Competing Views: A Dialogue on Response to Intervention
The provision for allowing local education agencies to use an assessment of a student's response to intervention (RTI) in lieu of a consideration of an ability— achievement discrepancy has been a controversial aspect of the 2004 Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. To addres...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Assessment for effective intervention 2006-10, Vol.32 (1), p.6-19 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 19 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 6 |
| container_title | Assessment for effective intervention |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Batsche, George M. Kavale, Kenneth A. Kovaleski, Joseph F. |
| description | The provision for allowing local education agencies to use an assessment of a student's response to intervention (RTI) in lieu of a consideration of an ability— achievement discrepancy has been a controversial aspect of the 2004 Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. To address issues that have arisen about RTI, a series of questions was posed to two authors who have written about the topic—one from an advocacy perspective and the other from a critical point of view. Their responses were arranged in a dialogue format so that these divergent views could be fully considered. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/15345084060320010301 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57229922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ793327</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_15345084060320010301</sage_id><sourcerecordid>57229922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-c4d089a4bb25a1526936710123ffa0c4e47ec316d29c327693e5fb5396c7b0043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j09LxDAQxYMouK7iF9iDJ2_VmUzSNEcp6z8WvKjXkGbTpUt3W5MW8dubpeJJPM2D93uPeYwtEG4QlbpFSUJCISAH4gAIBHjEZqipyJSQxXHSCckOzCk7i3ELQIWUYsYuy27X-6HZb67eG_8Zz9lJbdvoL37unL3dL1_Lx2z18vBU3q0yx7UYMifWUGgrqopLi5LnmnKFgJzq2oITXijvCPM11464SraXdSVJ505VAILm7Hrq7UP3Mfo4mF0TnW9bu_fdGI1UnGvNeQLFBLrQxRh8bfrQ7Gz4MgjmsN78tT7FFlPMh8b9RpbPSlP6J9k42dFuvNl2Y9intf9XfgPDc2At</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57229922</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Competing Views: A Dialogue on Response to Intervention</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Batsche, George M. ; Kavale, Kenneth A. ; Kovaleski, Joseph F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Batsche, George M. ; Kavale, Kenneth A. ; Kovaleski, Joseph F.</creatorcontrib><description>The provision for allowing local education agencies to use an assessment of a student's response to intervention (RTI) in lieu of a consideration of an ability— achievement discrepancy has been a controversial aspect of the 2004 Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. To address issues that have arisen about RTI, a series of questions was posed to two authors who have written about the topic—one from an advocacy perspective and the other from a critical point of view. Their responses were arranged in a dialogue format so that these divergent views could be fully considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1534-5084</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-7458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/15345084060320010301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Academic Ability ; Academic Achievement ; Advocacy ; Assessment ; Criticism ; Disabilities ; Disability Identification ; Disabled students ; Education ; Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ; Intervention ; Interventions ; Local government ; Policy ; School Districts ; Student Evaluation</subject><ispartof>Assessment for effective intervention, 2006-10, Vol.32 (1), p.6-19</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-c4d089a4bb25a1526936710123ffa0c4e47ec316d29c327693e5fb5396c7b0043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/15345084060320010301$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15345084060320010301$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,31000,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ793327$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batsche, George M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavale, Kenneth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovaleski, Joseph F.</creatorcontrib><title>Competing Views: A Dialogue on Response to Intervention</title><title>Assessment for effective intervention</title><description>The provision for allowing local education agencies to use an assessment of a student's response to intervention (RTI) in lieu of a consideration of an ability— achievement discrepancy has been a controversial aspect of the 2004 Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. To address issues that have arisen about RTI, a series of questions was posed to two authors who have written about the topic—one from an advocacy perspective and the other from a critical point of view. Their responses were arranged in a dialogue format so that these divergent views could be fully considered.</description><subject>Academic Ability</subject><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Disability Identification</subject><subject>Disabled students</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Individuals with Disabilities Education Act</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Interventions</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>School Districts</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><issn>1534-5084</issn><issn>1938-7458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9j09LxDAQxYMouK7iF9iDJ2_VmUzSNEcp6z8WvKjXkGbTpUt3W5MW8dubpeJJPM2D93uPeYwtEG4QlbpFSUJCISAH4gAIBHjEZqipyJSQxXHSCckOzCk7i3ELQIWUYsYuy27X-6HZb67eG_8Zz9lJbdvoL37unL3dL1_Lx2z18vBU3q0yx7UYMifWUGgrqopLi5LnmnKFgJzq2oITXijvCPM11464SraXdSVJ505VAILm7Hrq7UP3Mfo4mF0TnW9bu_fdGI1UnGvNeQLFBLrQxRh8bfrQ7Gz4MgjmsN78tT7FFlPMh8b9RpbPSlP6J9k42dFuvNl2Y9intf9XfgPDc2At</recordid><startdate>200610</startdate><enddate>200610</enddate><creator>Batsche, George M.</creator><creator>Kavale, Kenneth A.</creator><creator>Kovaleski, Joseph F.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>PRO-ED, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200610</creationdate><title>Competing Views</title><author>Batsche, George M. ; Kavale, Kenneth A. ; Kovaleski, Joseph F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-c4d089a4bb25a1526936710123ffa0c4e47ec316d29c327693e5fb5396c7b0043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Academic Ability</topic><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Disability Identification</topic><topic>Disabled students</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Individuals with Disabilities Education Act</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Interventions</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>School Districts</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batsche, George M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavale, Kenneth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovaleski, Joseph F.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Assessment for effective intervention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batsche, George M.</au><au>Kavale, Kenneth A.</au><au>Kovaleski, Joseph F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ793327</ericid><atitle>Competing Views: A Dialogue on Response to Intervention</atitle><jtitle>Assessment for effective intervention</jtitle><date>2006-10</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>6</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>6-19</pages><issn>1534-5084</issn><eissn>1938-7458</eissn><abstract>The provision for allowing local education agencies to use an assessment of a student's response to intervention (RTI) in lieu of a consideration of an ability— achievement discrepancy has been a controversial aspect of the 2004 Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. To address issues that have arisen about RTI, a series of questions was posed to two authors who have written about the topic—one from an advocacy perspective and the other from a critical point of view. Their responses were arranged in a dialogue format so that these divergent views could be fully considered.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/15345084060320010301</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1534-5084 |
| ispartof | Assessment for effective intervention, 2006-10, Vol.32 (1), p.6-19 |
| issn | 1534-5084 1938-7458 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57229922 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Academic Ability Academic Achievement Advocacy Assessment Criticism Disabilities Disability Identification Disabled students Education Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Intervention Interventions Local government Policy School Districts Student Evaluation |
| title | Competing Views: A Dialogue on Response to Intervention |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A07%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Competing%20Views:%20A%20Dialogue%20on%20Response%20to%20Intervention&rft.jtitle=Assessment%20for%20effective%20intervention&rft.au=Batsche,%20George%20M.&rft.date=2006-10&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=6&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=6-19&rft.issn=1534-5084&rft.eissn=1938-7458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/15345084060320010301&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57229922%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57229922&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ793327&rft_sage_id=10.1177_15345084060320010301&rfr_iscdi=true |