Training software engineers in a novel usability evaluation technique

Novel approaches to designing or analysing systems only become useful when they are usable by practitioners in the field, and not just by their originators. Design techniques often fail to make the transition from research to practice because insufficient attention is paid to understanding and commu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of human-computer studies 1998-09, Vol.49 (3), p.245-279
Hauptverfasser: BLANDFORD, ANN E., BUCKINGHAM SHUM, SIMON J., YOUNG, RICHARD M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 279
container_issue 3
container_start_page 245
container_title International journal of human-computer studies
container_volume 49
creator BLANDFORD, ANN E.
BUCKINGHAM SHUM, SIMON J.
YOUNG, RICHARD M.
description Novel approaches to designing or analysing systems only become useful when they are usable by practitioners in the field, and not just by their originators. Design techniques often fail to make the transition from research to practice because insufficient attention is paid to understanding and communicating the skills required to use them. This paper reports on work to train software engineering students to use a user-centred language for describing and analysing interface designs called the “Programmable User Model Instruction Language”, or IL. Various types of data, including video, students' IL descriptions and brief usability reports were collected during training, and subsequently analysed. These show that after 6 h of training, students have a good grasp of the syntax of the notation, and start using notational affordances to support their reasoning, but that their reasoning is still limited by a poor grasp of the underlying cognitive theory. A comparison of the analyses of trainees with those of experts provides a means of developing a better understanding of the nature of expertise in this area—as comprising an understanding of the syntax and the surface semantics of the notation, the underlying ognitive theory, the method of conducting an analysis and the implications of the analysis for design.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/ijhc.1998.0204
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57464432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S107158199890204X</els_id><sourcerecordid>57464432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-c460eeaf10640f600ae7429ccca154f3378559559cdaea45ec9eed0126a5428a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEEmNw5ZwTtxanTdrmiKbxIU3iMs6RSd0tU5eOpB3av6fVuCIkS_bhfWz5YexeQCoAike329pUaF2lkIG8YDMBWiU6B7ic5lIkqhL6mt3EuAOAUgLM2HId0HnnNzx2Tf-NgTj5jfNEIXLnOXLfHanlQ8RP17r-xOmI7YC96zzvyW69-xroll012Ea6--1z9vG8XC9ek9X7y9viaZXYXFZ9YmUBRNgIKCQ0BQBSKTNtrUWhZJPnZaWUHsvWSCgVWU1Ug8gKVDKrMJ-zh_PeQ-jGs7E3excttS166oZoVCkLKfPs32BWVHlWwhRMz0EbuhgDNeYQ3B7DyQgwk1YzaTWTVjNpHYHqDND459FRMNE68pZqF8j2pu7cX-gPsVF_Cw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>26832702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Training software engineers in a novel usability evaluation technique</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>BLANDFORD, ANN E. ; BUCKINGHAM SHUM, SIMON J. ; YOUNG, RICHARD M.</creator><creatorcontrib>BLANDFORD, ANN E. ; BUCKINGHAM SHUM, SIMON J. ; YOUNG, RICHARD M.</creatorcontrib><description>Novel approaches to designing or analysing systems only become useful when they are usable by practitioners in the field, and not just by their originators. Design techniques often fail to make the transition from research to practice because insufficient attention is paid to understanding and communicating the skills required to use them. This paper reports on work to train software engineering students to use a user-centred language for describing and analysing interface designs called the “Programmable User Model Instruction Language”, or IL. Various types of data, including video, students' IL descriptions and brief usability reports were collected during training, and subsequently analysed. These show that after 6 h of training, students have a good grasp of the syntax of the notation, and start using notational affordances to support their reasoning, but that their reasoning is still limited by a poor grasp of the underlying cognitive theory. A comparison of the analyses of trainees with those of experts provides a means of developing a better understanding of the nature of expertise in this area—as comprising an understanding of the syntax and the surface semantics of the notation, the underlying ognitive theory, the method of conducting an analysis and the implications of the analysis for design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-5819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9300</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.1998.0204</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Curricula ; Education ; Human-computer interaction ; Software engineering ; Usability testing</subject><ispartof>International journal of human-computer studies, 1998-09, Vol.49 (3), p.245-279</ispartof><rights>1998 Academic Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-c460eeaf10640f600ae7429ccca154f3378559559cdaea45ec9eed0126a5428a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107158199890204X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BLANDFORD, ANN E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUCKINGHAM SHUM, SIMON J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOUNG, RICHARD M.</creatorcontrib><title>Training software engineers in a novel usability evaluation technique</title><title>International journal of human-computer studies</title><description>Novel approaches to designing or analysing systems only become useful when they are usable by practitioners in the field, and not just by their originators. Design techniques often fail to make the transition from research to practice because insufficient attention is paid to understanding and communicating the skills required to use them. This paper reports on work to train software engineering students to use a user-centred language for describing and analysing interface designs called the “Programmable User Model Instruction Language”, or IL. Various types of data, including video, students' IL descriptions and brief usability reports were collected during training, and subsequently analysed. These show that after 6 h of training, students have a good grasp of the syntax of the notation, and start using notational affordances to support their reasoning, but that their reasoning is still limited by a poor grasp of the underlying cognitive theory. A comparison of the analyses of trainees with those of experts provides a means of developing a better understanding of the nature of expertise in this area—as comprising an understanding of the syntax and the surface semantics of the notation, the underlying ognitive theory, the method of conducting an analysis and the implications of the analysis for design.</description><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Human-computer interaction</subject><subject>Software engineering</subject><subject>Usability testing</subject><issn>1071-5819</issn><issn>1095-9300</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEEmNw5ZwTtxanTdrmiKbxIU3iMs6RSd0tU5eOpB3av6fVuCIkS_bhfWz5YexeQCoAike329pUaF2lkIG8YDMBWiU6B7ic5lIkqhL6mt3EuAOAUgLM2HId0HnnNzx2Tf-NgTj5jfNEIXLnOXLfHanlQ8RP17r-xOmI7YC96zzvyW69-xroll012Ea6--1z9vG8XC9ek9X7y9viaZXYXFZ9YmUBRNgIKCQ0BQBSKTNtrUWhZJPnZaWUHsvWSCgVWU1Ug8gKVDKrMJ-zh_PeQ-jGs7E3excttS166oZoVCkLKfPs32BWVHlWwhRMz0EbuhgDNeYQ3B7DyQgwk1YzaTWTVjNpHYHqDND459FRMNE68pZqF8j2pu7cX-gPsVF_Cw</recordid><startdate>19980901</startdate><enddate>19980901</enddate><creator>BLANDFORD, ANN E.</creator><creator>BUCKINGHAM SHUM, SIMON J.</creator><creator>YOUNG, RICHARD M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980901</creationdate><title>Training software engineers in a novel usability evaluation technique</title><author>BLANDFORD, ANN E. ; BUCKINGHAM SHUM, SIMON J. ; YOUNG, RICHARD M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-c460eeaf10640f600ae7429ccca154f3378559559cdaea45ec9eed0126a5428a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Human-computer interaction</topic><topic>Software engineering</topic><topic>Usability testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BLANDFORD, ANN E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUCKINGHAM SHUM, SIMON J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOUNG, RICHARD M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>International journal of human-computer studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BLANDFORD, ANN E.</au><au>BUCKINGHAM SHUM, SIMON J.</au><au>YOUNG, RICHARD M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Training software engineers in a novel usability evaluation technique</atitle><jtitle>International journal of human-computer studies</jtitle><date>1998-09-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>245</spage><epage>279</epage><pages>245-279</pages><issn>1071-5819</issn><eissn>1095-9300</eissn><abstract>Novel approaches to designing or analysing systems only become useful when they are usable by practitioners in the field, and not just by their originators. Design techniques often fail to make the transition from research to practice because insufficient attention is paid to understanding and communicating the skills required to use them. This paper reports on work to train software engineering students to use a user-centred language for describing and analysing interface designs called the “Programmable User Model Instruction Language”, or IL. Various types of data, including video, students' IL descriptions and brief usability reports were collected during training, and subsequently analysed. These show that after 6 h of training, students have a good grasp of the syntax of the notation, and start using notational affordances to support their reasoning, but that their reasoning is still limited by a poor grasp of the underlying cognitive theory. A comparison of the analyses of trainees with those of experts provides a means of developing a better understanding of the nature of expertise in this area—as comprising an understanding of the syntax and the surface semantics of the notation, the underlying ognitive theory, the method of conducting an analysis and the implications of the analysis for design.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1006/ijhc.1998.0204</doi><tpages>35</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1071-5819
ispartof International journal of human-computer studies, 1998-09, Vol.49 (3), p.245-279
issn 1071-5819
1095-9300
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57464432
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Curricula
Education
Human-computer interaction
Software engineering
Usability testing
title Training software engineers in a novel usability evaluation technique
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T08%3A57%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Training%20software%20engineers%20in%20a%20novel%20usability%20evaluation%20technique&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20human-computer%20studies&rft.au=BLANDFORD,%20ANN%20E.&rft.date=1998-09-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=245&rft.epage=279&rft.pages=245-279&rft.issn=1071-5819&rft.eissn=1095-9300&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/ijhc.1998.0204&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57464432%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=26832702&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S107158199890204X&rfr_iscdi=true