Garbo

Garbo

In the general context of generative syntactic theory, it has been assumed that a passive sentence like "John was shot" is immediately derivable from "John was shot by someone" and ultimately from "Someone shot John" with the vague subject of the active form usually rep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Linguistic inquiry 1973-10, Vol.4 (4), p.546-549
1. Verfasser: Leskosky, Richard J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Sentences
Squibs and Discussion
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 549
container_issue 4
container_start_page 546
container_title Linguistic inquiry
container_volume 4
creator Leskosky, Richard J.
description In the general context of generative syntactic theory, it has been assumed that a passive sentence like "John was shot" is immediately derivable from "John was shot by someone" and ultimately from "Someone shot John" with the vague subject of the active form usually represented as someone or somebody. Evidence is given in the form of triads of passive sentences with reconstructed active forms that not only does someone/somebody not suffice for all such cases, but that in some (but not all) cases, forms like they, people, and even everyone/everybody can arguably be included among those which are deleted as agentive phrases once a sentence containing them as subjects is passivized. This is seen as an indication that at least the agent deletion portion of the passivization process must be re-evaluated, and perhaps passivization as a whole. AA
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57928192</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4177798</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4177798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j802-3b11513d078cb745d8b59b3bf1dde9600ccc2b622885d906fac54245e06ea1623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdzjtLA0EUBeBBDGSN_oN0gt3AvfOeUoJGIZAm_TCvhSybTJzJFv57V2JldYrzcTh3pEPJgVqUcE86ACYoN5YtyUNrAwBYoXRHFltfQ3kki96PLT_95Yoc3t8Omw-6228_N687OhhglAdEiTyBNjFoIZMJ0gYeekwpWwUQY2RBMWaMTBZU76MUTMgMKntUjK_Iy232UsvXlNvVnY4t5nH051ym5qS2zKD9hc__4FCmep6vOWRWc6G1xlmtb2po11LdpR5Pvn47gXNrDf8BOX5F3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297347771</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Garbo</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Leskosky, Richard J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Leskosky, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><description>In the general context of generative syntactic theory, it has been assumed that a passive sentence like "John was shot" is immediately derivable from "John was shot by someone" and ultimately from "Someone shot John" with the vague subject of the active form usually represented as someone or somebody. Evidence is given in the form of triads of passive sentences with reconstructed active forms that not only does someone/somebody not suffice for all such cases, but that in some (but not all) cases, forms like they, people, and even everyone/everybody can arguably be included among those which are deleted as agentive phrases once a sentence containing them as subjects is passivized. This is seen as an indication that at least the agent deletion portion of the passivization process must be re-evaluated, and perhaps passivization as a whole. AA</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-3892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-9150</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LIINBL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press</publisher><subject>Sentences ; Squibs and Discussion</subject><ispartof>Linguistic inquiry, 1973-10, Vol.4 (4), p.546-549</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1974 The Massachusetts Institute of Technology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4177798$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4177798$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27846,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leskosky, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><title>Garbo</title><title>Linguistic inquiry</title><description>In the general context of generative syntactic theory, it has been assumed that a passive sentence like "John was shot" is immediately derivable from "John was shot by someone" and ultimately from "Someone shot John" with the vague subject of the active form usually represented as someone or somebody. Evidence is given in the form of triads of passive sentences with reconstructed active forms that not only does someone/somebody not suffice for all such cases, but that in some (but not all) cases, forms like they, people, and even everyone/everybody can arguably be included among those which are deleted as agentive phrases once a sentence containing them as subjects is passivized. This is seen as an indication that at least the agent deletion portion of the passivization process must be re-evaluated, and perhaps passivization as a whole. AA</description><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Squibs and Discussion</subject><issn>0024-3892</issn><issn>1530-9150</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1973</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNpdzjtLA0EUBeBBDGSN_oN0gt3AvfOeUoJGIZAm_TCvhSybTJzJFv57V2JldYrzcTh3pEPJgVqUcE86ACYoN5YtyUNrAwBYoXRHFltfQ3kki96PLT_95Yoc3t8Omw-6228_N687OhhglAdEiTyBNjFoIZMJ0gYeekwpWwUQY2RBMWaMTBZU76MUTMgMKntUjK_Iy232UsvXlNvVnY4t5nH051ym5qS2zKD9hc__4FCmep6vOWRWc6G1xlmtb2po11LdpR5Pvn47gXNrDf8BOX5F3g</recordid><startdate>19731001</startdate><enddate>19731001</enddate><creator>Leskosky, Richard J.</creator><general>The MIT Press</general><general>M. I. T. Press</general><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19731001</creationdate><title>Garbo</title><author>Leskosky, Richard J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j802-3b11513d078cb745d8b59b3bf1dde9600ccc2b622885d906fac54245e06ea1623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1973</creationdate><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Squibs and Discussion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leskosky, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Linguistic inquiry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leskosky, Richard J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Garbo</atitle><jtitle>Linguistic inquiry</jtitle><date>1973-10-01</date><risdate>1973</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>546</spage><epage>549</epage><pages>546-549</pages><issn>0024-3892</issn><eissn>1530-9150</eissn><coden>LIINBL</coden><abstract>In the general context of generative syntactic theory, it has been assumed that a passive sentence like "John was shot" is immediately derivable from "John was shot by someone" and ultimately from "Someone shot John" with the vague subject of the active form usually represented as someone or somebody. Evidence is given in the form of triads of passive sentences with reconstructed active forms that not only does someone/somebody not suffice for all such cases, but that in some (but not all) cases, forms like they, people, and even everyone/everybody can arguably be included among those which are deleted as agentive phrases once a sentence containing them as subjects is passivized. This is seen as an indication that at least the agent deletion portion of the passivization process must be re-evaluated, and perhaps passivization as a whole. AA</abstract><cop>Cambridge, Mass</cop><pub>The MIT Press</pub><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-3892
ispartof Linguistic inquiry, 1973-10, Vol.4 (4), p.546-549
issn 0024-3892
1530-9150
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57928192
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Sentences
Squibs and Discussion
title Garbo
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T15%3A21%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Garbo&rft.jtitle=Linguistic%20inquiry&rft.au=Leskosky,%20Richard%20J.&rft.date=1973-10-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=546&rft.epage=549&rft.pages=546-549&rft.issn=0024-3892&rft.eissn=1530-9150&rft.coden=LIINBL&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4177798%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297347771&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4177798&rfr_iscdi=true