Reciprocal Emotion Management: Working Together to Maintain Stratification in Private Law Firms
Using qualitative evidence, the concept of reciprocal emotion management is introduced and the role it plays in the reproduction of status inequality in the workplace is illustrated. Reciprocal emotion management is the reciprocal effort of similar others to manage one another's emotions. Three...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Work and occupations 2000-02, Vol.27 (1), p.32-63 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 63 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 32 |
container_title | Work and occupations |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | LIVELY, KATHRYN J. |
description | Using qualitative evidence, the concept of reciprocal emotion management is introduced and the role it plays in the reproduction of status inequality in the workplace is illustrated. Reciprocal emotion management is the reciprocal effort of similar others to manage one another's emotions. Three norms that exist in the workplace are also identified: professionalism, deference, and caretaking, and it is proposed that as paralegals strive to appear professional, they display deference to attorneys and accept having deference withheld. Reciprocal emotion management is one mechanism through which they are able to manage their emotional reactions to the status inequity in their daily interactions with attorneys. Ironically, pursuit of professionalism in these ways tends to perpetuate their marginal or inferior status in law firms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0730888400027001003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57343187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0730888400027001003</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1840060372</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-ecda741025edff0cdf8a50d4edee308e4a7c9009a27039b676a0e6207532d6f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1Lw0AQBuBFFKzRXyBCURAv0dnP2Ryl1A-oCKLnsG4mkpKPmk0P_ns31IOI1tNennd4d4axYw6XnCNeAUqw1ioAEAjAAeQOm3CtRWqVUbtsMop0JPvsIIRlhCqzasJOnshXq77zrp7Om26ounb64Fr3Rg21wyHbK10d6OjrTdjLzfx5dpcuHm_vZ9eL1Etrh5R84VBxEJqKsgRflNZpKBQVRLEYKYc-A8hcLCezV4PGARkBqKUoTKlkws43c2OT9zWFIW-q4KmuXUvdOuQapZLc4r8w1lHKoonwYivkwkpjNcZCCTv9QZfdum_jf3MRFWbGZhGd_YX4uHcDEkVUcqN834XQU5mv-qpx_UfOIR8vlf9yqZiCTSrEtX-buyXyCYqRj1A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1840060372</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reciprocal Emotion Management: Working Together to Maintain Stratification in Private Law Firms</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>LIVELY, KATHRYN J.</creator><creatorcontrib>LIVELY, KATHRYN J.</creatorcontrib><description>Using qualitative evidence, the concept of reciprocal emotion management is introduced and the role it plays in the reproduction of status inequality in the workplace is illustrated. Reciprocal emotion management is the reciprocal effort of similar others to manage one another's emotions. Three norms that exist in the workplace are also identified: professionalism, deference, and caretaking, and it is proposed that as paralegals strive to appear professional, they display deference to attorneys and accept having deference withheld. Reciprocal emotion management is one mechanism through which they are able to manage their emotional reactions to the status inequity in their daily interactions with attorneys. Ironically, pursuit of professionalism in these ways tends to perpetuate their marginal or inferior status in law firms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-8884</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0730888400027001003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WOOCDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>Attorneys ; Authors ; Behavior ; Coping ; Emotional Response ; Emotions ; Employees ; Employment ; Inequalities ; Interpersonal Relationship ; Interviews ; Labor ; Law ; Law firms ; Lawyers ; Management ; Norms ; Occupation ; Organizational behavior ; Paralegal personnel ; Personal relationships ; Power Structure ; Professionalism ; Psychological Patterns ; Reciprocal ; Reproduction ; Researchers ; Social Stratification ; Status ; Studies ; Work place ; Working conditions ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Work and occupations, 2000-02, Vol.27 (1), p.32-63</ispartof><rights>Copyright Sage Publications, Inc. Feb 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-ecda741025edff0cdf8a50d4edee308e4a7c9009a27039b676a0e6207532d6f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0730888400027001003$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0730888400027001003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27869,27924,27925,31000,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>LIVELY, KATHRYN J.</creatorcontrib><title>Reciprocal Emotion Management: Working Together to Maintain Stratification in Private Law Firms</title><title>Work and occupations</title><description>Using qualitative evidence, the concept of reciprocal emotion management is introduced and the role it plays in the reproduction of status inequality in the workplace is illustrated. Reciprocal emotion management is the reciprocal effort of similar others to manage one another's emotions. Three norms that exist in the workplace are also identified: professionalism, deference, and caretaking, and it is proposed that as paralegals strive to appear professional, they display deference to attorneys and accept having deference withheld. Reciprocal emotion management is one mechanism through which they are able to manage their emotional reactions to the status inequity in their daily interactions with attorneys. Ironically, pursuit of professionalism in these ways tends to perpetuate their marginal or inferior status in law firms.</description><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Authors</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Emotional Response</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Inequalities</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationship</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Law firms</subject><subject>Lawyers</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Occupation</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Paralegal personnel</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Power Structure</subject><subject>Professionalism</subject><subject>Psychological Patterns</subject><subject>Reciprocal</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Social Stratification</subject><subject>Status</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Work place</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0730-8884</issn><issn>1552-8464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1Lw0AQBuBFFKzRXyBCURAv0dnP2Ryl1A-oCKLnsG4mkpKPmk0P_ns31IOI1tNennd4d4axYw6XnCNeAUqw1ioAEAjAAeQOm3CtRWqVUbtsMop0JPvsIIRlhCqzasJOnshXq77zrp7Om26ounb64Fr3Rg21wyHbK10d6OjrTdjLzfx5dpcuHm_vZ9eL1Etrh5R84VBxEJqKsgRflNZpKBQVRLEYKYc-A8hcLCezV4PGARkBqKUoTKlkws43c2OT9zWFIW-q4KmuXUvdOuQapZLc4r8w1lHKoonwYivkwkpjNcZCCTv9QZfdum_jf3MRFWbGZhGd_YX4uHcDEkVUcqN834XQU5mv-qpx_UfOIR8vlf9yqZiCTSrEtX-buyXyCYqRj1A</recordid><startdate>20000201</startdate><enddate>20000201</enddate><creator>LIVELY, KATHRYN J.</creator><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JWXEY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000201</creationdate><title>Reciprocal Emotion Management</title><author>LIVELY, KATHRYN J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-ecda741025edff0cdf8a50d4edee308e4a7c9009a27039b676a0e6207532d6f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Authors</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Emotional Response</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Inequalities</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationship</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Law firms</topic><topic>Lawyers</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Occupation</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Paralegal personnel</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Power Structure</topic><topic>Professionalism</topic><topic>Psychological Patterns</topic><topic>Reciprocal</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Social Stratification</topic><topic>Status</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Work place</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LIVELY, KATHRYN J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 39</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Work and occupations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LIVELY, KATHRYN J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reciprocal Emotion Management: Working Together to Maintain Stratification in Private Law Firms</atitle><jtitle>Work and occupations</jtitle><date>2000-02-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>32</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>32-63</pages><issn>0730-8884</issn><eissn>1552-8464</eissn><coden>WOOCDD</coden><abstract>Using qualitative evidence, the concept of reciprocal emotion management is introduced and the role it plays in the reproduction of status inequality in the workplace is illustrated. Reciprocal emotion management is the reciprocal effort of similar others to manage one another's emotions. Three norms that exist in the workplace are also identified: professionalism, deference, and caretaking, and it is proposed that as paralegals strive to appear professional, they display deference to attorneys and accept having deference withheld. Reciprocal emotion management is one mechanism through which they are able to manage their emotional reactions to the status inequity in their daily interactions with attorneys. Ironically, pursuit of professionalism in these ways tends to perpetuate their marginal or inferior status in law firms.</abstract><cop>Beverly Hills, Calif</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Inc</pub><doi>10.1177/0730888400027001003</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0730-8884 |
ispartof | Work and occupations, 2000-02, Vol.27 (1), p.32-63 |
issn | 0730-8884 1552-8464 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57343187 |
source | Access via SAGE; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Attorneys Authors Behavior Coping Emotional Response Emotions Employees Employment Inequalities Interpersonal Relationship Interviews Labor Law Law firms Lawyers Management Norms Occupation Organizational behavior Paralegal personnel Personal relationships Power Structure Professionalism Psychological Patterns Reciprocal Reproduction Researchers Social Stratification Status Studies Work place Working conditions Workplaces |
title | Reciprocal Emotion Management: Working Together to Maintain Stratification in Private Law Firms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T16%3A27%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reciprocal%20Emotion%20Management:%20Working%20Together%20to%20Maintain%20Stratification%20in%20Private%20Law%20Firms&rft.jtitle=Work%20and%20occupations&rft.au=LIVELY,%20KATHRYN%20J.&rft.date=2000-02-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=32-63&rft.issn=0730-8884&rft.eissn=1552-8464&rft.coden=WOOCDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0730888400027001003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1840060372%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1840060372&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0730888400027001003&rfr_iscdi=true |