Comprehension of legal contracts by non-experts: Effectiveness of plain language redrafting
The primary motivation behind the advocated use of plain language in legal documents is to increase comprehension among non‐experts. We report empirical evidence regarding the effectiveness of three kinds of simplification of standard legal contracts for increasing comprehension among naïve readers....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Applied cognitive psychology 1994-02, Vol.8 (1), p.67-85 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 85 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 67 |
| container_title | Applied cognitive psychology |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Masson, Michael E. J. Waldron, Mary Anne |
| description | The primary motivation behind the advocated use of plain language in legal documents is to increase comprehension among non‐experts. We report empirical evidence regarding the effectiveness of three kinds of simplification of standard legal contracts for increasing comprehension among naïve readers. A set of legal contracts was redrafted in three stages to produce three modified versions. In the first stage we removed or replaced archaic and redundant terms; in the next stage simplified words and sentence structure were introduced; in the final stage legal terms were defined or replaced with simpler terms. Comprehension, as measured by paraphrasing and question‐answering tasks, was reliably enhanced by the use of simplified words and sentence structure, but absolute levels of comprehension were still very low. An examination of erroneous responses suggested that, quite apart from the constraints of language, non‐experts have difficulty understanding complex legal concepts that sometimes conflict with prior knowledge and beliefs. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/acp.2350080107 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58297814</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>58297814</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4467-eadd9405dbf799e566e0940b02c4c7bfadfd688961833bbf939499786dbef90a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhSMEEkNhyzoSiF2m13biB7syaqeVKh4SjwULy3GuB5eMndoZ6Px7XE1VBJuurCt_59xzdarqJYElAaDHxk5LyjoACQTEo2pBQKkGBIXH1QKklE1bvp5Wz3K-AgDFCV1U31dxOyX8gSH7GOro6hE3ZqxtDHMyds51v69DDA3eTJjm_LY-dQ7t7H9hwJxvBdNofKhHEzY7s8E64ZCMm33YPK-eODNmfHH3HlVfzk4_r86byw_ri9XJZWPblosGzTCoFrqhd0Ip7DhHKHMP1LZW9M4MbuBSlrySsb53iqlWKSH50KNTYNhR9ebgO6V4vcM8663PFscSCeMu607SgpP2YVAIKjsiCvjqP_Aq7lIoR2hCFS1BCGeFWh4om2LOCZ2ekt-atNcE9G0lulSi_1ZSBK_vbE22ZnTJBOvzvYopJlXHC6YO2G8_4v4BU32y-vjPiuag9XnGm3utST81F0x0-tv7tVafvrJ3Z-dSr9kfZzGrcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292183163</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comprehension of legal contracts by non-experts: Effectiveness of plain language redrafting</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Masson, Michael E. J. ; Waldron, Mary Anne</creator><creatorcontrib>Masson, Michael E. J. ; Waldron, Mary Anne</creatorcontrib><description>The primary motivation behind the advocated use of plain language in legal documents is to increase comprehension among non‐experts. We report empirical evidence regarding the effectiveness of three kinds of simplification of standard legal contracts for increasing comprehension among naïve readers. A set of legal contracts was redrafted in three stages to produce three modified versions. In the first stage we removed or replaced archaic and redundant terms; in the next stage simplified words and sentence structure were introduced; in the final stage legal terms were defined or replaced with simpler terms. Comprehension, as measured by paraphrasing and question‐answering tasks, was reliably enhanced by the use of simplified words and sentence structure, but absolute levels of comprehension were still very low. An examination of erroneous responses suggested that, quite apart from the constraints of language, non‐experts have difficulty understanding complex legal concepts that sometimes conflict with prior knowledge and beliefs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-4080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0720</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acp.2350080107</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACPSED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Comprehension ; Contracts ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Lay people ; Miscellaneous ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><ispartof>Applied cognitive psychology, 1994-02, Vol.8 (1), p.67-85</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4467-eadd9405dbf799e566e0940b02c4c7bfadfd688961833bbf939499786dbef90a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4467-eadd9405dbf799e566e0940b02c4c7bfadfd688961833bbf939499786dbef90a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Facp.2350080107$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Facp.2350080107$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27846,27901,27902,30977,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3938956$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Masson, Michael E. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldron, Mary Anne</creatorcontrib><title>Comprehension of legal contracts by non-experts: Effectiveness of plain language redrafting</title><title>Applied cognitive psychology</title><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><description>The primary motivation behind the advocated use of plain language in legal documents is to increase comprehension among non‐experts. We report empirical evidence regarding the effectiveness of three kinds of simplification of standard legal contracts for increasing comprehension among naïve readers. A set of legal contracts was redrafted in three stages to produce three modified versions. In the first stage we removed or replaced archaic and redundant terms; in the next stage simplified words and sentence structure were introduced; in the final stage legal terms were defined or replaced with simpler terms. Comprehension, as measured by paraphrasing and question‐answering tasks, was reliably enhanced by the use of simplified words and sentence structure, but absolute levels of comprehension were still very low. An examination of erroneous responses suggested that, quite apart from the constraints of language, non‐experts have difficulty understanding complex legal concepts that sometimes conflict with prior knowledge and beliefs.</description><subject>Applied psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Lay people</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><issn>0888-4080</issn><issn>1099-0720</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhSMEEkNhyzoSiF2m13biB7syaqeVKh4SjwULy3GuB5eMndoZ6Px7XE1VBJuurCt_59xzdarqJYElAaDHxk5LyjoACQTEo2pBQKkGBIXH1QKklE1bvp5Wz3K-AgDFCV1U31dxOyX8gSH7GOro6hE3ZqxtDHMyds51v69DDA3eTJjm_LY-dQ7t7H9hwJxvBdNofKhHEzY7s8E64ZCMm33YPK-eODNmfHH3HlVfzk4_r86byw_ri9XJZWPblosGzTCoFrqhd0Ip7DhHKHMP1LZW9M4MbuBSlrySsb53iqlWKSH50KNTYNhR9ebgO6V4vcM8663PFscSCeMu607SgpP2YVAIKjsiCvjqP_Aq7lIoR2hCFS1BCGeFWh4om2LOCZ2ekt-atNcE9G0lulSi_1ZSBK_vbE22ZnTJBOvzvYopJlXHC6YO2G8_4v4BU32y-vjPiuag9XnGm3utST81F0x0-tv7tVafvrJ3Z-dSr9kfZzGrcQ</recordid><startdate>199402</startdate><enddate>199402</enddate><creator>Masson, Michael E. J.</creator><creator>Waldron, Mary Anne</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199402</creationdate><title>Comprehension of legal contracts by non-experts: Effectiveness of plain language redrafting</title><author>Masson, Michael E. J. ; Waldron, Mary Anne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4467-eadd9405dbf799e566e0940b02c4c7bfadfd688961833bbf939499786dbef90a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Applied psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Lay people</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Masson, Michael E. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldron, Mary Anne</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Masson, Michael E. J.</au><au>Waldron, Mary Anne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comprehension of legal contracts by non-experts: Effectiveness of plain language redrafting</atitle><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><date>1994-02</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>67-85</pages><issn>0888-4080</issn><eissn>1099-0720</eissn><coden>ACPSED</coden><abstract>The primary motivation behind the advocated use of plain language in legal documents is to increase comprehension among non‐experts. We report empirical evidence regarding the effectiveness of three kinds of simplification of standard legal contracts for increasing comprehension among naïve readers. A set of legal contracts was redrafted in three stages to produce three modified versions. In the first stage we removed or replaced archaic and redundant terms; in the next stage simplified words and sentence structure were introduced; in the final stage legal terms were defined or replaced with simpler terms. Comprehension, as measured by paraphrasing and question‐answering tasks, was reliably enhanced by the use of simplified words and sentence structure, but absolute levels of comprehension were still very low. An examination of erroneous responses suggested that, quite apart from the constraints of language, non‐experts have difficulty understanding complex legal concepts that sometimes conflict with prior knowledge and beliefs.</abstract><cop>West Sussex</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/acp.2350080107</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0888-4080 |
| ispartof | Applied cognitive psychology, 1994-02, Vol.8 (1), p.67-85 |
| issn | 0888-4080 1099-0720 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58297814 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library All Journals; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Applied psychology Biological and medical sciences Comprehension Contracts Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Lay people Miscellaneous Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology |
| title | Comprehension of legal contracts by non-experts: Effectiveness of plain language redrafting |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T01%3A19%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comprehension%20of%20legal%20contracts%20by%20non-experts:%20Effectiveness%20of%20plain%20language%20redrafting&rft.jtitle=Applied%20cognitive%20psychology&rft.au=Masson,%20Michael%20E.%20J.&rft.date=1994-02&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=67-85&rft.issn=0888-4080&rft.eissn=1099-0720&rft.coden=ACPSED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acp.2350080107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E58297814%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292183163&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |