Interrogative suggestibility: The effects of sleep deprivation and relationship with field dependence
Suggestibility (yield) scores on the first Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale were found to correlate significantly with field dependence, as measured by the Finding Embedded Figures Test. Sleep‐deprived subjects, while scoring worse on story memory, reaction time, POMS vigour–energetic and POMS confus...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Applied cognitive psychology 1994-04, Vol.8 (2), p.169-179 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 179 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 169 |
| container_title | Applied cognitive psychology |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Blagrove, Mark Cole-Morgan, Dominic Lambe, Hazel |
| description | Suggestibility (yield) scores on the first Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale were found to correlate significantly with field dependence, as measured by the Finding Embedded Figures Test. Sleep‐deprived subjects, while scoring worse on story memory, reaction time, POMS vigour–energetic and POMS confusion than controls, did not show any increase in yielding to suggestive questions. Upon answering the questions again after negative feedback, however, sleep‐deprived subjects shifted their responses to questions significantly more than did controls. The results are interpreted in terms of sleep loss increasing the variability of performance. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/acp.2350080207 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57339004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57339004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4157-608ac38fccb7f395d2ff1a96b8be67044c4f1e7e6f054ddc1b7d5f912c6748363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAURS1UJKaFLWtLIHaZPttJbHdXjaBUqgqU4WNnOc7zjEuaBDvTMv8eD1O1gg0ry_I51-9dQl4ymDMAfmzdOOeiAlDAQT4hMwZaFyA5HJAZKKWKMj89I4cpXQOArhmfETzvJ4xxWNkp3CJNm9UK0xSa0IVpe0KXa6ToPbop0cHT1CGOtMUxhtssDD21fUsjdn8uaR1GehemNfUBu3bHYd9i7_A5eeptl_DF_XlEvrx7u1y8Ly4-nJ0vTi8KV7JKFjUo64TyzjXSC1213Htmdd2oBmsJZelKz1Bi7aEq29axRraV14y7WpZK1OKIvNnnjnH4ucmLmJuQHHad7XHYJFNJITRAmcFX_4DXwyb2eTbDuOZMVbIWmZrvKReHlCJ6kxe_sXFrGJhd5yZ3bh47z8Lr-1ibnO18tL0L6cHa9c80z5jeY3ehw-1_Qs3p4uNfXxR7N6QJfz24Nv4wtRSyMt8uz8z3T5_l1dVXZZbiNx8Oomg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292185763</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interrogative suggestibility: The effects of sleep deprivation and relationship with field dependence</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Blagrove, Mark ; Cole-Morgan, Dominic ; Lambe, Hazel</creator><creatorcontrib>Blagrove, Mark ; Cole-Morgan, Dominic ; Lambe, Hazel</creatorcontrib><description>Suggestibility (yield) scores on the first Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale were found to correlate significantly with field dependence, as measured by the Finding Embedded Figures Test. Sleep‐deprived subjects, while scoring worse on story memory, reaction time, POMS vigour–energetic and POMS confusion than controls, did not show any increase in yielding to suggestive questions. Upon answering the questions again after negative feedback, however, sleep‐deprived subjects shifted their responses to questions significantly more than did controls. The results are interpreted in terms of sleep loss increasing the variability of performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-4080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0720</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acp.2350080207</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACPSED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Deprivation ; Field dependence ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Sleep ; Suggestibility ; Vigilance. Attention. Sleep</subject><ispartof>Applied cognitive psychology, 1994-04, Vol.8 (2), p.169-179</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4157-608ac38fccb7f395d2ff1a96b8be67044c4f1e7e6f054ddc1b7d5f912c6748363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4157-608ac38fccb7f395d2ff1a96b8be67044c4f1e7e6f054ddc1b7d5f912c6748363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Facp.2350080207$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Facp.2350080207$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27848,27903,27904,30979,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4080192$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blagrove, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole-Morgan, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambe, Hazel</creatorcontrib><title>Interrogative suggestibility: The effects of sleep deprivation and relationship with field dependence</title><title>Applied cognitive psychology</title><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><description>Suggestibility (yield) scores on the first Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale were found to correlate significantly with field dependence, as measured by the Finding Embedded Figures Test. Sleep‐deprived subjects, while scoring worse on story memory, reaction time, POMS vigour–energetic and POMS confusion than controls, did not show any increase in yielding to suggestive questions. Upon answering the questions again after negative feedback, however, sleep‐deprived subjects shifted their responses to questions significantly more than did controls. The results are interpreted in terms of sleep loss increasing the variability of performance.</description><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Deprivation</subject><subject>Field dependence</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Suggestibility</subject><subject>Vigilance. Attention. Sleep</subject><issn>0888-4080</issn><issn>1099-0720</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAURS1UJKaFLWtLIHaZPttJbHdXjaBUqgqU4WNnOc7zjEuaBDvTMv8eD1O1gg0ry_I51-9dQl4ymDMAfmzdOOeiAlDAQT4hMwZaFyA5HJAZKKWKMj89I4cpXQOArhmfETzvJ4xxWNkp3CJNm9UK0xSa0IVpe0KXa6ToPbop0cHT1CGOtMUxhtssDD21fUsjdn8uaR1GehemNfUBu3bHYd9i7_A5eeptl_DF_XlEvrx7u1y8Ly4-nJ0vTi8KV7JKFjUo64TyzjXSC1213Htmdd2oBmsJZelKz1Bi7aEq29axRraV14y7WpZK1OKIvNnnjnH4ucmLmJuQHHad7XHYJFNJITRAmcFX_4DXwyb2eTbDuOZMVbIWmZrvKReHlCJ6kxe_sXFrGJhd5yZ3bh47z8Lr-1ibnO18tL0L6cHa9c80z5jeY3ehw-1_Qs3p4uNfXxR7N6QJfz24Nv4wtRSyMt8uz8z3T5_l1dVXZZbiNx8Oomg</recordid><startdate>199404</startdate><enddate>199404</enddate><creator>Blagrove, Mark</creator><creator>Cole-Morgan, Dominic</creator><creator>Lambe, Hazel</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199404</creationdate><title>Interrogative suggestibility: The effects of sleep deprivation and relationship with field dependence</title><author>Blagrove, Mark ; Cole-Morgan, Dominic ; Lambe, Hazel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4157-608ac38fccb7f395d2ff1a96b8be67044c4f1e7e6f054ddc1b7d5f912c6748363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Deprivation</topic><topic>Field dependence</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Suggestibility</topic><topic>Vigilance. Attention. Sleep</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blagrove, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole-Morgan, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambe, Hazel</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blagrove, Mark</au><au>Cole-Morgan, Dominic</au><au>Lambe, Hazel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interrogative suggestibility: The effects of sleep deprivation and relationship with field dependence</atitle><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><date>1994-04</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>169-179</pages><issn>0888-4080</issn><eissn>1099-0720</eissn><coden>ACPSED</coden><abstract>Suggestibility (yield) scores on the first Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale were found to correlate significantly with field dependence, as measured by the Finding Embedded Figures Test. Sleep‐deprived subjects, while scoring worse on story memory, reaction time, POMS vigour–energetic and POMS confusion than controls, did not show any increase in yielding to suggestive questions. Upon answering the questions again after negative feedback, however, sleep‐deprived subjects shifted their responses to questions significantly more than did controls. The results are interpreted in terms of sleep loss increasing the variability of performance.</abstract><cop>West Sussex</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/acp.2350080207</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0888-4080 |
| ispartof | Applied cognitive psychology, 1994-04, Vol.8 (2), p.169-179 |
| issn | 0888-4080 1099-0720 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57339004 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Activity levels. Psychomotricity Biological and medical sciences Deprivation Field dependence Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Sleep Suggestibility Vigilance. Attention. Sleep |
| title | Interrogative suggestibility: The effects of sleep deprivation and relationship with field dependence |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T03%3A47%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interrogative%20suggestibility:%20The%20effects%20of%20sleep%20deprivation%20and%20relationship%20with%20field%20dependence&rft.jtitle=Applied%20cognitive%20psychology&rft.au=Blagrove,%20Mark&rft.date=1994-04&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=169-179&rft.issn=0888-4080&rft.eissn=1099-0720&rft.coden=ACPSED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acp.2350080207&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57339004%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292185763&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |