Job engagement in organizations: Fad, fashion, or folderol?
Engagement, broadly defined as involvement, satisfaction, and enthusiasm, is widely used by organizations and consultants for improving retention. However, engagement fails to meet many of the common criteria for positive organizational practice, i.e. theoretical, valid, unique, state-like, and posi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of organizational behavior 2009-01, Vol.30 (1), p.141-145 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 145 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 141 |
| container_title | Journal of organizational behavior |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Wefald, Andrew J. Downey, Ronald G. |
| description | Engagement, broadly defined as involvement, satisfaction, and enthusiasm, is widely used by organizations and consultants for improving retention. However, engagement fails to meet many of the common criteria for positive organizational practice, i.e. theoretical, valid, unique, state-like, and positive. With attention to these criteria, engagement may useful to management. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/job.560 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57255623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20542532</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20542532</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4100-d6749f27e7d9dc47580a383673c6ca8957dec28a426db249ffd865ce8fb214d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E9LwzAYBvAgCs4pfgKheNCD60zT_KseRIfbnMNdJnoLaZPO1q6ZSYfOT2-k4kHwlDc8v4SXB4DDCPYjCNF5adI-oXALdCKYJGEUs2QbdCBPcOhHugv2nCshhAQntAMuJyYNdL2QC73UdRMUdWDsQtbFp2wKU7uLYChVL8ile_HXng-D3FRKW1Nd7YOdXFZOH_ycXfA4vJ0PxuF0NrobXE_DDPuNQkUZTnLENFOJyjAjHMqYx5TFGc0kTwhTOkNcYkRVijzNFack0zxPUYQVibvgpP13Zc3bWrtGLAuX6aqStTZrJwhDhFAUe3j8B5ZmbWu_m0AIc8YRhB6dtiizxjmrc7GyxVLajYig-G7QP0qFb9DLs1a-F5Xe_MfEZHbT6qNWl64x9lcjXzQiMfJ52OaFa_THby7tq_BVMCKeHkYCR6Pn6Xg-EPfxF9dFh-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224878200</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Job engagement in organizations: Fad, fashion, or folderol?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Wefald, Andrew J. ; Downey, Ronald G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wefald, Andrew J. ; Downey, Ronald G.</creatorcontrib><description>Engagement, broadly defined as involvement, satisfaction, and enthusiasm, is widely used by organizations and consultants for improving retention. However, engagement fails to meet many of the common criteria for positive organizational practice, i.e. theoretical, valid, unique, state-like, and positive. With attention to these criteria, engagement may useful to management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-3796</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1379</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/job.560</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JORBEJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic communities ; Fads ; Industrial and organizational psychology ; Job involvement ; Job satisfaction ; Management techniques ; Occupational psychology ; Organizational behavior ; Organizational behaviour ; Organizational psychology ; Psychological research ; Psychology ; Psychometrics ; Retention ; Studies ; The Incubator</subject><ispartof>Journal of organizational behavior, 2009-01, Vol.30 (1), p.141-145</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Jan 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4100-d6749f27e7d9dc47580a383673c6ca8957dec28a426db249ffd865ce8fb214d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4100-d6749f27e7d9dc47580a383673c6ca8957dec28a426db249ffd865ce8fb214d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20542532$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20542532$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,30999,31000,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wefald, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downey, Ronald G.</creatorcontrib><title>Job engagement in organizations: Fad, fashion, or folderol?</title><title>Journal of organizational behavior</title><addtitle>J. Organiz. Behav</addtitle><description>Engagement, broadly defined as involvement, satisfaction, and enthusiasm, is widely used by organizations and consultants for improving retention. However, engagement fails to meet many of the common criteria for positive organizational practice, i.e. theoretical, valid, unique, state-like, and positive. With attention to these criteria, engagement may useful to management.</description><subject>Academic communities</subject><subject>Fads</subject><subject>Industrial and organizational psychology</subject><subject>Job involvement</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Management techniques</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Organizational behaviour</subject><subject>Organizational psychology</subject><subject>Psychological research</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>The Incubator</subject><issn>0894-3796</issn><issn>1099-1379</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E9LwzAYBvAgCs4pfgKheNCD60zT_KseRIfbnMNdJnoLaZPO1q6ZSYfOT2-k4kHwlDc8v4SXB4DDCPYjCNF5adI-oXALdCKYJGEUs2QbdCBPcOhHugv2nCshhAQntAMuJyYNdL2QC73UdRMUdWDsQtbFp2wKU7uLYChVL8ile_HXng-D3FRKW1Nd7YOdXFZOH_ycXfA4vJ0PxuF0NrobXE_DDPuNQkUZTnLENFOJyjAjHMqYx5TFGc0kTwhTOkNcYkRVijzNFack0zxPUYQVibvgpP13Zc3bWrtGLAuX6aqStTZrJwhDhFAUe3j8B5ZmbWu_m0AIc8YRhB6dtiizxjmrc7GyxVLajYig-G7QP0qFb9DLs1a-F5Xe_MfEZHbT6qNWl64x9lcjXzQiMfJ52OaFa_THby7tq_BVMCKeHkYCR6Pn6Xg-EPfxF9dFh-Q</recordid><startdate>200901</startdate><enddate>200901</enddate><creator>Wefald, Andrew J.</creator><creator>Downey, Ronald G.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200901</creationdate><title>Job engagement in organizations: Fad, fashion, or folderol?</title><author>Wefald, Andrew J. ; Downey, Ronald G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4100-d6749f27e7d9dc47580a383673c6ca8957dec28a426db249ffd865ce8fb214d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Academic communities</topic><topic>Fads</topic><topic>Industrial and organizational psychology</topic><topic>Job involvement</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Management techniques</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Organizational behaviour</topic><topic>Organizational psychology</topic><topic>Psychological research</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>The Incubator</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wefald, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downey, Ronald G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wefald, Andrew J.</au><au>Downey, Ronald G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Job engagement in organizations: Fad, fashion, or folderol?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J. Organiz. Behav</addtitle><date>2009-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>145</epage><pages>141-145</pages><issn>0894-3796</issn><eissn>1099-1379</eissn><coden>JORBEJ</coden><abstract>Engagement, broadly defined as involvement, satisfaction, and enthusiasm, is widely used by organizations and consultants for improving retention. However, engagement fails to meet many of the common criteria for positive organizational practice, i.e. theoretical, valid, unique, state-like, and positive. With attention to these criteria, engagement may useful to management.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/job.560</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0894-3796 |
| ispartof | Journal of organizational behavior, 2009-01, Vol.30 (1), p.141-145 |
| issn | 0894-3796 1099-1379 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57255623 |
| source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Academic communities Fads Industrial and organizational psychology Job involvement Job satisfaction Management techniques Occupational psychology Organizational behavior Organizational behaviour Organizational psychology Psychological research Psychology Psychometrics Retention Studies The Incubator |
| title | Job engagement in organizations: Fad, fashion, or folderol? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T12%3A10%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Job%20engagement%20in%20organizations:%20Fad,%20fashion,%20or%20folderol?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20organizational%20behavior&rft.au=Wefald,%20Andrew%20J.&rft.date=2009-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=145&rft.pages=141-145&rft.issn=0894-3796&rft.eissn=1099-1379&rft.coden=JORBEJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/job.560&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20542532%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224878200&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20542532&rfr_iscdi=true |