Characterising frailty in the clinical setting-a comparison of different approaches
The first aim of this study was to operationalise Fried's and Rockwood's frailty assessment methods in clinical populations relevant to the practicing geriatrician. In addition, the modified frailty score was compared to existing approaches. Adapted from the source document.
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Age and ageing 2009-01, Vol.38 (1), p.115-119 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 119 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 115 |
container_title | Age and ageing |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Hubbard, Ruth E O'mahony, M Sinead Woodhouse, Ken W |
description | The first aim of this study was to operationalise Fried's and Rockwood's frailty assessment methods in clinical populations relevant to the practicing geriatrician. In addition, the modified frailty score was compared to existing approaches. Adapted from the source document. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ageing/afn244 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57257139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57257139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_572571393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNy70OAiEQBGAKTfwt7beyOwXOy-Vqo7HX3mxw8TAIJ4uFby-FD2A1mcw3QqyU3CjZ1Vu8kwv3Ldqgd7uRmEopdSVb3U3EjPlRqmqUnorzvseEJlNyXA5gEzqfP-AC5J7AeBecQQ9MOZe9QjDxOWDRMUC0cHPWUqKQAYchRTQ98UKMLXqm5S_nYn08XPanqoDXmzhfn44NeY-B4puvTaubVtVd_Tf8AuwuSWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57257139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterising frailty in the clinical setting-a comparison of different approaches</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hubbard, Ruth E ; O'mahony, M Sinead ; Woodhouse, Ken W</creator><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, Ruth E ; O'mahony, M Sinead ; Woodhouse, Ken W</creatorcontrib><description>The first aim of this study was to operationalise Fried's and Rockwood's frailty assessment methods in clinical populations relevant to the practicing geriatrician. In addition, the modified frailty score was compared to existing approaches. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-0729</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afn244</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Clinical assessment ; Elderly people ; Geriatricians</subject><ispartof>Age and ageing, 2009-01, Vol.38 (1), p.115-119</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30977</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, Ruth E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'mahony, M Sinead</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodhouse, Ken W</creatorcontrib><title>Characterising frailty in the clinical setting-a comparison of different approaches</title><title>Age and ageing</title><description>The first aim of this study was to operationalise Fried's and Rockwood's frailty assessment methods in clinical populations relevant to the practicing geriatrician. In addition, the modified frailty score was compared to existing approaches. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Elderly people</subject><subject>Geriatricians</subject><issn>0002-0729</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNy70OAiEQBGAKTfwt7beyOwXOy-Vqo7HX3mxw8TAIJ4uFby-FD2A1mcw3QqyU3CjZ1Vu8kwv3Ldqgd7uRmEopdSVb3U3EjPlRqmqUnorzvseEJlNyXA5gEzqfP-AC5J7AeBecQQ9MOZe9QjDxOWDRMUC0cHPWUqKQAYchRTQ98UKMLXqm5S_nYn08XPanqoDXmzhfn44NeY-B4puvTaubVtVd_Tf8AuwuSWg</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Hubbard, Ruth E</creator><creator>O'mahony, M Sinead</creator><creator>Woodhouse, Ken W</creator><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Characterising frailty in the clinical setting-a comparison of different approaches</title><author>Hubbard, Ruth E ; O'mahony, M Sinead ; Woodhouse, Ken W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_572571393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Elderly people</topic><topic>Geriatricians</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, Ruth E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'mahony, M Sinead</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodhouse, Ken W</creatorcontrib><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hubbard, Ruth E</au><au>O'mahony, M Sinead</au><au>Woodhouse, Ken W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterising frailty in the clinical setting-a comparison of different approaches</atitle><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>115-119</pages><issn>0002-0729</issn><abstract>The first aim of this study was to operationalise Fried's and Rockwood's frailty assessment methods in clinical populations relevant to the practicing geriatrician. In addition, the modified frailty score was compared to existing approaches. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><doi>10.1093/ageing/afn244</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-0729 |
ispartof | Age and ageing, 2009-01, Vol.38 (1), p.115-119 |
issn | 0002-0729 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57257139 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Clinical assessment Elderly people Geriatricians |
title | Characterising frailty in the clinical setting-a comparison of different approaches |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A58%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterising%20frailty%20in%20the%20clinical%20setting-a%20comparison%20of%20different%20approaches&rft.jtitle=Age%20and%20ageing&rft.au=Hubbard,%20Ruth%20E&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=115-119&rft.issn=0002-0729&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn244&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E57257139%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57257139&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |