Intragroup and Intergroup Evaluation Effects on Group Behavior
Groups differ in the prestige they are accorded by outgroups, and individuals differ in how much respect they receive from their group. The authors orthogonally varied both types of social evaluation—intergroup and intragroup—to assess their joint effects on reward allocations and the amount of time...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Personality & social psychology bulletin 2002-06, Vol.28 (6), p.744-753 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 753 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 744 |
| container_title | Personality & social psychology bulletin |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Branscombe, Nyla R. Spears, Russell Ellemers, Naomi Doosje, Bertjan |
| description | Groups differ in the prestige they are accorded by outgroups, and individuals differ in how much respect they receive from their group. The authors orthogonally varied both types of social evaluation—intergroup and intragroup—to assess their joint effects on reward allocations and the amount of time donated to work on a group activity that could satisfy either personal or group goals. Respected members of a devalued group were the most inclined to withhold rewards from the outgroup, and they donated the greatest amount of time to improve the ingroup’s image rather than their personal image. Disrespected members of a prestigious group did not favor the ingroup over the outgroup in reward allocations, and they invested in a group activity only if they might improve their personal image by doing so. The authors discuss why intragroup respect is particularly important for devalued group members. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0146167202289004 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57370123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0146167202289004</sage_id><sourcerecordid>57370123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a425t-eb4932e35f16593440be11cfc39d129d385f7124d224406ca4797e9965ad0dae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHoMHb9Gd_exeBJVaCwUvel62yWxNSZO6mxT87902glDwNPN4v3nMDCHXQO8AtL6nIBQozShjE0OpOCEjkJLlWnB-SkZ7O9_75-QixjVNhBJsRB7mTRfcKrT9NnNNmSWJYZDTnat711Vtk029x6KLWWpnB-8JP92uasMlOfOujnj1W8fk42X6_vyaL95m8-fHRe4Ek12OS2E4Qy49KGm4EHSJAIUvuCmBmZJPpNfARMlY8lThhDYajVHSlbR0yMfkdsjdhvarx9jZTRULrGvXYNtHKzXXFBhP4M0RuG770KTdLAORzlYHiA5QEdoYA3q7DdXGhW8L1O6_aY-_mUbyYSS6Ff5l_sv_AMG-cgc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214000623</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intragroup and Intergroup Evaluation Effects on Group Behavior</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Branscombe, Nyla R. ; Spears, Russell ; Ellemers, Naomi ; Doosje, Bertjan</creator><creatorcontrib>Branscombe, Nyla R. ; Spears, Russell ; Ellemers, Naomi ; Doosje, Bertjan</creatorcontrib><description>Groups differ in the prestige they are accorded by outgroups, and individuals differ in how much respect they receive from their group. The authors orthogonally varied both types of social evaluation—intergroup and intragroup—to assess their joint effects on reward allocations and the amount of time donated to work on a group activity that could satisfy either personal or group goals. Respected members of a devalued group were the most inclined to withhold rewards from the outgroup, and they donated the greatest amount of time to improve the ingroup’s image rather than their personal image. Disrespected members of a prestigious group did not favor the ingroup over the outgroup in reward allocations, and they invested in a group activity only if they might improve their personal image by doing so. The authors discuss why intragroup respect is particularly important for devalued group members.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-1672</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0146167202289004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSPBZZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Group dynamics ; Group evaluation ; Ingroup-Outgroup differentiation ; Social identity ; Social psychology</subject><ispartof>Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2002-06, Vol.28 (6), p.744-753</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Jun 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a425t-eb4932e35f16593440be11cfc39d129d385f7124d224406ca4797e9965ad0dae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a425t-eb4932e35f16593440be11cfc39d129d385f7124d224406ca4797e9965ad0dae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0146167202289004$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0146167202289004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,30997,30998,33772,43619,43620</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Branscombe, Nyla R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spears, Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellemers, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doosje, Bertjan</creatorcontrib><title>Intragroup and Intergroup Evaluation Effects on Group Behavior</title><title>Personality & social psychology bulletin</title><description>Groups differ in the prestige they are accorded by outgroups, and individuals differ in how much respect they receive from their group. The authors orthogonally varied both types of social evaluation—intergroup and intragroup—to assess their joint effects on reward allocations and the amount of time donated to work on a group activity that could satisfy either personal or group goals. Respected members of a devalued group were the most inclined to withhold rewards from the outgroup, and they donated the greatest amount of time to improve the ingroup’s image rather than their personal image. Disrespected members of a prestigious group did not favor the ingroup over the outgroup in reward allocations, and they invested in a group activity only if they might improve their personal image by doing so. The authors discuss why intragroup respect is particularly important for devalued group members.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Group evaluation</subject><subject>Ingroup-Outgroup differentiation</subject><subject>Social identity</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><issn>0146-1672</issn><issn>1552-7433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHoMHb9Gd_exeBJVaCwUvel62yWxNSZO6mxT87902glDwNPN4v3nMDCHXQO8AtL6nIBQozShjE0OpOCEjkJLlWnB-SkZ7O9_75-QixjVNhBJsRB7mTRfcKrT9NnNNmSWJYZDTnat711Vtk029x6KLWWpnB-8JP92uasMlOfOujnj1W8fk42X6_vyaL95m8-fHRe4Ek12OS2E4Qy49KGm4EHSJAIUvuCmBmZJPpNfARMlY8lThhDYajVHSlbR0yMfkdsjdhvarx9jZTRULrGvXYNtHKzXXFBhP4M0RuG770KTdLAORzlYHiA5QEdoYA3q7DdXGhW8L1O6_aY-_mUbyYSS6Ff5l_sv_AMG-cgc</recordid><startdate>20020601</startdate><enddate>20020601</enddate><creator>Branscombe, Nyla R.</creator><creator>Spears, Russell</creator><creator>Ellemers, Naomi</creator><creator>Doosje, Bertjan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020601</creationdate><title>Intragroup and Intergroup Evaluation Effects on Group Behavior</title><author>Branscombe, Nyla R. ; Spears, Russell ; Ellemers, Naomi ; Doosje, Bertjan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a425t-eb4932e35f16593440be11cfc39d129d385f7124d224406ca4797e9965ad0dae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Group evaluation</topic><topic>Ingroup-Outgroup differentiation</topic><topic>Social identity</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Branscombe, Nyla R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spears, Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellemers, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doosje, Bertjan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Personality & social psychology bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Branscombe, Nyla R.</au><au>Spears, Russell</au><au>Ellemers, Naomi</au><au>Doosje, Bertjan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intragroup and Intergroup Evaluation Effects on Group Behavior</atitle><jtitle>Personality & social psychology bulletin</jtitle><date>2002-06-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>744</spage><epage>753</epage><pages>744-753</pages><issn>0146-1672</issn><eissn>1552-7433</eissn><coden>PSPBZZ</coden><abstract>Groups differ in the prestige they are accorded by outgroups, and individuals differ in how much respect they receive from their group. The authors orthogonally varied both types of social evaluation—intergroup and intragroup—to assess their joint effects on reward allocations and the amount of time donated to work on a group activity that could satisfy either personal or group goals. Respected members of a devalued group were the most inclined to withhold rewards from the outgroup, and they donated the greatest amount of time to improve the ingroup’s image rather than their personal image. Disrespected members of a prestigious group did not favor the ingroup over the outgroup in reward allocations, and they invested in a group activity only if they might improve their personal image by doing so. The authors discuss why intragroup respect is particularly important for devalued group members.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0146167202289004</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0146-1672 |
| ispartof | Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2002-06, Vol.28 (6), p.744-753 |
| issn | 0146-1672 1552-7433 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57370123 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List |
| subjects | Behavior Group dynamics Group evaluation Ingroup-Outgroup differentiation Social identity Social psychology |
| title | Intragroup and Intergroup Evaluation Effects on Group Behavior |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A19%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intragroup%20and%20Intergroup%20Evaluation%20Effects%20on%20Group%20Behavior&rft.jtitle=Personality%20&%20social%20psychology%20bulletin&rft.au=Branscombe,%20Nyla%20R.&rft.date=2002-06-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=744&rft.epage=753&rft.pages=744-753&rft.issn=0146-1672&rft.eissn=1552-7433&rft.coden=PSPBZZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0146167202289004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57370123%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214000623&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0146167202289004&rfr_iscdi=true |