Pragmatic Inferences about Actions

The question of the relationship between the logic of speech & the logic of actions is examined. Conditionals of the form 'If an agent brings something about then she also brings something else about' are examined with reference to their function in what A. Goldman (A Theory of Human A...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Synthese (Dordrecht) 1985-11, Vol.65 (2), p.211-233
1. Verfasser: Walton, Douglas N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 233
container_issue 2
container_start_page 211
container_title Synthese (Dordrecht)
container_volume 65
creator Walton, Douglas N.
description The question of the relationship between the logic of speech & the logic of actions is examined. Conditionals of the form 'If an agent brings something about then she also brings something else about' are examined with reference to their function in what A. Goldman (A Theory of Human Action, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1970) has called level-generation of actions. Goldman's thesis that more than one kind of conditional is involved is confirmed, & it is shown that the conditionals have similar, but not identical, properties. Two different logical structures are proposed for these conditionals. Applications to the question of whether criticism of ad hominen hypocrisy (ie, actions that conflict with concurrent words) is valid are discussed. However, the question of whether this criticism is valid cannot be resolved without more complete detailing of the relevant propositional logic. 13 References. B. Annesser Murray
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF00869300
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58126610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20116194</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20116194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-55ec7df62f845acb7c5a8921bf991b2f2226758e918d4a14628f0a802f7b0e1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0M9LwzAYxvEgCs7pxbswFDwI1fdNm1_HbTgdDPSg55CmiXR0zUzag_-9HRUFT-_lw8vDl5BLhHsEEA-LFYDkKgc4IhNkIs9A8eKYTABylQnJxCk5S2kLgMgLmJDr12g-dqar7Wzdehdda12amTL03Wxuuzq06ZyceNMkd_Fzp-R99fi2fM42L0_r5XyTWSqwyxhzVlSeUy8LZmwpLDNSUSy9UlhSTynlgkmnUFaFwYJT6cFIoF6U4LDKp-R2_LuP4bN3qdO7OlnXNKZ1oU-aSaScIwzw5h_chj62wzaN-ZCBMSX4oO5GZWNIKTqv97HemfilEfQhlv6LNeCrEW9TF-KvpIdMqIr8G3V8Ync</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1310055976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pragmatic Inferences about Actions</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Walton, Douglas N.</creator><contributor>Talja, Jari</contributor><creatorcontrib>Walton, Douglas N. ; Talja, Jari</creatorcontrib><description>The question of the relationship between the logic of speech &amp; the logic of actions is examined. Conditionals of the form 'If an agent brings something about then she also brings something else about' are examined with reference to their function in what A. Goldman (A Theory of Human Action, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1970) has called level-generation of actions. Goldman's thesis that more than one kind of conditional is involved is confirmed, &amp; it is shown that the conditionals have similar, but not identical, properties. Two different logical structures are proposed for these conditionals. Applications to the question of whether criticism of ad hominen hypocrisy (ie, actions that conflict with concurrent words) is valid are discussed. However, the question of whether this criticism is valid cannot be resolved without more complete detailing of the relevant propositional logic. 13 References. B. Annesser Murray</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-7857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00869300</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SYNTAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Ad hominem ; Anti smoking movements ; Cigarette smoking ; Dependence logics ; Inference ; Information content ; Logical antecedents ; Logical consequents ; Relatedness logic ; Tautologies</subject><ispartof>Synthese (Dordrecht), 1985-11, Vol.65 (2), p.211-233</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-55ec7df62f845acb7c5a8921bf991b2f2226758e918d4a14628f0a802f7b0e1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20116194$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20116194$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27868,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Talja, Jari</contributor><creatorcontrib>Walton, Douglas N.</creatorcontrib><title>Pragmatic Inferences about Actions</title><title>Synthese (Dordrecht)</title><description>The question of the relationship between the logic of speech &amp; the logic of actions is examined. Conditionals of the form 'If an agent brings something about then she also brings something else about' are examined with reference to their function in what A. Goldman (A Theory of Human Action, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1970) has called level-generation of actions. Goldman's thesis that more than one kind of conditional is involved is confirmed, &amp; it is shown that the conditionals have similar, but not identical, properties. Two different logical structures are proposed for these conditionals. Applications to the question of whether criticism of ad hominen hypocrisy (ie, actions that conflict with concurrent words) is valid are discussed. However, the question of whether this criticism is valid cannot be resolved without more complete detailing of the relevant propositional logic. 13 References. B. Annesser Murray</description><subject>Ad hominem</subject><subject>Anti smoking movements</subject><subject>Cigarette smoking</subject><subject>Dependence logics</subject><subject>Inference</subject><subject>Information content</subject><subject>Logical antecedents</subject><subject>Logical consequents</subject><subject>Relatedness logic</subject><subject>Tautologies</subject><issn>0039-7857</issn><issn>1573-0964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AKNXY</sourceid><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~P3</sourceid><sourceid>~PQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0M9LwzAYxvEgCs7pxbswFDwI1fdNm1_HbTgdDPSg55CmiXR0zUzag_-9HRUFT-_lw8vDl5BLhHsEEA-LFYDkKgc4IhNkIs9A8eKYTABylQnJxCk5S2kLgMgLmJDr12g-dqar7Wzdehdda12amTL03Wxuuzq06ZyceNMkd_Fzp-R99fi2fM42L0_r5XyTWSqwyxhzVlSeUy8LZmwpLDNSUSy9UlhSTynlgkmnUFaFwYJT6cFIoF6U4LDKp-R2_LuP4bN3qdO7OlnXNKZ1oU-aSaScIwzw5h_chj62wzaN-ZCBMSX4oO5GZWNIKTqv97HemfilEfQhlv6LNeCrEW9TF-KvpIdMqIr8G3V8Ync</recordid><startdate>198511</startdate><enddate>198511</enddate><creator>Walton, Douglas N.</creator><general>D. Reidel Publishing Company</general><general>D. Reidel Pub. Co., etc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AKNXY</scope><scope>GYTRX</scope><scope>HDMVH</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>JWXEY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~P2</scope><scope>~P3</scope><scope>~PQ</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198511</creationdate><title>Pragmatic Inferences about Actions</title><author>Walton, Douglas N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-55ec7df62f845acb7c5a8921bf991b2f2226758e918d4a14628f0a802f7b0e1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Ad hominem</topic><topic>Anti smoking movements</topic><topic>Cigarette smoking</topic><topic>Dependence logics</topic><topic>Inference</topic><topic>Information content</topic><topic>Logical antecedents</topic><topic>Logical consequents</topic><topic>Relatedness logic</topic><topic>Tautologies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walton, Douglas N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 4 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 11</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 15</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 39</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 4</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 4</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 4</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walton, Douglas N.</au><au>Talja, Jari</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pragmatic Inferences about Actions</atitle><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle><date>1985-11</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>211</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>211-233</pages><issn>0039-7857</issn><eissn>1573-0964</eissn><coden>SYNTAE</coden><abstract>The question of the relationship between the logic of speech &amp; the logic of actions is examined. Conditionals of the form 'If an agent brings something about then she also brings something else about' are examined with reference to their function in what A. Goldman (A Theory of Human Action, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1970) has called level-generation of actions. Goldman's thesis that more than one kind of conditional is involved is confirmed, &amp; it is shown that the conditionals have similar, but not identical, properties. Two different logical structures are proposed for these conditionals. Applications to the question of whether criticism of ad hominen hypocrisy (ie, actions that conflict with concurrent words) is valid are discussed. However, the question of whether this criticism is valid cannot be resolved without more complete detailing of the relevant propositional logic. 13 References. B. Annesser Murray</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>D. Reidel Publishing Company</pub><doi>10.1007/BF00869300</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-7857
ispartof Synthese (Dordrecht), 1985-11, Vol.65 (2), p.211-233
issn 0039-7857
1573-0964
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58126610
source Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Ad hominem
Anti smoking movements
Cigarette smoking
Dependence logics
Inference
Information content
Logical antecedents
Logical consequents
Relatedness logic
Tautologies
title Pragmatic Inferences about Actions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T08%3A29%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pragmatic%20Inferences%20about%20Actions&rft.jtitle=Synthese%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Walton,%20Douglas%20N.&rft.date=1985-11&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=211&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=211-233&rft.issn=0039-7857&rft.eissn=1573-0964&rft.coden=SYNTAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00869300&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20116194%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1310055976&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20116194&rfr_iscdi=true