Drug Abuse Prevention Programming: Do We Know What Content Works?

This article summarizes the theoretical underpinnings, substantive contents, and limitations of comprehensive social-influences-based drug abuse prevention programming. This type of programming has produced the most consistently successful preventive effects. There is some evidence that one major pa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills) 1996-06, Vol.39 (7), p.868-883
Hauptverfasser: DONALDSON, STEWART I., SUSSMAN, STEVE, MacKINNON, DAVID P., SEVERSON, HERBERT H., GLYNN, THOMAS, MURRAY, DAVID M., STONE, ELAINE J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 883
container_issue 7
container_start_page 868
container_title The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills)
container_volume 39
creator DONALDSON, STEWART I.
SUSSMAN, STEVE
MacKINNON, DAVID P.
SEVERSON, HERBERT H.
GLYNN, THOMAS
MURRAY, DAVID M.
STONE, ELAINE J.
description This article summarizes the theoretical underpinnings, substantive contents, and limitations of comprehensive social-influences-based drug abuse prevention programming. This type of programming has produced the most consistently successful preventive effects. There is some evidence that one major part of these programs, changing social norms, is an essential ingredient for successful drug abuse prevention programming. Research suggests that these effects may not be contingent on the use of refusal assertion training, a prototype activity of social-influences-based prevention programs. Because programs, when disseminated to the public, often contain only a subset of lessons from the social influences curriculum, there remains the potential error of implementing a combination of lessons that may not be effective. Further, there is evidence that other types of prevention programming, such as physical consequences programming, may be successful in some situations. Finally, social-influences-based programming may not be as effective with some subpopulations such as high-risk youths.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0002764296039007008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57347378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ540207</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0002764296039007008</sage_id><sourcerecordid>57347378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-aa78faf9b994ecc0c86c2054da9d480468870f659e7370c500779a649d517da13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwC-BQLtwC61fWPlalvFQJDnC2XMeJUjVJsRsk_j2OgjghOO2u5ptZaQg5p3BNKeINADDMBdM5cA2AAOqATKiULONc0UMyGYhsQI7JSYybdAJKNiGXt6GvZvN1H_3sJfgP3-7rrk1rVwXbNHVbnZKj0m6jP_ueU_J2t3xdPGSr5_vHxXyVOc7oPrMWVWlLvdZaeOfAqdwxkKKwuhAKRK4UQplL7ZEjOJn-o7a50IWkWFjKp-RqzN2F7r33cW-aOjq_3drWd300ErlIVvUvyJVWVDCRQD6CLnQxBl-aXagbGz4NBTP0Zn7pLbkuRpcPtftxLJ-kAAaYZBjlaCtvNl0f2tTKn4lfll90FA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38981424</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Drug Abuse Prevention Programming: Do We Know What Content Works?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>DONALDSON, STEWART I. ; SUSSMAN, STEVE ; MacKINNON, DAVID P. ; SEVERSON, HERBERT H. ; GLYNN, THOMAS ; MURRAY, DAVID M. ; STONE, ELAINE J.</creator><creatorcontrib>DONALDSON, STEWART I. ; SUSSMAN, STEVE ; MacKINNON, DAVID P. ; SEVERSON, HERBERT H. ; GLYNN, THOMAS ; MURRAY, DAVID M. ; STONE, ELAINE J.</creatorcontrib><description>This article summarizes the theoretical underpinnings, substantive contents, and limitations of comprehensive social-influences-based drug abuse prevention programming. This type of programming has produced the most consistently successful preventive effects. There is some evidence that one major part of these programs, changing social norms, is an essential ingredient for successful drug abuse prevention programming. Research suggests that these effects may not be contingent on the use of refusal assertion training, a prototype activity of social-influences-based prevention programs. Because programs, when disseminated to the public, often contain only a subset of lessons from the social influences curriculum, there remains the potential error of implementing a combination of lessons that may not be effective. Further, there is evidence that other types of prevention programming, such as physical consequences programming, may be successful in some situations. Finally, social-influences-based programming may not be as effective with some subpopulations such as high-risk youths.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3381</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0002764296039007008</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ABHSAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>At Risk Persons ; Behavior Change ; Design ; Drug Abuse ; Drug Education ; Health Education ; High Risk Students ; Higher Education ; Incentives ; MacKinnon (David P) ; Preventive Medicine ; Preventive programmes ; Program Effectiveness ; Program Evaluation ; Social Influences ; Social Problems ; Social Science Research ; Social Theories ; Social Values ; Therapy</subject><ispartof>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills), 1996-06, Vol.39 (7), p.868-883</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-aa78faf9b994ecc0c86c2054da9d480468870f659e7370c500779a649d517da13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0002764296039007008$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002764296039007008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30977,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ540207$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DONALDSON, STEWART I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUSSMAN, STEVE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKINNON, DAVID P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEVERSON, HERBERT H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GLYNN, THOMAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURRAY, DAVID M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STONE, ELAINE J.</creatorcontrib><title>Drug Abuse Prevention Programming: Do We Know What Content Works?</title><title>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills)</title><description>This article summarizes the theoretical underpinnings, substantive contents, and limitations of comprehensive social-influences-based drug abuse prevention programming. This type of programming has produced the most consistently successful preventive effects. There is some evidence that one major part of these programs, changing social norms, is an essential ingredient for successful drug abuse prevention programming. Research suggests that these effects may not be contingent on the use of refusal assertion training, a prototype activity of social-influences-based prevention programs. Because programs, when disseminated to the public, often contain only a subset of lessons from the social influences curriculum, there remains the potential error of implementing a combination of lessons that may not be effective. Further, there is evidence that other types of prevention programming, such as physical consequences programming, may be successful in some situations. Finally, social-influences-based programming may not be as effective with some subpopulations such as high-risk youths.</description><subject>At Risk Persons</subject><subject>Behavior Change</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Drug Abuse</subject><subject>Drug Education</subject><subject>Health Education</subject><subject>High Risk Students</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>MacKinnon (David P)</subject><subject>Preventive Medicine</subject><subject>Preventive programmes</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Social Influences</subject><subject>Social Problems</subject><subject>Social Science Research</subject><subject>Social Theories</subject><subject>Social Values</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><issn>0002-7642</issn><issn>1552-3381</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwC-BQLtwC61fWPlalvFQJDnC2XMeJUjVJsRsk_j2OgjghOO2u5ptZaQg5p3BNKeINADDMBdM5cA2AAOqATKiULONc0UMyGYhsQI7JSYybdAJKNiGXt6GvZvN1H_3sJfgP3-7rrk1rVwXbNHVbnZKj0m6jP_ueU_J2t3xdPGSr5_vHxXyVOc7oPrMWVWlLvdZaeOfAqdwxkKKwuhAKRK4UQplL7ZEjOJn-o7a50IWkWFjKp-RqzN2F7r33cW-aOjq_3drWd300ErlIVvUvyJVWVDCRQD6CLnQxBl-aXagbGz4NBTP0Zn7pLbkuRpcPtftxLJ-kAAaYZBjlaCtvNl0f2tTKn4lfll90FA</recordid><startdate>19960601</startdate><enddate>19960601</enddate><creator>DONALDSON, STEWART I.</creator><creator>SUSSMAN, STEVE</creator><creator>MacKINNON, DAVID P.</creator><creator>SEVERSON, HERBERT H.</creator><creator>GLYNN, THOMAS</creator><creator>MURRAY, DAVID M.</creator><creator>STONE, ELAINE J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960601</creationdate><title>Drug Abuse Prevention Programming</title><author>DONALDSON, STEWART I. ; SUSSMAN, STEVE ; MacKINNON, DAVID P. ; SEVERSON, HERBERT H. ; GLYNN, THOMAS ; MURRAY, DAVID M. ; STONE, ELAINE J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-aa78faf9b994ecc0c86c2054da9d480468870f659e7370c500779a649d517da13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>At Risk Persons</topic><topic>Behavior Change</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Drug Abuse</topic><topic>Drug Education</topic><topic>Health Education</topic><topic>High Risk Students</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>MacKinnon (David P)</topic><topic>Preventive Medicine</topic><topic>Preventive programmes</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Social Influences</topic><topic>Social Problems</topic><topic>Social Science Research</topic><topic>Social Theories</topic><topic>Social Values</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DONALDSON, STEWART I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUSSMAN, STEVE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKINNON, DAVID P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEVERSON, HERBERT H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GLYNN, THOMAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURRAY, DAVID M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STONE, ELAINE J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DONALDSON, STEWART I.</au><au>SUSSMAN, STEVE</au><au>MacKINNON, DAVID P.</au><au>SEVERSON, HERBERT H.</au><au>GLYNN, THOMAS</au><au>MURRAY, DAVID M.</au><au>STONE, ELAINE J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ540207</ericid><atitle>Drug Abuse Prevention Programming: Do We Know What Content Works?</atitle><jtitle>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills)</jtitle><date>1996-06-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>868</spage><epage>883</epage><pages>868-883</pages><issn>0002-7642</issn><eissn>1552-3381</eissn><coden>ABHSAU</coden><abstract>This article summarizes the theoretical underpinnings, substantive contents, and limitations of comprehensive social-influences-based drug abuse prevention programming. This type of programming has produced the most consistently successful preventive effects. There is some evidence that one major part of these programs, changing social norms, is an essential ingredient for successful drug abuse prevention programming. Research suggests that these effects may not be contingent on the use of refusal assertion training, a prototype activity of social-influences-based prevention programs. Because programs, when disseminated to the public, often contain only a subset of lessons from the social influences curriculum, there remains the potential error of implementing a combination of lessons that may not be effective. Further, there is evidence that other types of prevention programming, such as physical consequences programming, may be successful in some situations. Finally, social-influences-based programming may not be as effective with some subpopulations such as high-risk youths.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0002764296039007008</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-7642
ispartof The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills), 1996-06, Vol.39 (7), p.868-883
issn 0002-7642
1552-3381
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57347378
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects At Risk Persons
Behavior Change
Design
Drug Abuse
Drug Education
Health Education
High Risk Students
Higher Education
Incentives
MacKinnon (David P)
Preventive Medicine
Preventive programmes
Program Effectiveness
Program Evaluation
Social Influences
Social Problems
Social Science Research
Social Theories
Social Values
Therapy
title Drug Abuse Prevention Programming: Do We Know What Content Works?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T20%3A44%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Drug%20Abuse%20Prevention%20Programming:%20Do%20We%20Know%20What%20Content%20Works?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20behavioral%20scientist%20(Beverly%20Hills)&rft.au=DONALDSON,%20STEWART%20I.&rft.date=1996-06-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=868&rft.epage=883&rft.pages=868-883&rft.issn=0002-7642&rft.eissn=1552-3381&rft.coden=ABHSAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0002764296039007008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57347378%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38981424&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ540207&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0002764296039007008&rfr_iscdi=true