Interrogative suggestibility: the importance of being earnest
Use of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales 1 & 2 (GSS 1 & 2) may be complicated by individual or situational differences in the manner in which negative feedback, a key aspect of the procedure, is delivered to the interviewee. The present study attempted to vary the social distance between...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Personality and individual differences 2000-04, Vol.28 (4), p.753-762 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 762 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 753 |
container_title | Personality and individual differences |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Baxter, James S Boon, Julian C.W |
description | Use of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales 1 & 2 (GSS 1 & 2) may be complicated by individual or situational differences in the manner in which negative feedback, a key aspect of the procedure, is delivered to the interviewee. The present study attempted to vary the social distance between interviewers and interviewees established during the delivery of negative feedback. The ability of 12 undergraduates to adopt one of three demeanours — friendliness, firmness and sterness — when administering negative feedback using the GSS 2 was assessed. Three of these undergraduates were found to be consistently more able than the others to adopt these demeanours and acted as interviewers. Each experimenter adopted her assigned demeanour when administering negative feedback in interviewing fifteen interviewees using the GSS 2 procedure. Clear trends emerged on two out of three post-feedback GSS scores, with increasing social distance producing increasing GSS scores. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00136-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57400634</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0191886999001361</els_id><sourcerecordid>57400634</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-4649cdfd41f536a197d5216cda22aed908a39bc0dc98c7b987de20ae83537dd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEURYMoWKs_QZiFiC5Gk8kkkwgiUvwoFFyo65BJ3oyR6UxN0kL_vWkrunT1Nue-yz0InRJ8RTDh16-YSJILweWFlJcYE8pzsodGRFQ0p6yU-2j0ixyioxA-McaMFXKEbqd9BO-HVke3giws2xZCdLXrXFzfZPEDMjdfDD7q3kA2NFkNrm8z0L5P3DE6aHQX4OTnjtH748Pb5DmfvTxNJ_ez3FBexbzkpTS2sSVpGOWayMqygnBjdVFosBILTWVtsDVSmKqWorJQYA2CMlpZS-kYne_-LvzwtUzFau6Cga7TPQzLoFhVYsxpmUC2A40fQvDQqIV3c-3XimC1kaW2stTGhJJSbWUpknJnPwU6GN01Ps114S9cMIqZTNjdDoM0duXAq2AcJDPWeTBR2cH9U_QN5MF-hg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57400634</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interrogative suggestibility: the importance of being earnest</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Baxter, James S ; Boon, Julian C.W</creator><creatorcontrib>Baxter, James S ; Boon, Julian C.W</creatorcontrib><description>Use of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales 1 & 2 (GSS 1 & 2) may be complicated by individual or situational differences in the manner in which negative feedback, a key aspect of the procedure, is delivered to the interviewee. The present study attempted to vary the social distance between interviewers and interviewees established during the delivery of negative feedback. The ability of 12 undergraduates to adopt one of three demeanours — friendliness, firmness and sterness — when administering negative feedback using the GSS 2 was assessed. Three of these undergraduates were found to be consistently more able than the others to adopt these demeanours and acted as interviewers. Each experimenter adopted her assigned demeanour when administering negative feedback in interviewing fifteen interviewees using the GSS 2 procedure. Clear trends emerged on two out of three post-feedback GSS scores, with increasing social distance producing increasing GSS scores.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-8869</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3549</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00136-1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PEIDD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Factors ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale ; Miscellaneous ; Negative feedback ; Personality. Affectivity ; Psychological tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Scores ; Suggestibility</subject><ispartof>Personality and individual differences, 2000-04, Vol.28 (4), p.753-762</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-4649cdfd41f536a197d5216cda22aed908a39bc0dc98c7b987de20ae83537dd33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-4649cdfd41f536a197d5216cda22aed908a39bc0dc98c7b987de20ae83537dd33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886999001361$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30977,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1253059$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baxter, James S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boon, Julian C.W</creatorcontrib><title>Interrogative suggestibility: the importance of being earnest</title><title>Personality and individual differences</title><description>Use of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales 1 & 2 (GSS 1 & 2) may be complicated by individual or situational differences in the manner in which negative feedback, a key aspect of the procedure, is delivered to the interviewee. The present study attempted to vary the social distance between interviewers and interviewees established during the delivery of negative feedback. The ability of 12 undergraduates to adopt one of three demeanours — friendliness, firmness and sterness — when administering negative feedback using the GSS 2 was assessed. Three of these undergraduates were found to be consistently more able than the others to adopt these demeanours and acted as interviewers. Each experimenter adopted her assigned demeanour when administering negative feedback in interviewing fifteen interviewees using the GSS 2 procedure. Clear trends emerged on two out of three post-feedback GSS scores, with increasing social distance producing increasing GSS scores.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Factors</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Negative feedback</subject><subject>Personality. Affectivity</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Suggestibility</subject><issn>0191-8869</issn><issn>1873-3549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEURYMoWKs_QZiFiC5Gk8kkkwgiUvwoFFyo65BJ3oyR6UxN0kL_vWkrunT1Nue-yz0InRJ8RTDh16-YSJILweWFlJcYE8pzsodGRFQ0p6yU-2j0ixyioxA-McaMFXKEbqd9BO-HVke3giws2xZCdLXrXFzfZPEDMjdfDD7q3kA2NFkNrm8z0L5P3DE6aHQX4OTnjtH748Pb5DmfvTxNJ_ez3FBexbzkpTS2sSVpGOWayMqygnBjdVFosBILTWVtsDVSmKqWorJQYA2CMlpZS-kYne_-LvzwtUzFau6Cga7TPQzLoFhVYsxpmUC2A40fQvDQqIV3c-3XimC1kaW2stTGhJJSbWUpknJnPwU6GN01Ps114S9cMIqZTNjdDoM0duXAq2AcJDPWeTBR2cH9U_QN5MF-hg</recordid><startdate>20000401</startdate><enddate>20000401</enddate><creator>Baxter, James S</creator><creator>Boon, Julian C.W</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000401</creationdate><title>Interrogative suggestibility: the importance of being earnest</title><author>Baxter, James S ; Boon, Julian C.W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-4649cdfd41f536a197d5216cda22aed908a39bc0dc98c7b987de20ae83537dd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Factors</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Negative feedback</topic><topic>Personality. Affectivity</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Suggestibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baxter, James S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boon, Julian C.W</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Personality and individual differences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baxter, James S</au><au>Boon, Julian C.W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interrogative suggestibility: the importance of being earnest</atitle><jtitle>Personality and individual differences</jtitle><date>2000-04-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>753</spage><epage>762</epage><pages>753-762</pages><issn>0191-8869</issn><eissn>1873-3549</eissn><coden>PEIDD9</coden><abstract>Use of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales 1 & 2 (GSS 1 & 2) may be complicated by individual or situational differences in the manner in which negative feedback, a key aspect of the procedure, is delivered to the interviewee. The present study attempted to vary the social distance between interviewers and interviewees established during the delivery of negative feedback. The ability of 12 undergraduates to adopt one of three demeanours — friendliness, firmness and sterness — when administering negative feedback using the GSS 2 was assessed. Three of these undergraduates were found to be consistently more able than the others to adopt these demeanours and acted as interviewers. Each experimenter adopted her assigned demeanour when administering negative feedback in interviewing fifteen interviewees using the GSS 2 procedure. Clear trends emerged on two out of three post-feedback GSS scores, with increasing social distance producing increasing GSS scores.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00136-1</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0191-8869 |
ispartof | Personality and individual differences, 2000-04, Vol.28 (4), p.753-762 |
issn | 0191-8869 1873-3549 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57400634 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Factors Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale Miscellaneous Negative feedback Personality. Affectivity Psychological tests Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Scores Suggestibility |
title | Interrogative suggestibility: the importance of being earnest |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T12%3A09%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interrogative%20suggestibility:%20the%20importance%20of%20being%20earnest&rft.jtitle=Personality%20and%20individual%20differences&rft.au=Baxter,%20James%20S&rft.date=2000-04-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=753&rft.epage=762&rft.pages=753-762&rft.issn=0191-8869&rft.eissn=1873-3549&rft.coden=PEIDD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00136-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57400634%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57400634&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0191886999001361&rfr_iscdi=true |