IDENTIFYING HAZARDOUS OR HARMFUL ALCOHOL USE IN MEDICAL ADMISSIONS: A COMPARISON OF AUDIT, CAGE AND BRIEF MAST

Two hundred and forty new medical inpatients received the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), CAGE and brief Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (brief MAST) questionnaires. Sensitivities when identifying weekly drinkers of>14 units (women) or>21 units (men) were 93, 79 and 35%,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford) 1996-11, Vol.31 (6), p.591-599
Hauptverfasser: MACKENZIE, DONALD M., LANGA, ARTURO, BROWN, TOM M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 599
container_issue 6
container_start_page 591
container_title Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford)
container_volume 31
creator MACKENZIE, DONALD M.
LANGA, ARTURO
BROWN, TOM M.
description Two hundred and forty new medical inpatients received the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), CAGE and brief Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (brief MAST) questionnaires. Sensitivities when identifying weekly drinkers of>14 units (women) or>21 units (men) were 93, 79 and 35%, respectively (P21 units (women) or>28 units (men) were 100%, 94% and 47%. Routine screening of medical admissions with the AUDIT (cut-off score 8) is recommended.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/oxfordjournals.alcalc.a008195
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57681052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57681052</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-37d171c0ad707acaa51343ef71c9a016469e94acb76ebbe7c0fd75f4ab3cd5733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkN2K2zAQhUVp2Wa3fYSCLtperVPJkqx1oReqf2JBbBc7hjY3QrZlyDaJt1YC27evlphAQTBozjkzwwfAJ4yWGIXky_g8jFP_OJ6no97bpd537i01Qg84ZK_AAtOAeoQh_zVYIE6Yhyimb8GttY8IYUp8fANuQoQRY2gBjjJOio1Mf8liBTOxFVVcNjUsK_ep8rRZQ7GOyqxcw6ZOoCxgnsQyEq4d57KuZVnUX6GAUZn_EJWsywKWKRRNLDf3MBKrBIoiht8rmaQwF_XmHXgzuKvN-7negSZNNlHmrcvVy1ivo5ycPMJ7zHGHdM8R153WDBNKzOB6oUY4oEFoQqq7lgembQ3v0NBzNlDdkq5nnJA78Pky92ka_5yNPanDznZmv9dHM56tYjx4cAR8Z_x2MXbTaO1kBvU07Q56-qswUi-81f-81YW3mnm7_Id50bk9mP6angE7_eOsa-uCw6SP3c5ebT5jFPuhs3kX286ezPNV1tNvFXDCmcp-blUchHzFi63KyD9BlpY3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57681052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>IDENTIFYING HAZARDOUS OR HARMFUL ALCOHOL USE IN MEDICAL ADMISSIONS: A COMPARISON OF AUDIT, CAGE AND BRIEF MAST</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>MACKENZIE, DONALD M. ; LANGA, ARTURO ; BROWN, TOM M.</creator><creatorcontrib>MACKENZIE, DONALD M. ; LANGA, ARTURO ; BROWN, TOM M.</creatorcontrib><description>Two hundred and forty new medical inpatients received the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), CAGE and brief Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (brief MAST) questionnaires. Sensitivities when identifying weekly drinkers of&gt;14 units (women) or&gt;21 units (men) were 93, 79 and 35%, respectively (P&lt;0.001). Sensitivities to&gt;21 units (women) or&gt;28 units (men) were 100%, 94% and 47%. Routine screening of medical admissions with the AUDIT (cut-off score 8) is recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-0414</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.alcalc.a008195</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9010550</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ALALDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Alcohol abuse ; Alcoholic Intoxication - epidemiology ; Alcoholism - epidemiology ; Alcoholism and acute alcohol poisoning ; Biological and medical sciences ; Comorbidity ; Female ; Hospitals ; Hospitals, General - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Lothian ; Male ; Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Patient Admission - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Patients ; Personality Inventory - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Psychometrics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Screening ; Toxicology ; United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford), 1996-11, Vol.31 (6), p.591-599</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-37d171c0ad707acaa51343ef71c9a016469e94acb76ebbe7c0fd75f4ab3cd5733</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2554129$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9010550$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MACKENZIE, DONALD M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANGA, ARTURO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROWN, TOM M.</creatorcontrib><title>IDENTIFYING HAZARDOUS OR HARMFUL ALCOHOL USE IN MEDICAL ADMISSIONS: A COMPARISON OF AUDIT, CAGE AND BRIEF MAST</title><title>Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Alcohol Alcohol</addtitle><description>Two hundred and forty new medical inpatients received the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), CAGE and brief Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (brief MAST) questionnaires. Sensitivities when identifying weekly drinkers of&gt;14 units (women) or&gt;21 units (men) were 93, 79 and 35%, respectively (P&lt;0.001). Sensitivities to&gt;21 units (women) or&gt;28 units (men) were 100%, 94% and 47%. Routine screening of medical admissions with the AUDIT (cut-off score 8) is recommended.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Alcohol abuse</subject><subject>Alcoholic Intoxication - epidemiology</subject><subject>Alcoholism - epidemiology</subject><subject>Alcoholism and acute alcohol poisoning</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals, General - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lothian</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Admission - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Personality Inventory - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><issn>0735-0414</issn><issn>1464-3502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkN2K2zAQhUVp2Wa3fYSCLtperVPJkqx1oReqf2JBbBc7hjY3QrZlyDaJt1YC27evlphAQTBozjkzwwfAJ4yWGIXky_g8jFP_OJ6no97bpd537i01Qg84ZK_AAtOAeoQh_zVYIE6Yhyimb8GttY8IYUp8fANuQoQRY2gBjjJOio1Mf8liBTOxFVVcNjUsK_ep8rRZQ7GOyqxcw6ZOoCxgnsQyEq4d57KuZVnUX6GAUZn_EJWsywKWKRRNLDf3MBKrBIoiht8rmaQwF_XmHXgzuKvN-7negSZNNlHmrcvVy1ivo5ycPMJ7zHGHdM8R153WDBNKzOB6oUY4oEFoQqq7lgembQ3v0NBzNlDdkq5nnJA78Pky92ka_5yNPanDznZmv9dHM56tYjx4cAR8Z_x2MXbTaO1kBvU07Q56-qswUi-81f-81YW3mnm7_Id50bk9mP6angE7_eOsa-uCw6SP3c5ebT5jFPuhs3kX286ezPNV1tNvFXDCmcp-blUchHzFi63KyD9BlpY3</recordid><startdate>19961101</startdate><enddate>19961101</enddate><creator>MACKENZIE, DONALD M.</creator><creator>LANGA, ARTURO</creator><creator>BROWN, TOM M.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961101</creationdate><title>IDENTIFYING HAZARDOUS OR HARMFUL ALCOHOL USE IN MEDICAL ADMISSIONS: A COMPARISON OF AUDIT, CAGE AND BRIEF MAST</title><author>MACKENZIE, DONALD M. ; LANGA, ARTURO ; BROWN, TOM M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-37d171c0ad707acaa51343ef71c9a016469e94acb76ebbe7c0fd75f4ab3cd5733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Alcohol abuse</topic><topic>Alcoholic Intoxication - epidemiology</topic><topic>Alcoholism - epidemiology</topic><topic>Alcoholism and acute alcohol poisoning</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals, General - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lothian</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Admission - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Personality Inventory - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MACKENZIE, DONALD M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANGA, ARTURO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROWN, TOM M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MACKENZIE, DONALD M.</au><au>LANGA, ARTURO</au><au>BROWN, TOM M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>IDENTIFYING HAZARDOUS OR HARMFUL ALCOHOL USE IN MEDICAL ADMISSIONS: A COMPARISON OF AUDIT, CAGE AND BRIEF MAST</atitle><jtitle>Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Alcohol Alcohol</addtitle><date>1996-11-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>591</spage><epage>599</epage><pages>591-599</pages><issn>0735-0414</issn><eissn>1464-3502</eissn><coden>ALALDD</coden><abstract>Two hundred and forty new medical inpatients received the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), CAGE and brief Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (brief MAST) questionnaires. Sensitivities when identifying weekly drinkers of&gt;14 units (women) or&gt;21 units (men) were 93, 79 and 35%, respectively (P&lt;0.001). Sensitivities to&gt;21 units (women) or&gt;28 units (men) were 100%, 94% and 47%. Routine screening of medical admissions with the AUDIT (cut-off score 8) is recommended.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>9010550</pmid><doi>10.1093/oxfordjournals.alcalc.a008195</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-0414
ispartof Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford), 1996-11, Vol.31 (6), p.591-599
issn 0735-0414
1464-3502
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57681052
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alcohol abuse
Alcoholic Intoxication - epidemiology
Alcoholism - epidemiology
Alcoholism and acute alcohol poisoning
Biological and medical sciences
Comorbidity
Female
Hospitals
Hospitals, General - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Lothian
Male
Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Patient Admission - statistics & numerical data
Patients
Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Screening
Toxicology
United Kingdom - epidemiology
title IDENTIFYING HAZARDOUS OR HARMFUL ALCOHOL USE IN MEDICAL ADMISSIONS: A COMPARISON OF AUDIT, CAGE AND BRIEF MAST
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T12%3A32%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=IDENTIFYING%20HAZARDOUS%20OR%20HARMFUL%20ALCOHOL%20USE%20IN%20MEDICAL%20ADMISSIONS:%20A%20COMPARISON%20OF%20AUDIT,%20CAGE%20AND%20BRIEF%20MAST&rft.jtitle=Alcohol%20and%20alcoholism%20(Oxford)&rft.au=MACKENZIE,%20DONALD%20M.&rft.date=1996-11-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=591&rft.epage=599&rft.pages=591-599&rft.issn=0735-0414&rft.eissn=1464-3502&rft.coden=ALALDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.alcalc.a008195&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57681052%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57681052&rft_id=info:pmid/9010550&rfr_iscdi=true