Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006

In order to prevent the formation of a gap between the quality and quantity in Iranian scientific publications, this study makes an effort to analyze Iranian scientific publications indexed on the ISI Web of Science database using quantitative and qualitative scientometrics criteria over a ten year...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientometrics 2009-09, Vol.80 (3), p.625-636
Hauptverfasser: Hayati, Zouhayr, Ebrahimy, Saeideh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 636
container_issue 3
container_start_page 625
container_title Scientometrics
container_volume 80
creator Hayati, Zouhayr
Ebrahimy, Saeideh
description In order to prevent the formation of a gap between the quality and quantity in Iranian scientific publications, this study makes an effort to analyze Iranian scientific publications indexed on the ISI Web of Science database using quantitative and qualitative scientometrics criteria over a ten year period. As a first step, all Iranian institutes were divided into three categories; universities, research institutes and other organizations. Then they were compared according to quantitative and qualitative criteria. Second, the correlation between the quality and quantity of the publications was measured. The research findings indicated that, according to qualitative criteria (citation, citation impact and percentage of cited documents) there are no meaningful differences among the three groups, while regarding quantitative criterion(number of papers), universities rank higher than the other two groups. The results also indicated that there is a positive and meaningful correlation among qualitative and quantitative criteria in the scholarly scientific publications conducted by Iranian organizations. In other words, in Iranian organizations the quality of publications increases as their quantity increases. The comparison of magnitude of correlation between these two criteria in the three categories reveals the fact that the correlation between number of papers and citations criterion in research institutes is stronger than the other two groups.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11192-009-2094-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57734444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57734444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e23110b1237119dfa6d3208a25402ba1e93bf4ea19b5db5d5077019c528ee38a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwA7jlxK1gJ-3acJsmPiZN4gLnKG3dqVOXbEkrtP16UsoZy5Jt6X0s-2XsHuERAfKngIhKJAAqEaDSRF6wGWZFkYhigZdsBiiLRKGEa3YTwg4iI6GYsfPKeU-d6VtneUn9N5Hlx8F0bX_ixtZjb_txaC0PVUtxaNqKH7yrh2qknvmSVyYQD_1Qn7hr-Nob2xrLnd_G5vy7O_DGuz1HpXLeOy4AFrfsqjFdoLu_Omdfry-fq_dk8_G2Xi03SSVR9QkJiQglCpnHF-vGLGopoDAiS0GUBknJsknJoCqzOmYGeQ6oqkwURLIwcs4epr3x5uNAodf7NlTUdcaSG4LO8lymMaIQJ2HlXQieGn3w7d74k0bQo8t6cllHl_XospaRERMTotZuyeudG7yN__wD_QCRY3_K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57734444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hayati, Zouhayr ; Ebrahimy, Saeideh</creator><creatorcontrib>Hayati, Zouhayr ; Ebrahimy, Saeideh</creatorcontrib><description>In order to prevent the formation of a gap between the quality and quantity in Iranian scientific publications, this study makes an effort to analyze Iranian scientific publications indexed on the ISI Web of Science database using quantitative and qualitative scientometrics criteria over a ten year period. As a first step, all Iranian institutes were divided into three categories; universities, research institutes and other organizations. Then they were compared according to quantitative and qualitative criteria. Second, the correlation between the quality and quantity of the publications was measured. The research findings indicated that, according to qualitative criteria (citation, citation impact and percentage of cited documents) there are no meaningful differences among the three groups, while regarding quantitative criterion(number of papers), universities rank higher than the other two groups. The results also indicated that there is a positive and meaningful correlation among qualitative and quantitative criteria in the scholarly scientific publications conducted by Iranian organizations. In other words, in Iranian organizations the quality of publications increases as their quantity increases. The comparison of magnitude of correlation between these two criteria in the three categories reveals the fact that the correlation between number of papers and citations criterion in research institutes is stronger than the other two groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0138-9130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1588-2861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-2094-3</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SCNTDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Computer Science ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Iran ; Library Science ; Scholarly publishing ; Scientometrics</subject><ispartof>Scientometrics, 2009-09, Vol.80 (3), p.625-636</ispartof><rights>Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e23110b1237119dfa6d3208a25402ba1e93bf4ea19b5db5d5077019c528ee38a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e23110b1237119dfa6d3208a25402ba1e93bf4ea19b5db5d5077019c528ee38a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11192-009-2094-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-009-2094-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hayati, Zouhayr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebrahimy, Saeideh</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006</title><title>Scientometrics</title><addtitle>Scientometrics</addtitle><description>In order to prevent the formation of a gap between the quality and quantity in Iranian scientific publications, this study makes an effort to analyze Iranian scientific publications indexed on the ISI Web of Science database using quantitative and qualitative scientometrics criteria over a ten year period. As a first step, all Iranian institutes were divided into three categories; universities, research institutes and other organizations. Then they were compared according to quantitative and qualitative criteria. Second, the correlation between the quality and quantity of the publications was measured. The research findings indicated that, according to qualitative criteria (citation, citation impact and percentage of cited documents) there are no meaningful differences among the three groups, while regarding quantitative criterion(number of papers), universities rank higher than the other two groups. The results also indicated that there is a positive and meaningful correlation among qualitative and quantitative criteria in the scholarly scientific publications conducted by Iranian organizations. In other words, in Iranian organizations the quality of publications increases as their quantity increases. The comparison of magnitude of correlation between these two criteria in the three categories reveals the fact that the correlation between number of papers and citations criterion in research institutes is stronger than the other two groups.</description><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Iran</subject><subject>Library Science</subject><subject>Scholarly publishing</subject><subject>Scientometrics</subject><issn>0138-9130</issn><issn>1588-2861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwA7jlxK1gJ-3acJsmPiZN4gLnKG3dqVOXbEkrtP16UsoZy5Jt6X0s-2XsHuERAfKngIhKJAAqEaDSRF6wGWZFkYhigZdsBiiLRKGEa3YTwg4iI6GYsfPKeU-d6VtneUn9N5Hlx8F0bX_ixtZjb_txaC0PVUtxaNqKH7yrh2qknvmSVyYQD_1Qn7hr-Nob2xrLnd_G5vy7O_DGuz1HpXLeOy4AFrfsqjFdoLu_Omdfry-fq_dk8_G2Xi03SSVR9QkJiQglCpnHF-vGLGopoDAiS0GUBknJsknJoCqzOmYGeQ6oqkwURLIwcs4epr3x5uNAodf7NlTUdcaSG4LO8lymMaIQJ2HlXQieGn3w7d74k0bQo8t6cllHl_XospaRERMTotZuyeudG7yN__wD_QCRY3_K</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Hayati, Zouhayr</creator><creator>Ebrahimy, Saeideh</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006</title><author>Hayati, Zouhayr ; Ebrahimy, Saeideh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e23110b1237119dfa6d3208a25402ba1e93bf4ea19b5db5d5077019c528ee38a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Iran</topic><topic>Library Science</topic><topic>Scholarly publishing</topic><topic>Scientometrics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hayati, Zouhayr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebrahimy, Saeideh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Scientometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hayati, Zouhayr</au><au>Ebrahimy, Saeideh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006</atitle><jtitle>Scientometrics</jtitle><stitle>Scientometrics</stitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>625</spage><epage>636</epage><pages>625-636</pages><issn>0138-9130</issn><eissn>1588-2861</eissn><coden>SCNTDX</coden><abstract>In order to prevent the formation of a gap between the quality and quantity in Iranian scientific publications, this study makes an effort to analyze Iranian scientific publications indexed on the ISI Web of Science database using quantitative and qualitative scientometrics criteria over a ten year period. As a first step, all Iranian institutes were divided into three categories; universities, research institutes and other organizations. Then they were compared according to quantitative and qualitative criteria. Second, the correlation between the quality and quantity of the publications was measured. The research findings indicated that, according to qualitative criteria (citation, citation impact and percentage of cited documents) there are no meaningful differences among the three groups, while regarding quantitative criterion(number of papers), universities rank higher than the other two groups. The results also indicated that there is a positive and meaningful correlation among qualitative and quantitative criteria in the scholarly scientific publications conducted by Iranian organizations. In other words, in Iranian organizations the quality of publications increases as their quantity increases. The comparison of magnitude of correlation between these two criteria in the three categories reveals the fact that the correlation between number of papers and citations criterion in research institutes is stronger than the other two groups.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11192-009-2094-3</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0138-9130
ispartof Scientometrics, 2009-09, Vol.80 (3), p.625-636
issn 0138-9130
1588-2861
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57734444
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Computer Science
Information Storage and Retrieval
Iran
Library Science
Scholarly publishing
Scientometrics
title Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T19%3A23%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20between%20quality%20and%20quantity%20in%20scientific%20production:%20A%20case%20study%20of%20Iranian%20organizations%20from%201997%20to%202006&rft.jtitle=Scientometrics&rft.au=Hayati,%20Zouhayr&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=625&rft.epage=636&rft.pages=625-636&rft.issn=0138-9130&rft.eissn=1588-2861&rft.coden=SCNTDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11192-009-2094-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57734444%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57734444&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true