Value priorities and social desirability: Much substance, some style
Associations of value priorities with socially desirable responding (SD) might be due to a stylistic bias that distorts self‐reported value ratings or to a substantive relationship between valued goals and needs. We hypothesize that, as a stylistic bias, SD would increase (a) the importance people a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of social psychology 1997-03, Vol.36 (1), p.3-18 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 18 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 3 |
| container_title | British journal of social psychology |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Schwartz, Shalom H. Verkasalo, Markku Antonovsky, Avishai Sagiv, Lilach |
| description | Associations of value priorities with socially desirable responding (SD) might be due to a stylistic bias that distorts self‐reported value ratings or to a substantive relationship between valued goals and needs. We hypothesize that, as a stylistic bias, SD would increase (a) the importance people attribute to values in general and (b) lead people to match own value ratings to those of importance in their social environment. As a substantive variable, SD would correlate positively with value types that emphasize social harmony (conformity, security, benevolence, tradition) and negatively with value types that challenge social conventions and harmony (hedonism, stimulation, self‐direction, achievement, power). In separate studies, 207 Israeli adults and 131 Finnish social work students completed the Marlow—Crowne SD scale and a value survey. Both studies supported the substantive hypotheses. There was weak evidence for the first stylistic hypothesis, but none for the second. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01115.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57778868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38561242</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5135-5075569e90c287c46db1a279c770777c921a16a4c80bd561567a660a929758213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1PGzEQhq2KSgTKf1gh1BO79cf6ixMktLQIyKGlHC2v46gOTjZ4dtXk39erRLlWWJY8Gr_zjPQgdE5wRfL5sqgorutSMawrorWsugbnPq82H9Do8HWERpjkWgjBj9EJwAJjwhiWI3T728beF-sU2hS64KGwq1kBrQs2FjMPIdkmxNBtr4rH3v0poG-gsyvnL3No6QvottF_Qh_nNoI_27-n6Pnb11-T7-XD9O7H5OahdJwwXnIsORfaa-yokq4Ws4ZYKrWTEkspnabEEmFrp3Az44JwIa0Q2GqqJVeUsFP0ecddp_at99CZZQDnY7Qr3_ZgeKYoJdR_g0xlPK1pDl7tgi61AMnPTTaxtGlrCDaDYbMwg0YzaDSDYbM3bDZ5-GK_xYKzcZ6ylwAHAhVM5Ztj17vY3xD99h0LzPj-53QoM6LcIQJ0fnNA2PRqhGSSm5enO0Mfn25f2PjeSPYPuJiddQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38561242</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Value priorities and social desirability: Much substance, some style</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Schwartz, Shalom H. ; Verkasalo, Markku ; Antonovsky, Avishai ; Sagiv, Lilach</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Shalom H. ; Verkasalo, Markku ; Antonovsky, Avishai ; Sagiv, Lilach</creatorcontrib><description>Associations of value priorities with socially desirable responding (SD) might be due to a stylistic bias that distorts self‐reported value ratings or to a substantive relationship between valued goals and needs. We hypothesize that, as a stylistic bias, SD would increase (a) the importance people attribute to values in general and (b) lead people to match own value ratings to those of importance in their social environment. As a substantive variable, SD would correlate positively with value types that emphasize social harmony (conformity, security, benevolence, tradition) and negatively with value types that challenge social conventions and harmony (hedonism, stimulation, self‐direction, achievement, power). In separate studies, 207 Israeli adults and 131 Finnish social work students completed the Marlow—Crowne SD scale and a value survey. Both studies supported the substantive hypotheses. There was weak evidence for the first stylistic hypothesis, but none for the second.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-6665</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01115.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJSPDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Priorities ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics. Sociometry ; Relationship ; Social desirability ; Social psychology ; Social values</subject><ispartof>British journal of social psychology, 1997-03, Vol.36 (1), p.3-18</ispartof><rights>1997 The British Psychological Society</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5135-5075569e90c287c46db1a279c770777c921a16a4c80bd561567a660a929758213</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.2044-8309.1997.tb01115.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.2044-8309.1997.tb01115.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2638638$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Shalom H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verkasalo, Markku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonovsky, Avishai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagiv, Lilach</creatorcontrib><title>Value priorities and social desirability: Much substance, some style</title><title>British journal of social psychology</title><description>Associations of value priorities with socially desirable responding (SD) might be due to a stylistic bias that distorts self‐reported value ratings or to a substantive relationship between valued goals and needs. We hypothesize that, as a stylistic bias, SD would increase (a) the importance people attribute to values in general and (b) lead people to match own value ratings to those of importance in their social environment. As a substantive variable, SD would correlate positively with value types that emphasize social harmony (conformity, security, benevolence, tradition) and negatively with value types that challenge social conventions and harmony (hedonism, stimulation, self‐direction, achievement, power). In separate studies, 207 Israeli adults and 131 Finnish social work students completed the Marlow—Crowne SD scale and a value survey. Both studies supported the substantive hypotheses. There was weak evidence for the first stylistic hypothesis, but none for the second.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Priorities</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Sociometry</subject><subject>Relationship</subject><subject>Social desirability</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social values</subject><issn>0144-6665</issn><issn>2044-8309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1PGzEQhq2KSgTKf1gh1BO79cf6ixMktLQIyKGlHC2v46gOTjZ4dtXk39erRLlWWJY8Gr_zjPQgdE5wRfL5sqgorutSMawrorWsugbnPq82H9Do8HWERpjkWgjBj9EJwAJjwhiWI3T728beF-sU2hS64KGwq1kBrQs2FjMPIdkmxNBtr4rH3v0poG-gsyvnL3No6QvottF_Qh_nNoI_27-n6Pnb11-T7-XD9O7H5OahdJwwXnIsORfaa-yokq4Ws4ZYKrWTEkspnabEEmFrp3Az44JwIa0Q2GqqJVeUsFP0ecddp_at99CZZQDnY7Qr3_ZgeKYoJdR_g0xlPK1pDl7tgi61AMnPTTaxtGlrCDaDYbMwg0YzaDSDYbM3bDZ5-GK_xYKzcZ6ylwAHAhVM5Ztj17vY3xD99h0LzPj-53QoM6LcIQJ0fnNA2PRqhGSSm5enO0Mfn25f2PjeSPYPuJiddQ</recordid><startdate>199703</startdate><enddate>199703</enddate><creator>Schwartz, Shalom H.</creator><creator>Verkasalo, Markku</creator><creator>Antonovsky, Avishai</creator><creator>Sagiv, Lilach</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>British Psychological Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199703</creationdate><title>Value priorities and social desirability: Much substance, some style</title><author>Schwartz, Shalom H. ; Verkasalo, Markku ; Antonovsky, Avishai ; Sagiv, Lilach</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5135-5075569e90c287c46db1a279c770777c921a16a4c80bd561567a660a929758213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Priorities</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Sociometry</topic><topic>Relationship</topic><topic>Social desirability</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Shalom H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verkasalo, Markku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonovsky, Avishai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagiv, Lilach</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>British journal of social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwartz, Shalom H.</au><au>Verkasalo, Markku</au><au>Antonovsky, Avishai</au><au>Sagiv, Lilach</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Value priorities and social desirability: Much substance, some style</atitle><jtitle>British journal of social psychology</jtitle><date>1997-03</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>3-18</pages><issn>0144-6665</issn><eissn>2044-8309</eissn><coden>BJSPDA</coden><abstract>Associations of value priorities with socially desirable responding (SD) might be due to a stylistic bias that distorts self‐reported value ratings or to a substantive relationship between valued goals and needs. We hypothesize that, as a stylistic bias, SD would increase (a) the importance people attribute to values in general and (b) lead people to match own value ratings to those of importance in their social environment. As a substantive variable, SD would correlate positively with value types that emphasize social harmony (conformity, security, benevolence, tradition) and negatively with value types that challenge social conventions and harmony (hedonism, stimulation, self‐direction, achievement, power). In separate studies, 207 Israeli adults and 131 Finnish social work students completed the Marlow—Crowne SD scale and a value survey. Both studies supported the substantive hypotheses. There was weak evidence for the first stylistic hypothesis, but none for the second.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01115.x</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0144-6665 |
| ispartof | British journal of social psychology, 1997-03, Vol.36 (1), p.3-18 |
| issn | 0144-6665 2044-8309 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57778868 |
| source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Bias Biological and medical sciences Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Priorities Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychometrics. Sociometry Relationship Social desirability Social psychology Social values |
| title | Value priorities and social desirability: Much substance, some style |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T00%3A56%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Value%20priorities%20and%20social%20desirability:%20Much%20substance,%20some%20style&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Schwartz,%20Shalom%20H.&rft.date=1997-03&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=3-18&rft.issn=0144-6665&rft.eissn=2044-8309&rft.coden=BJSPDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01115.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38561242%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38561242&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |