The A-Not-B Error: Results from a Logistic Meta-Analysis

A meta-analysis of the A-not-B error was conducted using logistic regression on studies conducted before September 1997 (107 data points). An earlier meta-analysis by Wellman, Cross, and Bartsch revealed that age, delay between hiding and retrieval, and number of hiding locations were significant pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Child development 1999-11, Vol.70 (6), p.1297-1313
Hauptverfasser: Marcovitch, Stuart, Zelazo, Philip David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1313
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1297
container_title Child development
container_volume 70
creator Marcovitch, Stuart
Zelazo, Philip David
description A meta-analysis of the A-not-B error was conducted using logistic regression on studies conducted before September 1997 (107 data points). An earlier meta-analysis by Wellman, Cross, and Bartsch revealed that age, delay between hiding and retrieval, and number of hiding locations were significant predictors of both the proportion of infants who searched correctly on B trials and the proportion of infants who searched perseveratively. The current analysis replicated these findings with two exceptions: (1) The number of trials at the A location was a significant predictor, and (2) the number of locations was a significant predictor of the proportion of infants who searched perseveratively, but not the proportion of infants who searched correctly. Implications of these findings are discussed and a quantitative version of a hierarchical competing-systems model of infant search is proposed.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1467-8624.00095
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57664661</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ602150</ericid><jstor_id>1132307</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1132307</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5205-e714435e7c60fdb262af329e2a7e8b47c54c76a1c53602b21dcc635d0b9784b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtvEzEUha0KpIbSNRsWI6jYufXbY3ZpCAEUwqu03VkexwOTTuLiOxHk3-N0olRCqvDG8j3ffR0j9IySU5rPGRVK41IxcUoIMfIADfaRR2iwjWFuGDlETwAW-cmU4QNUXvwMxRDPYofPi3FKMb0uvgZYtx0UdYrLwhXT-KOBrvHFx9A5PFy5dgMNPEWPa9dCON7dR-j72_HF6B2efpq8Hw2n2EtGJA6aCsFl0F6Rel4xxVzNmQnM6VBWQnspvFaOeskVYRWjc-8Vl3NSGV2KSvAj9Kqve5vir3WAzi4b8KFt3SrENViplRJK0Qy--AdcxHXK04KlppQlk0Rn6OWDkOKCaGJMmamznvIpAqRQ29vULF3aWErs1my7tdZurbV3ZueMk11dB961dXIr38B9GiMl1SZjz3sspMbv1fGHvDqVJMuil383bdj8r6kdvRlf9s13VRfQxXSfRjnjdzvjXs6_GP7sZZdurNJcS3s1m9irb58n1zP1xQr-F1YGqo4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1634070998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The A-Not-B Error: Results from a Logistic Meta-Analysis</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Marcovitch, Stuart ; Zelazo, Philip David</creator><creatorcontrib>Marcovitch, Stuart ; Zelazo, Philip David</creatorcontrib><description>A meta-analysis of the A-not-B error was conducted using logistic regression on studies conducted before September 1997 (107 data points). An earlier meta-analysis by Wellman, Cross, and Bartsch revealed that age, delay between hiding and retrieval, and number of hiding locations were significant predictors of both the proportion of infants who searched correctly on B trials and the proportion of infants who searched perseveratively. The current analysis replicated these findings with two exceptions: (1) The number of trials at the A location was a significant predictor, and (2) the number of locations was a significant predictor of the proportion of infants who searched perseveratively, but not the proportion of infants who searched correctly. Implications of these findings are discussed and a quantitative version of a hierarchical competing-systems model of infant search is proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-3920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00095</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CHDEAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Inc</publisher><subject>Age Differences ; Babies ; Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child development ; Cognition and Language ; Cognitive Development ; Datasets ; Developmental psychology ; Error Patterns ; Errors ; Experimentation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Infant Behavior ; Infants ; Information search ; Information search behavior ; Linear regression ; Logistic regression ; Logistics ; Meta Analysis ; Multilevel models ; Newborn. Infant ; Persistence ; Piagetian Theory ; Predictor Variables ; Predictors ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Regression analysis ; Research Replication ; Search Behavior ; Search tasks ; Systematic review ; Theories</subject><ispartof>Child development, 1999-11, Vol.70 (6), p.1297-1313</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 The Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Nov/Dec 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5205-e714435e7c60fdb262af329e2a7e8b47c54c76a1c53602b21dcc635d0b9784b43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1132307$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1132307$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27846,27901,27902,30976,30977,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ602150$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1208179$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marcovitch, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zelazo, Philip David</creatorcontrib><title>The A-Not-B Error: Results from a Logistic Meta-Analysis</title><title>Child development</title><description>A meta-analysis of the A-not-B error was conducted using logistic regression on studies conducted before September 1997 (107 data points). An earlier meta-analysis by Wellman, Cross, and Bartsch revealed that age, delay between hiding and retrieval, and number of hiding locations were significant predictors of both the proportion of infants who searched correctly on B trials and the proportion of infants who searched perseveratively. The current analysis replicated these findings with two exceptions: (1) The number of trials at the A location was a significant predictor, and (2) the number of locations was a significant predictor of the proportion of infants who searched perseveratively, but not the proportion of infants who searched correctly. Implications of these findings are discussed and a quantitative version of a hierarchical competing-systems model of infant search is proposed.</description><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Cognition and Language</subject><subject>Cognitive Development</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Error Patterns</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Infant Behavior</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Information search</subject><subject>Information search behavior</subject><subject>Linear regression</subject><subject>Logistic regression</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Multilevel models</subject><subject>Newborn. Infant</subject><subject>Persistence</subject><subject>Piagetian Theory</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Predictors</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Research Replication</subject><subject>Search Behavior</subject><subject>Search tasks</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Theories</subject><issn>0009-3920</issn><issn>1467-8624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtvEzEUha0KpIbSNRsWI6jYufXbY3ZpCAEUwqu03VkexwOTTuLiOxHk3-N0olRCqvDG8j3ffR0j9IySU5rPGRVK41IxcUoIMfIADfaRR2iwjWFuGDlETwAW-cmU4QNUXvwMxRDPYofPi3FKMb0uvgZYtx0UdYrLwhXT-KOBrvHFx9A5PFy5dgMNPEWPa9dCON7dR-j72_HF6B2efpq8Hw2n2EtGJA6aCsFl0F6Rel4xxVzNmQnM6VBWQnspvFaOeskVYRWjc-8Vl3NSGV2KSvAj9Kqve5vir3WAzi4b8KFt3SrENViplRJK0Qy--AdcxHXK04KlppQlk0Rn6OWDkOKCaGJMmamznvIpAqRQ29vULF3aWErs1my7tdZurbV3ZueMk11dB961dXIr38B9GiMl1SZjz3sspMbv1fGHvDqVJMuil383bdj8r6kdvRlf9s13VRfQxXSfRjnjdzvjXs6_GP7sZZdurNJcS3s1m9irb58n1zP1xQr-F1YGqo4</recordid><startdate>199911</startdate><enddate>199911</enddate><creator>Marcovitch, Stuart</creator><creator>Zelazo, Philip David</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishers</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>University of Chicago Press for the Society for Research in Child Development, etc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199911</creationdate><title>The A-Not-B Error: Results from a Logistic Meta-Analysis</title><author>Marcovitch, Stuart ; Zelazo, Philip David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5205-e714435e7c60fdb262af329e2a7e8b47c54c76a1c53602b21dcc635d0b9784b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Cognition and Language</topic><topic>Cognitive Development</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Error Patterns</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Infant Behavior</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Information search</topic><topic>Information search behavior</topic><topic>Linear regression</topic><topic>Logistic regression</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Multilevel models</topic><topic>Newborn. Infant</topic><topic>Persistence</topic><topic>Piagetian Theory</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Predictors</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Research Replication</topic><topic>Search Behavior</topic><topic>Search tasks</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Theories</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marcovitch, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zelazo, Philip David</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Child development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marcovitch, Stuart</au><au>Zelazo, Philip David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ602150</ericid><atitle>The A-Not-B Error: Results from a Logistic Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Child development</jtitle><date>1999-11</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1297</spage><epage>1313</epage><pages>1297-1313</pages><issn>0009-3920</issn><eissn>1467-8624</eissn><coden>CHDEAW</coden><abstract>A meta-analysis of the A-not-B error was conducted using logistic regression on studies conducted before September 1997 (107 data points). An earlier meta-analysis by Wellman, Cross, and Bartsch revealed that age, delay between hiding and retrieval, and number of hiding locations were significant predictors of both the proportion of infants who searched correctly on B trials and the proportion of infants who searched perseveratively. The current analysis replicated these findings with two exceptions: (1) The number of trials at the A location was a significant predictor, and (2) the number of locations was a significant predictor of the proportion of infants who searched perseveratively, but not the proportion of infants who searched correctly. Implications of these findings are discussed and a quantitative version of a hierarchical competing-systems model of infant search is proposed.</abstract><cop>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-8624.00095</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-3920
ispartof Child development, 1999-11, Vol.70 (6), p.1297-1313
issn 0009-3920
1467-8624
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57664661
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source (EBSCOhost); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Age Differences
Babies
Behavior
Biological and medical sciences
Child development
Cognition and Language
Cognitive Development
Datasets
Developmental psychology
Error Patterns
Errors
Experimentation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Infant Behavior
Infants
Information search
Information search behavior
Linear regression
Logistic regression
Logistics
Meta Analysis
Multilevel models
Newborn. Infant
Persistence
Piagetian Theory
Predictor Variables
Predictors
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Regression analysis
Research Replication
Search Behavior
Search tasks
Systematic review
Theories
title The A-Not-B Error: Results from a Logistic Meta-Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T02%3A06%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20A-Not-B%20Error:%20Results%20from%20a%20Logistic%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Child%20development&rft.au=Marcovitch,%20Stuart&rft.date=1999-11&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1297&rft.epage=1313&rft.pages=1297-1313&rft.issn=0009-3920&rft.eissn=1467-8624&rft.coden=CHDEAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-8624.00095&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1132307%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1634070998&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ602150&rft_jstor_id=1132307&rfr_iscdi=true