Cross-task consistency in strategy use and the relationship with intelligence
Two-hundred and forty-three Navy recruits participated in a study that examined the relationship between strategy use and intelligence. Each subject contributed ten enlistment aptitude and achievement scores, took eight additional paper-and-pencil aptitude and intelligence tests, and three computer-...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Intelligence (Norwood) 1994, Vol.18 (1), p.47-76 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 76 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 47 |
| container_title | Intelligence (Norwood) |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Alderton, David L. Larson, Gerald E. |
| description | Two-hundred and forty-three Navy recruits participated in a study that examined the relationship between strategy use and intelligence. Each subject contributed ten enlistment aptitude and achievement scores, took eight additional paper-and-pencil aptitude and intelligence tests, and three computer-administered tests. The computer tests were designed such that as item difficulty increased it became advantageous to strategically shift focus from one aspect of the items to another. Based on reaction time (RT) patterns it was possible to: (a) determine the point along the item difficulty continua where focus shifted, and (b) compare subjects' shift points with the logically optimal shift point. RTs from the computer tests were significantly intercorrelated and were related to psychometric test scores, particularly fluid intelligence. The strategy measures derived from the computer tests were statistically independent from one another and revealed no relationship with any of the psychometric tests. These results cast doubt on previous empirical research and theoretical arguments that strongly link strategy use and general intelligence. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0160-2896(94)90020-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57618356</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ492209</ericid><els_id>0160289694900205</els_id><sourcerecordid>7220323</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-b4720d01bf48b976e733f1cff696ff86307c6d048bdcf4bbd0bc65c9d83986d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kclKBDEQhoMoOC5v4KFRED20VjrpLBdBBlcUL3oO3Vmc6Ng9Jhll3t60M3gQ9BDqUN9fKb5CaA_DCQbMTvODshKSHUl6LAEqKOs1NMKCk5JLUq-j0Q-yibZifAGAGlMxQvfj0MdYpia-Frrvoo_JdnpR-K6IKTTJPi-KebRF05kiTWwR7LRJPoMTPys-fZpkMtnp1D_nmN1BG66ZRru7qtvo6fLicXxd3j1c3YzP70pNMUllS3kFBnDrqGglZ5YT4rB2jknmnGAEuGYGctNoR9vWQKtZraURRApmKrKNDpdzZ6F_n9uY1JuPOq_RdLafR1VzhgWpWQb3f4Ev_Tx0eTdVAa2orATJ0MFfEOYSc8azvUzRJaUHY8E6NQv-rQkLhUENZ1CDYzU4VpKq7zOoOsf2ljEbvP6JXNzmryuQuX22amddH94GFbUfVBofrE7K9P7_-V_u9JdE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791767016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross-task consistency in strategy use and the relationship with intelligence</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Alderton, David L. ; Larson, Gerald E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alderton, David L. ; Larson, Gerald E.</creatorcontrib><description>Two-hundred and forty-three Navy recruits participated in a study that examined the relationship between strategy use and intelligence. Each subject contributed ten enlistment aptitude and achievement scores, took eight additional paper-and-pencil aptitude and intelligence tests, and three computer-administered tests. The computer tests were designed such that as item difficulty increased it became advantageous to strategically shift focus from one aspect of the items to another. Based on reaction time (RT) patterns it was possible to: (a) determine the point along the item difficulty continua where focus shifted, and (b) compare subjects' shift points with the logically optimal shift point. RTs from the computer tests were significantly intercorrelated and were related to psychometric test scores, particularly fluid intelligence. The strategy measures derived from the computer tests were statistically independent from one another and revealed no relationship with any of the psychometric tests. These results cast doubt on previous empirical research and theoretical arguments that strongly link strategy use and general intelligence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-2896</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0160-2896(94)90020-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NTLLDT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Norwood: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Achievement Tests ; American ; Aptitude Tests ; Computer Assisted Testing ; Consistency (Behavior) ; Intelligence ; Intelligence Tests ; Military Personnel ; Navies ; Paper and Pencil Tests ; Psychometrics ; Reaction Time ; Recruits ; Social research ; Strategies ; Strategy Choice</subject><ispartof>Intelligence (Norwood), 1994, Vol.18 (1), p.47-76</ispartof><rights>1994</rights><rights>Copyright Ablex Publishing Corporation Jan 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-b4720d01bf48b976e733f1cff696ff86307c6d048bdcf4bbd0bc65c9d83986d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-b4720d01bf48b976e733f1cff696ff86307c6d048bdcf4bbd0bc65c9d83986d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(94)90020-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27869,27923,27924,27925,30999,31000,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ492209$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alderton, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Gerald E.</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-task consistency in strategy use and the relationship with intelligence</title><title>Intelligence (Norwood)</title><description>Two-hundred and forty-three Navy recruits participated in a study that examined the relationship between strategy use and intelligence. Each subject contributed ten enlistment aptitude and achievement scores, took eight additional paper-and-pencil aptitude and intelligence tests, and three computer-administered tests. The computer tests were designed such that as item difficulty increased it became advantageous to strategically shift focus from one aspect of the items to another. Based on reaction time (RT) patterns it was possible to: (a) determine the point along the item difficulty continua where focus shifted, and (b) compare subjects' shift points with the logically optimal shift point. RTs from the computer tests were significantly intercorrelated and were related to psychometric test scores, particularly fluid intelligence. The strategy measures derived from the computer tests were statistically independent from one another and revealed no relationship with any of the psychometric tests. These results cast doubt on previous empirical research and theoretical arguments that strongly link strategy use and general intelligence.</description><subject>Achievement Tests</subject><subject>American</subject><subject>Aptitude Tests</subject><subject>Computer Assisted Testing</subject><subject>Consistency (Behavior)</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Intelligence Tests</subject><subject>Military Personnel</subject><subject>Navies</subject><subject>Paper and Pencil Tests</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Recruits</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Strategies</subject><subject>Strategy Choice</subject><issn>0160-2896</issn><issn>1873-7935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kclKBDEQhoMoOC5v4KFRED20VjrpLBdBBlcUL3oO3Vmc6Ng9Jhll3t60M3gQ9BDqUN9fKb5CaA_DCQbMTvODshKSHUl6LAEqKOs1NMKCk5JLUq-j0Q-yibZifAGAGlMxQvfj0MdYpia-Frrvoo_JdnpR-K6IKTTJPi-KebRF05kiTWwR7LRJPoMTPys-fZpkMtnp1D_nmN1BG66ZRru7qtvo6fLicXxd3j1c3YzP70pNMUllS3kFBnDrqGglZ5YT4rB2jknmnGAEuGYGctNoR9vWQKtZraURRApmKrKNDpdzZ6F_n9uY1JuPOq_RdLafR1VzhgWpWQb3f4Ev_Tx0eTdVAa2orATJ0MFfEOYSc8azvUzRJaUHY8E6NQv-rQkLhUENZ1CDYzU4VpKq7zOoOsf2ljEbvP6JXNzmryuQuX22amddH94GFbUfVBofrE7K9P7_-V_u9JdE</recordid><startdate>1994</startdate><enddate>1994</enddate><creator>Alderton, David L.</creator><creator>Larson, Gerald E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Norwood, N.J. :Ablex Pub. Corp</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>S0M</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1994</creationdate><title>Cross-task consistency in strategy use and the relationship with intelligence</title><author>Alderton, David L. ; Larson, Gerald E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-b4720d01bf48b976e733f1cff696ff86307c6d048bdcf4bbd0bc65c9d83986d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Achievement Tests</topic><topic>American</topic><topic>Aptitude Tests</topic><topic>Computer Assisted Testing</topic><topic>Consistency (Behavior)</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Intelligence Tests</topic><topic>Military Personnel</topic><topic>Navies</topic><topic>Paper and Pencil Tests</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Recruits</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Strategies</topic><topic>Strategy Choice</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alderton, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Gerald E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 49</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Intelligence (Norwood)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alderton, David L.</au><au>Larson, Gerald E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ492209</ericid><atitle>Cross-task consistency in strategy use and the relationship with intelligence</atitle><jtitle>Intelligence (Norwood)</jtitle><date>1994</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>47-76</pages><issn>0160-2896</issn><eissn>1873-7935</eissn><coden>NTLLDT</coden><abstract>Two-hundred and forty-three Navy recruits participated in a study that examined the relationship between strategy use and intelligence. Each subject contributed ten enlistment aptitude and achievement scores, took eight additional paper-and-pencil aptitude and intelligence tests, and three computer-administered tests. The computer tests were designed such that as item difficulty increased it became advantageous to strategically shift focus from one aspect of the items to another. Based on reaction time (RT) patterns it was possible to: (a) determine the point along the item difficulty continua where focus shifted, and (b) compare subjects' shift points with the logically optimal shift point. RTs from the computer tests were significantly intercorrelated and were related to psychometric test scores, particularly fluid intelligence. The strategy measures derived from the computer tests were statistically independent from one another and revealed no relationship with any of the psychometric tests. These results cast doubt on previous empirical research and theoretical arguments that strongly link strategy use and general intelligence.</abstract><cop>Norwood</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/0160-2896(94)90020-5</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0160-2896 |
| ispartof | Intelligence (Norwood), 1994, Vol.18 (1), p.47-76 |
| issn | 0160-2896 1873-7935 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57618356 |
| source | Periodicals Index Online; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Achievement Tests American Aptitude Tests Computer Assisted Testing Consistency (Behavior) Intelligence Intelligence Tests Military Personnel Navies Paper and Pencil Tests Psychometrics Reaction Time Recruits Social research Strategies Strategy Choice |
| title | Cross-task consistency in strategy use and the relationship with intelligence |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T17%3A15%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-task%20consistency%20in%20strategy%20use%20and%20the%20relationship%20with%20intelligence&rft.jtitle=Intelligence%20(Norwood)&rft.au=Alderton,%20David%20L.&rft.date=1994&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=47-76&rft.issn=0160-2896&rft.eissn=1873-7935&rft.coden=NTLLDT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0160-2896(94)90020-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E7220323%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791767016&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ492209&rft_els_id=0160289694900205&rfr_iscdi=true |