Interrogative suggestibility: the importance of being earnest

Use of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales 1 & 2 (GSS 1 & 2) may be complicated by individual or situational differences in the manner in which negative feedback, a key aspect of the procedure, is delivered to the interviewee. The present study attempted to vary the social distance between...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Personality and individual differences 2000-04, Vol.28 (4), p.753-762
Hauptverfasser: Baxter, James S, Boon, Julian C.W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 762
container_issue 4
container_start_page 753
container_title Personality and individual differences
container_volume 28
creator Baxter, James S
Boon, Julian C.W
description Use of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales 1 & 2 (GSS 1 & 2) may be complicated by individual or situational differences in the manner in which negative feedback, a key aspect of the procedure, is delivered to the interviewee. The present study attempted to vary the social distance between interviewers and interviewees established during the delivery of negative feedback. The ability of 12 undergraduates to adopt one of three demeanours — friendliness, firmness and sterness — when administering negative feedback using the GSS 2 was assessed. Three of these undergraduates were found to be consistently more able than the others to adopt these demeanours and acted as interviewers. Each experimenter adopted her assigned demeanour when administering negative feedback in interviewing fifteen interviewees using the GSS 2 procedure. Clear trends emerged on two out of three post-feedback GSS scores, with increasing social distance producing increasing GSS scores.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00136-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57400634</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0191886999001361</els_id><sourcerecordid>57400634</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-4649cdfd41f536a197d5216cda22aed908a39bc0dc98c7b987de20ae83537dd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEURYMoWKs_QZiFiC5Gk8kkkwgiUvwoFFyo65BJ3oyR6UxN0kL_vWkrunT1Nue-yz0InRJ8RTDh16-YSJILweWFlJcYE8pzsodGRFQ0p6yU-2j0ixyioxA-McaMFXKEbqd9BO-HVke3giws2xZCdLXrXFzfZPEDMjdfDD7q3kA2NFkNrm8z0L5P3DE6aHQX4OTnjtH748Pb5DmfvTxNJ_ez3FBexbzkpTS2sSVpGOWayMqygnBjdVFosBILTWVtsDVSmKqWorJQYA2CMlpZS-kYne_-LvzwtUzFau6Cga7TPQzLoFhVYsxpmUC2A40fQvDQqIV3c-3XimC1kaW2stTGhJJSbWUpknJnPwU6GN01Ps114S9cMIqZTNjdDoM0duXAq2AcJDPWeTBR2cH9U_QN5MF-hg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57400634</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interrogative suggestibility: the importance of being earnest</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Baxter, James S ; Boon, Julian C.W</creator><creatorcontrib>Baxter, James S ; Boon, Julian C.W</creatorcontrib><description>Use of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales 1 &amp; 2 (GSS 1 &amp; 2) may be complicated by individual or situational differences in the manner in which negative feedback, a key aspect of the procedure, is delivered to the interviewee. The present study attempted to vary the social distance between interviewers and interviewees established during the delivery of negative feedback. The ability of 12 undergraduates to adopt one of three demeanours — friendliness, firmness and sterness — when administering negative feedback using the GSS 2 was assessed. Three of these undergraduates were found to be consistently more able than the others to adopt these demeanours and acted as interviewers. Each experimenter adopted her assigned demeanour when administering negative feedback in interviewing fifteen interviewees using the GSS 2 procedure. Clear trends emerged on two out of three post-feedback GSS scores, with increasing social distance producing increasing GSS scores.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-8869</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3549</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00136-1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PEIDD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Factors ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale ; Miscellaneous ; Negative feedback ; Personality. Affectivity ; Psychological tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Scores ; Suggestibility</subject><ispartof>Personality and individual differences, 2000-04, Vol.28 (4), p.753-762</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-4649cdfd41f536a197d5216cda22aed908a39bc0dc98c7b987de20ae83537dd33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-4649cdfd41f536a197d5216cda22aed908a39bc0dc98c7b987de20ae83537dd33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886999001361$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30977,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1253059$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baxter, James S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boon, Julian C.W</creatorcontrib><title>Interrogative suggestibility: the importance of being earnest</title><title>Personality and individual differences</title><description>Use of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales 1 &amp; 2 (GSS 1 &amp; 2) may be complicated by individual or situational differences in the manner in which negative feedback, a key aspect of the procedure, is delivered to the interviewee. The present study attempted to vary the social distance between interviewers and interviewees established during the delivery of negative feedback. The ability of 12 undergraduates to adopt one of three demeanours — friendliness, firmness and sterness — when administering negative feedback using the GSS 2 was assessed. Three of these undergraduates were found to be consistently more able than the others to adopt these demeanours and acted as interviewers. Each experimenter adopted her assigned demeanour when administering negative feedback in interviewing fifteen interviewees using the GSS 2 procedure. Clear trends emerged on two out of three post-feedback GSS scores, with increasing social distance producing increasing GSS scores.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Factors</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Negative feedback</subject><subject>Personality. Affectivity</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Suggestibility</subject><issn>0191-8869</issn><issn>1873-3549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEURYMoWKs_QZiFiC5Gk8kkkwgiUvwoFFyo65BJ3oyR6UxN0kL_vWkrunT1Nue-yz0InRJ8RTDh16-YSJILweWFlJcYE8pzsodGRFQ0p6yU-2j0ixyioxA-McaMFXKEbqd9BO-HVke3giws2xZCdLXrXFzfZPEDMjdfDD7q3kA2NFkNrm8z0L5P3DE6aHQX4OTnjtH748Pb5DmfvTxNJ_ez3FBexbzkpTS2sSVpGOWayMqygnBjdVFosBILTWVtsDVSmKqWorJQYA2CMlpZS-kYne_-LvzwtUzFau6Cga7TPQzLoFhVYsxpmUC2A40fQvDQqIV3c-3XimC1kaW2stTGhJJSbWUpknJnPwU6GN01Ps114S9cMIqZTNjdDoM0duXAq2AcJDPWeTBR2cH9U_QN5MF-hg</recordid><startdate>20000401</startdate><enddate>20000401</enddate><creator>Baxter, James S</creator><creator>Boon, Julian C.W</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000401</creationdate><title>Interrogative suggestibility: the importance of being earnest</title><author>Baxter, James S ; Boon, Julian C.W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-4649cdfd41f536a197d5216cda22aed908a39bc0dc98c7b987de20ae83537dd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Factors</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Negative feedback</topic><topic>Personality. Affectivity</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Suggestibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baxter, James S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boon, Julian C.W</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Personality and individual differences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baxter, James S</au><au>Boon, Julian C.W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interrogative suggestibility: the importance of being earnest</atitle><jtitle>Personality and individual differences</jtitle><date>2000-04-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>753</spage><epage>762</epage><pages>753-762</pages><issn>0191-8869</issn><eissn>1873-3549</eissn><coden>PEIDD9</coden><abstract>Use of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales 1 &amp; 2 (GSS 1 &amp; 2) may be complicated by individual or situational differences in the manner in which negative feedback, a key aspect of the procedure, is delivered to the interviewee. The present study attempted to vary the social distance between interviewers and interviewees established during the delivery of negative feedback. The ability of 12 undergraduates to adopt one of three demeanours — friendliness, firmness and sterness — when administering negative feedback using the GSS 2 was assessed. Three of these undergraduates were found to be consistently more able than the others to adopt these demeanours and acted as interviewers. Each experimenter adopted her assigned demeanour when administering negative feedback in interviewing fifteen interviewees using the GSS 2 procedure. Clear trends emerged on two out of three post-feedback GSS scores, with increasing social distance producing increasing GSS scores.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00136-1</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0191-8869
ispartof Personality and individual differences, 2000-04, Vol.28 (4), p.753-762
issn 0191-8869
1873-3549
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57400634
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Factors
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale
Miscellaneous
Negative feedback
Personality. Affectivity
Psychological tests
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Scores
Suggestibility
title Interrogative suggestibility: the importance of being earnest
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T12%3A09%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interrogative%20suggestibility:%20the%20importance%20of%20being%20earnest&rft.jtitle=Personality%20and%20individual%20differences&rft.au=Baxter,%20James%20S&rft.date=2000-04-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=753&rft.epage=762&rft.pages=753-762&rft.issn=0191-8869&rft.eissn=1873-3549&rft.coden=PEIDD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00136-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57400634%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57400634&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0191886999001361&rfr_iscdi=true