Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire

Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaires (MSSQ) predict individual differences in motion sickness caused by a variety of stimuli. The aim was to develop a short MSSQ. Development used repeated item analysis and various scoring methods. Retained were motion types (cars, boats, planes, trains, fu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Personality and individual differences 2006-07, Vol.41 (2), p.237-248
1. Verfasser: Golding, John F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 248
container_issue 2
container_start_page 237
container_title Personality and individual differences
container_volume 41
creator Golding, John F.
description Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaires (MSSQ) predict individual differences in motion sickness caused by a variety of stimuli. The aim was to develop a short MSSQ. Development used repeated item analysis and various scoring methods. Retained were motion types (cars, boats, planes, trains, funfair rides, etc.); corrections for motion type exposure; sickness severity weightings; childhood versus adult experiences. Excluded were visual/optokinetic items (cinerama, virtual reality, etc.) with low sickness prevalence, they added little information but could become important in the future. Norms and percentiles were produced ( n = 257). Predictive validity used controlled motions (total n = 178): cross-coupled (Coriolis); 0.2 Hz frequency translational oscillation; off vertical axis rotation (OVAR); visual-motion simulator. Predictive validity for motion was median r = 0.51. Relationship between MSSQ-Short and other non-motion sources of nausea and vomiting (e.g. headaches, food, stress, viral, etc.) in the last 12 months was r = 0.2 ( p < 0.01). Reliability: Cronbach’s alpha 0.87; test–retest reliability around r = 0.9; Part A (child) with Part B (adult) r = 0.68. MSSQ-Short provides reliability with an efficient compromise between length (reduced time cost) and validity (predicted motion susceptibility). Language variants include French, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Flemish, German, Russian and Chinese.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57219653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0191886906000602</els_id><sourcerecordid>57219653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-30d0e6f3215007778eb25775e2ef4e71cd91ca2519cb4338770c10ff6f46653d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAQgIMouD7-gKde9NZ1kjRNC15EfIGgBz2HbDKRWbvtmnSF_femruBNGBgYvnl9jJ1xmHPg9eVyvrbk5wKgngPPIfbYjDdallJV7T6bAW952TR1e8iOUloCgFKinbHXl4ie3Ej9e0G9py_yG9sVnkLAiL3DlMvFahhp6ItE7qPHlIq0SQ7XIy2oo3FbLLbF5wbTxPSWIp6wg2C7hKe_-Zi93d2-3jyUT8_3jzfXT6WrhB5LCR6wDlJwBaC1bnAhlNYKBYYKNXe-5c4KxVu3qKRstAbHIYQ6VHWtpJfH7GI3dx2HnwPMivJhXWd7HDbJKC14m8kMih3o4pBSxGDWkVY2bg0HMwk0SzMJNJNAAzyHyE3nv9NtcrYL0faO0l-nbiTIqsnc1Y7D_OoXYTTJ0aTOZxVuNH6g_9Z8A_NXh4E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57219653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Golding, John F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Golding, John F.</creatorcontrib><description>Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaires (MSSQ) predict individual differences in motion sickness caused by a variety of stimuli. The aim was to develop a short MSSQ. Development used repeated item analysis and various scoring methods. Retained were motion types (cars, boats, planes, trains, funfair rides, etc.); corrections for motion type exposure; sickness severity weightings; childhood versus adult experiences. Excluded were visual/optokinetic items (cinerama, virtual reality, etc.) with low sickness prevalence, they added little information but could become important in the future. Norms and percentiles were produced ( n = 257). Predictive validity used controlled motions (total n = 178): cross-coupled (Coriolis); 0.2 Hz frequency translational oscillation; off vertical axis rotation (OVAR); visual-motion simulator. Predictive validity for motion was median r = 0.51. Relationship between MSSQ-Short and other non-motion sources of nausea and vomiting (e.g. headaches, food, stress, viral, etc.) in the last 12 months was r = 0.2 ( p &lt; 0.01). Reliability: Cronbach’s alpha 0.87; test–retest reliability around r = 0.9; Part A (child) with Part B (adult) r = 0.68. MSSQ-Short provides reliability with an efficient compromise between length (reduced time cost) and validity (predicted motion susceptibility). Language variants include French, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Flemish, German, Russian and Chinese.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-8869</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3549</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.012</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PEIDD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Evolution ; Fight–flight ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Individual differences ; Language ; Motion ; Personality ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Stress ; Transportation. City planning ; Travel sickness</subject><ispartof>Personality and individual differences, 2006-07, Vol.41 (2), p.237-248</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-30d0e6f3215007778eb25775e2ef4e71cd91ca2519cb4338770c10ff6f46653d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-30d0e6f3215007778eb25775e2ef4e71cd91ca2519cb4338770c10ff6f46653d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,30981,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17830348$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Golding, John F.</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire</title><title>Personality and individual differences</title><description>Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaires (MSSQ) predict individual differences in motion sickness caused by a variety of stimuli. The aim was to develop a short MSSQ. Development used repeated item analysis and various scoring methods. Retained were motion types (cars, boats, planes, trains, funfair rides, etc.); corrections for motion type exposure; sickness severity weightings; childhood versus adult experiences. Excluded were visual/optokinetic items (cinerama, virtual reality, etc.) with low sickness prevalence, they added little information but could become important in the future. Norms and percentiles were produced ( n = 257). Predictive validity used controlled motions (total n = 178): cross-coupled (Coriolis); 0.2 Hz frequency translational oscillation; off vertical axis rotation (OVAR); visual-motion simulator. Predictive validity for motion was median r = 0.51. Relationship between MSSQ-Short and other non-motion sources of nausea and vomiting (e.g. headaches, food, stress, viral, etc.) in the last 12 months was r = 0.2 ( p &lt; 0.01). Reliability: Cronbach’s alpha 0.87; test–retest reliability around r = 0.9; Part A (child) with Part B (adult) r = 0.68. MSSQ-Short provides reliability with an efficient compromise between length (reduced time cost) and validity (predicted motion susceptibility). Language variants include French, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Flemish, German, Russian and Chinese.</description><subject>Applied psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Fight–flight</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Transportation. City planning</subject><subject>Travel sickness</subject><issn>0191-8869</issn><issn>1873-3549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAQgIMouD7-gKde9NZ1kjRNC15EfIGgBz2HbDKRWbvtmnSF_femruBNGBgYvnl9jJ1xmHPg9eVyvrbk5wKgngPPIfbYjDdallJV7T6bAW952TR1e8iOUloCgFKinbHXl4ie3Ej9e0G9py_yG9sVnkLAiL3DlMvFahhp6ItE7qPHlIq0SQ7XIy2oo3FbLLbF5wbTxPSWIp6wg2C7hKe_-Zi93d2-3jyUT8_3jzfXT6WrhB5LCR6wDlJwBaC1bnAhlNYKBYYKNXe-5c4KxVu3qKRstAbHIYQ6VHWtpJfH7GI3dx2HnwPMivJhXWd7HDbJKC14m8kMih3o4pBSxGDWkVY2bg0HMwk0SzMJNJNAAzyHyE3nv9NtcrYL0faO0l-nbiTIqsnc1Y7D_OoXYTTJ0aTOZxVuNH6g_9Z8A_NXh4E</recordid><startdate>20060701</startdate><enddate>20060701</enddate><creator>Golding, John F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060701</creationdate><title>Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire</title><author>Golding, John F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-30d0e6f3215007778eb25775e2ef4e71cd91ca2519cb4338770c10ff6f46653d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Applied psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Fight–flight</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Transportation. City planning</topic><topic>Travel sickness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Golding, John F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Personality and individual differences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Golding, John F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire</atitle><jtitle>Personality and individual differences</jtitle><date>2006-07-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>237</spage><epage>248</epage><pages>237-248</pages><issn>0191-8869</issn><eissn>1873-3549</eissn><coden>PEIDD9</coden><abstract>Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaires (MSSQ) predict individual differences in motion sickness caused by a variety of stimuli. The aim was to develop a short MSSQ. Development used repeated item analysis and various scoring methods. Retained were motion types (cars, boats, planes, trains, funfair rides, etc.); corrections for motion type exposure; sickness severity weightings; childhood versus adult experiences. Excluded were visual/optokinetic items (cinerama, virtual reality, etc.) with low sickness prevalence, they added little information but could become important in the future. Norms and percentiles were produced ( n = 257). Predictive validity used controlled motions (total n = 178): cross-coupled (Coriolis); 0.2 Hz frequency translational oscillation; off vertical axis rotation (OVAR); visual-motion simulator. Predictive validity for motion was median r = 0.51. Relationship between MSSQ-Short and other non-motion sources of nausea and vomiting (e.g. headaches, food, stress, viral, etc.) in the last 12 months was r = 0.2 ( p &lt; 0.01). Reliability: Cronbach’s alpha 0.87; test–retest reliability around r = 0.9; Part A (child) with Part B (adult) r = 0.68. MSSQ-Short provides reliability with an efficient compromise between length (reduced time cost) and validity (predicted motion susceptibility). Language variants include French, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Flemish, German, Russian and Chinese.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.012</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0191-8869
ispartof Personality and individual differences, 2006-07, Vol.41 (2), p.237-248
issn 0191-8869
1873-3549
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57219653
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Applied psychology
Biological and medical sciences
Evolution
Fight–flight
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Individual differences
Language
Motion
Personality
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Stress
Transportation. City planning
Travel sickness
title Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T09%3A33%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20individual%20differences%20in%20motion%20sickness%20susceptibility%20by%20questionnaire&rft.jtitle=Personality%20and%20individual%20differences&rft.au=Golding,%20John%20F.&rft.date=2006-07-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=248&rft.pages=237-248&rft.issn=0191-8869&rft.eissn=1873-3549&rft.coden=PEIDD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57219653%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57219653&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0191886906000602&rfr_iscdi=true