The Effects of Context on Word Identification in Good and Poor Readers
A semantic priming procedure was used to test the hypothesis that children differing in word-decoding skills differentially used context to facilitate word identification. Fifth-grade Ss classified as good or poor readers (N = 14 each group) saw pairs of stimuli - a prime followed by a target - with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of psychology 1980-11, Vol.106 (2), p.179-192 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 192 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 179 |
container_title | The journal of psychology |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Merrill, Edward C. Sperber, Richard D. Mccauley, Charley |
description | A semantic priming procedure was used to test the hypothesis that children differing in word-decoding skills differentially used context to facilitate word identification. Fifth-grade Ss classified as good or poor readers (N = 14 each group) saw pairs of stimuli - a prime followed by a target - with instructions to read the target as rapidly as possible. Primes were either semantically related or unrelated to the targets. For both single-word & incomplete-sentence primes, targets in related pairs were read faster than those in unrelated pairs, with larger facilitation effects obtained with the incomplete-sentence primes. However, the magnitude of these context effects did not vary as a function of word-decoding skill. In contrast to data obtained by other procedures, these findings suggest that differences between good & poor readers in word-decoding skills are not necessarily related to differences in ability to extract & utilize the semantic content of written material. 2 Tables. HA |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00223980.1980.9915183 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58072908</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>58072908</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-65531fede0a1ac1ae20a40642ae1c8113f86ef5626a15cdbb9a158d765cb560a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfQQgI3lYzu5s0e1NKWwsFRSoeQ5o_mLJNarJF--3N0nrx4BxmmOH3HsND6BrIHRBO7gkpy6rheetb0wAFXp2gATQ1KYBAc4oGPVP00Dm6SGlN-uIwQNPlh8ETa43qEg4Wj4PvzHeHg8fvIWo818Z3zjolO5dvzuNZCBpLr_FLCBG_GqlNTJfozMo2mavjHKK36WQ5fioWz7P5-HFRqIo1XcEorcAabYgEqUCaksiasLqUBhQHqCxnxlJWMglU6dWqyZPrEaNqRRmR1RDdHny3MXzuTOrExiVl2lZ6E3ZJUE5GZUN4Bm_-gOuwiz7_JiADLIN1T9EDpWJIKRorttFtZNwLIKLPVvxmK_psxTHbrHs46Jy3IW7kV4itFp3ctyHaKL1ySVT_W_wALtJ-dQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1290658048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Context on Word Identification in Good and Poor Readers</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Merrill, Edward C. ; Sperber, Richard D. ; Mccauley, Charley</creator><creatorcontrib>Merrill, Edward C. ; Sperber, Richard D. ; Mccauley, Charley</creatorcontrib><description>A semantic priming procedure was used to test the hypothesis that children differing in word-decoding skills differentially used context to facilitate word identification. Fifth-grade Ss classified as good or poor readers (N = 14 each group) saw pairs of stimuli - a prime followed by a target - with instructions to read the target as rapidly as possible. Primes were either semantically related or unrelated to the targets. For both single-word & incomplete-sentence primes, targets in related pairs were read faster than those in unrelated pairs, with larger facilitation effects obtained with the incomplete-sentence primes. However, the magnitude of these context effects did not vary as a function of word-decoding skill. In contrast to data obtained by other procedures, these findings suggest that differences between good & poor readers in word-decoding skills are not necessarily related to differences in ability to extract & utilize the semantic content of written material. 2 Tables. HA</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3980</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-1019</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1980.9915183</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOPSAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Provincetown, Mass., etc: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><ispartof>The journal of psychology, 1980-11, Vol.106 (2), p.179-192</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1980</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-65531fede0a1ac1ae20a40642ae1c8113f86ef5626a15cdbb9a158d765cb560a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-65531fede0a1ac1ae20a40642ae1c8113f86ef5626a15cdbb9a158d765cb560a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27850,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Merrill, Edward C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sperber, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mccauley, Charley</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Context on Word Identification in Good and Poor Readers</title><title>The journal of psychology</title><description>A semantic priming procedure was used to test the hypothesis that children differing in word-decoding skills differentially used context to facilitate word identification. Fifth-grade Ss classified as good or poor readers (N = 14 each group) saw pairs of stimuli - a prime followed by a target - with instructions to read the target as rapidly as possible. Primes were either semantically related or unrelated to the targets. For both single-word & incomplete-sentence primes, targets in related pairs were read faster than those in unrelated pairs, with larger facilitation effects obtained with the incomplete-sentence primes. However, the magnitude of these context effects did not vary as a function of word-decoding skill. In contrast to data obtained by other procedures, these findings suggest that differences between good & poor readers in word-decoding skills are not necessarily related to differences in ability to extract & utilize the semantic content of written material. 2 Tables. HA</description><issn>0022-3980</issn><issn>1940-1019</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ACFII</sourceid><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~OU</sourceid><sourceid>~OW</sourceid><sourceid>~PJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfQQgI3lYzu5s0e1NKWwsFRSoeQ5o_mLJNarJF--3N0nrx4BxmmOH3HsND6BrIHRBO7gkpy6rheetb0wAFXp2gATQ1KYBAc4oGPVP00Dm6SGlN-uIwQNPlh8ETa43qEg4Wj4PvzHeHg8fvIWo818Z3zjolO5dvzuNZCBpLr_FLCBG_GqlNTJfozMo2mavjHKK36WQ5fioWz7P5-HFRqIo1XcEorcAabYgEqUCaksiasLqUBhQHqCxnxlJWMglU6dWqyZPrEaNqRRmR1RDdHny3MXzuTOrExiVl2lZ6E3ZJUE5GZUN4Bm_-gOuwiz7_JiADLIN1T9EDpWJIKRorttFtZNwLIKLPVvxmK_psxTHbrHs46Jy3IW7kV4itFp3ctyHaKL1ySVT_W_wALtJ-dQ</recordid><startdate>19801101</startdate><enddate>19801101</enddate><creator>Merrill, Edward C.</creator><creator>Sperber, Richard D.</creator><creator>Mccauley, Charley</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Journal Press, etc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ACFII</scope><scope>ANHVI</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>JSICY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OT</scope><scope>~OU</scope><scope>~OV</scope><scope>~OW</scope><scope>~PJ</scope><scope>~PM</scope><scope>~PN</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19801101</creationdate><title>The Effects of Context on Word Identification in Good and Poor Readers</title><author>Merrill, Edward C. ; Sperber, Richard D. ; Mccauley, Charley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-65531fede0a1ac1ae20a40642ae1c8113f86ef5626a15cdbb9a158d765cb560a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Merrill, Edward C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sperber, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mccauley, Charley</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 36</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 2 (purchase pre Oct/2008)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 2</collection><collection>PAO Collection 2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 2.2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JISC Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 1</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>The journal of psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Merrill, Edward C.</au><au>Sperber, Richard D.</au><au>Mccauley, Charley</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of Context on Word Identification in Good and Poor Readers</atitle><jtitle>The journal of psychology</jtitle><date>1980-11-01</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>179-192</pages><issn>0022-3980</issn><eissn>1940-1019</eissn><coden>JOPSAM</coden><abstract>A semantic priming procedure was used to test the hypothesis that children differing in word-decoding skills differentially used context to facilitate word identification. Fifth-grade Ss classified as good or poor readers (N = 14 each group) saw pairs of stimuli - a prime followed by a target - with instructions to read the target as rapidly as possible. Primes were either semantically related or unrelated to the targets. For both single-word & incomplete-sentence primes, targets in related pairs were read faster than those in unrelated pairs, with larger facilitation effects obtained with the incomplete-sentence primes. However, the magnitude of these context effects did not vary as a function of word-decoding skill. In contrast to data obtained by other procedures, these findings suggest that differences between good & poor readers in word-decoding skills are not necessarily related to differences in ability to extract & utilize the semantic content of written material. 2 Tables. HA</abstract><cop>Provincetown, Mass., etc</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00223980.1980.9915183</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3980 |
ispartof | The journal of psychology, 1980-11, Vol.106 (2), p.179-192 |
issn | 0022-3980 1940-1019 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58072908 |
source | Periodicals Index Online; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | The Effects of Context on Word Identification in Good and Poor Readers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T10%3A03%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Context%20on%20Word%20Identification%20in%20Good%20and%20Poor%20Readers&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20psychology&rft.au=Merrill,%20Edward%20C.&rft.date=1980-11-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=179-192&rft.issn=0022-3980&rft.eissn=1940-1019&rft.coden=JOPSAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00223980.1980.9915183&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E58072908%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1290658048&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |