Which Training Method Works Best? A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Three Methods of Training Clinicians in Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills

This study evaluated the efficacy of three methods of training community mental health providers (N = 150) in Dialectical Behavior Therapy skills, including a written treatment manual; an interactive, multimedia online training (OLT); and a two-day instructor-led training workshop (ILT). A hybrid de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behaviour research and therapy 2009-11, Vol.47 (11), p.921-930
Hauptverfasser: Dimeff, Linda A, Koerner, Kelly, Woodcock, Eric A, Beadnell, Blair, Brown, Milton Z, Skutch, Julie M, Paves, Andrew P, Bazinet, Alissa, Harned, Melanie S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 930
container_issue 11
container_start_page 921
container_title Behaviour research and therapy
container_volume 47
creator Dimeff, Linda A
Koerner, Kelly
Woodcock, Eric A
Beadnell, Blair
Brown, Milton Z
Skutch, Julie M
Paves, Andrew P
Bazinet, Alissa
Harned, Melanie S
description This study evaluated the efficacy of three methods of training community mental health providers (N = 150) in Dialectical Behavior Therapy skills, including a written treatment manual; an interactive, multimedia online training (OLT); and a two-day instructor-led training workshop (ILT). A hybrid design was utilized that incorporated aspects of efficacy and effectiveness trials. Assessments were completed at baseline, post-training, and 30- and 90-days following training. The results indicate that learner satisfaction with the training was highest in OLT and ILT, and both resulted in significantly higher satisfaction ratings than the manual. OLT outperformed ILT and the manual in increasing knowledge of the treatment, whereas ILT and the manual did not differ. All three training methods resulted in comparable increases in clinicians' ability to apply course content in clinical simulations. Overall, the results provide strong support for the efficacy of technology-based OLT methods in disseminating knowledge of empirically supported treatments to community mental health providers, suggesting that OLT may be a high-quality, easily accessible, and affordable addition to traditional training methods. Adapted from source document.
doi_str_mv 10.10.10/j.brat.2009.07.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57326329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57326329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_573263293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjs1OwzAQhH0AifLzBFz2xK3GSdSGnBANIC5cIFKPlXG2eFvHDl4XCd6D98WgSlyRVprZ1XyjFeK8UPJ3LjfyJeokS6UaqWqpiuJATJRSs2ndzOsjccy8yWt1VaqJ-FpaMha6qMmTf4VHTDb0sAxxy7BATtdwA0_a92GgT-yhDT7F4Fy2XSTt8mEYdfxBOxsR9wUMYf1X2rqshrRnIA-3GUOTyGR6gVa_U4gZxqjHD3jeknN8Kg7X2jGe7fVEXNzfde3DdIzhbZe_Wg3EBp3THsOOV7O6KudV2VT_Dn4D1iNgxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57326329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Which Training Method Works Best? A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Three Methods of Training Clinicians in Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Dimeff, Linda A ; Koerner, Kelly ; Woodcock, Eric A ; Beadnell, Blair ; Brown, Milton Z ; Skutch, Julie M ; Paves, Andrew P ; Bazinet, Alissa ; Harned, Melanie S</creator><creatorcontrib>Dimeff, Linda A ; Koerner, Kelly ; Woodcock, Eric A ; Beadnell, Blair ; Brown, Milton Z ; Skutch, Julie M ; Paves, Andrew P ; Bazinet, Alissa ; Harned, Melanie S</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated the efficacy of three methods of training community mental health providers (N = 150) in Dialectical Behavior Therapy skills, including a written treatment manual; an interactive, multimedia online training (OLT); and a two-day instructor-led training workshop (ILT). A hybrid design was utilized that incorporated aspects of efficacy and effectiveness trials. Assessments were completed at baseline, post-training, and 30- and 90-days following training. The results indicate that learner satisfaction with the training was highest in OLT and ILT, and both resulted in significantly higher satisfaction ratings than the manual. OLT outperformed ILT and the manual in increasing knowledge of the treatment, whereas ILT and the manual did not differ. All three training methods resulted in comparable increases in clinicians' ability to apply course content in clinical simulations. Overall, the results provide strong support for the efficacy of technology-based OLT methods in disseminating knowledge of empirically supported treatments to community mental health providers, suggesting that OLT may be a high-quality, easily accessible, and affordable addition to traditional training methods. Adapted from source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-7967</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.10.10/j.brat.2009.07.011</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRTHAA</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Behaviour therapy ; Community mental health services ; Efficacy ; Multimedia ; Randomized controlled trials ; Workshops</subject><ispartof>Behaviour research and therapy, 2009-11, Vol.47 (11), p.921-930</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,31005</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dimeff, Linda A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koerner, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodcock, Eric A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beadnell, Blair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Milton Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skutch, Julie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paves, Andrew P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bazinet, Alissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harned, Melanie S</creatorcontrib><title>Which Training Method Works Best? A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Three Methods of Training Clinicians in Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills</title><title>Behaviour research and therapy</title><description>This study evaluated the efficacy of three methods of training community mental health providers (N = 150) in Dialectical Behavior Therapy skills, including a written treatment manual; an interactive, multimedia online training (OLT); and a two-day instructor-led training workshop (ILT). A hybrid design was utilized that incorporated aspects of efficacy and effectiveness trials. Assessments were completed at baseline, post-training, and 30- and 90-days following training. The results indicate that learner satisfaction with the training was highest in OLT and ILT, and both resulted in significantly higher satisfaction ratings than the manual. OLT outperformed ILT and the manual in increasing knowledge of the treatment, whereas ILT and the manual did not differ. All three training methods resulted in comparable increases in clinicians' ability to apply course content in clinical simulations. Overall, the results provide strong support for the efficacy of technology-based OLT methods in disseminating knowledge of empirically supported treatments to community mental health providers, suggesting that OLT may be a high-quality, easily accessible, and affordable addition to traditional training methods. Adapted from source document.</description><subject>Behaviour therapy</subject><subject>Community mental health services</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Multimedia</subject><subject>Randomized controlled trials</subject><subject>Workshops</subject><issn>0005-7967</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjs1OwzAQhH0AifLzBFz2xK3GSdSGnBANIC5cIFKPlXG2eFvHDl4XCd6D98WgSlyRVprZ1XyjFeK8UPJ3LjfyJeokS6UaqWqpiuJATJRSs2ndzOsjccy8yWt1VaqJ-FpaMha6qMmTf4VHTDb0sAxxy7BATtdwA0_a92GgT-yhDT7F4Fy2XSTt8mEYdfxBOxsR9wUMYf1X2rqshrRnIA-3GUOTyGR6gVa_U4gZxqjHD3jeknN8Kg7X2jGe7fVEXNzfde3DdIzhbZe_Wg3EBp3THsOOV7O6KudV2VT_Dn4D1iNgxw</recordid><startdate>20091101</startdate><enddate>20091101</enddate><creator>Dimeff, Linda A</creator><creator>Koerner, Kelly</creator><creator>Woodcock, Eric A</creator><creator>Beadnell, Blair</creator><creator>Brown, Milton Z</creator><creator>Skutch, Julie M</creator><creator>Paves, Andrew P</creator><creator>Bazinet, Alissa</creator><creator>Harned, Melanie S</creator><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091101</creationdate><title>Which Training Method Works Best? A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Three Methods of Training Clinicians in Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills</title><author>Dimeff, Linda A ; Koerner, Kelly ; Woodcock, Eric A ; Beadnell, Blair ; Brown, Milton Z ; Skutch, Julie M ; Paves, Andrew P ; Bazinet, Alissa ; Harned, Melanie S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_573263293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Behaviour therapy</topic><topic>Community mental health services</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Multimedia</topic><topic>Randomized controlled trials</topic><topic>Workshops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dimeff, Linda A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koerner, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodcock, Eric A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beadnell, Blair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Milton Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skutch, Julie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paves, Andrew P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bazinet, Alissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harned, Melanie S</creatorcontrib><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Behaviour research and therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dimeff, Linda A</au><au>Koerner, Kelly</au><au>Woodcock, Eric A</au><au>Beadnell, Blair</au><au>Brown, Milton Z</au><au>Skutch, Julie M</au><au>Paves, Andrew P</au><au>Bazinet, Alissa</au><au>Harned, Melanie S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Which Training Method Works Best? A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Three Methods of Training Clinicians in Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills</atitle><jtitle>Behaviour research and therapy</jtitle><date>2009-11-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>921</spage><epage>930</epage><pages>921-930</pages><issn>0005-7967</issn><coden>BRTHAA</coden><abstract>This study evaluated the efficacy of three methods of training community mental health providers (N = 150) in Dialectical Behavior Therapy skills, including a written treatment manual; an interactive, multimedia online training (OLT); and a two-day instructor-led training workshop (ILT). A hybrid design was utilized that incorporated aspects of efficacy and effectiveness trials. Assessments were completed at baseline, post-training, and 30- and 90-days following training. The results indicate that learner satisfaction with the training was highest in OLT and ILT, and both resulted in significantly higher satisfaction ratings than the manual. OLT outperformed ILT and the manual in increasing knowledge of the treatment, whereas ILT and the manual did not differ. All three training methods resulted in comparable increases in clinicians' ability to apply course content in clinical simulations. Overall, the results provide strong support for the efficacy of technology-based OLT methods in disseminating knowledge of empirically supported treatments to community mental health providers, suggesting that OLT may be a high-quality, easily accessible, and affordable addition to traditional training methods. Adapted from source document.</abstract><doi>10.10.10/j.brat.2009.07.011</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0005-7967
ispartof Behaviour research and therapy, 2009-11, Vol.47 (11), p.921-930
issn 0005-7967
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57326329
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Behaviour therapy
Community mental health services
Efficacy
Multimedia
Randomized controlled trials
Workshops
title Which Training Method Works Best? A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Three Methods of Training Clinicians in Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T03%3A14%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which%20Training%20Method%20Works%20Best?%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial%20Comparing%20Three%20Methods%20of%20Training%20Clinicians%20in%20Dialectical%20Behavior%20Therapy%20Skills&rft.jtitle=Behaviour%20research%20and%20therapy&rft.au=Dimeff,%20Linda%20A&rft.date=2009-11-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=921&rft.epage=930&rft.pages=921-930&rft.issn=0005-7967&rft.coden=BRTHAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.10.10/j.brat.2009.07.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E57326329%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57326329&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true