Who cheats at university? A self-report study of dishonest academic behaviours in a sample of Australian university students
The study investigated the dishonest academic behaviours of Australian university students and their relationships with demographic factors, academic policy advised to students, academic self-efficacy, and academic orientation. It was hypothesised that higher levels of dishonesty would be associated...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Australian journal of psychology 2005-05, Vol.57 (1), p.1-10 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 10 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Australian journal of psychology |
| container_volume | 57 |
| creator | Marsden, Helen Carroll, Marie Neill, James T. |
| description | The study investigated the dishonest academic behaviours of Australian university students and their relationships with demographic factors, academic policy advised to students, academic self-efficacy, and academic orientation. It was hypothesised that higher levels of dishonesty would be associated with low learning-orientation, high grade-orientation, low academic self-efficacy and nonreceipt of information about the rules of cheating and plagiarism. Descriptive analyses revealed high levels of three types of self-reported academic dishonesty: cheating, plagiarism and falsification. Regression analyses revealed demographic variables, academic orientation and academic self-efficacy to have differential predictive value for the three types of dishonesty, underlining the argument that it is misleading to measure academic dishonesty as a unidimensional construct. The results are discussed in terms of implications for strategic interventions and university policy formulation. [Author abstract] |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00049530412331283426 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57200282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.200504642</informt_id><sourcerecordid>57200282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6216-d3e343489c4072ef8bbcb29b0d8272171cecea410c84c0b5bb9bddc7cdf5b06e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhiMEEkvhH3CwOHBLGTvOFwfQbqGlUAESoMLJcuwJccnGwXYKK_Hj6zQIVcBhJUu27Od9NDNOkocUDilU8AQAeJ1nwCnLMsqqjLPiVrKiJWdpvC9uJ6sZmc9wN7nn_QUArfO6WiW_zjtLVIcyeCIDmQZzic6bsHtO1sRj36YOR-sC8WHSO2Jboo3v7IA-EKmkxq1RpMFOXho7OU_MQCTxcjv2OMPryQcneyOHG-prFw7B30_utLL3-OD3fpB8On758ehVevbu5PRofZaqgtEi1RlmPONVrTiUDNuqaVTD6gZ0xUpGS6pQoeQUVMUVNHnT1I3WqlS6zRsoMDtIHi_e0dnvUyxdbI1X2PdyQDt5kZcMgFUsgo_-Ai9iV0OsTbA46ZzFFSG-QMpZ7x22YnRmK91OUBDzf4j__UeMPV1iP0yPu70yYv36_RdalHP4eAm7rQlCjrINogth9ELLIIUZWnv9Yt1Xoa2ZrdFSCIN9hEVsLwde8Ln4zU0RmnE_0ULSggKDKHn2j8SjdKrbW5AuAuMD_vwzC-m-iaLMylycvz0RLz5_qMs3m43Isyu7ueVp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210852852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Who cheats at university? A self-report study of dishonest academic behaviours in a sample of Australian university students</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Marsden, Helen ; Carroll, Marie ; Neill, James T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marsden, Helen ; Carroll, Marie ; Neill, James T.</creatorcontrib><description>The study investigated the dishonest academic behaviours of Australian university students and their relationships with demographic factors, academic policy advised to students, academic self-efficacy, and academic orientation. It was hypothesised that higher levels of dishonesty would be associated with low learning-orientation, high grade-orientation, low academic self-efficacy and nonreceipt of information about the rules of cheating and plagiarism. Descriptive analyses revealed high levels of three types of self-reported academic dishonesty: cheating, plagiarism and falsification. Regression analyses revealed demographic variables, academic orientation and academic self-efficacy to have differential predictive value for the three types of dishonesty, underlining the argument that it is misleading to measure academic dishonesty as a unidimensional construct. The results are discussed in terms of implications for strategic interventions and university policy formulation. [Author abstract]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-9530</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-9536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00049530412331283426</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Australia ; Cheating ; Ethics ; Falsification ; Fraud ; Higher education ; Literature review ; Mathematical models ; Plagiarism ; Self report measures ; Selfreport ; Statistics ; Student characteristics ; Students ; Surveys ; Tertiary students ; Universities ; University students</subject><ispartof>Australian journal of psychology, 2005-05, Vol.57 (1), p.1-10</ispartof><rights>2005 Australian Psychological Society</rights><rights>Copyright Copyright Agency Limited (Distributor) May 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6216-d3e343489c4072ef8bbcb29b0d8272171cecea410c84c0b5bb9bddc7cdf5b06e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6216-d3e343489c4072ef8bbcb29b0d8272171cecea410c84c0b5bb9bddc7cdf5b06e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1080%2F00049530412331283426$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1080%2F00049530412331283426$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marsden, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neill, James T.</creatorcontrib><title>Who cheats at university? A self-report study of dishonest academic behaviours in a sample of Australian university students</title><title>Australian journal of psychology</title><description>The study investigated the dishonest academic behaviours of Australian university students and their relationships with demographic factors, academic policy advised to students, academic self-efficacy, and academic orientation. It was hypothesised that higher levels of dishonesty would be associated with low learning-orientation, high grade-orientation, low academic self-efficacy and nonreceipt of information about the rules of cheating and plagiarism. Descriptive analyses revealed high levels of three types of self-reported academic dishonesty: cheating, plagiarism and falsification. Regression analyses revealed demographic variables, academic orientation and academic self-efficacy to have differential predictive value for the three types of dishonesty, underlining the argument that it is misleading to measure academic dishonesty as a unidimensional construct. The results are discussed in terms of implications for strategic interventions and university policy formulation. [Author abstract]</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Cheating</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Falsification</subject><subject>Fraud</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Literature review</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Plagiarism</subject><subject>Self report measures</subject><subject>Selfreport</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Student characteristics</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Tertiary students</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>University students</subject><issn>0004-9530</issn><issn>1742-9536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhiMEEkvhH3CwOHBLGTvOFwfQbqGlUAESoMLJcuwJccnGwXYKK_Hj6zQIVcBhJUu27Od9NDNOkocUDilU8AQAeJ1nwCnLMsqqjLPiVrKiJWdpvC9uJ6sZmc9wN7nn_QUArfO6WiW_zjtLVIcyeCIDmQZzic6bsHtO1sRj36YOR-sC8WHSO2Jboo3v7IA-EKmkxq1RpMFOXho7OU_MQCTxcjv2OMPryQcneyOHG-prFw7B30_utLL3-OD3fpB8On758ehVevbu5PRofZaqgtEi1RlmPONVrTiUDNuqaVTD6gZ0xUpGS6pQoeQUVMUVNHnT1I3WqlS6zRsoMDtIHi_e0dnvUyxdbI1X2PdyQDt5kZcMgFUsgo_-Ai9iV0OsTbA46ZzFFSG-QMpZ7x22YnRmK91OUBDzf4j__UeMPV1iP0yPu70yYv36_RdalHP4eAm7rQlCjrINogth9ELLIIUZWnv9Yt1Xoa2ZrdFSCIN9hEVsLwde8Ln4zU0RmnE_0ULSggKDKHn2j8SjdKrbW5AuAuMD_vwzC-m-iaLMylycvz0RLz5_qMs3m43Isyu7ueVp</recordid><startdate>200505</startdate><enddate>200505</enddate><creator>Marsden, Helen</creator><creator>Carroll, Marie</creator><creator>Neill, James T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200505</creationdate><title>Who cheats at university? A self-report study of dishonest academic behaviours in a sample of Australian university students</title><author>Marsden, Helen ; Carroll, Marie ; Neill, James T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6216-d3e343489c4072ef8bbcb29b0d8272171cecea410c84c0b5bb9bddc7cdf5b06e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Cheating</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Falsification</topic><topic>Fraud</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Literature review</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Plagiarism</topic><topic>Self report measures</topic><topic>Selfreport</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Student characteristics</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Tertiary students</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>University students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marsden, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neill, James T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Australian journal of psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marsden, Helen</au><au>Carroll, Marie</au><au>Neill, James T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Who cheats at university? A self-report study of dishonest academic behaviours in a sample of Australian university students</atitle><jtitle>Australian journal of psychology</jtitle><date>2005-05</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>0004-9530</issn><eissn>1742-9536</eissn><abstract>The study investigated the dishonest academic behaviours of Australian university students and their relationships with demographic factors, academic policy advised to students, academic self-efficacy, and academic orientation. It was hypothesised that higher levels of dishonesty would be associated with low learning-orientation, high grade-orientation, low academic self-efficacy and nonreceipt of information about the rules of cheating and plagiarism. Descriptive analyses revealed high levels of three types of self-reported academic dishonesty: cheating, plagiarism and falsification. Regression analyses revealed demographic variables, academic orientation and academic self-efficacy to have differential predictive value for the three types of dishonesty, underlining the argument that it is misleading to measure academic dishonesty as a unidimensional construct. The results are discussed in terms of implications for strategic interventions and university policy formulation. [Author abstract]</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/00049530412331283426</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0004-9530 |
| ispartof | Australian journal of psychology, 2005-05, Vol.57 (1), p.1-10 |
| issn | 0004-9530 1742-9536 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57200282 |
| source | Wiley Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Australia Cheating Ethics Falsification Fraud Higher education Literature review Mathematical models Plagiarism Self report measures Selfreport Statistics Student characteristics Students Surveys Tertiary students Universities University students |
| title | Who cheats at university? A self-report study of dishonest academic behaviours in a sample of Australian university students |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A32%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Who%20cheats%20at%20university?%20A%20self-report%20study%20of%20dishonest%20academic%20behaviours%20in%20a%20sample%20of%20Australian%20university%20students&rft.jtitle=Australian%20journal%20of%20psychology&rft.au=Marsden,%20Helen&rft.date=2005-05&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=0004-9530&rft.eissn=1742-9536&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00049530412331283426&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E57200282%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210852852&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.200504642&rfr_iscdi=true |