Joan McKay versus John McKay: do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?

Examines research using a classic, influential experiment conducted by Goldberg (1968), showing that women were likely to rate male authors more favourably than female authors of identical articles. A quantitative meta-analysis of research using Goldberg's experimental paradigm shows that the a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Psychological bulletin 1989-05, Vol.105 (May 89), p.409-429
Hauptverfasser:	Swim, J, Maruyama, G, Borgida, E, Myers, D G
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Authors Bias Evaluation Factors Gender stereotypes Women
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	429
container_issue	May 89
container_start_page	409
container_title	Psychological bulletin
container_volume	105
creator	Swim, J Maruyama, G Borgida, E Myers, D G
description	Examines research using a classic, influential experiment conducted by Goldberg (1968), showing that women were likely to rate male authors more favourably than female authors of identical articles. A quantitative meta-analysis of research using Goldberg's experimental paradigm shows that the average difference between ratings of men and women is negligible. (Abstract amended)
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57816964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57816964</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_578169643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyr0KwjAUQOEMCtafd7iTWyEa21oXB6mI4uZeru1VKzGpuUmhb-_SB3A68HFGIpJSqXidy3wipsxvKWWWpCoSxdmigWt1wR46chwYzvY1yA5qC08yNTlgT46s71tiuDfIQB3qgL6xhvdzMX6gZloMnYnlsbgdTnHr7DcQ-_LTcEVaoyEbuEyy7SrN0436e_wBU7U9Og</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57816964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Joan McKay versus John McKay: do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Swim, J ; Maruyama, G ; Borgida, E ; Myers, D G</creator><creatorcontrib>Swim, J ; Maruyama, G ; Borgida, E ; Myers, D G</creatorcontrib><description>Examines research using a classic, influential experiment conducted by Goldberg (1968), showing that women were likely to rate male authors more favourably than female authors of identical articles. A quantitative meta-analysis of research using Goldberg's experimental paradigm shows that the average difference between ratings of men and women is negligible. (Abstract amended)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2909</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSBUAI</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Authors ; Bias ; Evaluation ; Factors ; Gender stereotypes ; Women</subject><ispartof>Psychological bulletin, 1989-05, Vol.105 (May 89), p.409-429</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,31000</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swim, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruyama, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borgida, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, D G</creatorcontrib><title>Joan McKay versus John McKay: do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?</title><title>Psychological bulletin</title><description>Examines research using a classic, influential experiment conducted by Goldberg (1968), showing that women were likely to rate male authors more favourably than female authors of identical articles. A quantitative meta-analysis of research using Goldberg's experimental paradigm shows that the average difference between ratings of men and women is negligible. (Abstract amended)</description><subject>Authors</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Factors</subject><subject>Gender stereotypes</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0033-2909</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyr0KwjAUQOEMCtafd7iTWyEa21oXB6mI4uZeru1VKzGpuUmhb-_SB3A68HFGIpJSqXidy3wipsxvKWWWpCoSxdmigWt1wR46chwYzvY1yA5qC08yNTlgT46s71tiuDfIQB3qgL6xhvdzMX6gZloMnYnlsbgdTnHr7DcQ-_LTcEVaoyEbuEyy7SrN0436e_wBU7U9Og</recordid><startdate>19890501</startdate><enddate>19890501</enddate><creator>Swim, J</creator><creator>Maruyama, G</creator><creator>Borgida, E</creator><creator>Myers, D G</creator><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890501</creationdate><title>Joan McKay versus John McKay: do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?</title><author>Swim, J ; Maruyama, G ; Borgida, E ; Myers, D G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_578169643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Authors</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Factors</topic><topic>Gender stereotypes</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swim, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruyama, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borgida, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, D G</creatorcontrib><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swim, J</au><au>Maruyama, G</au><au>Borgida, E</au><au>Myers, D G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Joan McKay versus John McKay: do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?</atitle><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle><date>1989-05-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>May 89</issue><spage>409</spage><epage>429</epage><pages>409-429</pages><issn>0033-2909</issn><coden>PSBUAI</coden><abstract>Examines research using a classic, influential experiment conducted by Goldberg (1968), showing that women were likely to rate male authors more favourably than female authors of identical articles. A quantitative meta-analysis of research using Goldberg's experimental paradigm shows that the average difference between ratings of men and women is negligible. (Abstract amended)</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0033-2909
ispartof	Psychological bulletin, 1989-05, Vol.105 (May 89), p.409-429
issn	0033-2909
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57816964
source	EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects	Authors Bias Evaluation Factors Gender stereotypes Women
title	Joan McKay versus John McKay: do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A40%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Joan%20McKay%20versus%20John%20McKay:%20do%20gender%20stereotypes%20bias%20evaluations?&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20bulletin&rft.au=Swim,%20J&rft.date=1989-05-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=May%2089&rft.spage=409&rft.epage=429&rft.pages=409-429&rft.issn=0033-2909&rft.coden=PSBUAI&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E57816964%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57816964&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true