Characterising frailty in the clinical setting-a comparison of different approaches

The first aim of this study was to operationalise Fried's and Rockwood's frailty assessment methods in clinical populations relevant to the practicing geriatrician. In addition, the modified frailty score was compared to existing approaches. Adapted from the source document.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Age and ageing 2009-01, Vol.38 (1), p.115-119
Hauptverfasser: Hubbard, Ruth E, O'mahony, M Sinead, Woodhouse, Ken W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 119
container_issue 1
container_start_page 115
container_title Age and ageing
container_volume 38
creator Hubbard, Ruth E
O'mahony, M Sinead
Woodhouse, Ken W
description The first aim of this study was to operationalise Fried's and Rockwood's frailty assessment methods in clinical populations relevant to the practicing geriatrician. In addition, the modified frailty score was compared to existing approaches. Adapted from the source document.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ageing/afn244
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57257139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57257139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_572571393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNy70OAiEQBGAKTfwt7beyOwXOy-Vqo7HX3mxw8TAIJ4uFby-FD2A1mcw3QqyU3CjZ1Vu8kwv3Ldqgd7uRmEopdSVb3U3EjPlRqmqUnorzvseEJlNyXA5gEzqfP-AC5J7AeBecQQ9MOZe9QjDxOWDRMUC0cHPWUqKQAYchRTQ98UKMLXqm5S_nYn08XPanqoDXmzhfn44NeY-B4puvTaubVtVd_Tf8AuwuSWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57257139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterising frailty in the clinical setting-a comparison of different approaches</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hubbard, Ruth E ; O'mahony, M Sinead ; Woodhouse, Ken W</creator><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, Ruth E ; O'mahony, M Sinead ; Woodhouse, Ken W</creatorcontrib><description>The first aim of this study was to operationalise Fried's and Rockwood's frailty assessment methods in clinical populations relevant to the practicing geriatrician. In addition, the modified frailty score was compared to existing approaches. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-0729</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afn244</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Clinical assessment ; Elderly people ; Geriatricians</subject><ispartof>Age and ageing, 2009-01, Vol.38 (1), p.115-119</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30977</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, Ruth E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'mahony, M Sinead</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodhouse, Ken W</creatorcontrib><title>Characterising frailty in the clinical setting-a comparison of different approaches</title><title>Age and ageing</title><description>The first aim of this study was to operationalise Fried's and Rockwood's frailty assessment methods in clinical populations relevant to the practicing geriatrician. In addition, the modified frailty score was compared to existing approaches. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Elderly people</subject><subject>Geriatricians</subject><issn>0002-0729</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNy70OAiEQBGAKTfwt7beyOwXOy-Vqo7HX3mxw8TAIJ4uFby-FD2A1mcw3QqyU3CjZ1Vu8kwv3Ldqgd7uRmEopdSVb3U3EjPlRqmqUnorzvseEJlNyXA5gEzqfP-AC5J7AeBecQQ9MOZe9QjDxOWDRMUC0cHPWUqKQAYchRTQ98UKMLXqm5S_nYn08XPanqoDXmzhfn44NeY-B4puvTaubVtVd_Tf8AuwuSWg</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Hubbard, Ruth E</creator><creator>O'mahony, M Sinead</creator><creator>Woodhouse, Ken W</creator><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Characterising frailty in the clinical setting-a comparison of different approaches</title><author>Hubbard, Ruth E ; O'mahony, M Sinead ; Woodhouse, Ken W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_572571393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Elderly people</topic><topic>Geriatricians</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, Ruth E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'mahony, M Sinead</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodhouse, Ken W</creatorcontrib><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hubbard, Ruth E</au><au>O'mahony, M Sinead</au><au>Woodhouse, Ken W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterising frailty in the clinical setting-a comparison of different approaches</atitle><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>115-119</pages><issn>0002-0729</issn><abstract>The first aim of this study was to operationalise Fried's and Rockwood's frailty assessment methods in clinical populations relevant to the practicing geriatrician. In addition, the modified frailty score was compared to existing approaches. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><doi>10.1093/ageing/afn244</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-0729
ispartof Age and ageing, 2009-01, Vol.38 (1), p.115-119
issn 0002-0729
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57257139
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Clinical assessment
Elderly people
Geriatricians
title Characterising frailty in the clinical setting-a comparison of different approaches
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A58%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterising%20frailty%20in%20the%20clinical%20setting-a%20comparison%20of%20different%20approaches&rft.jtitle=Age%20and%20ageing&rft.au=Hubbard,%20Ruth%20E&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=115-119&rft.issn=0002-0729&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn244&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E57257139%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57257139&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true