Assessing smoking status in children, adolescents and adults: cotinine cut-points revisited
ABSTRACT Aims To reassess saliva cotinine cut‐points to discriminate smoking status. Cotinine cut‐points that are in use were derived from relatively small samples of smokers and non‐smokers 20 or more years ago. It is possible that optimal cut‐points may have changed as prevalence and exposure to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Addiction (Abingdon, England) England), 2008-09, Vol.103 (9), p.1553-1561 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1561 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1553 |
container_title | Addiction (Abingdon, England) |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Jarvis, Martin J. Fidler, Jennifer Mindell, Jennifer Feyerabend, Colin West, Robert |
description | ABSTRACT
Aims To reassess saliva cotinine cut‐points to discriminate smoking status. Cotinine cut‐points that are in use were derived from relatively small samples of smokers and non‐smokers 20 or more years ago. It is possible that optimal cut‐points may have changed as prevalence and exposure to passive smoking have declined.
Design Cross‐sectional survey of the general population, with assessment of self‐reported smoking and saliva cotinine.
Participants A total of 58 791 respondents aged 4 years and older in the Health Survey for England for the years 1996–2004 who provided valid saliva cotinine specimens.
Measures Saliva cotinine concentrations, demographic variables, self‐reported smoking, presence or absence of smoking in the home, a composite index of social disadvantage derived from occupation, housing tenure and access to a car.
Findings A cut‐point of 12 ng/ml performed best overall, with specificity of 96.9% and sensitivity of 96.7% in discriminating confirmed cigarette smokers from never regular smokers. This cut‐point also identified correctly 95.8% of children aged 8–15 years smoking six or more cigarettes a week. There was evidence of substantial misreport in claimed ex‐smokers, especially adolescents (specificity 72.3%) and young adults aged 16–24 years (77.5%). Optimal cut‐points varied by presence (18 ng/ml) or absence (5 ng/ml) of smoking in the home, and there was a gradient from 8 ng/ml to 18 ng/ml with increasing social disadvantage.
Conclusions The extent of non‐smokers' exposure to other people's tobacco smoke is the principal factor driving optimal cotinine cut‐points. A cut‐point of 12 ng/ml can be recommended for general use across the whole age range, although different cut‐points may be appropriate for population subgroups and in societies with differing levels of exposure to secondhand smoke. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02297.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57279623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57279623</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5747-1e6a0acfe7e59c910264fe5cdf9537d8a990da38631d12c2facb5b2e75bf18ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV2L1DAUhoMo7rj6F6QIemVrvtMIXoy7uirrCrIi6EVI01Qz20nHnFZn_73pzjCCN5qbk3Ce93DCg1BBcEXyebaqCJO4xJyzimJcV5hSrartLbQ4NG6jBdZSlJRwfITuAawwxqrW_C46IrWqmcBqgb4uATxAiN8KWA9XN3W04wRFiIX7Hvo2-fi0sO3Qe3A-jlDY2Ob31I_wvHDDGGKIvnDTWG6GMPeT_xkgjL69j-50tgf_YF-P0afXry5P3pTnH87enizPSycUVyXx0mLrOq-80E4TTCXvvHBtpwVTbW21xq1ltWSkJdTRzrpGNNQr0XSkbiw7Rk92czdp-DF5GM065F373kY_TGCEokpLyv4JMqkl10Jl8NFf4GqYUsyfMERrITnDOEP1DnJpAEi-M5sU1jZdG4LNrMmszGzDzDbMrMncaDLbHH24nz81a9_-Ce69ZODxHrDgbN8lG12AA0exqDnnJHMvdtyv0Pvr_17ALE9P51vOl7t8gNFvD3mbroxUTAnz-eLMfJTvXn650O_NJfsNpOq9kA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199564300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing smoking status in children, adolescents and adults: cotinine cut-points revisited</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Jarvis, Martin J. ; Fidler, Jennifer ; Mindell, Jennifer ; Feyerabend, Colin ; West, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Jarvis, Martin J. ; Fidler, Jennifer ; Mindell, Jennifer ; Feyerabend, Colin ; West, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Aims To reassess saliva cotinine cut‐points to discriminate smoking status. Cotinine cut‐points that are in use were derived from relatively small samples of smokers and non‐smokers 20 or more years ago. It is possible that optimal cut‐points may have changed as prevalence and exposure to passive smoking have declined.
Design Cross‐sectional survey of the general population, with assessment of self‐reported smoking and saliva cotinine.
Participants A total of 58 791 respondents aged 4 years and older in the Health Survey for England for the years 1996–2004 who provided valid saliva cotinine specimens.
Measures Saliva cotinine concentrations, demographic variables, self‐reported smoking, presence or absence of smoking in the home, a composite index of social disadvantage derived from occupation, housing tenure and access to a car.
Findings A cut‐point of 12 ng/ml performed best overall, with specificity of 96.9% and sensitivity of 96.7% in discriminating confirmed cigarette smokers from never regular smokers. This cut‐point also identified correctly 95.8% of children aged 8–15 years smoking six or more cigarettes a week. There was evidence of substantial misreport in claimed ex‐smokers, especially adolescents (specificity 72.3%) and young adults aged 16–24 years (77.5%). Optimal cut‐points varied by presence (18 ng/ml) or absence (5 ng/ml) of smoking in the home, and there was a gradient from 8 ng/ml to 18 ng/ml with increasing social disadvantage.
Conclusions The extent of non‐smokers' exposure to other people's tobacco smoke is the principal factor driving optimal cotinine cut‐points. A cut‐point of 12 ng/ml can be recommended for general use across the whole age range, although different cut‐points may be appropriate for population subgroups and in societies with differing levels of exposure to secondhand smoke.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-2140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-0443</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02297.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18783507</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADICE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Addiction ; Addictive behaviors ; Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Adults ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers - analysis ; Body fluids ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Children & youth ; Cotinine - analysis ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disadvantaged people ; Environmental Exposure ; Female ; General aspects ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nicotine ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Public health ; Reference Values ; Saliva - chemistry ; Saliva cotinine ; Smoking ; Smoking - metabolism ; smoking cut-points ; Social problems ; Teenagers ; Tobacco smoke ; Tobacco Smoke Pollution - statistics & numerical data ; Tobacco smoking ; Tobacco, tobacco smoking ; Toxicology ; United Kingdom ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2008-09, Vol.103 (9), p.1553-1561</ispartof><rights>2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 Society for the Study of Addiction</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Journal compilation © 2008 Society for the Study of Addiction</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5747-1e6a0acfe7e59c910264fe5cdf9537d8a990da38631d12c2facb5b2e75bf18ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5747-1e6a0acfe7e59c910264fe5cdf9537d8a990da38631d12c2facb5b2e75bf18ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1360-0443.2008.02297.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1360-0443.2008.02297.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20584441$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18783507$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jarvis, Martin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidler, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mindell, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feyerabend, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing smoking status in children, adolescents and adults: cotinine cut-points revisited</title><title>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</title><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Aims To reassess saliva cotinine cut‐points to discriminate smoking status. Cotinine cut‐points that are in use were derived from relatively small samples of smokers and non‐smokers 20 or more years ago. It is possible that optimal cut‐points may have changed as prevalence and exposure to passive smoking have declined.
Design Cross‐sectional survey of the general population, with assessment of self‐reported smoking and saliva cotinine.
Participants A total of 58 791 respondents aged 4 years and older in the Health Survey for England for the years 1996–2004 who provided valid saliva cotinine specimens.
Measures Saliva cotinine concentrations, demographic variables, self‐reported smoking, presence or absence of smoking in the home, a composite index of social disadvantage derived from occupation, housing tenure and access to a car.
Findings A cut‐point of 12 ng/ml performed best overall, with specificity of 96.9% and sensitivity of 96.7% in discriminating confirmed cigarette smokers from never regular smokers. This cut‐point also identified correctly 95.8% of children aged 8–15 years smoking six or more cigarettes a week. There was evidence of substantial misreport in claimed ex‐smokers, especially adolescents (specificity 72.3%) and young adults aged 16–24 years (77.5%). Optimal cut‐points varied by presence (18 ng/ml) or absence (5 ng/ml) of smoking in the home, and there was a gradient from 8 ng/ml to 18 ng/ml with increasing social disadvantage.
Conclusions The extent of non‐smokers' exposure to other people's tobacco smoke is the principal factor driving optimal cotinine cut‐points. A cut‐point of 12 ng/ml can be recommended for general use across the whole age range, although different cut‐points may be appropriate for population subgroups and in societies with differing levels of exposure to secondhand smoke.</description><subject>Addiction</subject><subject>Addictive behaviors</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers - analysis</subject><subject>Body fluids</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Cotinine - analysis</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disadvantaged people</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nicotine</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Saliva - chemistry</subject><subject>Saliva cotinine</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking - metabolism</subject><subject>smoking cut-points</subject><subject>Social problems</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Tobacco smoke</subject><subject>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0965-2140</issn><issn>1360-0443</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV2L1DAUhoMo7rj6F6QIemVrvtMIXoy7uirrCrIi6EVI01Qz20nHnFZn_73pzjCCN5qbk3Ce93DCg1BBcEXyebaqCJO4xJyzimJcV5hSrartLbQ4NG6jBdZSlJRwfITuAawwxqrW_C46IrWqmcBqgb4uATxAiN8KWA9XN3W04wRFiIX7Hvo2-fi0sO3Qe3A-jlDY2Ob31I_wvHDDGGKIvnDTWG6GMPeT_xkgjL69j-50tgf_YF-P0afXry5P3pTnH87enizPSycUVyXx0mLrOq-80E4TTCXvvHBtpwVTbW21xq1ltWSkJdTRzrpGNNQr0XSkbiw7Rk92czdp-DF5GM065F373kY_TGCEokpLyv4JMqkl10Jl8NFf4GqYUsyfMERrITnDOEP1DnJpAEi-M5sU1jZdG4LNrMmszGzDzDbMrMncaDLbHH24nz81a9_-Ce69ZODxHrDgbN8lG12AA0exqDnnJHMvdtyv0Pvr_17ALE9P51vOl7t8gNFvD3mbroxUTAnz-eLMfJTvXn650O_NJfsNpOq9kA</recordid><startdate>200809</startdate><enddate>200809</enddate><creator>Jarvis, Martin J.</creator><creator>Fidler, Jennifer</creator><creator>Mindell, Jennifer</creator><creator>Feyerabend, Colin</creator><creator>West, Robert</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200809</creationdate><title>Assessing smoking status in children, adolescents and adults: cotinine cut-points revisited</title><author>Jarvis, Martin J. ; Fidler, Jennifer ; Mindell, Jennifer ; Feyerabend, Colin ; West, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5747-1e6a0acfe7e59c910264fe5cdf9537d8a990da38631d12c2facb5b2e75bf18ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Addiction</topic><topic>Addictive behaviors</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers - analysis</topic><topic>Body fluids</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Cotinine - analysis</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disadvantaged people</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nicotine</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Saliva - chemistry</topic><topic>Saliva cotinine</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking - metabolism</topic><topic>smoking cut-points</topic><topic>Social problems</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Tobacco smoke</topic><topic>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jarvis, Martin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidler, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mindell, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feyerabend, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jarvis, Martin J.</au><au>Fidler, Jennifer</au><au>Mindell, Jennifer</au><au>Feyerabend, Colin</au><au>West, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing smoking status in children, adolescents and adults: cotinine cut-points revisited</atitle><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><date>2008-09</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1553</spage><epage>1561</epage><pages>1553-1561</pages><issn>0965-2140</issn><eissn>1360-0443</eissn><coden>ADICE5</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT
Aims To reassess saliva cotinine cut‐points to discriminate smoking status. Cotinine cut‐points that are in use were derived from relatively small samples of smokers and non‐smokers 20 or more years ago. It is possible that optimal cut‐points may have changed as prevalence and exposure to passive smoking have declined.
Design Cross‐sectional survey of the general population, with assessment of self‐reported smoking and saliva cotinine.
Participants A total of 58 791 respondents aged 4 years and older in the Health Survey for England for the years 1996–2004 who provided valid saliva cotinine specimens.
Measures Saliva cotinine concentrations, demographic variables, self‐reported smoking, presence or absence of smoking in the home, a composite index of social disadvantage derived from occupation, housing tenure and access to a car.
Findings A cut‐point of 12 ng/ml performed best overall, with specificity of 96.9% and sensitivity of 96.7% in discriminating confirmed cigarette smokers from never regular smokers. This cut‐point also identified correctly 95.8% of children aged 8–15 years smoking six or more cigarettes a week. There was evidence of substantial misreport in claimed ex‐smokers, especially adolescents (specificity 72.3%) and young adults aged 16–24 years (77.5%). Optimal cut‐points varied by presence (18 ng/ml) or absence (5 ng/ml) of smoking in the home, and there was a gradient from 8 ng/ml to 18 ng/ml with increasing social disadvantage.
Conclusions The extent of non‐smokers' exposure to other people's tobacco smoke is the principal factor driving optimal cotinine cut‐points. A cut‐point of 12 ng/ml can be recommended for general use across the whole age range, although different cut‐points may be appropriate for population subgroups and in societies with differing levels of exposure to secondhand smoke.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>18783507</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02297.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0965-2140 |
ispartof | Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2008-09, Vol.103 (9), p.1553-1561 |
issn | 0965-2140 1360-0443 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57279623 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Addiction Addictive behaviors Adolescent Adolescents Adult Adult and adolescent clinical studies Adults Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Biomarkers - analysis Body fluids Child Child, Preschool Children Children & youth Cotinine - analysis Cross-Sectional Studies Disadvantaged people Environmental Exposure Female General aspects Health Surveys Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Nicotine Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Public health Reference Values Saliva - chemistry Saliva cotinine Smoking Smoking - metabolism smoking cut-points Social problems Teenagers Tobacco smoke Tobacco Smoke Pollution - statistics & numerical data Tobacco smoking Tobacco, tobacco smoking Toxicology United Kingdom Young Adult |
title | Assessing smoking status in children, adolescents and adults: cotinine cut-points revisited |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A53%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20smoking%20status%20in%20children,%20adolescents%20and%20adults:%20cotinine%20cut-points%20revisited&rft.jtitle=Addiction%20(Abingdon,%20England)&rft.au=Jarvis,%20Martin%20J.&rft.date=2008-09&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1553&rft.epage=1561&rft.pages=1553-1561&rft.issn=0965-2140&rft.eissn=1360-0443&rft.coden=ADICE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02297.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57279623%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199564300&rft_id=info:pmid/18783507&rfr_iscdi=true |