Phallacious theories of the subject (Review Article)

An extended review essay assesses current attempts to unify Freudian, Marxist, & semiotic theories of subjectivity. The subject - sexual for Freud, revolutionary for Marx - has undergone severe questioning under the pressure of semiotics, in which the traditional "subject" tends to dis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Semiotica 1980-01, Vol.30 (3-4), p.359-374
1. Verfasser: MacCannell, Juliet Flower
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 374
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 359
container_title Semiotica
container_volume 30
creator MacCannell, Juliet Flower
description An extended review essay assesses current attempts to unify Freudian, Marxist, & semiotic theories of subjectivity. The subject - sexual for Freud, revolutionary for Marx - has undergone severe questioning under the pressure of semiotics, in which the traditional "subject" tends to disappear, to become an empty crossroads "where," as C. Levi-Strauss wrote, "something happens." The most comprehensive model for retaining the subject in both its sexual & semiotic roles derives from the work of J. Lacan, who read Freud in light of Saussure. His model is, however, limited in its political applicability. His structuralist followers have sought to draw out the implied political subject of Lacan's work; this particular movement is detailed comprehensively in R. Coward's & J. Ellis's Language and Materialism: Developments in Semiology and the Theory of the Subject (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977). This book, although useful, fails to measure the import of the poststructural critique of the Lacanian subject, a critique led by the philosopher J. Derrida & developed by psychoanalytic critics, eg, J. Laplanche. Modified AA
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58108119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>58108119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p599-44c6c325deeca8d5754d9b353e6b940d3ec0c3e06af497d082dd9d98f25813c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdjs1KxDAURrNQcBx9h4Aguijc9CZt7nIY_BkYUGbclzS5ZVrqdGxafX0junL1fYvD4ZyJBQCWmSKyF-Iyxg4AtCphIfTrwfW98-0wRzkdeBhbjnJofr6Mc92xn-Tdjj9b_pKrcWp9z_dX4rxxfeTrv12K_ePD2_o52748bdarbXYyRJnWvvCYm8DsnQ2mNDpQjQa5qElDQPbgkaFwjaYygM1DoEC2yY1V6HEpbn-tp3H4mDlO1XsbPafaI6faKlFglaIE3vwDu2Eej6msUjlZA4iFwm8O8kxb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1298503361</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phallacious theories of the subject (Review Article)</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>MacCannell, Juliet Flower</creator><creatorcontrib>MacCannell, Juliet Flower</creatorcontrib><description>An extended review essay assesses current attempts to unify Freudian, Marxist, &amp; semiotic theories of subjectivity. The subject - sexual for Freud, revolutionary for Marx - has undergone severe questioning under the pressure of semiotics, in which the traditional "subject" tends to disappear, to become an empty crossroads "where," as C. Levi-Strauss wrote, "something happens." The most comprehensive model for retaining the subject in both its sexual &amp; semiotic roles derives from the work of J. Lacan, who read Freud in light of Saussure. His model is, however, limited in its political applicability. His structuralist followers have sought to draw out the implied political subject of Lacan's work; this particular movement is detailed comprehensively in R. Coward's &amp; J. Ellis's Language and Materialism: Developments in Semiology and the Theory of the Subject (London: Routledge &amp; Kegan Paul, 1977). This book, although useful, fails to measure the import of the poststructural critique of the Lacanian subject, a critique led by the philosopher J. Derrida &amp; developed by psychoanalytic critics, eg, J. Laplanche. Modified AA</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-1998</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SMOTA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Den Haag: Mouton</publisher><ispartof>Semiotica, 1980-01, Vol.30 (3-4), p.359-374</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>MacCannell, Juliet Flower</creatorcontrib><title>Phallacious theories of the subject (Review Article)</title><title>Semiotica</title><description>An extended review essay assesses current attempts to unify Freudian, Marxist, &amp; semiotic theories of subjectivity. The subject - sexual for Freud, revolutionary for Marx - has undergone severe questioning under the pressure of semiotics, in which the traditional "subject" tends to disappear, to become an empty crossroads "where," as C. Levi-Strauss wrote, "something happens." The most comprehensive model for retaining the subject in both its sexual &amp; semiotic roles derives from the work of J. Lacan, who read Freud in light of Saussure. His model is, however, limited in its political applicability. His structuralist followers have sought to draw out the implied political subject of Lacan's work; this particular movement is detailed comprehensively in R. Coward's &amp; J. Ellis's Language and Materialism: Developments in Semiology and the Theory of the Subject (London: Routledge &amp; Kegan Paul, 1977). This book, although useful, fails to measure the import of the poststructural critique of the Lacanian subject, a critique led by the philosopher J. Derrida &amp; developed by psychoanalytic critics, eg, J. Laplanche. Modified AA</description><issn>0037-1998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNpdjs1KxDAURrNQcBx9h4Aguijc9CZt7nIY_BkYUGbclzS5ZVrqdGxafX0junL1fYvD4ZyJBQCWmSKyF-Iyxg4AtCphIfTrwfW98-0wRzkdeBhbjnJofr6Mc92xn-Tdjj9b_pKrcWp9z_dX4rxxfeTrv12K_ePD2_o52748bdarbXYyRJnWvvCYm8DsnQ2mNDpQjQa5qElDQPbgkaFwjaYygM1DoEC2yY1V6HEpbn-tp3H4mDlO1XsbPafaI6faKlFglaIE3vwDu2Eej6msUjlZA4iFwm8O8kxb</recordid><startdate>19800101</startdate><enddate>19800101</enddate><creator>MacCannell, Juliet Flower</creator><general>Mouton</general><scope>HDMVH</scope><scope>HWXIY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SFNNT</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19800101</creationdate><title>Phallacious theories of the subject (Review Article)</title><author>MacCannell, Juliet Flower</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p599-44c6c325deeca8d5754d9b353e6b940d3ec0c3e06af497d082dd9d98f25813c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MacCannell, Juliet Flower</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 15</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 25</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 44</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Semiotica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MacCannell, Juliet Flower</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phallacious theories of the subject (Review Article)</atitle><jtitle>Semiotica</jtitle><date>1980-01-01</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>359</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>359-374</pages><issn>0037-1998</issn><coden>SMOTA3</coden><abstract>An extended review essay assesses current attempts to unify Freudian, Marxist, &amp; semiotic theories of subjectivity. The subject - sexual for Freud, revolutionary for Marx - has undergone severe questioning under the pressure of semiotics, in which the traditional "subject" tends to disappear, to become an empty crossroads "where," as C. Levi-Strauss wrote, "something happens." The most comprehensive model for retaining the subject in both its sexual &amp; semiotic roles derives from the work of J. Lacan, who read Freud in light of Saussure. His model is, however, limited in its political applicability. His structuralist followers have sought to draw out the implied political subject of Lacan's work; this particular movement is detailed comprehensively in R. Coward's &amp; J. Ellis's Language and Materialism: Developments in Semiology and the Theory of the Subject (London: Routledge &amp; Kegan Paul, 1977). This book, although useful, fails to measure the import of the poststructural critique of the Lacanian subject, a critique led by the philosopher J. Derrida &amp; developed by psychoanalytic critics, eg, J. Laplanche. Modified AA</abstract><cop>Den Haag</cop><pub>Mouton</pub><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0037-1998
ispartof Semiotica, 1980-01, Vol.30 (3-4), p.359-374
issn 0037-1998
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58108119
source Periodicals Index Online; De Gruyter journals
title Phallacious theories of the subject (Review Article)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T22%3A05%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phallacious%20theories%20of%20the%20subject%20(Review%20Article)&rft.jtitle=Semiotica&rft.au=MacCannell,%20Juliet%20Flower&rft.date=1980-01-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=359&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=359-374&rft.issn=0037-1998&rft.coden=SMOTA3&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E58108119%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1298503361&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true