Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire
Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaires (MSSQ) predict individual differences in motion sickness caused by a variety of stimuli. The aim was to develop a short MSSQ. Development used repeated item analysis and various scoring methods. Retained were motion types (cars, boats, planes, trains, fu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Personality and individual differences 2006-07, Vol.41 (2), p.237-248 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 248 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 237 |
container_title | Personality and individual differences |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Golding, John F. |
description | Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaires (MSSQ) predict individual differences in motion sickness caused by a variety of stimuli. The aim was to develop a short MSSQ. Development used repeated item analysis and various scoring methods. Retained were motion types (cars, boats, planes, trains, funfair rides, etc.); corrections for motion type exposure; sickness severity weightings; childhood versus adult experiences. Excluded were visual/optokinetic items (cinerama, virtual reality, etc.) with low sickness prevalence, they added little information but could become important in the future. Norms and percentiles were produced (
n
=
257). Predictive validity used controlled motions (total
n
=
178): cross-coupled (Coriolis); 0.2
Hz frequency translational oscillation; off vertical axis rotation (OVAR); visual-motion simulator. Predictive validity for motion was median
r
=
0.51. Relationship between MSSQ-Short and other non-motion sources of nausea and vomiting (e.g. headaches, food, stress, viral, etc.) in the last 12 months was
r
=
0.2 (
p
<
0.01). Reliability: Cronbach’s alpha 0.87; test–retest reliability around
r
=
0.9; Part A (child) with Part B (adult)
r
=
0.68. MSSQ-Short provides reliability with an efficient compromise between length (reduced time cost) and validity (predicted motion susceptibility). Language variants include French, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Flemish, German, Russian and Chinese. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57219653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0191886906000602</els_id><sourcerecordid>57219653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-30d0e6f3215007778eb25775e2ef4e71cd91ca2519cb4338770c10ff6f46653d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAQgIMouD7-gKde9NZ1kjRNC15EfIGgBz2HbDKRWbvtmnSF_femruBNGBgYvnl9jJ1xmHPg9eVyvrbk5wKgngPPIfbYjDdallJV7T6bAW952TR1e8iOUloCgFKinbHXl4ie3Ej9e0G9py_yG9sVnkLAiL3DlMvFahhp6ItE7qPHlIq0SQ7XIy2oo3FbLLbF5wbTxPSWIp6wg2C7hKe_-Zi93d2-3jyUT8_3jzfXT6WrhB5LCR6wDlJwBaC1bnAhlNYKBYYKNXe-5c4KxVu3qKRstAbHIYQ6VHWtpJfH7GI3dx2HnwPMivJhXWd7HDbJKC14m8kMih3o4pBSxGDWkVY2bg0HMwk0SzMJNJNAAzyHyE3nv9NtcrYL0faO0l-nbiTIqsnc1Y7D_OoXYTTJ0aTOZxVuNH6g_9Z8A_NXh4E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57219653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Golding, John F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Golding, John F.</creatorcontrib><description>Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaires (MSSQ) predict individual differences in motion sickness caused by a variety of stimuli. The aim was to develop a short MSSQ. Development used repeated item analysis and various scoring methods. Retained were motion types (cars, boats, planes, trains, funfair rides, etc.); corrections for motion type exposure; sickness severity weightings; childhood versus adult experiences. Excluded were visual/optokinetic items (cinerama, virtual reality, etc.) with low sickness prevalence, they added little information but could become important in the future. Norms and percentiles were produced (
n
=
257). Predictive validity used controlled motions (total
n
=
178): cross-coupled (Coriolis); 0.2
Hz frequency translational oscillation; off vertical axis rotation (OVAR); visual-motion simulator. Predictive validity for motion was median
r
=
0.51. Relationship between MSSQ-Short and other non-motion sources of nausea and vomiting (e.g. headaches, food, stress, viral, etc.) in the last 12 months was
r
=
0.2 (
p
<
0.01). Reliability: Cronbach’s alpha 0.87; test–retest reliability around
r
=
0.9; Part A (child) with Part B (adult)
r
=
0.68. MSSQ-Short provides reliability with an efficient compromise between length (reduced time cost) and validity (predicted motion susceptibility). Language variants include French, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Flemish, German, Russian and Chinese.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-8869</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3549</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.012</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PEIDD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Evolution ; Fight–flight ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Individual differences ; Language ; Motion ; Personality ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Stress ; Transportation. City planning ; Travel sickness</subject><ispartof>Personality and individual differences, 2006-07, Vol.41 (2), p.237-248</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-30d0e6f3215007778eb25775e2ef4e71cd91ca2519cb4338770c10ff6f46653d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-30d0e6f3215007778eb25775e2ef4e71cd91ca2519cb4338770c10ff6f46653d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,30981,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17830348$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Golding, John F.</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire</title><title>Personality and individual differences</title><description>Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaires (MSSQ) predict individual differences in motion sickness caused by a variety of stimuli. The aim was to develop a short MSSQ. Development used repeated item analysis and various scoring methods. Retained were motion types (cars, boats, planes, trains, funfair rides, etc.); corrections for motion type exposure; sickness severity weightings; childhood versus adult experiences. Excluded were visual/optokinetic items (cinerama, virtual reality, etc.) with low sickness prevalence, they added little information but could become important in the future. Norms and percentiles were produced (
n
=
257). Predictive validity used controlled motions (total
n
=
178): cross-coupled (Coriolis); 0.2
Hz frequency translational oscillation; off vertical axis rotation (OVAR); visual-motion simulator. Predictive validity for motion was median
r
=
0.51. Relationship between MSSQ-Short and other non-motion sources of nausea and vomiting (e.g. headaches, food, stress, viral, etc.) in the last 12 months was
r
=
0.2 (
p
<
0.01). Reliability: Cronbach’s alpha 0.87; test–retest reliability around
r
=
0.9; Part A (child) with Part B (adult)
r
=
0.68. MSSQ-Short provides reliability with an efficient compromise between length (reduced time cost) and validity (predicted motion susceptibility). Language variants include French, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Flemish, German, Russian and Chinese.</description><subject>Applied psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Fight–flight</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Transportation. City planning</subject><subject>Travel sickness</subject><issn>0191-8869</issn><issn>1873-3549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAQgIMouD7-gKde9NZ1kjRNC15EfIGgBz2HbDKRWbvtmnSF_femruBNGBgYvnl9jJ1xmHPg9eVyvrbk5wKgngPPIfbYjDdallJV7T6bAW952TR1e8iOUloCgFKinbHXl4ie3Ej9e0G9py_yG9sVnkLAiL3DlMvFahhp6ItE7qPHlIq0SQ7XIy2oo3FbLLbF5wbTxPSWIp6wg2C7hKe_-Zi93d2-3jyUT8_3jzfXT6WrhB5LCR6wDlJwBaC1bnAhlNYKBYYKNXe-5c4KxVu3qKRstAbHIYQ6VHWtpJfH7GI3dx2HnwPMivJhXWd7HDbJKC14m8kMih3o4pBSxGDWkVY2bg0HMwk0SzMJNJNAAzyHyE3nv9NtcrYL0faO0l-nbiTIqsnc1Y7D_OoXYTTJ0aTOZxVuNH6g_9Z8A_NXh4E</recordid><startdate>20060701</startdate><enddate>20060701</enddate><creator>Golding, John F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060701</creationdate><title>Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire</title><author>Golding, John F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-30d0e6f3215007778eb25775e2ef4e71cd91ca2519cb4338770c10ff6f46653d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Applied psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Fight–flight</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Transportation. City planning</topic><topic>Travel sickness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Golding, John F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Personality and individual differences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Golding, John F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire</atitle><jtitle>Personality and individual differences</jtitle><date>2006-07-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>237</spage><epage>248</epage><pages>237-248</pages><issn>0191-8869</issn><eissn>1873-3549</eissn><coden>PEIDD9</coden><abstract>Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaires (MSSQ) predict individual differences in motion sickness caused by a variety of stimuli. The aim was to develop a short MSSQ. Development used repeated item analysis and various scoring methods. Retained were motion types (cars, boats, planes, trains, funfair rides, etc.); corrections for motion type exposure; sickness severity weightings; childhood versus adult experiences. Excluded were visual/optokinetic items (cinerama, virtual reality, etc.) with low sickness prevalence, they added little information but could become important in the future. Norms and percentiles were produced (
n
=
257). Predictive validity used controlled motions (total
n
=
178): cross-coupled (Coriolis); 0.2
Hz frequency translational oscillation; off vertical axis rotation (OVAR); visual-motion simulator. Predictive validity for motion was median
r
=
0.51. Relationship between MSSQ-Short and other non-motion sources of nausea and vomiting (e.g. headaches, food, stress, viral, etc.) in the last 12 months was
r
=
0.2 (
p
<
0.01). Reliability: Cronbach’s alpha 0.87; test–retest reliability around
r
=
0.9; Part A (child) with Part B (adult)
r
=
0.68. MSSQ-Short provides reliability with an efficient compromise between length (reduced time cost) and validity (predicted motion susceptibility). Language variants include French, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Flemish, German, Russian and Chinese.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.012</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0191-8869 |
ispartof | Personality and individual differences, 2006-07, Vol.41 (2), p.237-248 |
issn | 0191-8869 1873-3549 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57219653 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Applied psychology Biological and medical sciences Evolution Fight–flight Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Individual differences Language Motion Personality Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Stress Transportation. City planning Travel sickness |
title | Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T09%3A33%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20individual%20differences%20in%20motion%20sickness%20susceptibility%20by%20questionnaire&rft.jtitle=Personality%20and%20individual%20differences&rft.au=Golding,%20John%20F.&rft.date=2006-07-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=248&rft.pages=237-248&rft.issn=0191-8869&rft.eissn=1873-3549&rft.coden=PEIDD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57219653%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57219653&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0191886906000602&rfr_iscdi=true |