58319244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_026553229401100203</sage_id><sourcerecordid>58319244</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-da4717057a4aa583c20e5e5b0e6fa335b0e5d501043c5c8f89517a130e45c3673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPw0AQhE8IJELgD1C5ojPZvYcvLlHES4qEkKA-LZd15OCcnTu7yL_HVuiQqHaKb0azI8Qtwj2itQuQhTFKylIDIoAEdSZmqK3NodTFuZhNQD4Rl-IqpR0AlKiKmcD3gUJf98eMwiY7DNRMug5Z6pi-67DNek591nGs2rin4PlaXFTUJL75vXPx-fT4sXrJ12_Pr6uHde6lUn2-IW3RgrGkicxSeQls2HwBFxUpNQmzMYCglTd-WS1Lg5ZQAWvjVWHVXNydcrvYHoaxhNvXyXPTUOB2SG7MxFJqPYLyBPrYphS5cl2s9xSPDsFN67i_64ymxcmUaMtu1w4xjM_85_gBn3RjDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>58319244</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantity and quality in speaking test performance</title><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Douglas, Dan</creator><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Dan</creatorcontrib><description>Scores on speaking tests are used as evidence of both learner language ability and the second language acquisition process, and most speaking tests include scoring rubrics to help ensure that ratings are reliable and reflect a theoretical construct of speaking ability. Nevertheless, it may be that similar ratings on a speaking test in fact represent qualitatively different learner performances. Such a situation would mean that interpretations of ability or acquisition process based on such test scores may not be valid. The purpose of this article is to investigate the hypothesis that similar quantitative scores on a speaking test represent qualitatively different performances. The results of the study raise a number of issues for further investigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-5322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/026553229401100203</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LATEEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><ispartof>Language testing, 1994-07, Vol.11 (2), p.125-144</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-da4717057a4aa583c20e5e5b0e6fa335b0e5d501043c5c8f89517a130e45c3673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-da4717057a4aa583c20e5e5b0e6fa335b0e5d501043c5c8f89517a130e45c3673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/026553229401100203$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/026553229401100203$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Dan</creatorcontrib><title>Quantity and quality in speaking test performance</title><title>Language testing</title><description>Scores on speaking tests are used as evidence of both learner language ability and the second language acquisition process, and most speaking tests include scoring rubrics to help ensure that ratings are reliable and reflect a theoretical construct of speaking ability. Nevertheless, it may be that similar ratings on a speaking test in fact represent qualitatively different learner performances. Such a situation would mean that interpretations of ability or acquisition process based on such test scores may not be valid. The purpose of this article is to investigate the hypothesis that similar quantitative scores on a speaking test represent qualitatively different performances. The results of the study raise a number of issues for further investigation.</description><issn>0265-5322</issn><issn>1477-0946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtPw0AQhE8IJELgD1C5ojPZvYcvLlHES4qEkKA-LZd15OCcnTu7yL_HVuiQqHaKb0azI8Qtwj2itQuQhTFKylIDIoAEdSZmqK3NodTFuZhNQD4Rl-IqpR0AlKiKmcD3gUJf98eMwiY7DNRMug5Z6pi-67DNek591nGs2rin4PlaXFTUJL75vXPx-fT4sXrJ12_Pr6uHde6lUn2-IW3RgrGkicxSeQls2HwBFxUpNQmzMYCglTd-WS1Lg5ZQAWvjVWHVXNydcrvYHoaxhNvXyXPTUOB2SG7MxFJqPYLyBPrYphS5cl2s9xSPDsFN67i_64ymxcmUaMtu1w4xjM_85_gBn3RjDA</recordid><startdate>199407</startdate><enddate>199407</enddate><creator>Douglas, Dan</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199407</creationdate><title>Quantity and quality in speaking test performance</title><author>Douglas, Dan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-da4717057a4aa583c20e5e5b0e6fa335b0e5d501043c5c8f89517a130e45c3673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Dan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Language testing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Douglas, Dan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantity and quality in speaking test performance</atitle><jtitle>Language testing</jtitle><date>1994-07</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>125-144</pages><issn>0265-5322</issn><eissn>1477-0946</eissn><coden>LATEEU</coden><abstract>Scores on speaking tests are used as evidence of both learner language ability and the second language acquisition process, and most speaking tests include scoring rubrics to help ensure that ratings are reliable and reflect a theoretical construct of speaking ability. Nevertheless, it may be that similar ratings on a speaking test in fact represent qualitatively different learner performances. Such a situation would mean that interpretations of ability or acquisition process based on such test scores may not be valid. The purpose of this article is to investigate the hypothesis that similar quantitative scores on a speaking test represent qualitatively different performances. The results of the study raise a number of issues for further investigation.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/026553229401100203</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0265-5322
ispartof Language testing, 1994-07, Vol.11 (2), p.125-144
issn 0265-5322
1477-0946
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58319244
source SAGE Journals
title Quantity and quality in speaking test performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A58%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantity%20and%20quality%20in%20speaking%20test%20performance&rft.jtitle=Language%20testing&rft.au=Douglas,%20Dan&rft.date=1994-07&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=125-144&rft.issn=0265-5322&rft.eissn=1477-0946&rft.coden=LATEEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/026553229401100203&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E58319244%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=58319244&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_026553229401100203&rfr_iscdi=true