Effects of Response-Signal Temporal Separation on Behavior Maintained Under Temporally Defined Schedules of Delayed Signaled Reinforcement
The present study assessed the effects of systematically separating the cue from the response in temporally defined schedules of delayed signaled reinforcement. Identical schedules were used to study the effects of the independent variable on response acquisition and response maintenance. In the fir...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Psychological record 2010, Vol.60 (1), p.115-136 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 136 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 115 |
| container_title | The Psychological record |
| container_volume | 60 |
| creator | Pulido, Marco A. Martínez, Guillermo |
| description | The present study assessed the effects of systematically separating the cue from the response in temporally defined schedules of delayed signaled reinforcement. Identical schedules were used to study the effects of the independent variable on response acquisition and response maintenance. In the first experiment, 8 groups of 3 naive rats were exposed to 1 of 8 temporally defined schedules that differed in both the duration of a response opportunity and response- signal temporal separation. In the second experiment, 3 rats were exposed to the previously described schedules using a within-subjects design. Results in both experiments showed response rate as a decreasing function of response- signal temporal separation. The findings could be the result of the combination of delaying conditioned reinforcement and blocking the response selected for reinforcement. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF03395697 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57335103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A218845145</galeid><ericid>EJ874140</ericid><sourcerecordid>A218845145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-79c0e7f21981f808dfc3e5359d2da69f180fe092b15b72ca3d2f019a0ef59bee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkktvEzEQxy0EEiFw4cxhBRIH0BY_1tn1sY-Uh4qQmvZsOd5x6mrXXuwNUr4Cn5pJFrUCRbbl0fx_M_aMhpDXjJ4wSutPZ5dUCCUXqn5CZpwtRCkqyZ-SGUV_yZUQz8mLnO8ppayi9Yz8XjoHdsxFdMU15CGGDOXKb4Lpihvoh5jQWMFgkhl9DAXuM7gzv3xMxXfjw4gH2uI2tJAeArpdcQHuIKzsHbTbDg4PXEBndnvnIT8a1-CDi8lCD2F8SZ4502V49feek9vL5c35l_Lqx-ev56dXpa0kG8taWQq140w1zDW0aZ0VIIVULW_NQjnWUAdU8TWT65pbI1ruKFOGgpNqDSDm5P2Ud0jx5xbyqHufLXSdCRC3WctaCMmwX3Py9j_wPm4T_jzrWrKKN5WkCL2boA1WpPfljMnYfUZ9ylmDDKskUuURagMBsF0xYLPQ_Q9_coTH1ULv7dGAD1OATTHnBE4Pyfcm7TSjej8a-nE0EH4zwZC8fQCX35q6wqlA-eMkZ5TCBtJj3UeS_QFxLMGT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>751428450</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Response-Signal Temporal Separation on Behavior Maintained Under Temporally Defined Schedules of Delayed Signaled Reinforcement</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Pulido, Marco A. ; Martínez, Guillermo</creator><creatorcontrib>Pulido, Marco A. ; Martínez, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><description>The present study assessed the effects of systematically separating the cue from the response in temporally defined schedules of delayed signaled reinforcement. Identical schedules were used to study the effects of the independent variable on response acquisition and response maintenance. In the first experiment, 8 groups of 3 naive rats were exposed to 1 of 8 temporally defined schedules that differed in both the duration of a response opportunity and response- signal temporal separation. In the second experiment, 3 rats were exposed to the previously described schedules using a within-subjects design. Results in both experiments showed response rate as a decreasing function of response- signal temporal separation. The findings could be the result of the combination of delaying conditioned reinforcement and blocking the response selected for reinforcement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-3452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03395697</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PYRCAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Animals ; Behavior ; Behavior Patterns ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Birds ; Blocking ; Cues ; Delayed ; Experiments ; Independent variables ; Operant Conditioning ; Predictor Variables ; Psychology ; Rats ; Reinforcement ; Reinforcement (Psychology) ; Research Methodology ; Response rate ; Response rates ; Responses ; Royalty ; Stimuli ; Stimuli (Psychology) ; Studies ; Time ; Variables</subject><ispartof>The Psychological record, 2010, Vol.60 (1), p.115-136</ispartof><rights>Association of Behavior Analysis International 2010</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 The Association for Behavior Analysis International</rights><rights>Copyright The Psychological Record Winter 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-79c0e7f21981f808dfc3e5359d2da69f180fe092b15b72ca3d2f019a0ef59bee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-79c0e7f21981f808dfc3e5359d2da69f180fe092b15b72ca3d2f019a0ef59bee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF03395697$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03395697$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12826,27903,27904,30978,30979,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ874140$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pulido, Marco A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Response-Signal Temporal Separation on Behavior Maintained Under Temporally Defined Schedules of Delayed Signaled Reinforcement</title><title>The Psychological record</title><addtitle>Psychol Rec</addtitle><description>The present study assessed the effects of systematically separating the cue from the response in temporally defined schedules of delayed signaled reinforcement. Identical schedules were used to study the effects of the independent variable on response acquisition and response maintenance. In the first experiment, 8 groups of 3 naive rats were exposed to 1 of 8 temporally defined schedules that differed in both the duration of a response opportunity and response- signal temporal separation. In the second experiment, 3 rats were exposed to the previously described schedules using a within-subjects design. Results in both experiments showed response rate as a decreasing function of response- signal temporal separation. The findings could be the result of the combination of delaying conditioned reinforcement and blocking the response selected for reinforcement.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior Patterns</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Blocking</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Delayed</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Independent variables</subject><subject>Operant Conditioning</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Response rate</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Royalty</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Stimuli (Psychology)</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0033-2933</issn><issn>2163-3452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkktvEzEQxy0EEiFw4cxhBRIH0BY_1tn1sY-Uh4qQmvZsOd5x6mrXXuwNUr4Cn5pJFrUCRbbl0fx_M_aMhpDXjJ4wSutPZ5dUCCUXqn5CZpwtRCkqyZ-SGUV_yZUQz8mLnO8ppayi9Yz8XjoHdsxFdMU15CGGDOXKb4Lpihvoh5jQWMFgkhl9DAXuM7gzv3xMxXfjw4gH2uI2tJAeArpdcQHuIKzsHbTbDg4PXEBndnvnIT8a1-CDi8lCD2F8SZ4502V49feek9vL5c35l_Lqx-ev56dXpa0kG8taWQq140w1zDW0aZ0VIIVULW_NQjnWUAdU8TWT65pbI1ruKFOGgpNqDSDm5P2Ud0jx5xbyqHufLXSdCRC3WctaCMmwX3Py9j_wPm4T_jzrWrKKN5WkCL2boA1WpPfljMnYfUZ9ylmDDKskUuURagMBsF0xYLPQ_Q9_coTH1ULv7dGAD1OATTHnBE4Pyfcm7TSjej8a-nE0EH4zwZC8fQCX35q6wqlA-eMkZ5TCBtJj3UeS_QFxLMGT</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Pulido, Marco A.</creator><creator>Martínez, Guillermo</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Southern Illinois University Carbondale</general><general>The Association for Behavior Analysis International</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Effects of Response-Signal Temporal Separation on Behavior Maintained Under Temporally Defined Schedules of Delayed Signaled Reinforcement</title><author>Pulido, Marco A. ; Martínez, Guillermo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-79c0e7f21981f808dfc3e5359d2da69f180fe092b15b72ca3d2f019a0ef59bee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior Patterns</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Blocking</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Delayed</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Independent variables</topic><topic>Operant Conditioning</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Response rate</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Royalty</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Stimuli (Psychology)</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pulido, Marco A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Psychological record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pulido, Marco A.</au><au>Martínez, Guillermo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ874140</ericid><atitle>Effects of Response-Signal Temporal Separation on Behavior Maintained Under Temporally Defined Schedules of Delayed Signaled Reinforcement</atitle><jtitle>The Psychological record</jtitle><stitle>Psychol Rec</stitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>115-136</pages><issn>0033-2933</issn><eissn>2163-3452</eissn><coden>PYRCAI</coden><abstract>The present study assessed the effects of systematically separating the cue from the response in temporally defined schedules of delayed signaled reinforcement. Identical schedules were used to study the effects of the independent variable on response acquisition and response maintenance. In the first experiment, 8 groups of 3 naive rats were exposed to 1 of 8 temporally defined schedules that differed in both the duration of a response opportunity and response- signal temporal separation. In the second experiment, 3 rats were exposed to the previously described schedules using a within-subjects design. Results in both experiments showed response rate as a decreasing function of response- signal temporal separation. The findings could be the result of the combination of delaying conditioned reinforcement and blocking the response selected for reinforcement.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/BF03395697</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0033-2933 |
| ispartof | The Psychological record, 2010, Vol.60 (1), p.115-136 |
| issn | 0033-2933 2163-3452 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57335103 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source; SpringerLink Journals; Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Agreements Animals Behavior Behavior Patterns Behavioral Science and Psychology Birds Blocking Cues Delayed Experiments Independent variables Operant Conditioning Predictor Variables Psychology Rats Reinforcement Reinforcement (Psychology) Research Methodology Response rate Response rates Responses Royalty Stimuli Stimuli (Psychology) Studies Time Variables |
| title | Effects of Response-Signal Temporal Separation on Behavior Maintained Under Temporally Defined Schedules of Delayed Signaled Reinforcement |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T08%3A08%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Response-Signal%20Temporal%20Separation%20on%20Behavior%20Maintained%20Under%20Temporally%20Defined%20Schedules%20of%20Delayed%20Signaled%20Reinforcement&rft.jtitle=The%20Psychological%20record&rft.au=Pulido,%20Marco%20A.&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=115-136&rft.issn=0033-2933&rft.eissn=2163-3452&rft.coden=PYRCAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03395697&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA218845145%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=751428450&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A218845145&rft_ericid=EJ874140&rfr_iscdi=true |