Incidence and effect of leg length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty

Abstract Objectives The clinical importance of a leg length discrepancy (LLD) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains controversial. This study was undertaken to determine the effects of LLD on clinical outcomes at up to 3 years follow-up. Design and setting Prospective, multicentre study. Pa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physiotherapy 2008-06, Vol.94 (2), p.91-96
Hauptverfasser: Beard, D.J, Palan, J, Andrew, J.G, Nolan, J, Murray, D.W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 96
container_issue 2
container_start_page 91
container_title Physiotherapy
container_volume 94
creator Beard, D.J
Palan, J
Andrew, J.G
Nolan, J
Murray, D.W
description Abstract Objectives The clinical importance of a leg length discrepancy (LLD) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains controversial. This study was undertaken to determine the effects of LLD on clinical outcomes at up to 3 years follow-up. Design and setting Prospective, multicentre study. Participants Nine hundred and eighty-seven cases of primary THA, categorised into two main groups: the NoLLD group (LLD of less than 10 mm) and the LLD group (LLD of 10 mm or more). Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure was the change in Oxford Hip Score (ΔOHS) at up to 3 years follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were length of operating time and hospital stay, and revision and dislocation rates. Potential predisposing factors for LLD, including body mass index, age and type of anaesthesia employed, were examined. Results At 3 years, the LLD group had a significantly worse ΔOHS [22.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 20.5 to 23.5] compared with the NoLLD group (23.8; 95% CI 23.1 to 24.5) ( P = 0.034). There were no significant differences in revision ( P = 0.389) or dislocation ( P = 0.220) rates between the two groups. Use of an epidural was associated with a decreased incidence of developing an LLD of 10 mm ( P = 0.004). Conclusion A postoperative LLD of 10 mm or more leads to poorer functional outcomes. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of an LLD on clinical outcomes in the longer term.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.physio.2008.01.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57271335</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0031940608000345</els_id><sourcerecordid>20978911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-d32a1e7cd629256f36ecb422a24ae018e643ca687de86ea913fbe288206ac7dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkUFv1DAQhS1EJZa2_6AHn7gljO3EcS5IqIJSqVIPhbPl2pNdL64d7Cwo_x5Hyx31MJo5vPc08w0hNwxaBkx-PLbzYS0-tRxAtcBagP4N2TE1iIZ1sn9LdgCCNWMH8h15X8oRgPdsYDvyeB-tdxgtUhMdxWlCu9A00YD7WnG_HKjzxWacTbQrnVII6Y-Pe7qkxQR68DM1eTnkNAdTlvWKXEwmFLz-1y_Jj69fvt9-ax4e7-5vPz80tlPj0jjBDcPBOslH3stJSLTPHeeGdwaBKZSdsEaqwaGSaEYmpmfkSnGQxg7OiUvy4Zw75_TrhGXRL3VLDMFETKei-4EPTIj-v0IO46BGxqqwOwttTqVknPSc_YvJq2agN8z6qM-Y9YZZA9MVc7V9OtuwXvvbY9bF-o2n87mi1C751wbY4KO3JvzEFcsxnXKsJDXThWvQT9snt0eCgjp2vfgLpsedzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20978911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incidence and effect of leg length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Beard, D.J ; Palan, J ; Andrew, J.G ; Nolan, J ; Murray, D.W</creator><creatorcontrib>Beard, D.J ; Palan, J ; Andrew, J.G ; Nolan, J ; Murray, D.W ; EPOS Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives The clinical importance of a leg length discrepancy (LLD) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains controversial. This study was undertaken to determine the effects of LLD on clinical outcomes at up to 3 years follow-up. Design and setting Prospective, multicentre study. Participants Nine hundred and eighty-seven cases of primary THA, categorised into two main groups: the NoLLD group (LLD of less than 10 mm) and the LLD group (LLD of 10 mm or more). Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure was the change in Oxford Hip Score (ΔOHS) at up to 3 years follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were length of operating time and hospital stay, and revision and dislocation rates. Potential predisposing factors for LLD, including body mass index, age and type of anaesthesia employed, were examined. Results At 3 years, the LLD group had a significantly worse ΔOHS [22.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 20.5 to 23.5] compared with the NoLLD group (23.8; 95% CI 23.1 to 24.5) ( P = 0.034). There were no significant differences in revision ( P = 0.389) or dislocation ( P = 0.220) rates between the two groups. Use of an epidural was associated with a decreased incidence of developing an LLD of 10 mm ( P = 0.004). Conclusion A postoperative LLD of 10 mm or more leads to poorer functional outcomes. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of an LLD on clinical outcomes in the longer term.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2008.01.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty ; Arthroplasty, hip ; Clinical outcomes ; Confidence intervals ; Discrepancies ; Dislocation ; Hospitals ; Leg length discrepancy ; Oxford Hip Score ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Revision ; Revisions</subject><ispartof>Physiotherapy, 2008-06, Vol.94 (2), p.91-96</ispartof><rights>Chartered Society of Physiotherapy</rights><rights>2008 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-d32a1e7cd629256f36ecb422a24ae018e643ca687de86ea913fbe288206ac7dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-d32a1e7cd629256f36ecb422a24ae018e643ca687de86ea913fbe288206ac7dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2008.01.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,31005,46000</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beard, D.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palan, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrew, J.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nolan, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, D.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EPOS Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Incidence and effect of leg length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty</title><title>Physiotherapy</title><description>Abstract Objectives The clinical importance of a leg length discrepancy (LLD) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains controversial. This study was undertaken to determine the effects of LLD on clinical outcomes at up to 3 years follow-up. Design and setting Prospective, multicentre study. Participants Nine hundred and eighty-seven cases of primary THA, categorised into two main groups: the NoLLD group (LLD of less than 10 mm) and the LLD group (LLD of 10 mm or more). Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure was the change in Oxford Hip Score (ΔOHS) at up to 3 years follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were length of operating time and hospital stay, and revision and dislocation rates. Potential predisposing factors for LLD, including body mass index, age and type of anaesthesia employed, were examined. Results At 3 years, the LLD group had a significantly worse ΔOHS [22.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 20.5 to 23.5] compared with the NoLLD group (23.8; 95% CI 23.1 to 24.5) ( P = 0.034). There were no significant differences in revision ( P = 0.389) or dislocation ( P = 0.220) rates between the two groups. Use of an epidural was associated with a decreased incidence of developing an LLD of 10 mm ( P = 0.004). Conclusion A postoperative LLD of 10 mm or more leads to poorer functional outcomes. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of an LLD on clinical outcomes in the longer term.</description><subject>Arthroplasty</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, hip</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Discrepancies</subject><subject>Dislocation</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Leg length discrepancy</subject><subject>Oxford Hip Score</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Revision</subject><subject>Revisions</subject><issn>0031-9406</issn><issn>1873-1465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkUFv1DAQhS1EJZa2_6AHn7gljO3EcS5IqIJSqVIPhbPl2pNdL64d7Cwo_x5Hyx31MJo5vPc08w0hNwxaBkx-PLbzYS0-tRxAtcBagP4N2TE1iIZ1sn9LdgCCNWMH8h15X8oRgPdsYDvyeB-tdxgtUhMdxWlCu9A00YD7WnG_HKjzxWacTbQrnVII6Y-Pe7qkxQR68DM1eTnkNAdTlvWKXEwmFLz-1y_Jj69fvt9-ax4e7-5vPz80tlPj0jjBDcPBOslH3stJSLTPHeeGdwaBKZSdsEaqwaGSaEYmpmfkSnGQxg7OiUvy4Zw75_TrhGXRL3VLDMFETKei-4EPTIj-v0IO46BGxqqwOwttTqVknPSc_YvJq2agN8z6qM-Y9YZZA9MVc7V9OtuwXvvbY9bF-o2n87mi1C751wbY4KO3JvzEFcsxnXKsJDXThWvQT9snt0eCgjp2vfgLpsedzw</recordid><startdate>20080601</startdate><enddate>20080601</enddate><creator>Beard, D.J</creator><creator>Palan, J</creator><creator>Andrew, J.G</creator><creator>Nolan, J</creator><creator>Murray, D.W</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080601</creationdate><title>Incidence and effect of leg length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty</title><author>Beard, D.J ; Palan, J ; Andrew, J.G ; Nolan, J ; Murray, D.W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-d32a1e7cd629256f36ecb422a24ae018e643ca687de86ea913fbe288206ac7dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, hip</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Discrepancies</topic><topic>Dislocation</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Leg length discrepancy</topic><topic>Oxford Hip Score</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Revision</topic><topic>Revisions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beard, D.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palan, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrew, J.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nolan, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, D.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EPOS Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Physiotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beard, D.J</au><au>Palan, J</au><au>Andrew, J.G</au><au>Nolan, J</au><au>Murray, D.W</au><aucorp>EPOS Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incidence and effect of leg length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Physiotherapy</jtitle><date>2008-06-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>91-96</pages><issn>0031-9406</issn><eissn>1873-1465</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives The clinical importance of a leg length discrepancy (LLD) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains controversial. This study was undertaken to determine the effects of LLD on clinical outcomes at up to 3 years follow-up. Design and setting Prospective, multicentre study. Participants Nine hundred and eighty-seven cases of primary THA, categorised into two main groups: the NoLLD group (LLD of less than 10 mm) and the LLD group (LLD of 10 mm or more). Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure was the change in Oxford Hip Score (ΔOHS) at up to 3 years follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were length of operating time and hospital stay, and revision and dislocation rates. Potential predisposing factors for LLD, including body mass index, age and type of anaesthesia employed, were examined. Results At 3 years, the LLD group had a significantly worse ΔOHS [22.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 20.5 to 23.5] compared with the NoLLD group (23.8; 95% CI 23.1 to 24.5) ( P = 0.034). There were no significant differences in revision ( P = 0.389) or dislocation ( P = 0.220) rates between the two groups. Use of an epidural was associated with a decreased incidence of developing an LLD of 10 mm ( P = 0.004). Conclusion A postoperative LLD of 10 mm or more leads to poorer functional outcomes. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of an LLD on clinical outcomes in the longer term.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.physio.2008.01.005</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9406
ispartof Physiotherapy, 2008-06, Vol.94 (2), p.91-96
issn 0031-9406
1873-1465
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57271335
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty, hip
Clinical outcomes
Confidence intervals
Discrepancies
Dislocation
Hospitals
Leg length discrepancy
Oxford Hip Score
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Revision
Revisions
title Incidence and effect of leg length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T12%3A32%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incidence%20and%20effect%20of%20leg%20length%20discrepancy%20following%20total%20hip%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Physiotherapy&rft.au=Beard,%20D.J&rft.aucorp=EPOS%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2008-06-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=91-96&rft.issn=0031-9406&rft.eissn=1873-1465&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.physio.2008.01.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20978911%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20978911&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0031940608000345&rfr_iscdi=true