Drug Abuse Prevention Programming: Do We Know What Content Works?
This article summarizes the theoretical underpinnings, substantive contents, and limitations of comprehensive social-influences-based drug abuse prevention programming. This type of programming has produced the most consistently successful preventive effects. There is some evidence that one major pa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills) 1996-06, Vol.39 (7), p.868-883 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 883 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 868 |
container_title | The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills) |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | DONALDSON, STEWART I. SUSSMAN, STEVE MacKINNON, DAVID P. SEVERSON, HERBERT H. GLYNN, THOMAS MURRAY, DAVID M. STONE, ELAINE J. |
description | This article summarizes the theoretical underpinnings, substantive contents, and limitations of comprehensive social-influences-based drug abuse prevention programming. This type of programming has produced the most consistently successful preventive effects. There is some evidence that one major part of these programs, changing social norms, is an essential ingredient for successful drug abuse prevention programming. Research suggests that these effects may not be contingent on the use of refusal assertion training, a prototype activity of social-influences-based prevention programs. Because programs, when disseminated to the public, often contain only a subset of lessons from the social influences curriculum, there remains the potential error of implementing a combination of lessons that may not be effective. Further, there is evidence that other types of prevention programming, such as physical consequences programming, may be successful in some situations. Finally, social-influences-based programming may not be as effective with some subpopulations such as high-risk youths. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0002764296039007008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57347378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ540207</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0002764296039007008</sage_id><sourcerecordid>57347378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-aa78faf9b994ecc0c86c2054da9d480468870f659e7370c500779a649d517da13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwC-BQLtwC61fWPlalvFQJDnC2XMeJUjVJsRsk_j2OgjghOO2u5ptZaQg5p3BNKeINADDMBdM5cA2AAOqATKiULONc0UMyGYhsQI7JSYybdAJKNiGXt6GvZvN1H_3sJfgP3-7rrk1rVwXbNHVbnZKj0m6jP_ueU_J2t3xdPGSr5_vHxXyVOc7oPrMWVWlLvdZaeOfAqdwxkKKwuhAKRK4UQplL7ZEjOJn-o7a50IWkWFjKp-RqzN2F7r33cW-aOjq_3drWd300ErlIVvUvyJVWVDCRQD6CLnQxBl-aXagbGz4NBTP0Zn7pLbkuRpcPtftxLJ-kAAaYZBjlaCtvNl0f2tTKn4lfll90FA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38981424</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Drug Abuse Prevention Programming: Do We Know What Content Works?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>DONALDSON, STEWART I. ; SUSSMAN, STEVE ; MacKINNON, DAVID P. ; SEVERSON, HERBERT H. ; GLYNN, THOMAS ; MURRAY, DAVID M. ; STONE, ELAINE J.</creator><creatorcontrib>DONALDSON, STEWART I. ; SUSSMAN, STEVE ; MacKINNON, DAVID P. ; SEVERSON, HERBERT H. ; GLYNN, THOMAS ; MURRAY, DAVID M. ; STONE, ELAINE J.</creatorcontrib><description>This article summarizes the theoretical underpinnings, substantive contents, and limitations of comprehensive social-influences-based drug abuse prevention programming. This type of programming has produced the most consistently successful preventive effects. There is some evidence that one major part of these programs, changing social norms, is an essential ingredient for successful drug abuse prevention programming. Research suggests that these effects may not be contingent on the use of refusal assertion training, a prototype activity of social-influences-based prevention programs. Because programs, when disseminated to the public, often contain only a subset of lessons from the social influences curriculum, there remains the potential error of implementing a combination of lessons that may not be effective. Further, there is evidence that other types of prevention programming, such as physical consequences programming, may be successful in some situations. Finally, social-influences-based programming may not be as effective with some subpopulations such as high-risk youths.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3381</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0002764296039007008</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ABHSAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>At Risk Persons ; Behavior Change ; Design ; Drug Abuse ; Drug Education ; Health Education ; High Risk Students ; Higher Education ; Incentives ; MacKinnon (David P) ; Preventive Medicine ; Preventive programmes ; Program Effectiveness ; Program Evaluation ; Social Influences ; Social Problems ; Social Science Research ; Social Theories ; Social Values ; Therapy</subject><ispartof>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills), 1996-06, Vol.39 (7), p.868-883</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-aa78faf9b994ecc0c86c2054da9d480468870f659e7370c500779a649d517da13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0002764296039007008$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002764296039007008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30977,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ540207$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DONALDSON, STEWART I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUSSMAN, STEVE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKINNON, DAVID P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEVERSON, HERBERT H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GLYNN, THOMAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURRAY, DAVID M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STONE, ELAINE J.</creatorcontrib><title>Drug Abuse Prevention Programming: Do We Know What Content Works?</title><title>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills)</title><description>This article summarizes the theoretical underpinnings, substantive contents, and limitations of comprehensive social-influences-based drug abuse prevention programming. This type of programming has produced the most consistently successful preventive effects. There is some evidence that one major part of these programs, changing social norms, is an essential ingredient for successful drug abuse prevention programming. Research suggests that these effects may not be contingent on the use of refusal assertion training, a prototype activity of social-influences-based prevention programs. Because programs, when disseminated to the public, often contain only a subset of lessons from the social influences curriculum, there remains the potential error of implementing a combination of lessons that may not be effective. Further, there is evidence that other types of prevention programming, such as physical consequences programming, may be successful in some situations. Finally, social-influences-based programming may not be as effective with some subpopulations such as high-risk youths.</description><subject>At Risk Persons</subject><subject>Behavior Change</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Drug Abuse</subject><subject>Drug Education</subject><subject>Health Education</subject><subject>High Risk Students</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>MacKinnon (David P)</subject><subject>Preventive Medicine</subject><subject>Preventive programmes</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Social Influences</subject><subject>Social Problems</subject><subject>Social Science Research</subject><subject>Social Theories</subject><subject>Social Values</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><issn>0002-7642</issn><issn>1552-3381</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwC-BQLtwC61fWPlalvFQJDnC2XMeJUjVJsRsk_j2OgjghOO2u5ptZaQg5p3BNKeINADDMBdM5cA2AAOqATKiULONc0UMyGYhsQI7JSYybdAJKNiGXt6GvZvN1H_3sJfgP3-7rrk1rVwXbNHVbnZKj0m6jP_ueU_J2t3xdPGSr5_vHxXyVOc7oPrMWVWlLvdZaeOfAqdwxkKKwuhAKRK4UQplL7ZEjOJn-o7a50IWkWFjKp-RqzN2F7r33cW-aOjq_3drWd300ErlIVvUvyJVWVDCRQD6CLnQxBl-aXagbGz4NBTP0Zn7pLbkuRpcPtftxLJ-kAAaYZBjlaCtvNl0f2tTKn4lfll90FA</recordid><startdate>19960601</startdate><enddate>19960601</enddate><creator>DONALDSON, STEWART I.</creator><creator>SUSSMAN, STEVE</creator><creator>MacKINNON, DAVID P.</creator><creator>SEVERSON, HERBERT H.</creator><creator>GLYNN, THOMAS</creator><creator>MURRAY, DAVID M.</creator><creator>STONE, ELAINE J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960601</creationdate><title>Drug Abuse Prevention Programming</title><author>DONALDSON, STEWART I. ; SUSSMAN, STEVE ; MacKINNON, DAVID P. ; SEVERSON, HERBERT H. ; GLYNN, THOMAS ; MURRAY, DAVID M. ; STONE, ELAINE J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-aa78faf9b994ecc0c86c2054da9d480468870f659e7370c500779a649d517da13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>At Risk Persons</topic><topic>Behavior Change</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Drug Abuse</topic><topic>Drug Education</topic><topic>Health Education</topic><topic>High Risk Students</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>MacKinnon (David P)</topic><topic>Preventive Medicine</topic><topic>Preventive programmes</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Social Influences</topic><topic>Social Problems</topic><topic>Social Science Research</topic><topic>Social Theories</topic><topic>Social Values</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DONALDSON, STEWART I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUSSMAN, STEVE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKINNON, DAVID P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEVERSON, HERBERT H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GLYNN, THOMAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURRAY, DAVID M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STONE, ELAINE J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DONALDSON, STEWART I.</au><au>SUSSMAN, STEVE</au><au>MacKINNON, DAVID P.</au><au>SEVERSON, HERBERT H.</au><au>GLYNN, THOMAS</au><au>MURRAY, DAVID M.</au><au>STONE, ELAINE J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ540207</ericid><atitle>Drug Abuse Prevention Programming: Do We Know What Content Works?</atitle><jtitle>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills)</jtitle><date>1996-06-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>868</spage><epage>883</epage><pages>868-883</pages><issn>0002-7642</issn><eissn>1552-3381</eissn><coden>ABHSAU</coden><abstract>This article summarizes the theoretical underpinnings, substantive contents, and limitations of comprehensive social-influences-based drug abuse prevention programming. This type of programming has produced the most consistently successful preventive effects. There is some evidence that one major part of these programs, changing social norms, is an essential ingredient for successful drug abuse prevention programming. Research suggests that these effects may not be contingent on the use of refusal assertion training, a prototype activity of social-influences-based prevention programs. Because programs, when disseminated to the public, often contain only a subset of lessons from the social influences curriculum, there remains the potential error of implementing a combination of lessons that may not be effective. Further, there is evidence that other types of prevention programming, such as physical consequences programming, may be successful in some situations. Finally, social-influences-based programming may not be as effective with some subpopulations such as high-risk youths.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0002764296039007008</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-7642 |
ispartof | The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills), 1996-06, Vol.39 (7), p.868-883 |
issn | 0002-7642 1552-3381 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57347378 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | At Risk Persons Behavior Change Design Drug Abuse Drug Education Health Education High Risk Students Higher Education Incentives MacKinnon (David P) Preventive Medicine Preventive programmes Program Effectiveness Program Evaluation Social Influences Social Problems Social Science Research Social Theories Social Values Therapy |
title | Drug Abuse Prevention Programming: Do We Know What Content Works? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T20%3A44%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Drug%20Abuse%20Prevention%20Programming:%20Do%20We%20Know%20What%20Content%20Works?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20behavioral%20scientist%20(Beverly%20Hills)&rft.au=DONALDSON,%20STEWART%20I.&rft.date=1996-06-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=868&rft.epage=883&rft.pages=868-883&rft.issn=0002-7642&rft.eissn=1552-3381&rft.coden=ABHSAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0002764296039007008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57347378%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38981424&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ540207&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0002764296039007008&rfr_iscdi=true |