The discourse-level structure of empirical abstracts: an exploratory study
Free-text retrieval is less effective than it might be because of its dependence on notions that evolved with controlled vocabulary representation and searching. The structure and nature of the discourse level features of natural language text types are not incorporated. In an attempt to address thi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Information processing & management 1991, Vol.27 (1), p.55-81 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 81 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 55 |
container_title | Information processing & management |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Liddy, Elizabeth DuRoss |
description | Free-text retrieval is less effective than it might be because of its dependence on notions that evolved with controlled vocabulary representation and searching. The structure and nature of the discourse level features of natural language text types are not incorporated. In an attempt to address this problem, an exploratory study was conducted for the purpose of determining whether information abstracts reporting on empirical work do possess a predictable discourse-level structure and whether there are lexical clues that reveal this structure. A three phase study was conducted, with Phase I making use of four tasks to delineate the structure of empirical abstracts based on the internalized notions of 12 expert abstractors. Phase II consisted of a linguistic analysis of 276 empirical abstracts that suggested a linguistic model of an empirical abstract, which was tested in Phase III with a two stage validation procedure using 68 abstracts and four abstractors. Results indicate that expert abstractors do possess an internalized structure of empirical abstracts, whose components and relations were confirmed repeatedly over the four tasks. Substantively the same structure revealed by the experts was manifested in the sample of abstracts, with a relatively small set of recurring lexical clues revealing the presence and nature of the text components. Abstractors validated the linguistic model at an average level of 86%. Results strongly support the presence of a detectable structure in the text-type of empirical abstracts. Such a structure may be of use in a variety of text-based information processing systems. The techniques developed for analyzing natural language texts for the purpose of providing more useful representations of their semantic content offer potential for application of other types of natural language texts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0306-4573(91)90031-G |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57200471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ423386</ericid><els_id>030645739190031G</els_id><sourcerecordid>1416130602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-73a5b70df878b67fb5800c9059f07bb78cd07338ce942c2beccc67fc8073b1103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUGL1EAQhRtRcBz9B3sIiqKHaFW6k-54EGRZR5cFL-u56VQqmCWTjN3JsvPvrdkZVhD01FD1vepXr5Q6Q3iPgNUH0FDlprT6bY3vagCN-eaRWqGzOi-1xcdq9YA8Vc9SugEAU2KxUpfXPzlr-0TTEhPnA9_ykKU5LjQvkbOpy3i762NPYchCI41Ac_qYhTHju90wxTBPcS-Cpd0_V0-6MCR-cXrX6seXi-vzr_nV9823889XORmDc251KBsLbeesayrbNaUDoBrKugPbNNZRC1ZrR1ybgoqGiUgwclJtEEGv1Zvj3F2cfi2cZr8V_zwMYeRpSb60hWxnUcCXf4E3suUo3jzWxsm3VSXQq39CBiuU3KAQyhwpilNKkTu_i_02xL1H8Icb-EPA_hCwr9Hf38BvRPb6NDwkSbCLYaQ-_dHWlcNCNGt1duRYkn5oX1yaQoI4ePx0akustz1Hn6jnkbjtI9Ps26n_v4_fDhKihA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1416130602</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The discourse-level structure of empirical abstracts: an exploratory study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Liddy, Elizabeth DuRoss</creator><creatorcontrib>Liddy, Elizabeth DuRoss</creatorcontrib><description>Free-text retrieval is less effective than it might be because of its dependence on notions that evolved with controlled vocabulary representation and searching. The structure and nature of the discourse level features of natural language text types are not incorporated. In an attempt to address this problem, an exploratory study was conducted for the purpose of determining whether information abstracts reporting on empirical work do possess a predictable discourse-level structure and whether there are lexical clues that reveal this structure. A three phase study was conducted, with Phase I making use of four tasks to delineate the structure of empirical abstracts based on the internalized notions of 12 expert abstractors. Phase II consisted of a linguistic analysis of 276 empirical abstracts that suggested a linguistic model of an empirical abstract, which was tested in Phase III with a two stage validation procedure using 68 abstracts and four abstractors. Results indicate that expert abstractors do possess an internalized structure of empirical abstracts, whose components and relations were confirmed repeatedly over the four tasks. Substantively the same structure revealed by the experts was manifested in the sample of abstracts, with a relatively small set of recurring lexical clues revealing the presence and nature of the text components. Abstractors validated the linguistic model at an average level of 86%. Results strongly support the presence of a detectable structure in the text-type of empirical abstracts. Such a structure may be of use in a variety of text-based information processing systems. The techniques developed for analyzing natural language texts for the purpose of providing more useful representations of their semantic content offer potential for application of other types of natural language texts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-4573</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5371</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0306-4573(91)90031-G</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IPMADK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Abstracting ; Abstracts ; Automatic Abstracting ; Cognitive Psychology ; Computerised information retrieval ; Computerized information storage and retrieval ; Content analysis ; Controlled ; Discourse Analysis ; Discourse Modes ; Exact sciences and technology ; Expert Systems ; Free text searching ; Indexing. Classification. Abstracting. Syntheses ; Information and communication sciences ; Information and document structure and analysis ; Information processing and retrieval ; Information Retrieval ; Information science. Documentation ; Information storage and retrieval ; Information Systems ; Information work ; Language Processing ; Languages ; Linguistic Theory ; Natural language ; Natural Language Processing ; Online information retrieval ; Phases ; Sciences and techniques of general use ; Searches ; Searching ; Strategies ; Studies ; Subject indexing ; Terms ; Text Structure ; Words</subject><ispartof>Information processing & management, 1991, Vol.27 (1), p.55-81</ispartof><rights>1991</rights><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. 1991</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-73a5b70df878b67fb5800c9059f07bb78cd07338ce942c2beccc67fc8073b1103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-73a5b70df878b67fb5800c9059f07bb78cd07338ce942c2beccc67fc8073b1103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/030645739190031G$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27846,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ423386$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19681257$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liddy, Elizabeth DuRoss</creatorcontrib><title>The discourse-level structure of empirical abstracts: an exploratory study</title><title>Information processing & management</title><description>Free-text retrieval is less effective than it might be because of its dependence on notions that evolved with controlled vocabulary representation and searching. The structure and nature of the discourse level features of natural language text types are not incorporated. In an attempt to address this problem, an exploratory study was conducted for the purpose of determining whether information abstracts reporting on empirical work do possess a predictable discourse-level structure and whether there are lexical clues that reveal this structure. A three phase study was conducted, with Phase I making use of four tasks to delineate the structure of empirical abstracts based on the internalized notions of 12 expert abstractors. Phase II consisted of a linguistic analysis of 276 empirical abstracts that suggested a linguistic model of an empirical abstract, which was tested in Phase III with a two stage validation procedure using 68 abstracts and four abstractors. Results indicate that expert abstractors do possess an internalized structure of empirical abstracts, whose components and relations were confirmed repeatedly over the four tasks. Substantively the same structure revealed by the experts was manifested in the sample of abstracts, with a relatively small set of recurring lexical clues revealing the presence and nature of the text components. Abstractors validated the linguistic model at an average level of 86%. Results strongly support the presence of a detectable structure in the text-type of empirical abstracts. Such a structure may be of use in a variety of text-based information processing systems. The techniques developed for analyzing natural language texts for the purpose of providing more useful representations of their semantic content offer potential for application of other types of natural language texts.</description><subject>Abstracting</subject><subject>Abstracts</subject><subject>Automatic Abstracting</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Computerised information retrieval</subject><subject>Computerized information storage and retrieval</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Controlled</subject><subject>Discourse Analysis</subject><subject>Discourse Modes</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Expert Systems</subject><subject>Free text searching</subject><subject>Indexing. Classification. Abstracting. Syntheses</subject><subject>Information and communication sciences</subject><subject>Information and document structure and analysis</subject><subject>Information processing and retrieval</subject><subject>Information Retrieval</subject><subject>Information science. Documentation</subject><subject>Information storage and retrieval</subject><subject>Information Systems</subject><subject>Information work</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Languages</subject><subject>Linguistic Theory</subject><subject>Natural language</subject><subject>Natural Language Processing</subject><subject>Online information retrieval</subject><subject>Phases</subject><subject>Sciences and techniques of general use</subject><subject>Searches</subject><subject>Searching</subject><subject>Strategies</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subject indexing</subject><subject>Terms</subject><subject>Text Structure</subject><subject>Words</subject><issn>0306-4573</issn><issn>1873-5371</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUGL1EAQhRtRcBz9B3sIiqKHaFW6k-54EGRZR5cFL-u56VQqmCWTjN3JsvPvrdkZVhD01FD1vepXr5Q6Q3iPgNUH0FDlprT6bY3vagCN-eaRWqGzOi-1xcdq9YA8Vc9SugEAU2KxUpfXPzlr-0TTEhPnA9_ykKU5LjQvkbOpy3i762NPYchCI41Ac_qYhTHju90wxTBPcS-Cpd0_V0-6MCR-cXrX6seXi-vzr_nV9823889XORmDc251KBsLbeesayrbNaUDoBrKugPbNNZRC1ZrR1ybgoqGiUgwclJtEEGv1Zvj3F2cfi2cZr8V_zwMYeRpSb60hWxnUcCXf4E3suUo3jzWxsm3VSXQq39CBiuU3KAQyhwpilNKkTu_i_02xL1H8Icb-EPA_hCwr9Hf38BvRPb6NDwkSbCLYaQ-_dHWlcNCNGt1duRYkn5oX1yaQoI4ePx0akustz1Hn6jnkbjtI9Ps26n_v4_fDhKihA</recordid><startdate>1991</startdate><enddate>1991</enddate><creator>Liddy, Elizabeth DuRoss</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Pergamon Press</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SFNNT</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1991</creationdate><title>The discourse-level structure of empirical abstracts: an exploratory study</title><author>Liddy, Elizabeth DuRoss</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-73a5b70df878b67fb5800c9059f07bb78cd07338ce942c2beccc67fc8073b1103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Abstracting</topic><topic>Abstracts</topic><topic>Automatic Abstracting</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Computerised information retrieval</topic><topic>Computerized information storage and retrieval</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Controlled</topic><topic>Discourse Analysis</topic><topic>Discourse Modes</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Expert Systems</topic><topic>Free text searching</topic><topic>Indexing. Classification. Abstracting. Syntheses</topic><topic>Information and communication sciences</topic><topic>Information and document structure and analysis</topic><topic>Information processing and retrieval</topic><topic>Information Retrieval</topic><topic>Information science. Documentation</topic><topic>Information storage and retrieval</topic><topic>Information Systems</topic><topic>Information work</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Languages</topic><topic>Linguistic Theory</topic><topic>Natural language</topic><topic>Natural Language Processing</topic><topic>Online information retrieval</topic><topic>Phases</topic><topic>Sciences and techniques of general use</topic><topic>Searches</topic><topic>Searching</topic><topic>Strategies</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subject indexing</topic><topic>Terms</topic><topic>Text Structure</topic><topic>Words</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liddy, Elizabeth DuRoss</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 44</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Information processing & management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liddy, Elizabeth DuRoss</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ423386</ericid><atitle>The discourse-level structure of empirical abstracts: an exploratory study</atitle><jtitle>Information processing & management</jtitle><date>1991</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>55-81</pages><issn>0306-4573</issn><eissn>1873-5371</eissn><coden>IPMADK</coden><abstract>Free-text retrieval is less effective than it might be because of its dependence on notions that evolved with controlled vocabulary representation and searching. The structure and nature of the discourse level features of natural language text types are not incorporated. In an attempt to address this problem, an exploratory study was conducted for the purpose of determining whether information abstracts reporting on empirical work do possess a predictable discourse-level structure and whether there are lexical clues that reveal this structure. A three phase study was conducted, with Phase I making use of four tasks to delineate the structure of empirical abstracts based on the internalized notions of 12 expert abstractors. Phase II consisted of a linguistic analysis of 276 empirical abstracts that suggested a linguistic model of an empirical abstract, which was tested in Phase III with a two stage validation procedure using 68 abstracts and four abstractors. Results indicate that expert abstractors do possess an internalized structure of empirical abstracts, whose components and relations were confirmed repeatedly over the four tasks. Substantively the same structure revealed by the experts was manifested in the sample of abstracts, with a relatively small set of recurring lexical clues revealing the presence and nature of the text components. Abstractors validated the linguistic model at an average level of 86%. Results strongly support the presence of a detectable structure in the text-type of empirical abstracts. Such a structure may be of use in a variety of text-based information processing systems. The techniques developed for analyzing natural language texts for the purpose of providing more useful representations of their semantic content offer potential for application of other types of natural language texts.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0306-4573(91)90031-G</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-4573 |
ispartof | Information processing & management, 1991, Vol.27 (1), p.55-81 |
issn | 0306-4573 1873-5371 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57200471 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Abstracting Abstracts Automatic Abstracting Cognitive Psychology Computerised information retrieval Computerized information storage and retrieval Content analysis Controlled Discourse Analysis Discourse Modes Exact sciences and technology Expert Systems Free text searching Indexing. Classification. Abstracting. Syntheses Information and communication sciences Information and document structure and analysis Information processing and retrieval Information Retrieval Information science. Documentation Information storage and retrieval Information Systems Information work Language Processing Languages Linguistic Theory Natural language Natural Language Processing Online information retrieval Phases Sciences and techniques of general use Searches Searching Strategies Studies Subject indexing Terms Text Structure Words |
title | The discourse-level structure of empirical abstracts: an exploratory study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T23%3A00%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20discourse-level%20structure%20of%20empirical%20abstracts:%20an%20exploratory%20study&rft.jtitle=Information%20processing%20&%20management&rft.au=Liddy,%20Elizabeth%20DuRoss&rft.date=1991&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=55-81&rft.issn=0306-4573&rft.eissn=1873-5371&rft.coden=IPMADK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0306-4573(91)90031-G&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1416130602%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1416130602&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ423386&rft_els_id=030645739190031G&rfr_iscdi=true |