Comparative concurrent validities of five alcoholism measures in a psychiatric hospital
The concurrent validities of five self‐report alcoholism measures were compared in a psychiatric hospital population using Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) alcohol dependence module outputs as criterion. The Michigan Alcohol Screening Test was the most accurate identifier of alcohol dependence at...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical psychology 1995-09, Vol.51 (5), p.676-684 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 684 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 676 |
| container_title | Journal of clinical psychology |
| container_volume | 51 |
| creator | Watson, Charles G. Detra, Ellen Fox, Kurt L. Ewing, James W. Gearhart, Lee P. Demotts, John R. |
| description | The concurrent validities of five self‐report alcoholism measures were compared in a psychiatric hospital population using Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) alcohol dependence module outputs as criterion. The Michigan Alcohol Screening Test was the most accurate identifier of alcohol dependence at some point in the subjectS' life, while the CAGE interview best identified alcohol dependence in the previous year. The correlations of a quantity‐frequency measure, the Clinical Signs checklist, and the Medical History questionnaire with DIS alcohol dependence module outputs were generally weaker. The data also suggested that cutting scores based on local norms may offer better hit rates in psychiatric settings than those proposed by the instrumentS' authors, but additional cross‐validations are needed to confirm that possibility. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/1097-4679(199509)51:5<676::AID-JCLP2270510513>3.0.CO;2-L |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57898252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57898252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-399f0c7c8af0b26b2ac44572c83a6edb2986083e17b8617986ffd58f7d7c18d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkWuL00AYhYMoa3f1JwhBRPRD6lwytyriGt0b1Soo9dvLdDKhs-bSnUlW---d0FJwPwhCYAjnmXPeeU-SvMNoihEirzBSIsu5UC-wUgyplwzP2Bsu-Gx2evkhuyrmXwgRiOH40bd0iqbF4jXJ5veSyeHq_WQSrXCmBCcPk-MQrhFCOcLsKDmSEmGS55NkWXTNRnvdu1ubmq41g_e27dNbXbvS9c6GtKvSalR1bbp1V7vQpI3VYfBRc22q003YmrXTvXcmXXdh43pdP0oeVLoO9vH-PEm-n338Vlxk88X5ZXE6z0yOFc2oUhUywkhdoRXhK6JNnjNBjKSa23JFlORIUovFSnIs4l9VlUxWohQGy5LSk-T5znfju5vBhh4aF4yta93abgjAhFSSMBLBp3fA627wbZwNCOUq7oXLCP3YQcZ3IXhbwca7RvstYARjMTBuF8btwq4YYBgYxGIAYjHwdzFAAUGxAALzaP1knz-sGlsejPdNRP3ZXtfB6LryujUuHDDKR258htlhv1xtt_8x3j-nu6PElGyX4kJvfx9StP8ZvahgsPx8DvRieaXef_0EZ_QPw5HGRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>236940168</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative concurrent validities of five alcoholism measures in a psychiatric hospital</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Watson, Charles G. ; Detra, Ellen ; Fox, Kurt L. ; Ewing, James W. ; Gearhart, Lee P. ; Demotts, John R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Watson, Charles G. ; Detra, Ellen ; Fox, Kurt L. ; Ewing, James W. ; Gearhart, Lee P. ; Demotts, John R.</creatorcontrib><description>The concurrent validities of five self‐report alcoholism measures were compared in a psychiatric hospital population using Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) alcohol dependence module outputs as criterion. The Michigan Alcohol Screening Test was the most accurate identifier of alcohol dependence at some point in the subjectS' life, while the CAGE interview best identified alcohol dependence in the previous year. The correlations of a quantity‐frequency measure, the Clinical Signs checklist, and the Medical History questionnaire with DIS alcohol dependence module outputs were generally weaker. The data also suggested that cutting scores based on local norms may offer better hit rates in psychiatric settings than those proposed by the instrumentS' authors, but additional cross‐validations are needed to confirm that possibility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9762</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(199509)51:5<676::AID-JCLP2270510513>3.0.CO;2-L</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8801244</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCPYAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brandon: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; Alcoholism ; Alcoholism - diagnosis ; Alcoholism - psychology ; Alcoholism - rehabilitation ; Biological and medical sciences ; Comorbidity ; Comparison ; Female ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mental Disorders - diagnosis ; Mental Disorders - psychology ; Mental Disorders - rehabilitation ; Middle Aged ; Patient Admission ; Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data ; Psychiatry ; Psychological tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reference Values ; Reproducibility of Results ; Selfreport measures ; Techniques and methods ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical psychology, 1995-09, Vol.51 (5), p.676-684</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1995 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Clinical Psychology Publishing Company, Incorporated Sep 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-399f0c7c8af0b26b2ac44572c83a6edb2986083e17b8617986ffd58f7d7c18d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F1097-4679%28199509%2951%3A5%3C676%3A%3AAID-JCLP2270510513%3E3.0.CO%3B2-L$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F1097-4679%28199509%2951%3A5%3C676%3A%3AAID-JCLP2270510513%3E3.0.CO%3B2-L$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3680122$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8801244$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Watson, Charles G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Detra, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Kurt L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewing, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gearhart, Lee P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demotts, John R.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative concurrent validities of five alcoholism measures in a psychiatric hospital</title><title>Journal of clinical psychology</title><addtitle>J. Clin. Psychol</addtitle><description>The concurrent validities of five self‐report alcoholism measures were compared in a psychiatric hospital population using Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) alcohol dependence module outputs as criterion. The Michigan Alcohol Screening Test was the most accurate identifier of alcohol dependence at some point in the subjectS' life, while the CAGE interview best identified alcohol dependence in the previous year. The correlations of a quantity‐frequency measure, the Clinical Signs checklist, and the Medical History questionnaire with DIS alcohol dependence module outputs were generally weaker. The data also suggested that cutting scores based on local norms may offer better hit rates in psychiatric settings than those proposed by the instrumentS' authors, but additional cross‐validations are needed to confirm that possibility.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alcoholism</subject><subject>Alcoholism - diagnosis</subject><subject>Alcoholism - psychology</subject><subject>Alcoholism - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Comparison</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Admission</subject><subject>Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Selfreport measures</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0021-9762</issn><issn>1097-4679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkWuL00AYhYMoa3f1JwhBRPRD6lwytyriGt0b1Soo9dvLdDKhs-bSnUlW---d0FJwPwhCYAjnmXPeeU-SvMNoihEirzBSIsu5UC-wUgyplwzP2Bsu-Gx2evkhuyrmXwgRiOH40bd0iqbF4jXJ5veSyeHq_WQSrXCmBCcPk-MQrhFCOcLsKDmSEmGS55NkWXTNRnvdu1ubmq41g_e27dNbXbvS9c6GtKvSalR1bbp1V7vQpI3VYfBRc22q003YmrXTvXcmXXdh43pdP0oeVLoO9vH-PEm-n338Vlxk88X5ZXE6z0yOFc2oUhUywkhdoRXhK6JNnjNBjKSa23JFlORIUovFSnIs4l9VlUxWohQGy5LSk-T5znfju5vBhh4aF4yta93abgjAhFSSMBLBp3fA627wbZwNCOUq7oXLCP3YQcZ3IXhbwca7RvstYARjMTBuF8btwq4YYBgYxGIAYjHwdzFAAUGxAALzaP1knz-sGlsejPdNRP3ZXtfB6LryujUuHDDKR258htlhv1xtt_8x3j-nu6PElGyX4kJvfx9StP8ZvahgsPx8DvRieaXef_0EZ_QPw5HGRA</recordid><startdate>199509</startdate><enddate>199509</enddate><creator>Watson, Charles G.</creator><creator>Detra, Ellen</creator><creator>Fox, Kurt L.</creator><creator>Ewing, James W.</creator><creator>Gearhart, Lee P.</creator><creator>Demotts, John R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199509</creationdate><title>Comparative concurrent validities of five alcoholism measures in a psychiatric hospital</title><author>Watson, Charles G. ; Detra, Ellen ; Fox, Kurt L. ; Ewing, James W. ; Gearhart, Lee P. ; Demotts, John R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-399f0c7c8af0b26b2ac44572c83a6edb2986083e17b8617986ffd58f7d7c18d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alcoholism</topic><topic>Alcoholism - diagnosis</topic><topic>Alcoholism - psychology</topic><topic>Alcoholism - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Comparison</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Admission</topic><topic>Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Selfreport measures</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Watson, Charles G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Detra, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Kurt L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewing, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gearhart, Lee P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demotts, John R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Watson, Charles G.</au><au>Detra, Ellen</au><au>Fox, Kurt L.</au><au>Ewing, James W.</au><au>Gearhart, Lee P.</au><au>Demotts, John R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative concurrent validities of five alcoholism measures in a psychiatric hospital</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Clin. Psychol</addtitle><date>1995-09</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>676</spage><epage>684</epage><pages>676-684</pages><issn>0021-9762</issn><eissn>1097-4679</eissn><coden>JCPYAO</coden><abstract>The concurrent validities of five self‐report alcoholism measures were compared in a psychiatric hospital population using Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) alcohol dependence module outputs as criterion. The Michigan Alcohol Screening Test was the most accurate identifier of alcohol dependence at some point in the subjectS' life, while the CAGE interview best identified alcohol dependence in the previous year. The correlations of a quantity‐frequency measure, the Clinical Signs checklist, and the Medical History questionnaire with DIS alcohol dependence module outputs were generally weaker. The data also suggested that cutting scores based on local norms may offer better hit rates in psychiatric settings than those proposed by the instrumentS' authors, but additional cross‐validations are needed to confirm that possibility.</abstract><cop>Brandon</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>8801244</pmid><doi>10.1002/1097-4679(199509)51:5<676::AID-JCLP2270510513>3.0.CO;2-L</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9762 |
| ispartof | Journal of clinical psychology, 1995-09, Vol.51 (5), p.676-684 |
| issn | 0021-9762 1097-4679 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57898252 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost Education Source |
| subjects | Adult Alcoholism Alcoholism - diagnosis Alcoholism - psychology Alcoholism - rehabilitation Biological and medical sciences Comorbidity Comparison Female Hospitals Humans Male Medical sciences Mental Disorders - diagnosis Mental Disorders - psychology Mental Disorders - rehabilitation Middle Aged Patient Admission Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data Psychiatry Psychological tests Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems Psychopathology. Psychiatry Reference Values Reproducibility of Results Selfreport measures Techniques and methods Validity |
| title | Comparative concurrent validities of five alcoholism measures in a psychiatric hospital |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T12%3A47%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20concurrent%20validities%20of%20five%20alcoholism%20measures%20in%20a%20psychiatric%20hospital&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20psychology&rft.au=Watson,%20Charles%20G.&rft.date=1995-09&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=676&rft.epage=684&rft.pages=676-684&rft.issn=0021-9762&rft.eissn=1097-4679&rft.coden=JCPYAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1097-4679(199509)51:5%3C676::AID-JCLP2270510513%3E3.0.CO;2-L&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57898252%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236940168&rft_id=info:pmid/8801244&rfr_iscdi=true |