Do Husbands and Wives Pool Their Resources? Evidence from the United Kingdom Child Benefit
Common preference models of family behavior imply income pooling, a restriction on family demand functions such that only the sum of husband's income and wife's income affects the allocation of goods and time. Testing the pooling hypothesis is difficult because most family income sources a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of human resources 1997-07, Vol.32 (3), p.463-480 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 480 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 463 |
container_title | The Journal of human resources |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Lundberg, Shelly J. Pollak, Robert A. Wales, Terence J. |
description | Common preference models of family behavior imply income pooling, a restriction on family demand functions such that only the sum of husband's income and wife's income affects the allocation of goods and time. Testing the pooling hypothesis is difficult because most family income sources are not exogenous to the allocations being analyzed. In this paper, we present an alternative test based on a "natural experiment"-a policy change in the United Kingdom that transferred a substantial child allowance to wives in the late 1970s. Using Family Expenditure Survey data, we find strong evidence that a shift toward greater expenditures on women's clothing and children's clothing relative to men's clothing coincided with this income redistribution. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/146179 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57638418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A19909693</galeid><jstor_id>146179</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A19909693</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-f5808c895d05102264f0f477a123c3a95dcba87e6e164c54ae7e6d025b697bb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1LwzAUhoMoOL9-Q1DwymrSpkl6JTo_JgqKKIo3JU1Pt4yumUk38N97ZIIgSg7JyctDeN8cQvY4O04zpk64kFwVa2TAc6ETzZhYJwPG0jThUr5ukq0YpwzvPBMD8nbh6WgRK9PVkeJGX9wSIn3wvqVPE3CBPkL0i2AhntLLpauhs0Cb4Ge0nwB97lwPNb113bhGaThxbU3PoYPG9TtkozFthN3vc5s8X10-DUfJ3f31zfDsLrFCpX3S5Jppq4u8ZjlHl1I0rBFKGZ5mNjOo28poBRK4FDYXBrCvWZpXslBVJbNtcrh6dx78-wJiX85ctNC2pgO_iGWuZKYF1wju_wKnmKxDb2XKUqmV5hyhg_8g_FUskQmG1NGKGpsWStc1vg_GjjF4MK3_io_yGS8KVsgiQzz5A8dVw8zZv_jvSDb4GAM05Ty4mQkfJWfl15DL1ZB_3E5j78N_1CeslKBE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>202687811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Husbands and Wives Pool Their Resources? Evidence from the United Kingdom Child Benefit</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Lundberg, Shelly J. ; Pollak, Robert A. ; Wales, Terence J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Shelly J. ; Pollak, Robert A. ; Wales, Terence J.</creatorcontrib><description>Common preference models of family behavior imply income pooling, a restriction on family demand functions such that only the sum of husband's income and wife's income affects the allocation of goods and time. Testing the pooling hypothesis is difficult because most family income sources are not exogenous to the allocations being analyzed. In this paper, we present an alternative test based on a "natural experiment"-a policy change in the United Kingdom that transferred a substantial child allowance to wives in the late 1970s. Using Family Expenditure Survey data, we find strong evidence that a shift toward greater expenditures on women's clothing and children's clothing relative to men's clothing coincided with this income redistribution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-166X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-8004</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/146179</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHREA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: University of Wisconsin Press</publisher><subject>Bargaining ; Child benefit ; Child welfare ; Children ; Children & youth ; Childrens clothing ; Consumer behavior ; Consumer spending ; Consumption ; Cost control ; Demand curves ; Dining Facilities ; Earnings ; Economic models ; Economic Research ; Evidence ; Expenditures ; Experiments ; Families & family life ; Family income ; Finance ; Households ; Human resources ; Husband and wife ; Husbands ; Hypotheses ; Income distribution ; Income redistribution ; Income taxes ; Labor supply ; Married couples ; Married people ; Meals ; Men ; Personal finance ; Poolings of interest ; Preferences ; Prices ; Resource allocation ; Resources ; Restaurants ; Sexes ; Sharing ; Spouses ; Studies ; Tax benefits ; Transfer Policy ; Unearned income ; United Kingdom ; Wage rates ; Wages ; Wives</subject><ispartof>The Journal of human resources, 1997-07, Vol.32 (3), p.463-480</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1995 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1997 University of Wisconsin Press</rights><rights>Copyright University of Wisconsin Press Summer 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-f5808c895d05102264f0f477a123c3a95dcba87e6e164c54ae7e6d025b697bb63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/146179$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/146179$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,27874,27929,27930,31005,58022,58255</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Shelly J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollak, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wales, Terence J.</creatorcontrib><title>Do Husbands and Wives Pool Their Resources? Evidence from the United Kingdom Child Benefit</title><title>The Journal of human resources</title><description>Common preference models of family behavior imply income pooling, a restriction on family demand functions such that only the sum of husband's income and wife's income affects the allocation of goods and time. Testing the pooling hypothesis is difficult because most family income sources are not exogenous to the allocations being analyzed. In this paper, we present an alternative test based on a "natural experiment"-a policy change in the United Kingdom that transferred a substantial child allowance to wives in the late 1970s. Using Family Expenditure Survey data, we find strong evidence that a shift toward greater expenditures on women's clothing and children's clothing relative to men's clothing coincided with this income redistribution.</description><subject>Bargaining</subject><subject>Child benefit</subject><subject>Child welfare</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Childrens clothing</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumer spending</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Demand curves</subject><subject>Dining Facilities</subject><subject>Earnings</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic Research</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Family income</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Human resources</subject><subject>Husband and wife</subject><subject>Husbands</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Income redistribution</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Labor supply</subject><subject>Married couples</subject><subject>Married people</subject><subject>Meals</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Personal finance</subject><subject>Poolings of interest</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Resource allocation</subject><subject>Resources</subject><subject>Restaurants</subject><subject>Sexes</subject><subject>Sharing</subject><subject>Spouses</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax benefits</subject><subject>Transfer Policy</subject><subject>Unearned income</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Wage rates</subject><subject>Wages</subject><subject>Wives</subject><issn>0022-166X</issn><issn>1548-8004</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1LwzAUhoMoOL9-Q1DwymrSpkl6JTo_JgqKKIo3JU1Pt4yumUk38N97ZIIgSg7JyctDeN8cQvY4O04zpk64kFwVa2TAc6ETzZhYJwPG0jThUr5ukq0YpwzvPBMD8nbh6WgRK9PVkeJGX9wSIn3wvqVPE3CBPkL0i2AhntLLpauhs0Cb4Ge0nwB97lwPNb113bhGaThxbU3PoYPG9TtkozFthN3vc5s8X10-DUfJ3f31zfDsLrFCpX3S5Jppq4u8ZjlHl1I0rBFKGZ5mNjOo28poBRK4FDYXBrCvWZpXslBVJbNtcrh6dx78-wJiX85ctNC2pgO_iGWuZKYF1wju_wKnmKxDb2XKUqmV5hyhg_8g_FUskQmG1NGKGpsWStc1vg_GjjF4MK3_io_yGS8KVsgiQzz5A8dVw8zZv_jvSDb4GAM05Ty4mQkfJWfl15DL1ZB_3E5j78N_1CeslKBE</recordid><startdate>19970701</startdate><enddate>19970701</enddate><creator>Lundberg, Shelly J.</creator><creator>Pollak, Robert A.</creator><creator>Wales, Terence J.</creator><general>University of Wisconsin Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970701</creationdate><title>Do Husbands and Wives Pool Their Resources? Evidence from the United Kingdom Child Benefit</title><author>Lundberg, Shelly J. ; Pollak, Robert A. ; Wales, Terence J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-f5808c895d05102264f0f477a123c3a95dcba87e6e164c54ae7e6d025b697bb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Bargaining</topic><topic>Child benefit</topic><topic>Child welfare</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Childrens clothing</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumer spending</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Demand curves</topic><topic>Dining Facilities</topic><topic>Earnings</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic Research</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Family income</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Human resources</topic><topic>Husband and wife</topic><topic>Husbands</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Income redistribution</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Labor supply</topic><topic>Married couples</topic><topic>Married people</topic><topic>Meals</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Personal finance</topic><topic>Poolings of interest</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Resource allocation</topic><topic>Resources</topic><topic>Restaurants</topic><topic>Sexes</topic><topic>Sharing</topic><topic>Spouses</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax benefits</topic><topic>Transfer Policy</topic><topic>Unearned income</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Wage rates</topic><topic>Wages</topic><topic>Wives</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Shelly J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollak, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wales, Terence J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of human resources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lundberg, Shelly J.</au><au>Pollak, Robert A.</au><au>Wales, Terence J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Husbands and Wives Pool Their Resources? Evidence from the United Kingdom Child Benefit</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of human resources</jtitle><date>1997-07-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>463</spage><epage>480</epage><pages>463-480</pages><issn>0022-166X</issn><eissn>1548-8004</eissn><coden>JHREA9</coden><abstract>Common preference models of family behavior imply income pooling, a restriction on family demand functions such that only the sum of husband's income and wife's income affects the allocation of goods and time. Testing the pooling hypothesis is difficult because most family income sources are not exogenous to the allocations being analyzed. In this paper, we present an alternative test based on a "natural experiment"-a policy change in the United Kingdom that transferred a substantial child allowance to wives in the late 1970s. Using Family Expenditure Survey data, we find strong evidence that a shift toward greater expenditures on women's clothing and children's clothing relative to men's clothing coincided with this income redistribution.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>University of Wisconsin Press</pub><doi>10.2307/146179</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-166X |
ispartof | The Journal of human resources, 1997-07, Vol.32 (3), p.463-480 |
issn | 0022-166X 1548-8004 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57638418 |
source | Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Bargaining Child benefit Child welfare Children Children & youth Childrens clothing Consumer behavior Consumer spending Consumption Cost control Demand curves Dining Facilities Earnings Economic models Economic Research Evidence Expenditures Experiments Families & family life Family income Finance Households Human resources Husband and wife Husbands Hypotheses Income distribution Income redistribution Income taxes Labor supply Married couples Married people Meals Men Personal finance Poolings of interest Preferences Prices Resource allocation Resources Restaurants Sexes Sharing Spouses Studies Tax benefits Transfer Policy Unearned income United Kingdom Wage rates Wages Wives |
title | Do Husbands and Wives Pool Their Resources? Evidence from the United Kingdom Child Benefit |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T11%3A33%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Husbands%20and%20Wives%20Pool%20Their%20Resources?%20Evidence%20from%20the%20United%20Kingdom%20Child%20Benefit&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20human%20resources&rft.au=Lundberg,%20Shelly%20J.&rft.date=1997-07-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=463&rft.epage=480&rft.pages=463-480&rft.issn=0022-166X&rft.eissn=1548-8004&rft.coden=JHREA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/146179&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA19909693%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=202687811&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A19909693&rft_jstor_id=146179&rfr_iscdi=true |