Validation of a Chinese Achievement Goal Orientation Questionnaire
Background: The mixed findings of previous studies on the nature and effects of performance goals have led to a call for re-examination of the dichotomous framework of achievement goal orientation theory. While the call for a revised achievement goal orientation theory has received considerable disc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of educational psychology 2008-06, Vol.78 (2), p.331-353 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 353 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 331 |
container_title | British journal of educational psychology |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Lau, Kit-Ling Lee, John C. K |
description | Background: The mixed findings of previous studies on the nature and effects of performance goals have led to a call for re-examination of the dichotomous framework of achievement goal orientation theory. While the call for a revised achievement goal orientation theory has received considerable discussion in Western studies, it is not clear whether the revised theory can also be applied in other ethnic and cultural contexts. Aims: Our aim was to validate the Chinese version of Elliot and Church's (1007) Goal Orientation Questionnaire and to initially test the revised goal orientation theory in the context of Chinese students in Hong Kong. Sample: A total of 270 Chinese students (137 boys and 133 girls) from a primary and secondary school in Hong Kong participated in Study 1. Study 2 involved a total of 9,440 students (5,420 boys and 4,020 girls) from 10 primary and 18 secondary schools in Hong Kong. Method: Participants in Study 1 completed a Chinese Goal Orientation Questionnaire (CGOQ) measuring three types of goal orientation. Exploratory factor analysis, item total correlation, and reliability analyses were undertaken to assess the psychometric quality of the CGOQ. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analysis was used to provide further validation for the revised questionnaire. The relationships among different goal orientations and that with students' perceived classroom environment and self-efficacy were also explored using structural equation modelling. Results: Findings of exploratory factor analysis in Study 1 and confirmatory factor analysis in Study 2 supported the proposed factor structure of the CGOQ. All the subscales in the questionnaire also showed good internal consistency reliabilities. The construct validity of the CGOQ was supported by its significant relationship with criterion measures. While most of the relationships between the three types of goal orientation and the learning-related variables measured in our study were consistent with the revised goal orientation theory, the positive relationships between performance-avoidance goals, mastery goals, and perceived classroom environment were different from previous studies. Conclusion: Our findings generally supported the trichotomous framework of the revised goal orientation theory with Chinese students in Hong Kong. Consistent with the revised goal orientation theory, our findings indicated that both mastery and performance-approach goals had positive impacts on students' learning. Howe |
doi_str_mv | 10.1348/014466507X238608 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57252970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ797177</ericid><sourcerecordid>57252970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e520-a26b1eb4922c32c0ea2aa54828d85a51b7da44a7f6d6c6f693aa111ec4b012013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjUtLw0AUhWehYK3uXbjIyl30znuyrKFWpVCEIu7CzeSGjuRRM63gv29KXJ3vwMc5jN1xeORSuSfgShmjwX4J6Qy4CzYDAJtClrkrdh3j91i1lWrGnj-xCRUeQt8lfZ1gku9CR5GShd8F-qWWukOy6rFJNkMYeTI_jhTP0GEY6IZd1thEuv3POdu-LLf5a7rerN7yxTolLSBFYUpOpcqE8FJ4IBSIWjnhKqdR89JWqBTa2lTGm9pkEpFzTl6VwAVwOWcP0-x-6H_O_0UboqemwY76Yyy0FVpkFkbxfhJpCL7YD6HF4a9YvtvMcmvlCeHdVHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57252970</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of a Chinese Achievement Goal Orientation Questionnaire</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lau, Kit-Ling ; Lee, John C. K</creator><creatorcontrib>Lau, Kit-Ling ; Lee, John C. K</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The mixed findings of previous studies on the nature and effects of performance goals have led to a call for re-examination of the dichotomous framework of achievement goal orientation theory. While the call for a revised achievement goal orientation theory has received considerable discussion in Western studies, it is not clear whether the revised theory can also be applied in other ethnic and cultural contexts. Aims: Our aim was to validate the Chinese version of Elliot and Church's (1007) Goal Orientation Questionnaire and to initially test the revised goal orientation theory in the context of Chinese students in Hong Kong. Sample: A total of 270 Chinese students (137 boys and 133 girls) from a primary and secondary school in Hong Kong participated in Study 1. Study 2 involved a total of 9,440 students (5,420 boys and 4,020 girls) from 10 primary and 18 secondary schools in Hong Kong. Method: Participants in Study 1 completed a Chinese Goal Orientation Questionnaire (CGOQ) measuring three types of goal orientation. Exploratory factor analysis, item total correlation, and reliability analyses were undertaken to assess the psychometric quality of the CGOQ. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analysis was used to provide further validation for the revised questionnaire. The relationships among different goal orientations and that with students' perceived classroom environment and self-efficacy were also explored using structural equation modelling. Results: Findings of exploratory factor analysis in Study 1 and confirmatory factor analysis in Study 2 supported the proposed factor structure of the CGOQ. All the subscales in the questionnaire also showed good internal consistency reliabilities. The construct validity of the CGOQ was supported by its significant relationship with criterion measures. While most of the relationships between the three types of goal orientation and the learning-related variables measured in our study were consistent with the revised goal orientation theory, the positive relationships between performance-avoidance goals, mastery goals, and perceived classroom environment were different from previous studies. Conclusion: Our findings generally supported the trichotomous framework of the revised goal orientation theory with Chinese students in Hong Kong. Consistent with the revised goal orientation theory, our findings indicated that both mastery and performance-approach goals had positive impacts on students' learning. However, the positive relationships between performance-avoidance goals, mastery goals, and perceived classroom environment were contradictory to the conceptualization of performance-avoidance goals in the revised theory. Cultural and social factors affecting Hong Kong students' goal orientations are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1348/014466507X238608</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJESAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>British Psychological Society</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Asians ; Chinese ; Chinese people ; Classroom environment ; Confirmatory factor analysis ; Construct Validity ; Correlation ; Elementary Schools ; Factor Analysis ; Factor Structure ; Females ; Foreign Countries ; Goal Orientation ; Goals ; Hong Kong ; Measures (Individuals) ; Program Effectiveness ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; Secondary Schools ; Self Efficacy</subject><ispartof>British journal of educational psychology, 2008-06, Vol.78 (2), p.331-353</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30979</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ797177$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lau, Kit-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, John C. K</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of a Chinese Achievement Goal Orientation Questionnaire</title><title>British journal of educational psychology</title><description>Background: The mixed findings of previous studies on the nature and effects of performance goals have led to a call for re-examination of the dichotomous framework of achievement goal orientation theory. While the call for a revised achievement goal orientation theory has received considerable discussion in Western studies, it is not clear whether the revised theory can also be applied in other ethnic and cultural contexts. Aims: Our aim was to validate the Chinese version of Elliot and Church's (1007) Goal Orientation Questionnaire and to initially test the revised goal orientation theory in the context of Chinese students in Hong Kong. Sample: A total of 270 Chinese students (137 boys and 133 girls) from a primary and secondary school in Hong Kong participated in Study 1. Study 2 involved a total of 9,440 students (5,420 boys and 4,020 girls) from 10 primary and 18 secondary schools in Hong Kong. Method: Participants in Study 1 completed a Chinese Goal Orientation Questionnaire (CGOQ) measuring three types of goal orientation. Exploratory factor analysis, item total correlation, and reliability analyses were undertaken to assess the psychometric quality of the CGOQ. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analysis was used to provide further validation for the revised questionnaire. The relationships among different goal orientations and that with students' perceived classroom environment and self-efficacy were also explored using structural equation modelling. Results: Findings of exploratory factor analysis in Study 1 and confirmatory factor analysis in Study 2 supported the proposed factor structure of the CGOQ. All the subscales in the questionnaire also showed good internal consistency reliabilities. The construct validity of the CGOQ was supported by its significant relationship with criterion measures. While most of the relationships between the three types of goal orientation and the learning-related variables measured in our study were consistent with the revised goal orientation theory, the positive relationships between performance-avoidance goals, mastery goals, and perceived classroom environment were different from previous studies. Conclusion: Our findings generally supported the trichotomous framework of the revised goal orientation theory with Chinese students in Hong Kong. Consistent with the revised goal orientation theory, our findings indicated that both mastery and performance-approach goals had positive impacts on students' learning. However, the positive relationships between performance-avoidance goals, mastery goals, and perceived classroom environment were contradictory to the conceptualization of performance-avoidance goals in the revised theory. Cultural and social factors affecting Hong Kong students' goal orientations are discussed.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Asians</subject><subject>Chinese</subject><subject>Chinese people</subject><subject>Classroom environment</subject><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis</subject><subject>Construct Validity</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Elementary Schools</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Factor Structure</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Goal Orientation</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Hong Kong</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Secondary Schools</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><issn>0007-0998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNotjUtLw0AUhWehYK3uXbjIyl30znuyrKFWpVCEIu7CzeSGjuRRM63gv29KXJ3vwMc5jN1xeORSuSfgShmjwX4J6Qy4CzYDAJtClrkrdh3j91i1lWrGnj-xCRUeQt8lfZ1gku9CR5GShd8F-qWWukOy6rFJNkMYeTI_jhTP0GEY6IZd1thEuv3POdu-LLf5a7rerN7yxTolLSBFYUpOpcqE8FJ4IBSIWjnhKqdR89JWqBTa2lTGm9pkEpFzTl6VwAVwOWcP0-x-6H_O_0UboqemwY76Yyy0FVpkFkbxfhJpCL7YD6HF4a9YvtvMcmvlCeHdVHA</recordid><startdate>200806</startdate><enddate>200806</enddate><creator>Lau, Kit-Ling</creator><creator>Lee, John C. K</creator><general>British Psychological Society</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200806</creationdate><title>Validation of a Chinese Achievement Goal Orientation Questionnaire</title><author>Lau, Kit-Ling ; Lee, John C. K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e520-a26b1eb4922c32c0ea2aa54828d85a51b7da44a7f6d6c6f693aa111ec4b012013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Asians</topic><topic>Chinese</topic><topic>Chinese people</topic><topic>Classroom environment</topic><topic>Confirmatory factor analysis</topic><topic>Construct Validity</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Elementary Schools</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Factor Structure</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Goal Orientation</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Hong Kong</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Secondary Schools</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lau, Kit-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, John C. K</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>British journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lau, Kit-Ling</au><au>Lee, John C. K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ797177</ericid><atitle>Validation of a Chinese Achievement Goal Orientation Questionnaire</atitle><jtitle>British journal of educational psychology</jtitle><date>2008-06</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>331</spage><epage>353</epage><pages>331-353</pages><issn>0007-0998</issn><coden>BJESAE</coden><abstract>Background: The mixed findings of previous studies on the nature and effects of performance goals have led to a call for re-examination of the dichotomous framework of achievement goal orientation theory. While the call for a revised achievement goal orientation theory has received considerable discussion in Western studies, it is not clear whether the revised theory can also be applied in other ethnic and cultural contexts. Aims: Our aim was to validate the Chinese version of Elliot and Church's (1007) Goal Orientation Questionnaire and to initially test the revised goal orientation theory in the context of Chinese students in Hong Kong. Sample: A total of 270 Chinese students (137 boys and 133 girls) from a primary and secondary school in Hong Kong participated in Study 1. Study 2 involved a total of 9,440 students (5,420 boys and 4,020 girls) from 10 primary and 18 secondary schools in Hong Kong. Method: Participants in Study 1 completed a Chinese Goal Orientation Questionnaire (CGOQ) measuring three types of goal orientation. Exploratory factor analysis, item total correlation, and reliability analyses were undertaken to assess the psychometric quality of the CGOQ. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analysis was used to provide further validation for the revised questionnaire. The relationships among different goal orientations and that with students' perceived classroom environment and self-efficacy were also explored using structural equation modelling. Results: Findings of exploratory factor analysis in Study 1 and confirmatory factor analysis in Study 2 supported the proposed factor structure of the CGOQ. All the subscales in the questionnaire also showed good internal consistency reliabilities. The construct validity of the CGOQ was supported by its significant relationship with criterion measures. While most of the relationships between the three types of goal orientation and the learning-related variables measured in our study were consistent with the revised goal orientation theory, the positive relationships between performance-avoidance goals, mastery goals, and perceived classroom environment were different from previous studies. Conclusion: Our findings generally supported the trichotomous framework of the revised goal orientation theory with Chinese students in Hong Kong. Consistent with the revised goal orientation theory, our findings indicated that both mastery and performance-approach goals had positive impacts on students' learning. However, the positive relationships between performance-avoidance goals, mastery goals, and perceived classroom environment were contradictory to the conceptualization of performance-avoidance goals in the revised theory. Cultural and social factors affecting Hong Kong students' goal orientations are discussed.</abstract><pub>British Psychological Society</pub><doi>10.1348/014466507X238608</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-0998 |
ispartof | British journal of educational psychology, 2008-06, Vol.78 (2), p.331-353 |
issn | 0007-0998 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57252970 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Academic achievement Asians Chinese Chinese people Classroom environment Confirmatory factor analysis Construct Validity Correlation Elementary Schools Factor Analysis Factor Structure Females Foreign Countries Goal Orientation Goals Hong Kong Measures (Individuals) Program Effectiveness Questionnaires Reliability Secondary Schools Self Efficacy |
title | Validation of a Chinese Achievement Goal Orientation Questionnaire |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A22%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20a%20Chinese%20Achievement%20Goal%20Orientation%20Questionnaire&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Lau,%20Kit-Ling&rft.date=2008-06&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=331&rft.epage=353&rft.pages=331-353&rft.issn=0007-0998&rft.coden=BJESAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1348/014466507X238608&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E57252970%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57252970&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ797177&rfr_iscdi=true |