Dealing with Design Failures in Randomized Field Experiments: Analytic Issues Regarding the Evaluation of Treatment Effects
With an increasing number of criminal justice scholars conducting randomized field experiments, there are several analytic issues related to such studies that our discipline must begin to address more systematically. For example, treatment dilution and treatment migration are common forms of randomi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of research in crime and delinquency 1995-11, Vol.32 (4), p.425-445 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 445 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 425 |
| container_title | The journal of research in crime and delinquency |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | GARTIN, PATRICK R. |
| description | With an increasing number of criminal justice scholars conducting randomized field experiments, there are several analytic issues related to such studies that our discipline must begin to address more systematically. For example, treatment dilution and treatment migration are common forms of randomization implementation failure in field experiments, and a review of the criminological literature on experiments reveals a lack of consensus as to how these problems should be handled when evaluating treatment effects. In addition, issues related to statistical power and desired sample size remain unresolved. Given the relatively longer history of dealing with these issues in medicine, literature from that field is reviewed, providing additional insights regarding the dilemmas created by various design failures in randomized field experiments. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0022427895032004003 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57523211</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ521153</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0022427895032004003</sage_id><sourcerecordid>8717916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-5f4227391932774e38a704b5038519fb03338a16802a6dc768706c732e34b92b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQha0KJJbSX9AerCJxC4zHdpxwq9psKaqEVBWJW-RNJltX2WSxHaDlz-NoUYUqoL5Y8nzvjWceY4cC3gphzDsARIWmKDVIBFAAco8thNaYGSm-PGOLmchm5AV7GcItpINFvmA_z8j2bljz7y7e8DMKbj3wpXX95ClwN_ArO7Tjxt1Ty5eO-pZXP7bk3YaGGN7zk8H2d9E1_CKEKQmuaG19O_vFG-LVN9tPNrpx4GPHrz3ZOOt41XXUxPCKPe9sH-jg973PPi-r69MP2eWn84vTk8uskUrETHcK0chSlBKNUSQLa0Ct0qiFFmW3AinTk8gLQJu3jckLA3ljJJJUqxJXcp-92flu_fg1_TLWGxca6ns70DiFWhuNEoV4EpRFCSZXmMDjR-DtOPm0i1CLslASEUyCXv8TwhJRpuRmK7mjGj-G4Kmrt2m71t_VAuo53Pov4SbV0U6VomgeFNVHncbQcxl25WDX9Efb_zj-AoeeqvE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292231772</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dealing with Design Failures in Randomized Field Experiments: Analytic Issues Regarding the Evaluation of Treatment Effects</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>GARTIN, PATRICK R.</creator><creatorcontrib>GARTIN, PATRICK R.</creatorcontrib><description>With an increasing number of criminal justice scholars conducting randomized field experiments, there are several analytic issues related to such studies that our discipline must begin to address more systematically. For example, treatment dilution and treatment migration are common forms of randomization implementation failure in field experiments, and a review of the criminological literature on experiments reveals a lack of consensus as to how these problems should be handled when evaluating treatment effects. In addition, issues related to statistical power and desired sample size remain unresolved. Given the relatively longer history of dealing with these issues in medicine, literature from that field is reviewed, providing additional insights regarding the dilemmas created by various design failures in randomized field experiments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4278</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-731X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0022427895032004003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JRCDB2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Beverley Hills, Calif: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Correctional Rehabilitation ; Crime ; Criminal Justice ; Criminals ; Criminology ; Data analysis ; Delinquency ; Design ; Evaluation ; Experiments ; Failure ; Failure analysis ; Field study ; Health care ; Randomization ; Randomized controlled trials ; Randomized Experiments ; Research Methodology ; Responses</subject><ispartof>The journal of research in crime and delinquency, 1995-11, Vol.32 (4), p.425-445</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Nov 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-5f4227391932774e38a704b5038519fb03338a16802a6dc768706c732e34b92b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-5f4227391932774e38a704b5038519fb03338a16802a6dc768706c732e34b92b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0022427895032004003$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022427895032004003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27846,27901,27902,30977,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ521153$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GARTIN, PATRICK R.</creatorcontrib><title>Dealing with Design Failures in Randomized Field Experiments: Analytic Issues Regarding the Evaluation of Treatment Effects</title><title>The journal of research in crime and delinquency</title><description>With an increasing number of criminal justice scholars conducting randomized field experiments, there are several analytic issues related to such studies that our discipline must begin to address more systematically. For example, treatment dilution and treatment migration are common forms of randomization implementation failure in field experiments, and a review of the criminological literature on experiments reveals a lack of consensus as to how these problems should be handled when evaluating treatment effects. In addition, issues related to statistical power and desired sample size remain unresolved. Given the relatively longer history of dealing with these issues in medicine, literature from that field is reviewed, providing additional insights regarding the dilemmas created by various design failures in randomized field experiments.</description><subject>Correctional Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Criminal Justice</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>Criminology</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Delinquency</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Failure analysis</subject><subject>Field study</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Randomized controlled trials</subject><subject>Randomized Experiments</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Responses</subject><issn>0022-4278</issn><issn>1552-731X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQha0KJJbSX9AerCJxC4zHdpxwq9psKaqEVBWJW-RNJltX2WSxHaDlz-NoUYUqoL5Y8nzvjWceY4cC3gphzDsARIWmKDVIBFAAco8thNaYGSm-PGOLmchm5AV7GcItpINFvmA_z8j2bljz7y7e8DMKbj3wpXX95ClwN_ArO7Tjxt1Ty5eO-pZXP7bk3YaGGN7zk8H2d9E1_CKEKQmuaG19O_vFG-LVN9tPNrpx4GPHrz3ZOOt41XXUxPCKPe9sH-jg973PPi-r69MP2eWn84vTk8uskUrETHcK0chSlBKNUSQLa0Ct0qiFFmW3AinTk8gLQJu3jckLA3ljJJJUqxJXcp-92flu_fg1_TLWGxca6ns70DiFWhuNEoV4EpRFCSZXmMDjR-DtOPm0i1CLslASEUyCXv8TwhJRpuRmK7mjGj-G4Kmrt2m71t_VAuo53Pov4SbV0U6VomgeFNVHncbQcxl25WDX9Efb_zj-AoeeqvE</recordid><startdate>199511</startdate><enddate>199511</enddate><creator>GARTIN, PATRICK R.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199511</creationdate><title>Dealing with Design Failures in Randomized Field Experiments: Analytic Issues Regarding the Evaluation of Treatment Effects</title><author>GARTIN, PATRICK R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-5f4227391932774e38a704b5038519fb03338a16802a6dc768706c732e34b92b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Correctional Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Criminal Justice</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>Criminology</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Delinquency</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Failure analysis</topic><topic>Field study</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Randomized controlled trials</topic><topic>Randomized Experiments</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Responses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GARTIN, PATRICK R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>The journal of research in crime and delinquency</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GARTIN, PATRICK R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ521153</ericid><atitle>Dealing with Design Failures in Randomized Field Experiments: Analytic Issues Regarding the Evaluation of Treatment Effects</atitle><jtitle>The journal of research in crime and delinquency</jtitle><date>1995-11</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>425</spage><epage>445</epage><pages>425-445</pages><issn>0022-4278</issn><eissn>1552-731X</eissn><coden>JRCDB2</coden><abstract>With an increasing number of criminal justice scholars conducting randomized field experiments, there are several analytic issues related to such studies that our discipline must begin to address more systematically. For example, treatment dilution and treatment migration are common forms of randomization implementation failure in field experiments, and a review of the criminological literature on experiments reveals a lack of consensus as to how these problems should be handled when evaluating treatment effects. In addition, issues related to statistical power and desired sample size remain unresolved. Given the relatively longer history of dealing with these issues in medicine, literature from that field is reviewed, providing additional insights regarding the dilemmas created by various design failures in randomized field experiments.</abstract><cop>Beverley Hills, Calif</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0022427895032004003</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-4278 |
| ispartof | The journal of research in crime and delinquency, 1995-11, Vol.32 (4), p.425-445 |
| issn | 0022-4278 1552-731X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57523211 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); HeinOnline Law Journal Library; SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Correctional Rehabilitation Crime Criminal Justice Criminals Criminology Data analysis Delinquency Design Evaluation Experiments Failure Failure analysis Field study Health care Randomization Randomized controlled trials Randomized Experiments Research Methodology Responses |
| title | Dealing with Design Failures in Randomized Field Experiments: Analytic Issues Regarding the Evaluation of Treatment Effects |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T15%3A30%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dealing%20with%20Design%20Failures%20in%20Randomized%20Field%20Experiments:%20Analytic%20Issues%20Regarding%20the%20Evaluation%20of%20Treatment%20Effects&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20research%20in%20crime%20and%20delinquency&rft.au=GARTIN,%20PATRICK%20R.&rft.date=1995-11&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=425&rft.epage=445&rft.pages=425-445&rft.issn=0022-4278&rft.eissn=1552-731X&rft.coden=JRCDB2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0022427895032004003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E8717916%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292231772&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ521153&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0022427895032004003&rfr_iscdi=true |