The Cognitive Interview and Lie Detection: a New Magnifying Glass for Sherlock Holmes?
The observation of serious deficiencies in the traditional police interview led Geiselman and colleagues to develop an alternative method of questioning. This method is known as the cognitive interview. The CI starts from the premise that the witness, victim or suspect wishes to cooperate. But, what...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Applied cognitive psychology 1997-02, Vol.11 (1), p.55-68 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 68 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 55 |
| container_title | Applied cognitive psychology |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Hernández-Fernaud, Estefania Alonso-Quecuty, Marisa |
| description | The observation of serious deficiencies in the traditional police interview led Geiselman and colleagues to develop an alternative method of questioning. This method is known as the cognitive interview. The CI starts from the premise that the witness, victim or suspect wishes to cooperate. But, what happens if this is not the case? More seriously, what happens if he/she lies? The main aim of this study is to examine the differences between true and false statements, as a function of the interview technique employed (CI/STI). Participants were 73 students of the University of La Laguna. A 2×2 factorial design with the following variables was used: type of interview [traditional interview used in Spain by the Police (STI) and cognitive (CI)] and type of statement (true and false). The hypothesis was that the true and false accounts of witnesses would be qualitatively and quantitatively different independent of the type of interview used (STI/CI). Results confirmed the hypothesis. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199702)11:1<55::AID-ACP423>3.0.CO;2-G |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57582909</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57582909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3523-2cabd2e0e151f2280f1d4f79df9dc3a84f0ba797df03647e83307524358901b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdFu0zAUhiMEEmXwDpZAaLtIObbj2i4DVGVrWqmsoA52eeQmzuYtTYadbuvbk6pVLwBxZcn-_f1H54uiTxT6FIB9OF5M0-kJBa1jkAyOqdYS2AmlQ3oqxHA4mp7Fo_Rbwvhn3od-Ov_I4uxZ1Dv8eB71QCkVJ6DgZfQqhFsA0APKetHPyxtL0ua6dq17sGRat9Y_OPtITF2QmbPkzLY2b11TD4khF93DV9OFy42rr0lWmRBI2XiyuLG-avI7MmmqlQ1fXkcvSlMF-2Z_HkU_xueX6SSezbNpOprFOReMxyw3y4JZsFTQkjEFJS2SUuqi1EXOjUpKWBqpZVECHyTSKs5BCpZwoTTQJedH0fsd9943v9Y2tLhyIbdVZWrbrAMKKRTToLvg2z-Ct83a191sSJWUIDhXA34YM_dNCN6WeO_dyvgNUsCtC8StC9xuFrebxZ0LpBQpCoHYucCdC-QImM6RYdZx3-3bTchNVXpT5y4c4ExoSpXoYle72KOr7Oav7v9X_7N5f9OR4x3ZhdY-HcjG3-FAcinw6iJDuZhk4_T7GMf8NwmrtXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877053386</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Cognitive Interview and Lie Detection: a New Magnifying Glass for Sherlock Holmes?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Hernández-Fernaud, Estefania ; Alonso-Quecuty, Marisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Fernaud, Estefania ; Alonso-Quecuty, Marisa</creatorcontrib><description>The observation of serious deficiencies in the traditional police interview led Geiselman and colleagues to develop an alternative method of questioning. This method is known as the cognitive interview. The CI starts from the premise that the witness, victim or suspect wishes to cooperate. But, what happens if this is not the case? More seriously, what happens if he/she lies? The main aim of this study is to examine the differences between true and false statements, as a function of the interview technique employed (CI/STI). Participants were 73 students of the University of La Laguna. A 2×2 factorial design with the following variables was used: type of interview [traditional interview used in Spain by the Police (STI) and cognitive (CI)] and type of statement (true and false). The hypothesis was that the true and false accounts of witnesses would be qualitatively and quantitatively different independent of the type of interview used (STI/CI). Results confirmed the hypothesis. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-4080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0720</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199702)11:1<55::AID-ACP423>3.0.CO;2-G</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognitive interviews ; Eyewitnesses ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Lie detection ; Miscellaneous ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><ispartof>Applied cognitive psychology, 1997-02, Vol.11 (1), p.55-68</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291099-0720%28199702%2911%3A1%3C55%3A%3AAID-ACP423%3E3.0.CO%3B2-G$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291099-0720%28199702%2911%3A1%3C55%3A%3AAID-ACP423%3E3.0.CO%3B2-G$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27848,27903,27904,30979,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2591185$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Fernaud, Estefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Quecuty, Marisa</creatorcontrib><title>The Cognitive Interview and Lie Detection: a New Magnifying Glass for Sherlock Holmes?</title><title>Applied cognitive psychology</title><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><description>The observation of serious deficiencies in the traditional police interview led Geiselman and colleagues to develop an alternative method of questioning. This method is known as the cognitive interview. The CI starts from the premise that the witness, victim or suspect wishes to cooperate. But, what happens if this is not the case? More seriously, what happens if he/she lies? The main aim of this study is to examine the differences between true and false statements, as a function of the interview technique employed (CI/STI). Participants were 73 students of the University of La Laguna. A 2×2 factorial design with the following variables was used: type of interview [traditional interview used in Spain by the Police (STI) and cognitive (CI)] and type of statement (true and false). The hypothesis was that the true and false accounts of witnesses would be qualitatively and quantitatively different independent of the type of interview used (STI/CI). Results confirmed the hypothesis. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Applied psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognitive interviews</subject><subject>Eyewitnesses</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Lie detection</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><issn>0888-4080</issn><issn>1099-0720</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kdFu0zAUhiMEEmXwDpZAaLtIObbj2i4DVGVrWqmsoA52eeQmzuYtTYadbuvbk6pVLwBxZcn-_f1H54uiTxT6FIB9OF5M0-kJBa1jkAyOqdYS2AmlQ3oqxHA4mp7Fo_Rbwvhn3od-Ov_I4uxZ1Dv8eB71QCkVJ6DgZfQqhFsA0APKetHPyxtL0ua6dq17sGRat9Y_OPtITF2QmbPkzLY2b11TD4khF93DV9OFy42rr0lWmRBI2XiyuLG-avI7MmmqlQ1fXkcvSlMF-2Z_HkU_xueX6SSezbNpOprFOReMxyw3y4JZsFTQkjEFJS2SUuqi1EXOjUpKWBqpZVECHyTSKs5BCpZwoTTQJedH0fsd9943v9Y2tLhyIbdVZWrbrAMKKRTToLvg2z-Ct83a191sSJWUIDhXA34YM_dNCN6WeO_dyvgNUsCtC8StC9xuFrebxZ0LpBQpCoHYucCdC-QImM6RYdZx3-3bTchNVXpT5y4c4ExoSpXoYle72KOr7Oav7v9X_7N5f9OR4x3ZhdY-HcjG3-FAcinw6iJDuZhk4_T7GMf8NwmrtXQ</recordid><startdate>199702</startdate><enddate>199702</enddate><creator>Hernández-Fernaud, Estefania</creator><creator>Alonso-Quecuty, Marisa</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199702</creationdate><title>The Cognitive Interview and Lie Detection: a New Magnifying Glass for Sherlock Holmes?</title><author>Hernández-Fernaud, Estefania ; Alonso-Quecuty, Marisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3523-2cabd2e0e151f2280f1d4f79df9dc3a84f0ba797df03647e83307524358901b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Applied psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognitive interviews</topic><topic>Eyewitnesses</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Lie detection</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Fernaud, Estefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Quecuty, Marisa</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hernández-Fernaud, Estefania</au><au>Alonso-Quecuty, Marisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Cognitive Interview and Lie Detection: a New Magnifying Glass for Sherlock Holmes?</atitle><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><date>1997-02</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>55-68</pages><issn>0888-4080</issn><eissn>1099-0720</eissn><abstract>The observation of serious deficiencies in the traditional police interview led Geiselman and colleagues to develop an alternative method of questioning. This method is known as the cognitive interview. The CI starts from the premise that the witness, victim or suspect wishes to cooperate. But, what happens if this is not the case? More seriously, what happens if he/she lies? The main aim of this study is to examine the differences between true and false statements, as a function of the interview technique employed (CI/STI). Participants were 73 students of the University of La Laguna. A 2×2 factorial design with the following variables was used: type of interview [traditional interview used in Spain by the Police (STI) and cognitive (CI)] and type of statement (true and false). The hypothesis was that the true and false accounts of witnesses would be qualitatively and quantitatively different independent of the type of interview used (STI/CI). Results confirmed the hypothesis. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>West Sussex</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199702)11:1<55::AID-ACP423>3.0.CO;2-G</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0888-4080 |
| ispartof | Applied cognitive psychology, 1997-02, Vol.11 (1), p.55-68 |
| issn | 0888-4080 1099-0720 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57582909 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Applied psychology Biological and medical sciences Cognitive interviews Eyewitnesses Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Lie detection Miscellaneous Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology |
| title | The Cognitive Interview and Lie Detection: a New Magnifying Glass for Sherlock Holmes? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T19%3A50%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Cognitive%20Interview%20and%20Lie%20Detection:%20a%20New%20Magnifying%20Glass%20for%20Sherlock%20Holmes?&rft.jtitle=Applied%20cognitive%20psychology&rft.au=Hern%C3%A1ndez-Fernaud,%20Estefania&rft.date=1997-02&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=55-68&rft.issn=0888-4080&rft.eissn=1099-0720&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199702)11:1%3C55::AID-ACP423%3E3.0.CO;2-G&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57582909%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877053386&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |