Assessing smoking status in children, adolescents and adults: cotinine cut-points revisited

ABSTRACT Aims  To reassess saliva cotinine cut‐points to discriminate smoking status. Cotinine cut‐points that are in use were derived from relatively small samples of smokers and non‐smokers 20 or more years ago. It is possible that optimal cut‐points may have changed as prevalence and exposure to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Addiction (Abingdon, England) England), 2008-09, Vol.103 (9), p.1553-1561
Hauptverfasser: Jarvis, Martin J., Fidler, Jennifer, Mindell, Jennifer, Feyerabend, Colin, West, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1561
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1553
container_title Addiction (Abingdon, England)
container_volume 103
creator Jarvis, Martin J.
Fidler, Jennifer
Mindell, Jennifer
Feyerabend, Colin
West, Robert
description ABSTRACT Aims  To reassess saliva cotinine cut‐points to discriminate smoking status. Cotinine cut‐points that are in use were derived from relatively small samples of smokers and non‐smokers 20 or more years ago. It is possible that optimal cut‐points may have changed as prevalence and exposure to passive smoking have declined. Design  Cross‐sectional survey of the general population, with assessment of self‐reported smoking and saliva cotinine. Participants  A total of 58 791 respondents aged 4 years and older in the Health Survey for England for the years 1996–2004 who provided valid saliva cotinine specimens. Measures  Saliva cotinine concentrations, demographic variables, self‐reported smoking, presence or absence of smoking in the home, a composite index of social disadvantage derived from occupation, housing tenure and access to a car. Findings  A cut‐point of 12 ng/ml performed best overall, with specificity of 96.9% and sensitivity of 96.7% in discriminating confirmed cigarette smokers from never regular smokers. This cut‐point also identified correctly 95.8% of children aged 8–15 years smoking six or more cigarettes a week. There was evidence of substantial misreport in claimed ex‐smokers, especially adolescents (specificity 72.3%) and young adults aged 16–24 years (77.5%). Optimal cut‐points varied by presence (18 ng/ml) or absence (5 ng/ml) of smoking in the home, and there was a gradient from 8 ng/ml to 18 ng/ml with increasing social disadvantage. Conclusions  The extent of non‐smokers' exposure to other people's tobacco smoke is the principal factor driving optimal cotinine cut‐points. A cut‐point of 12 ng/ml can be recommended for general use across the whole age range, although different cut‐points may be appropriate for population subgroups and in societies with differing levels of exposure to secondhand smoke.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02297.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57279623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57279623</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5747-1e6a0acfe7e59c910264fe5cdf9537d8a990da38631d12c2facb5b2e75bf18ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV2L1DAUhoMo7rj6F6QIemVrvtMIXoy7uirrCrIi6EVI01Qz20nHnFZn_73pzjCCN5qbk3Ce93DCg1BBcEXyebaqCJO4xJyzimJcV5hSrartLbQ4NG6jBdZSlJRwfITuAawwxqrW_C46IrWqmcBqgb4uATxAiN8KWA9XN3W04wRFiIX7Hvo2-fi0sO3Qe3A-jlDY2Ob31I_wvHDDGGKIvnDTWG6GMPeT_xkgjL69j-50tgf_YF-P0afXry5P3pTnH87enizPSycUVyXx0mLrOq-80E4TTCXvvHBtpwVTbW21xq1ltWSkJdTRzrpGNNQr0XSkbiw7Rk92czdp-DF5GM065F373kY_TGCEokpLyv4JMqkl10Jl8NFf4GqYUsyfMERrITnDOEP1DnJpAEi-M5sU1jZdG4LNrMmszGzDzDbMrMncaDLbHH24nz81a9_-Ce69ZODxHrDgbN8lG12AA0exqDnnJHMvdtyv0Pvr_17ALE9P51vOl7t8gNFvD3mbroxUTAnz-eLMfJTvXn650O_NJfsNpOq9kA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199564300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing smoking status in children, adolescents and adults: cotinine cut-points revisited</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Jarvis, Martin J. ; Fidler, Jennifer ; Mindell, Jennifer ; Feyerabend, Colin ; West, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Jarvis, Martin J. ; Fidler, Jennifer ; Mindell, Jennifer ; Feyerabend, Colin ; West, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Aims  To reassess saliva cotinine cut‐points to discriminate smoking status. Cotinine cut‐points that are in use were derived from relatively small samples of smokers and non‐smokers 20 or more years ago. It is possible that optimal cut‐points may have changed as prevalence and exposure to passive smoking have declined. Design  Cross‐sectional survey of the general population, with assessment of self‐reported smoking and saliva cotinine. Participants  A total of 58 791 respondents aged 4 years and older in the Health Survey for England for the years 1996–2004 who provided valid saliva cotinine specimens. Measures  Saliva cotinine concentrations, demographic variables, self‐reported smoking, presence or absence of smoking in the home, a composite index of social disadvantage derived from occupation, housing tenure and access to a car. Findings  A cut‐point of 12 ng/ml performed best overall, with specificity of 96.9% and sensitivity of 96.7% in discriminating confirmed cigarette smokers from never regular smokers. This cut‐point also identified correctly 95.8% of children aged 8–15 years smoking six or more cigarettes a week. There was evidence of substantial misreport in claimed ex‐smokers, especially adolescents (specificity 72.3%) and young adults aged 16–24 years (77.5%). Optimal cut‐points varied by presence (18 ng/ml) or absence (5 ng/ml) of smoking in the home, and there was a gradient from 8 ng/ml to 18 ng/ml with increasing social disadvantage. Conclusions  The extent of non‐smokers' exposure to other people's tobacco smoke is the principal factor driving optimal cotinine cut‐points. A cut‐point of 12 ng/ml can be recommended for general use across the whole age range, although different cut‐points may be appropriate for population subgroups and in societies with differing levels of exposure to secondhand smoke.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-2140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-0443</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02297.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18783507</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADICE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Addiction ; Addictive behaviors ; Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Adults ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers - analysis ; Body fluids ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Children &amp; youth ; Cotinine - analysis ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disadvantaged people ; Environmental Exposure ; Female ; General aspects ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nicotine ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Public health ; Reference Values ; Saliva - chemistry ; Saliva cotinine ; Smoking ; Smoking - metabolism ; smoking cut-points ; Social problems ; Teenagers ; Tobacco smoke ; Tobacco Smoke Pollution - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Tobacco smoking ; Tobacco, tobacco smoking ; Toxicology ; United Kingdom ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2008-09, Vol.103 (9), p.1553-1561</ispartof><rights>2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 Society for the Study of Addiction</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Journal compilation © 2008 Society for the Study of Addiction</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5747-1e6a0acfe7e59c910264fe5cdf9537d8a990da38631d12c2facb5b2e75bf18ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5747-1e6a0acfe7e59c910264fe5cdf9537d8a990da38631d12c2facb5b2e75bf18ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1360-0443.2008.02297.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1360-0443.2008.02297.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20584441$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18783507$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jarvis, Martin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidler, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mindell, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feyerabend, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing smoking status in children, adolescents and adults: cotinine cut-points revisited</title><title>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</title><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Aims  To reassess saliva cotinine cut‐points to discriminate smoking status. Cotinine cut‐points that are in use were derived from relatively small samples of smokers and non‐smokers 20 or more years ago. It is possible that optimal cut‐points may have changed as prevalence and exposure to passive smoking have declined. Design  Cross‐sectional survey of the general population, with assessment of self‐reported smoking and saliva cotinine. Participants  A total of 58 791 respondents aged 4 years and older in the Health Survey for England for the years 1996–2004 who provided valid saliva cotinine specimens. Measures  Saliva cotinine concentrations, demographic variables, self‐reported smoking, presence or absence of smoking in the home, a composite index of social disadvantage derived from occupation, housing tenure and access to a car. Findings  A cut‐point of 12 ng/ml performed best overall, with specificity of 96.9% and sensitivity of 96.7% in discriminating confirmed cigarette smokers from never regular smokers. This cut‐point also identified correctly 95.8% of children aged 8–15 years smoking six or more cigarettes a week. There was evidence of substantial misreport in claimed ex‐smokers, especially adolescents (specificity 72.3%) and young adults aged 16–24 years (77.5%). Optimal cut‐points varied by presence (18 ng/ml) or absence (5 ng/ml) of smoking in the home, and there was a gradient from 8 ng/ml to 18 ng/ml with increasing social disadvantage. Conclusions  The extent of non‐smokers' exposure to other people's tobacco smoke is the principal factor driving optimal cotinine cut‐points. A cut‐point of 12 ng/ml can be recommended for general use across the whole age range, although different cut‐points may be appropriate for population subgroups and in societies with differing levels of exposure to secondhand smoke.</description><subject>Addiction</subject><subject>Addictive behaviors</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers - analysis</subject><subject>Body fluids</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Cotinine - analysis</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disadvantaged people</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nicotine</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Saliva - chemistry</subject><subject>Saliva cotinine</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking - metabolism</subject><subject>smoking cut-points</subject><subject>Social problems</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Tobacco smoke</subject><subject>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0965-2140</issn><issn>1360-0443</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV2L1DAUhoMo7rj6F6QIemVrvtMIXoy7uirrCrIi6EVI01Qz20nHnFZn_73pzjCCN5qbk3Ce93DCg1BBcEXyebaqCJO4xJyzimJcV5hSrartLbQ4NG6jBdZSlJRwfITuAawwxqrW_C46IrWqmcBqgb4uATxAiN8KWA9XN3W04wRFiIX7Hvo2-fi0sO3Qe3A-jlDY2Ob31I_wvHDDGGKIvnDTWG6GMPeT_xkgjL69j-50tgf_YF-P0afXry5P3pTnH87enizPSycUVyXx0mLrOq-80E4TTCXvvHBtpwVTbW21xq1ltWSkJdTRzrpGNNQr0XSkbiw7Rk92czdp-DF5GM065F373kY_TGCEokpLyv4JMqkl10Jl8NFf4GqYUsyfMERrITnDOEP1DnJpAEi-M5sU1jZdG4LNrMmszGzDzDbMrMncaDLbHH24nz81a9_-Ce69ZODxHrDgbN8lG12AA0exqDnnJHMvdtyv0Pvr_17ALE9P51vOl7t8gNFvD3mbroxUTAnz-eLMfJTvXn650O_NJfsNpOq9kA</recordid><startdate>200809</startdate><enddate>200809</enddate><creator>Jarvis, Martin J.</creator><creator>Fidler, Jennifer</creator><creator>Mindell, Jennifer</creator><creator>Feyerabend, Colin</creator><creator>West, Robert</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200809</creationdate><title>Assessing smoking status in children, adolescents and adults: cotinine cut-points revisited</title><author>Jarvis, Martin J. ; Fidler, Jennifer ; Mindell, Jennifer ; Feyerabend, Colin ; West, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5747-1e6a0acfe7e59c910264fe5cdf9537d8a990da38631d12c2facb5b2e75bf18ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Addiction</topic><topic>Addictive behaviors</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers - analysis</topic><topic>Body fluids</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Cotinine - analysis</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disadvantaged people</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nicotine</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Saliva - chemistry</topic><topic>Saliva cotinine</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking - metabolism</topic><topic>smoking cut-points</topic><topic>Social problems</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Tobacco smoke</topic><topic>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jarvis, Martin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidler, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mindell, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feyerabend, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jarvis, Martin J.</au><au>Fidler, Jennifer</au><au>Mindell, Jennifer</au><au>Feyerabend, Colin</au><au>West, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing smoking status in children, adolescents and adults: cotinine cut-points revisited</atitle><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><date>2008-09</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1553</spage><epage>1561</epage><pages>1553-1561</pages><issn>0965-2140</issn><eissn>1360-0443</eissn><coden>ADICE5</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT Aims  To reassess saliva cotinine cut‐points to discriminate smoking status. Cotinine cut‐points that are in use were derived from relatively small samples of smokers and non‐smokers 20 or more years ago. It is possible that optimal cut‐points may have changed as prevalence and exposure to passive smoking have declined. Design  Cross‐sectional survey of the general population, with assessment of self‐reported smoking and saliva cotinine. Participants  A total of 58 791 respondents aged 4 years and older in the Health Survey for England for the years 1996–2004 who provided valid saliva cotinine specimens. Measures  Saliva cotinine concentrations, demographic variables, self‐reported smoking, presence or absence of smoking in the home, a composite index of social disadvantage derived from occupation, housing tenure and access to a car. Findings  A cut‐point of 12 ng/ml performed best overall, with specificity of 96.9% and sensitivity of 96.7% in discriminating confirmed cigarette smokers from never regular smokers. This cut‐point also identified correctly 95.8% of children aged 8–15 years smoking six or more cigarettes a week. There was evidence of substantial misreport in claimed ex‐smokers, especially adolescents (specificity 72.3%) and young adults aged 16–24 years (77.5%). Optimal cut‐points varied by presence (18 ng/ml) or absence (5 ng/ml) of smoking in the home, and there was a gradient from 8 ng/ml to 18 ng/ml with increasing social disadvantage. Conclusions  The extent of non‐smokers' exposure to other people's tobacco smoke is the principal factor driving optimal cotinine cut‐points. A cut‐point of 12 ng/ml can be recommended for general use across the whole age range, although different cut‐points may be appropriate for population subgroups and in societies with differing levels of exposure to secondhand smoke.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>18783507</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02297.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0965-2140
ispartof Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2008-09, Vol.103 (9), p.1553-1561
issn 0965-2140
1360-0443
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57279623
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Addiction
Addictive behaviors
Adolescent
Adolescents
Adult
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Adults
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Biomarkers - analysis
Body fluids
Child
Child, Preschool
Children
Children & youth
Cotinine - analysis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Disadvantaged people
Environmental Exposure
Female
General aspects
Health Surveys
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nicotine
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Public health
Reference Values
Saliva - chemistry
Saliva cotinine
Smoking
Smoking - metabolism
smoking cut-points
Social problems
Teenagers
Tobacco smoke
Tobacco Smoke Pollution - statistics & numerical data
Tobacco smoking
Tobacco, tobacco smoking
Toxicology
United Kingdom
Young Adult
title Assessing smoking status in children, adolescents and adults: cotinine cut-points revisited
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A53%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20smoking%20status%20in%20children,%20adolescents%20and%20adults:%20cotinine%20cut-points%20revisited&rft.jtitle=Addiction%20(Abingdon,%20England)&rft.au=Jarvis,%20Martin%20J.&rft.date=2008-09&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1553&rft.epage=1561&rft.pages=1553-1561&rft.issn=0965-2140&rft.eissn=1360-0443&rft.coden=ADICE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02297.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57279623%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199564300&rft_id=info:pmid/18783507&rfr_iscdi=true