Evaluating three models of intimate relationships
The models evaluated are attachment, elementary pragmatic, and selfhood. Three instruments were constructed to evaluate the validity of each model. One convenience group of functioning individuals and three experimental groups of inpatients and outpatients were administered the three instruments. Al...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Contemporary family therapy 2000-03, Vol.22 (1), p.103-122 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 122 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 103 |
| container_title | Contemporary family therapy |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | L'ABATE, L DE GIACOMO, P MCCARTY, F DE GIACOMO, A VERRASTRO, G |
| description | The models evaluated are attachment, elementary pragmatic, and selfhood. Three instruments were constructed to evaluate the validity of each model. One convenience group of functioning individuals and three experimental groups of inpatients and outpatients were administered the three instruments. All three instruments showed relatively high internal consistency and discriminated among the four groups. Significant correlations were found among the measure of attachment with measures of the pragmatic elementary and selfhood models, indicating that all three instruments were measuring similar aspects of intimate relationships. (Original abstract - amended) |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1007726717603 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57631979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57631979</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-f1f452309aea0711878fd4a3f8b50d634634596b90166af2e72279d4e438f2de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzjtLxEAUBeApFFxXa9sUYhe987wZu2VZH7Bgo3WYTe64kcnDmYngvzfgwoHTfBwOYzcc7jkI-bB55ACIwiBHA_KMraCyohRo1AW7TOkLACxKvWJ89-PC7HI3fBb5GImKfmwppGL0RTfkrneZikhhEeOQjt2Urti5dyHR9anX7ONp9759Kfdvz6_bzb5shLa59NwrLSRYRw6Q8wor3yonfXXQ0BqplmhrDha4Mc4LQiHQtoqUrLxoSa7Z3f_uFMfvmVKu-y41FIIbaJxTrdFIbtEu8PYEXWpc8NENTZfqKS7n42_NpQAOKP8AOQhRbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57631979</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating three models of intimate relationships</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>L'ABATE, L ; DE GIACOMO, P ; MCCARTY, F ; DE GIACOMO, A ; VERRASTRO, G</creator><creatorcontrib>L'ABATE, L ; DE GIACOMO, P ; MCCARTY, F ; DE GIACOMO, A ; VERRASTRO, G</creatorcontrib><description>The models evaluated are attachment, elementary pragmatic, and selfhood. Three instruments were constructed to evaluate the validity of each model. One convenience group of functioning individuals and three experimental groups of inpatients and outpatients were administered the three instruments. All three instruments showed relatively high internal consistency and discriminated among the four groups. Significant correlations were found among the measure of attachment with measures of the pragmatic elementary and selfhood models, indicating that all three instruments were measuring similar aspects of intimate relationships. (Original abstract - amended)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-2764</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1007726717603</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CFTHE9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Springer</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Evaluation ; Family psychotherapy. Systemic therapy ; Intimate relationships ; Medical sciences ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychotherapies. Psychological and clinical counseling ; Techniques and methods ; Treatments</subject><ispartof>Contemporary family therapy, 2000-03, Vol.22 (1), p.103-122</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-f1f452309aea0711878fd4a3f8b50d634634596b90166af2e72279d4e438f2de3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1320107$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>L'ABATE, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE GIACOMO, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCCARTY, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE GIACOMO, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERRASTRO, G</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating three models of intimate relationships</title><title>Contemporary family therapy</title><description>The models evaluated are attachment, elementary pragmatic, and selfhood. Three instruments were constructed to evaluate the validity of each model. One convenience group of functioning individuals and three experimental groups of inpatients and outpatients were administered the three instruments. All three instruments showed relatively high internal consistency and discriminated among the four groups. Significant correlations were found among the measure of attachment with measures of the pragmatic elementary and selfhood models, indicating that all three instruments were measuring similar aspects of intimate relationships. (Original abstract - amended)</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Family psychotherapy. Systemic therapy</subject><subject>Intimate relationships</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychotherapies. Psychological and clinical counseling</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Treatments</subject><issn>0892-2764</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNotzjtLxEAUBeApFFxXa9sUYhe987wZu2VZH7Bgo3WYTe64kcnDmYngvzfgwoHTfBwOYzcc7jkI-bB55ACIwiBHA_KMraCyohRo1AW7TOkLACxKvWJ89-PC7HI3fBb5GImKfmwppGL0RTfkrneZikhhEeOQjt2Urti5dyHR9anX7ONp9759Kfdvz6_bzb5shLa59NwrLSRYRw6Q8wor3yonfXXQ0BqplmhrDha4Mc4LQiHQtoqUrLxoSa7Z3f_uFMfvmVKu-y41FIIbaJxTrdFIbtEu8PYEXWpc8NENTZfqKS7n42_NpQAOKP8AOQhRbg</recordid><startdate>20000301</startdate><enddate>20000301</enddate><creator>L'ABATE, L</creator><creator>DE GIACOMO, P</creator><creator>MCCARTY, F</creator><creator>DE GIACOMO, A</creator><creator>VERRASTRO, G</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000301</creationdate><title>Evaluating three models of intimate relationships</title><author>L'ABATE, L ; DE GIACOMO, P ; MCCARTY, F ; DE GIACOMO, A ; VERRASTRO, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-f1f452309aea0711878fd4a3f8b50d634634596b90166af2e72279d4e438f2de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Family psychotherapy. Systemic therapy</topic><topic>Intimate relationships</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychotherapies. Psychological and clinical counseling</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Treatments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>L'ABATE, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE GIACOMO, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCCARTY, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE GIACOMO, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERRASTRO, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Contemporary family therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>L'ABATE, L</au><au>DE GIACOMO, P</au><au>MCCARTY, F</au><au>DE GIACOMO, A</au><au>VERRASTRO, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating three models of intimate relationships</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary family therapy</jtitle><date>2000-03-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>103-122</pages><issn>0892-2764</issn><coden>CFTHE9</coden><abstract>The models evaluated are attachment, elementary pragmatic, and selfhood. Three instruments were constructed to evaluate the validity of each model. One convenience group of functioning individuals and three experimental groups of inpatients and outpatients were administered the three instruments. All three instruments showed relatively high internal consistency and discriminated among the four groups. Significant correlations were found among the measure of attachment with measures of the pragmatic elementary and selfhood models, indicating that all three instruments were measuring similar aspects of intimate relationships. (Original abstract - amended)</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1007726717603</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0892-2764 |
| ispartof | Contemporary family therapy, 2000-03, Vol.22 (1), p.103-122 |
| issn | 0892-2764 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57631979 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Evaluation Family psychotherapy. Systemic therapy Intimate relationships Medical sciences Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems Psychopathology. Psychiatry Psychotherapies. Psychological and clinical counseling Techniques and methods Treatments |
| title | Evaluating three models of intimate relationships |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A33%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20three%20models%20of%20intimate%20relationships&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20family%20therapy&rft.au=L'ABATE,%20L&rft.date=2000-03-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=103-122&rft.issn=0892-2764&rft.coden=CFTHE9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1007726717603&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E57631979%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57631979&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |