Selective attentional bias to alcohol related stimuli in problem drinkers and non-problem drinkers
Aims. The issues explored in this study were whether a patient group of problem drinkers selectively attend to alcohol‐related stimuli and the time course of any interference from alcohol‐related stimuli in comparison with two control groups of non‐problem drinkers. Design. A 3 × 2 × 2 × 5 factorial...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Addiction (Abingdon, England) England), 2001-02, Vol.96 (2), p.285-295 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 295 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 285 |
| container_title | Addiction (Abingdon, England) |
| container_volume | 96 |
| creator | Sharma, Dinkar Albery, Ian P. Cook, Chris |
| description | Aims. The issues explored in this study were whether a patient group of problem drinkers selectively attend to alcohol‐related stimuli and the time course of any interference from alcohol‐related stimuli in comparison with two control groups of non‐problem drinkers.
Design. A 3 × 2 × 2 × 5 factorial design was used. Drinking group (low, high and problem) and word order (alcohol‐neutral, neutral‐alcohol) were between‐participant factors, and word type (alcohol, neutral) and presentation block (1‐5) were within participant factors.
Participants. Three groups were used, 20 participants from a local community alcohol Service (CAS) and 40 participants (student volunteers) in two control groups. The two control groups were differentiated as scoring high or low on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT).
Measurements. A modified computerized Stroop colour naming test was used to measure response latencies. Anxiety was measured using the State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory.
Findings. The CAS group showed significantly longer reaction times to respond to the colour of alcohol‐related words than to neutral category words. Although the interference was smaller for the high AUDIT group it was significant. No significant interference was found in the low AUDIT group. There was no statistical evidence that the interference habituated in the three groups.
Conclusions. The present study showed it is possible to use a modified Stroop task as a measure of implicit processing of alcohol stimuli. Despite the fact that all participants were asked to ignore the words, they were unable to do so. Alcohol‐related words produced more interference than neutral category words in a group of problem drinkers and a control group of high alcohol drinkers. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96228512.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57789750</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>109246049</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5992-d5b07f07b89bedb6b93a3c792dcf1159561347c9685685eaa15534806b5e1af83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkV1rFDEUhoModq3-BQkWvJsxH5MvvGq7ugqlXlTxMiSZDGabmanJjG7_vRl2u0JvREgI4Tx5c5IHgDOMaowa_m5bY8pRhZqG1gQhXCtOiGSY1LsnYHWsPQUrpDirCG7QCXiR8xYhJKRqnoMTjLEkUjQrYG989G4Kvzw00-SHKYyDidAGk-E0QhPd-GOMMPloJt_CPIV-jgGGAd6l0UbfwzaF4danDM3QwmEcqseFl-BZZ2L2rw7rKfj28cPXy0_V1ZfN58vzq8oxpUjVMotEh4SVyvrWcquooU4o0roOY6YYx7QRTnHJyvDGYMZoIxG3zGPTSXoK3u5zSwM_Z58n3YfsfIxm8OOcNRPl9YKhf4JUKiUwpgV88wjcjnMq_5M1VoqrMhfo_R5yacw5-U7fpdCbdK8x0oswvdWLFL1I0Ysw_SBM78rp14crZtv79u_Zg6ECnB0Ak52JXTKDC_nIKaIEUYVa76nfIfr7_-lAn6_XD7sSU-1jQp787hhj0q3mggqmv19vNLtZX4uLTaMl_QNq08EO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199699963</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selective attentional bias to alcohol related stimuli in problem drinkers and non-problem drinkers</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Sharma, Dinkar ; Albery, Ian P. ; Cook, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Dinkar ; Albery, Ian P. ; Cook, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>Aims. The issues explored in this study were whether a patient group of problem drinkers selectively attend to alcohol‐related stimuli and the time course of any interference from alcohol‐related stimuli in comparison with two control groups of non‐problem drinkers.
Design. A 3 × 2 × 2 × 5 factorial design was used. Drinking group (low, high and problem) and word order (alcohol‐neutral, neutral‐alcohol) were between‐participant factors, and word type (alcohol, neutral) and presentation block (1‐5) were within participant factors.
Participants. Three groups were used, 20 participants from a local community alcohol Service (CAS) and 40 participants (student volunteers) in two control groups. The two control groups were differentiated as scoring high or low on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT).
Measurements. A modified computerized Stroop colour naming test was used to measure response latencies. Anxiety was measured using the State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory.
Findings. The CAS group showed significantly longer reaction times to respond to the colour of alcohol‐related words than to neutral category words. Although the interference was smaller for the high AUDIT group it was significant. No significant interference was found in the low AUDIT group. There was no statistical evidence that the interference habituated in the three groups.
Conclusions. The present study showed it is possible to use a modified Stroop task as a measure of implicit processing of alcohol stimuli. Despite the fact that all participants were asked to ignore the words, they were unable to do so. Alcohol‐related words produced more interference than neutral category words in a group of problem drinkers and a control group of high alcohol drinkers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-2140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-0443</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96228512.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11182874</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADICE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Carfax Publishing, part of the Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Addiction ; Addictive behaviors ; Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Alcohol ; Alcohol consumption ; Alcohol use ; Alcoholism ; Alcoholism - psychology ; Analysis of Variance ; Anxiety ; Attention ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Case-Control Studies ; Clinical psychology ; Cognition ; Cognition. Intelligence ; Comparative studies ; Drinkers ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Intellectual and cognitive abilities ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Problem drinkers ; Psychological Tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Selective attention ; Social problems</subject><ispartof>Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2001-02, Vol.96 (2), p.285-295</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company Feb 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5992-d5b07f07b89bedb6b93a3c792dcf1159561347c9685685eaa15534806b5e1af83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1360-0443.2001.96228512.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1360-0443.2001.96228512.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30977,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=929729$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11182874$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Dinkar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albery, Ian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>Selective attentional bias to alcohol related stimuli in problem drinkers and non-problem drinkers</title><title>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</title><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><description>Aims. The issues explored in this study were whether a patient group of problem drinkers selectively attend to alcohol‐related stimuli and the time course of any interference from alcohol‐related stimuli in comparison with two control groups of non‐problem drinkers.
Design. A 3 × 2 × 2 × 5 factorial design was used. Drinking group (low, high and problem) and word order (alcohol‐neutral, neutral‐alcohol) were between‐participant factors, and word type (alcohol, neutral) and presentation block (1‐5) were within participant factors.
Participants. Three groups were used, 20 participants from a local community alcohol Service (CAS) and 40 participants (student volunteers) in two control groups. The two control groups were differentiated as scoring high or low on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT).
Measurements. A modified computerized Stroop colour naming test was used to measure response latencies. Anxiety was measured using the State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory.
Findings. The CAS group showed significantly longer reaction times to respond to the colour of alcohol‐related words than to neutral category words. Although the interference was smaller for the high AUDIT group it was significant. No significant interference was found in the low AUDIT group. There was no statistical evidence that the interference habituated in the three groups.
Conclusions. The present study showed it is possible to use a modified Stroop task as a measure of implicit processing of alcohol stimuli. Despite the fact that all participants were asked to ignore the words, they were unable to do so. Alcohol‐related words produced more interference than neutral category words in a group of problem drinkers and a control group of high alcohol drinkers.</description><subject>Addiction</subject><subject>Addictive behaviors</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>Alcohol consumption</subject><subject>Alcohol use</subject><subject>Alcoholism</subject><subject>Alcoholism - psychology</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Clinical psychology</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition. Intelligence</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Drinkers</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intellectual and cognitive abilities</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Problem drinkers</subject><subject>Psychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Selective attention</subject><subject>Social problems</subject><issn>0965-2140</issn><issn>1360-0443</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkV1rFDEUhoModq3-BQkWvJsxH5MvvGq7ugqlXlTxMiSZDGabmanJjG7_vRl2u0JvREgI4Tx5c5IHgDOMaowa_m5bY8pRhZqG1gQhXCtOiGSY1LsnYHWsPQUrpDirCG7QCXiR8xYhJKRqnoMTjLEkUjQrYG989G4Kvzw00-SHKYyDidAGk-E0QhPd-GOMMPloJt_CPIV-jgGGAd6l0UbfwzaF4danDM3QwmEcqseFl-BZZ2L2rw7rKfj28cPXy0_V1ZfN58vzq8oxpUjVMotEh4SVyvrWcquooU4o0roOY6YYx7QRTnHJyvDGYMZoIxG3zGPTSXoK3u5zSwM_Z58n3YfsfIxm8OOcNRPl9YKhf4JUKiUwpgV88wjcjnMq_5M1VoqrMhfo_R5yacw5-U7fpdCbdK8x0oswvdWLFL1I0Ysw_SBM78rp14crZtv79u_Zg6ECnB0Ak52JXTKDC_nIKaIEUYVa76nfIfr7_-lAn6_XD7sSU-1jQp787hhj0q3mggqmv19vNLtZX4uLTaMl_QNq08EO</recordid><startdate>200102</startdate><enddate>200102</enddate><creator>Sharma, Dinkar</creator><creator>Albery, Ian P.</creator><creator>Cook, Chris</creator><general>Carfax Publishing, part of the Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200102</creationdate><title>Selective attentional bias to alcohol related stimuli in problem drinkers and non-problem drinkers</title><author>Sharma, Dinkar ; Albery, Ian P. ; Cook, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5992-d5b07f07b89bedb6b93a3c792dcf1159561347c9685685eaa15534806b5e1af83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Addiction</topic><topic>Addictive behaviors</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>Alcohol consumption</topic><topic>Alcohol use</topic><topic>Alcoholism</topic><topic>Alcoholism - psychology</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Clinical psychology</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition. Intelligence</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Drinkers</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intellectual and cognitive abilities</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Problem drinkers</topic><topic>Psychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Selective attention</topic><topic>Social problems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Dinkar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albery, Ian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, Dinkar</au><au>Albery, Ian P.</au><au>Cook, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selective attentional bias to alcohol related stimuli in problem drinkers and non-problem drinkers</atitle><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><date>2001-02</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>285-295</pages><issn>0965-2140</issn><eissn>1360-0443</eissn><coden>ADICE5</coden><abstract>Aims. The issues explored in this study were whether a patient group of problem drinkers selectively attend to alcohol‐related stimuli and the time course of any interference from alcohol‐related stimuli in comparison with two control groups of non‐problem drinkers.
Design. A 3 × 2 × 2 × 5 factorial design was used. Drinking group (low, high and problem) and word order (alcohol‐neutral, neutral‐alcohol) were between‐participant factors, and word type (alcohol, neutral) and presentation block (1‐5) were within participant factors.
Participants. Three groups were used, 20 participants from a local community alcohol Service (CAS) and 40 participants (student volunteers) in two control groups. The two control groups were differentiated as scoring high or low on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT).
Measurements. A modified computerized Stroop colour naming test was used to measure response latencies. Anxiety was measured using the State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory.
Findings. The CAS group showed significantly longer reaction times to respond to the colour of alcohol‐related words than to neutral category words. Although the interference was smaller for the high AUDIT group it was significant. No significant interference was found in the low AUDIT group. There was no statistical evidence that the interference habituated in the three groups.
Conclusions. The present study showed it is possible to use a modified Stroop task as a measure of implicit processing of alcohol stimuli. Despite the fact that all participants were asked to ignore the words, they were unable to do so. Alcohol‐related words produced more interference than neutral category words in a group of problem drinkers and a control group of high alcohol drinkers.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Carfax Publishing, part of the Taylor & Francis Group</pub><pmid>11182874</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96228512.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0965-2140 |
| ispartof | Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2001-02, Vol.96 (2), p.285-295 |
| issn | 0965-2140 1360-0443 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57789750 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Addiction Addictive behaviors Adult Adult and adolescent clinical studies Alcohol Alcohol consumption Alcohol use Alcoholism Alcoholism - psychology Analysis of Variance Anxiety Attention Bias Biological and medical sciences Case-Control Studies Clinical psychology Cognition Cognition. Intelligence Comparative studies Drinkers Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Intellectual and cognitive abilities Male Medical sciences Problem drinkers Psychological Tests Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychopathology. Psychiatry Selective attention Social problems |
| title | Selective attentional bias to alcohol related stimuli in problem drinkers and non-problem drinkers |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T22%3A42%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selective%20attentional%20bias%20to%20alcohol%20related%20stimuli%20in%20problem%20drinkers%20and%20non-problem%20drinkers&rft.jtitle=Addiction%20(Abingdon,%20England)&rft.au=Sharma,%20Dinkar&rft.date=2001-02&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=285-295&rft.issn=0965-2140&rft.eissn=1360-0443&rft.coden=ADICE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96228512.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E109246049%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199699963&rft_id=info:pmid/11182874&rfr_iscdi=true |