Selfreported versus behavioral selfhandicapping: empirical evidence for a theoretical distinction
Examined how subjects would respond when given a choice between 2 methods of selfhandicapping. Results suggest a preference for selfreporting selfhandicapping, and sex differences are apparent. Reasons for choice of selfhandicap are presented, together with accounts of sex differences. JGW
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of personality and social psychology 1991-12, Vol.61 (Dec 91), p.981-991 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 991 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | Dec 91 |
| container_start_page | 981 |
| container_title | Journal of personality and social psychology |
| container_volume | 61 |
| creator | Hirt, E R Deppe, R K Gordon, L J |
| description | Examined how subjects would respond when given a choice between 2 methods of selfhandicapping. Results suggest a preference for selfreporting selfhandicapping, and sex differences are apparent. Reasons for choice of selfhandicap are presented, together with accounts of sex differences. JGW |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57579725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57579725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_575797253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNiksKwjAUALNQsH7ukJW7Qkwbim5Fca97icmrfZImMS_t-S3iAVwNw8yMFUJIWVZqVy_YkuglhKiVlAXTV3BtghhSBstHSDQQf0CnRwxJO05T7rS3aHSM6J8HDn3ENKnjMKIFb4C3IXHNcwchQf4mi5TRm4zBr9m81Y5g8-OKbc-n2_FSxhTeA1C-90gGnNMewkB31ahm30hV_T1-AF--SWc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57579725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selfreported versus behavioral selfhandicapping: empirical evidence for a theoretical distinction</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Hirt, E R ; Deppe, R K ; Gordon, L J</creator><creatorcontrib>Hirt, E R ; Deppe, R K ; Gordon, L J</creatorcontrib><description>Examined how subjects would respond when given a choice between 2 methods of selfhandicapping. Results suggest a preference for selfreporting selfhandicapping, and sex differences are apparent. Reasons for choice of selfhandicap are presented, together with accounts of sex differences. JGW</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPSPB2</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Behaviour ; Comparison ; Selfhandicapping strategies ; Selfreport</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 1991-12, Vol.61 (Dec 91), p.981-991</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,30977</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hirt, E R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deppe, R K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, L J</creatorcontrib><title>Selfreported versus behavioral selfhandicapping: empirical evidence for a theoretical distinction</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><description>Examined how subjects would respond when given a choice between 2 methods of selfhandicapping. Results suggest a preference for selfreporting selfhandicapping, and sex differences are apparent. Reasons for choice of selfhandicap are presented, together with accounts of sex differences. JGW</description><subject>Behaviour</subject><subject>Comparison</subject><subject>Selfhandicapping strategies</subject><subject>Selfreport</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNiksKwjAUALNQsH7ukJW7Qkwbim5Fca97icmrfZImMS_t-S3iAVwNw8yMFUJIWVZqVy_YkuglhKiVlAXTV3BtghhSBstHSDQQf0CnRwxJO05T7rS3aHSM6J8HDn3ENKnjMKIFb4C3IXHNcwchQf4mi5TRm4zBr9m81Y5g8-OKbc-n2_FSxhTeA1C-90gGnNMewkB31ahm30hV_T1-AF--SWc</recordid><startdate>19911201</startdate><enddate>19911201</enddate><creator>Hirt, E R</creator><creator>Deppe, R K</creator><creator>Gordon, L J</creator><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19911201</creationdate><title>Selfreported versus behavioral selfhandicapping: empirical evidence for a theoretical distinction</title><author>Hirt, E R ; Deppe, R K ; Gordon, L J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_575797253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Behaviour</topic><topic>Comparison</topic><topic>Selfhandicapping strategies</topic><topic>Selfreport</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hirt, E R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deppe, R K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, L J</creatorcontrib><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hirt, E R</au><au>Deppe, R K</au><au>Gordon, L J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selfreported versus behavioral selfhandicapping: empirical evidence for a theoretical distinction</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><date>1991-12-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>Dec 91</issue><spage>981</spage><epage>991</epage><pages>981-991</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><coden>JPSPB2</coden><abstract>Examined how subjects would respond when given a choice between 2 methods of selfhandicapping. Results suggest a preference for selfreporting selfhandicapping, and sex differences are apparent. Reasons for choice of selfhandicap are presented, together with accounts of sex differences. JGW</abstract></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-3514 |
| ispartof | Journal of personality and social psychology, 1991-12, Vol.61 (Dec 91), p.981-991 |
| issn | 0022-3514 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57579725 |
| source | APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Behaviour Comparison Selfhandicapping strategies Selfreport |
| title | Selfreported versus behavioral selfhandicapping: empirical evidence for a theoretical distinction |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A37%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selfreported%20versus%20behavioral%20selfhandicapping:%20empirical%20evidence%20for%20a%20theoretical%20distinction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Hirt,%20E%20R&rft.date=1991-12-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=Dec%2091&rft.spage=981&rft.epage=991&rft.pages=981-991&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.coden=JPSPB2&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E57579725%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57579725&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |