Does group discussion facilitate the use of consensus information in making causal attributions?

Before rendering attributions, Ss spent 7 min either engaging in a group discussion, thinking about their judgment, or perusing attribution responses made by other Ss. Only the participants in the group-discussion conditions were affected by the consensus information. (Abstract amended)

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of personality and social psychology 1990-08, Vol.59 (Aug 90), p.261-269
Hauptverfasser:	Wright, E F, Christie, S D, Luus, C A E
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Causal attributions Consensus information Discussions Factors Groups Information Use
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	269
container_issue	Aug 90
container_start_page	261
container_title	Journal of personality and social psychology
container_volume	59
creator	Wright, E F Christie, S D Luus, C A E
description	Before rendering attributions, Ss spent 7 min either engaging in a group discussion, thinking about their judgment, or perusing attribution responses made by other Ss. Only the participants in the group-discussion conditions were affected by the consensus information. (Abstract amended)
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57888951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57888951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_578889513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjTkOwjAQAF2ARDj-sBVdJOewCBUFh3gAfVjCOhgcO2Tt_0MkHkA1xYw0E5FImedpobJyJubMTyllqfI8EdeDJ4Z28LGHu-EmMhvvQGNjrAkYCMKDIDKB19B4x-Q4Mhin_dBhGFvjoMOXcS00GBktYAiDucVR8m4pphot0-rHhVifjpf9Oe0H_47Eoe6-W7IWHfnItdpUVbVVWfF3-AG-oUid</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57888951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does group discussion facilitate the use of consensus information in making causal attributions?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Wright, E F ; Christie, S D ; Luus, C A E</creator><creatorcontrib>Wright, E F ; Christie, S D ; Luus, C A E</creatorcontrib><description>Before rendering attributions, Ss spent 7 min either engaging in a group discussion, thinking about their judgment, or perusing attribution responses made by other Ss. Only the participants in the group-discussion conditions were affected by the consensus information. (Abstract amended)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPSPB2</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Causal attributions ; Consensus information ; Discussions ; Factors ; Groups ; Information ; Use</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 1990-08, Vol.59 (Aug 90), p.261-269</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,30977</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wright, E F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christie, S D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luus, C A E</creatorcontrib><title>Does group discussion facilitate the use of consensus information in making causal attributions?</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><description>Before rendering attributions, Ss spent 7 min either engaging in a group discussion, thinking about their judgment, or perusing attribution responses made by other Ss. Only the participants in the group-discussion conditions were affected by the consensus information. (Abstract amended)</description><subject>Causal attributions</subject><subject>Consensus information</subject><subject>Discussions</subject><subject>Factors</subject><subject>Groups</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Use</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjTkOwjAQAF2ARDj-sBVdJOewCBUFh3gAfVjCOhgcO2Tt_0MkHkA1xYw0E5FImedpobJyJubMTyllqfI8EdeDJ4Z28LGHu-EmMhvvQGNjrAkYCMKDIDKB19B4x-Q4Mhin_dBhGFvjoMOXcS00GBktYAiDucVR8m4pphot0-rHhVifjpf9Oe0H_47Eoe6-W7IWHfnItdpUVbVVWfF3-AG-oUid</recordid><startdate>19900801</startdate><enddate>19900801</enddate><creator>Wright, E F</creator><creator>Christie, S D</creator><creator>Luus, C A E</creator><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900801</creationdate><title>Does group discussion facilitate the use of consensus information in making causal attributions?</title><author>Wright, E F ; Christie, S D ; Luus, C A E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_578889513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Causal attributions</topic><topic>Consensus information</topic><topic>Discussions</topic><topic>Factors</topic><topic>Groups</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wright, E F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christie, S D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luus, C A E</creatorcontrib><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wright, E F</au><au>Christie, S D</au><au>Luus, C A E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does group discussion facilitate the use of consensus information in making causal attributions?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><date>1990-08-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>Aug 90</issue><spage>261</spage><epage>269</epage><pages>261-269</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><coden>JPSPB2</coden><abstract>Before rendering attributions, Ss spent 7 min either engaging in a group discussion, thinking about their judgment, or perusing attribution responses made by other Ss. Only the participants in the group-discussion conditions were affected by the consensus information. (Abstract amended)</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0022-3514
ispartof	Journal of personality and social psychology, 1990-08, Vol.59 (Aug 90), p.261-269
issn	0022-3514
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57888951
source	Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects	Causal attributions Consensus information Discussions Factors Groups Information Use
title	Does group discussion facilitate the use of consensus information in making causal attributions?
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T20%3A14%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20group%20discussion%20facilitate%20the%20use%20of%20consensus%20information%20in%20making%20causal%20attributions?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Wright,%20E%20F&rft.date=1990-08-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=Aug%2090&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=269&rft.pages=261-269&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.coden=JPSPB2&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E57888951%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57888951&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true