Illuminating the glass ceiling: The role of organizational culture preferences
We present two studies that investigated women's motives to pursue a career in top management. The central hypothesis was that masculine culture preferences are important predictors for career motives. Women were expected to have less masculine preferences than men do, which is assumed to be a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of occupational and organizational psychology 2002-09, Vol.75 (3), p.315-337 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 337 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 315 |
container_title | Journal of occupational and organizational psychology |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Van Vianen, Annelies E. M. Fischer, Agneta H. |
description | We present two studies that investigated women's motives to pursue a career in top management. The central hypothesis was that masculine culture preferences are important predictors for career motives. Women were expected to have less masculine preferences than men do, which is assumed to be a determinant of their relative absence in management positions. In Study 1 (N =327), we investigated gender differences in organizational culture preferences, both in a managerial sample and a sample of non‐managerial professionals in private sector organizations. It was shown that gender differences only existed in the non‐managerial groups, with women showing less masculine culture preferences than men did. In Study 2 (N =350), we examined the effects of organizational culture preferences on the ambitions of staff employees and middle‐level managers to pursue a career at a top management level in one governmental organization. The results showed that organizational culture preferences were predictive for ambition of non‐managerial employees, but not for that of middle management employees. Overall, women were less ambitious than men, and even ambitious women perceived work‐home conflict as an important barrier to career advancement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1348/096317902320369730 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57834686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A92615472</galeid><sourcerecordid>A92615472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5257-e489e33aef9b75d817cd468ad7ccb026df70e0136bd43f4aad98461d38f4f2423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhgdRcK3-Aa8GQa8czdfkw7u2aK2WbsGK3oVs5mRMzSZrMkNbf71ZtljQgiYXgZfnfc85OU3zFKNXmDL5GilOsVCIUIIoV4Kie82CIMY6SUl_v1lsga4S8mHzqJQLVI9gYtGcHocwr300k49jO32DdgymlNaCD1V5055XKacAbXJtyqOJ_mdlUzShtXOY5gztJoODDNFCedw8cCYUeHLz7jWf3709P3zfnSyPjg_3Tzrbk150wKQCSg04tRL9ILGwA-PSDMLaFSJ8cAIBwpSvBkYdM2ZQknE8UOmYI4zQvebFLneT048ZyqTXvlgIwURIc9G9kLQG8n-CVGHEJZYVfPYHeJHmXMcsGitFWS8FqtDLHTSaANpHl6Zs7AgRsgkpgvNV3leE456JbZfdHXi9A6y9vYsnO97mVEr9Vb3Jfm3ytcZIb_es_95zNT2_adwUa4LLJlpfbp20xiuFKyd23GUtev0fyfrDcnmGibgdw5cJrn47Tf6uuaCi119OjzTpP3496M8-aU5_AT3DxQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199345870</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Illuminating the glass ceiling: The role of organizational culture preferences</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Van Vianen, Annelies E. M. ; Fischer, Agneta H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Vianen, Annelies E. M. ; Fischer, Agneta H.</creatorcontrib><description>We present two studies that investigated women's motives to pursue a career in top management. The central hypothesis was that masculine culture preferences are important predictors for career motives. Women were expected to have less masculine preferences than men do, which is assumed to be a determinant of their relative absence in management positions. In Study 1 (N =327), we investigated gender differences in organizational culture preferences, both in a managerial sample and a sample of non‐managerial professionals in private sector organizations. It was shown that gender differences only existed in the non‐managerial groups, with women showing less masculine culture preferences than men did. In Study 2 (N =350), we examined the effects of organizational culture preferences on the ambitions of staff employees and middle‐level managers to pursue a career at a top management level in one governmental organization. The results showed that organizational culture preferences were predictive for ambition of non‐managerial employees, but not for that of middle management employees. Overall, women were less ambitious than men, and even ambitious women perceived work‐home conflict as an important barrier to career advancement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-1798</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8325</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1348/096317902320369730</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOCCEF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Career advancement ; Corporate culture ; Employees ; Employment ; Employment discrimination ; Femininity ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gender differences ; Glass ceiling ; Hypotheses ; Industrial psychology ; Labour force ; Management ; Managers ; Middle management ; Motivation. Job satisfaction. Attitude ; Netherlands ; Occupational psychology ; Occupations ; Organization ; Organizational behaviour ; Organizational culture ; Organizations ; Personality ; Personality traits ; Professionals ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Statistical analysis ; Stereotypes ; Studies ; Upper management ; Women ; Women executives ; Work-Family conflict</subject><ispartof>Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 2002-09, Vol.75 (3), p.315-337</ispartof><rights>2002 The British Psychological Society</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright British Psychological Society Sep 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5257-e489e33aef9b75d817cd468ad7ccb026df70e0136bd43f4aad98461d38f4f2423</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1348%2F096317902320369730$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1348%2F096317902320369730$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,12844,27922,27923,30997,30998,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13926991$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Vianen, Annelies E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Agneta H.</creatorcontrib><title>Illuminating the glass ceiling: The role of organizational culture preferences</title><title>Journal of occupational and organizational psychology</title><description>We present two studies that investigated women's motives to pursue a career in top management. The central hypothesis was that masculine culture preferences are important predictors for career motives. Women were expected to have less masculine preferences than men do, which is assumed to be a determinant of their relative absence in management positions. In Study 1 (N =327), we investigated gender differences in organizational culture preferences, both in a managerial sample and a sample of non‐managerial professionals in private sector organizations. It was shown that gender differences only existed in the non‐managerial groups, with women showing less masculine culture preferences than men did. In Study 2 (N =350), we examined the effects of organizational culture preferences on the ambitions of staff employees and middle‐level managers to pursue a career at a top management level in one governmental organization. The results showed that organizational culture preferences were predictive for ambition of non‐managerial employees, but not for that of middle management employees. Overall, women were less ambitious than men, and even ambitious women perceived work‐home conflict as an important barrier to career advancement.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Career advancement</subject><subject>Corporate culture</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Employment discrimination</subject><subject>Femininity</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Glass ceiling</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Industrial psychology</subject><subject>Labour force</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Managers</subject><subject>Middle management</subject><subject>Motivation. Job satisfaction. Attitude</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Organization</subject><subject>Organizational behaviour</subject><subject>Organizational culture</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality traits</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stereotypes</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Upper management</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Women executives</subject><subject>Work-Family conflict</subject><issn>0963-1798</issn><issn>2044-8325</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhgdRcK3-Aa8GQa8czdfkw7u2aK2WbsGK3oVs5mRMzSZrMkNbf71ZtljQgiYXgZfnfc85OU3zFKNXmDL5GilOsVCIUIIoV4Kie82CIMY6SUl_v1lsga4S8mHzqJQLVI9gYtGcHocwr300k49jO32DdgymlNaCD1V5055XKacAbXJtyqOJ_mdlUzShtXOY5gztJoODDNFCedw8cCYUeHLz7jWf3709P3zfnSyPjg_3Tzrbk150wKQCSg04tRL9ILGwA-PSDMLaFSJ8cAIBwpSvBkYdM2ZQknE8UOmYI4zQvebFLneT048ZyqTXvlgIwURIc9G9kLQG8n-CVGHEJZYVfPYHeJHmXMcsGitFWS8FqtDLHTSaANpHl6Zs7AgRsgkpgvNV3leE456JbZfdHXi9A6y9vYsnO97mVEr9Vb3Jfm3ytcZIb_es_95zNT2_adwUa4LLJlpfbp20xiuFKyd23GUtev0fyfrDcnmGibgdw5cJrn47Tf6uuaCi119OjzTpP3496M8-aU5_AT3DxQQ</recordid><startdate>200209</startdate><enddate>200209</enddate><creator>Van Vianen, Annelies E. M.</creator><creator>Fischer, Agneta H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>British Psychological Society</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BF</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0Q</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200209</creationdate><title>Illuminating the glass ceiling: The role of organizational culture preferences</title><author>Van Vianen, Annelies E. M. ; Fischer, Agneta H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5257-e489e33aef9b75d817cd468ad7ccb026df70e0136bd43f4aad98461d38f4f2423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Career advancement</topic><topic>Corporate culture</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Employment discrimination</topic><topic>Femininity</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Glass ceiling</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Industrial psychology</topic><topic>Labour force</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Managers</topic><topic>Middle management</topic><topic>Motivation. Job satisfaction. Attitude</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Organization</topic><topic>Organizational behaviour</topic><topic>Organizational culture</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality traits</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stereotypes</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Upper management</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Women executives</topic><topic>Work-Family conflict</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Vianen, Annelies E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Agneta H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>European Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>European Business Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of occupational and organizational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Vianen, Annelies E. M.</au><au>Fischer, Agneta H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Illuminating the glass ceiling: The role of organizational culture preferences</atitle><jtitle>Journal of occupational and organizational psychology</jtitle><date>2002-09</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>315</spage><epage>337</epage><pages>315-337</pages><issn>0963-1798</issn><eissn>2044-8325</eissn><coden>JOCCEF</coden><abstract>We present two studies that investigated women's motives to pursue a career in top management. The central hypothesis was that masculine culture preferences are important predictors for career motives. Women were expected to have less masculine preferences than men do, which is assumed to be a determinant of their relative absence in management positions. In Study 1 (N =327), we investigated gender differences in organizational culture preferences, both in a managerial sample and a sample of non‐managerial professionals in private sector organizations. It was shown that gender differences only existed in the non‐managerial groups, with women showing less masculine culture preferences than men did. In Study 2 (N =350), we examined the effects of organizational culture preferences on the ambitions of staff employees and middle‐level managers to pursue a career at a top management level in one governmental organization. The results showed that organizational culture preferences were predictive for ambition of non‐managerial employees, but not for that of middle management employees. Overall, women were less ambitious than men, and even ambitious women perceived work‐home conflict as an important barrier to career advancement.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1348/096317902320369730</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-1798 |
ispartof | Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 2002-09, Vol.75 (3), p.315-337 |
issn | 0963-1798 2044-8325 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57834686 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Career advancement Corporate culture Employees Employment Employment discrimination Femininity Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gender differences Glass ceiling Hypotheses Industrial psychology Labour force Management Managers Middle management Motivation. Job satisfaction. Attitude Netherlands Occupational psychology Occupations Organization Organizational behaviour Organizational culture Organizations Personality Personality traits Professionals Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Statistical analysis Stereotypes Studies Upper management Women Women executives Work-Family conflict |
title | Illuminating the glass ceiling: The role of organizational culture preferences |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T04%3A29%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Illuminating%20the%20glass%20ceiling:%20The%20role%20of%20organizational%20culture%20preferences&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20occupational%20and%20organizational%20psychology&rft.au=Van%20Vianen,%20Annelies%20E.%20M.&rft.date=2002-09&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=337&rft.pages=315-337&rft.issn=0963-1798&rft.eissn=2044-8325&rft.coden=JOCCEF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1348/096317902320369730&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA92615472%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199345870&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A92615472&rfr_iscdi=true |