Characteristics of Two Groups of Angry Drivers
High anger drivers acknowledging problems with driving anger and interest in counseling (high anger/problem [HP] drivers) were compared with high and low anger drivers not acknowledging problems with driving anger and seeking counseling (high and low/nonproblem [HNP and LNP, respectively] drivers)....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of counseling psychology 2003-04, Vol.50 (2), p.123-132 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 132 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 123 |
container_title | Journal of counseling psychology |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Deffenbacher, Jerry L Filetti, Linda B Richards, Tracy L Lynch, Rebekah S Oetting, Eugene R |
description | High anger drivers acknowledging problems with driving anger and interest in counseling (high anger/problem [HP] drivers) were compared with high and low anger drivers not acknowledging problems with driving anger and seeking counseling (high and low/nonproblem [HNP and LNP, respectively] drivers). High anger groups reported more anger while driving; aggressive expression of driving anger; aggression and risky behavior; trait anger; impulsiveness; and aggressive, less controlled forms of general anger expression and less adaptive/constructive coping than LNP drivers. HP drivers received more tickets and experienced more minor accidents than LNP drivers. Although high anger drivers did not differ on reported anger, risky behavior, and impulsiveness, HP drivers reported greater aggression on 1 measure, greater aggressiveness on 3 measures of driving anger expression, greater trait anger, and more aggressive and less controlled forms of general anger expression, suggesting HP drivers are somewhat more aggressive than the HNP group. Results supported the state-trait model of anger. Implications for intervention were drawn. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0022-0167.50.2.123 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57187785</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ775267</ericid><sourcerecordid>677736701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a410t-d259fd2509a8f7c21e7508b9b82dc920ab2c22c6d5a0a6cbd59c6ad2ca023fd13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kT1PwzAQhi0EEuXjDyCGCgFbwvkS2_FYFSggJJYyW1fHgaDQBLsB9d_j0qpIDCy2rPe5O_sxYyccUg6ZugJATIBLlQpIMeWY7bAB15lOkMtilw22wD47COENgOdZoQcsHb-SJ7twvg6L2oZhWw2nX-1w4tu--zmN5i9-Obz29afz4YjtVdQEd7zZD9nz7c10fJc8Pk3ux6PHhHIOi6REoau4gKaiUha5UwKKmZ4VWFqNQDO0iFaWgoCknZVCW0klWgLMqpJnh-xy3bfz7UfvwsK818G6pqG5a_tghOKFUoWI4Nkf8K3t_TzezUie55zHh_8HYSYlSCEhQriGrG9D8K4yna_fyS8NB7OSbFYOzcqhEWDQRMmx6GLTmYKlpvI0t3X4rcwL0KjyyJ2uuejZbuObB6UEShXj83VMHZkuLC35-BmNC8a2_e-0b9Usjzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614411002</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characteristics of Two Groups of Angry Drivers</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCO_PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Deffenbacher, Jerry L ; Filetti, Linda B ; Richards, Tracy L ; Lynch, Rebekah S ; Oetting, Eugene R</creator><creatorcontrib>Deffenbacher, Jerry L ; Filetti, Linda B ; Richards, Tracy L ; Lynch, Rebekah S ; Oetting, Eugene R</creatorcontrib><description>High anger drivers acknowledging problems with driving anger and interest in counseling (high anger/problem [HP] drivers) were compared with high and low anger drivers not acknowledging problems with driving anger and seeking counseling (high and low/nonproblem [HNP and LNP, respectively] drivers). High anger groups reported more anger while driving; aggressive expression of driving anger; aggression and risky behavior; trait anger; impulsiveness; and aggressive, less controlled forms of general anger expression and less adaptive/constructive coping than LNP drivers. HP drivers received more tickets and experienced more minor accidents than LNP drivers. Although high anger drivers did not differ on reported anger, risky behavior, and impulsiveness, HP drivers reported greater aggression on 1 measure, greater aggressiveness on 3 measures of driving anger expression, greater trait anger, and more aggressive and less controlled forms of general anger expression, suggesting HP drivers are somewhat more aggressive than the HNP group. Results supported the state-trait model of anger. Implications for intervention were drawn.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0167</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2168</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.50.2.123</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLCPAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Aggression ; Aggressiveness ; Anger ; Antisocial Behavior ; At Risk Persons ; Automobile drivers ; Biological and medical sciences ; Comparative Analysis ; Coping ; Counseling ; Drivers ; Driving Behavior ; Female ; Group therapy ; Human ; Impulsiveness ; Individual Characteristics ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Motor Vehicles ; Psychological Patterns ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Risk Factors ; Self Control ; Social behavior disorders. Criminal behavior. Delinquency ; State-Trait theory ; Traffic Safety ; USA</subject><ispartof>Journal of counseling psychology, 2003-04, Vol.50 (2), p.123-132</ispartof><rights>2003 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Apr 2003</rights><rights>2003, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a410t-d259fd2509a8f7c21e7508b9b82dc920ab2c22c6d5a0a6cbd59c6ad2ca023fd13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a410t-d259fd2509a8f7c21e7508b9b82dc920ab2c22c6d5a0a6cbd59c6ad2ca023fd13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ775267$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14809274$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deffenbacher, Jerry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filetti, Linda B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Tracy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Rebekah S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oetting, Eugene R</creatorcontrib><title>Characteristics of Two Groups of Angry Drivers</title><title>Journal of counseling psychology</title><description>High anger drivers acknowledging problems with driving anger and interest in counseling (high anger/problem [HP] drivers) were compared with high and low anger drivers not acknowledging problems with driving anger and seeking counseling (high and low/nonproblem [HNP and LNP, respectively] drivers). High anger groups reported more anger while driving; aggressive expression of driving anger; aggression and risky behavior; trait anger; impulsiveness; and aggressive, less controlled forms of general anger expression and less adaptive/constructive coping than LNP drivers. HP drivers received more tickets and experienced more minor accidents than LNP drivers. Although high anger drivers did not differ on reported anger, risky behavior, and impulsiveness, HP drivers reported greater aggression on 1 measure, greater aggressiveness on 3 measures of driving anger expression, greater trait anger, and more aggressive and less controlled forms of general anger expression, suggesting HP drivers are somewhat more aggressive than the HNP group. Results supported the state-trait model of anger. Implications for intervention were drawn.</description><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Aggression</subject><subject>Aggressiveness</subject><subject>Anger</subject><subject>Antisocial Behavior</subject><subject>At Risk Persons</subject><subject>Automobile drivers</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Drivers</subject><subject>Driving Behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Group therapy</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Impulsiveness</subject><subject>Individual Characteristics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Motor Vehicles</subject><subject>Psychological Patterns</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Self Control</subject><subject>Social behavior disorders. Criminal behavior. Delinquency</subject><subject>State-Trait theory</subject><subject>Traffic Safety</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0022-0167</issn><issn>1939-2168</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kT1PwzAQhi0EEuXjDyCGCgFbwvkS2_FYFSggJJYyW1fHgaDQBLsB9d_j0qpIDCy2rPe5O_sxYyccUg6ZugJATIBLlQpIMeWY7bAB15lOkMtilw22wD47COENgOdZoQcsHb-SJ7twvg6L2oZhWw2nX-1w4tu--zmN5i9-Obz29afz4YjtVdQEd7zZD9nz7c10fJc8Pk3ux6PHhHIOi6REoau4gKaiUha5UwKKmZ4VWFqNQDO0iFaWgoCknZVCW0klWgLMqpJnh-xy3bfz7UfvwsK818G6pqG5a_tghOKFUoWI4Nkf8K3t_TzezUie55zHh_8HYSYlSCEhQriGrG9D8K4yna_fyS8NB7OSbFYOzcqhEWDQRMmx6GLTmYKlpvI0t3X4rcwL0KjyyJ2uuejZbuObB6UEShXj83VMHZkuLC35-BmNC8a2_e-0b9Usjzw</recordid><startdate>20030401</startdate><enddate>20030401</enddate><creator>Deffenbacher, Jerry L</creator><creator>Filetti, Linda B</creator><creator>Richards, Tracy L</creator><creator>Lynch, Rebekah S</creator><creator>Oetting, Eugene R</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030401</creationdate><title>Characteristics of Two Groups of Angry Drivers</title><author>Deffenbacher, Jerry L ; Filetti, Linda B ; Richards, Tracy L ; Lynch, Rebekah S ; Oetting, Eugene R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a410t-d259fd2509a8f7c21e7508b9b82dc920ab2c22c6d5a0a6cbd59c6ad2ca023fd13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Aggression</topic><topic>Aggressiveness</topic><topic>Anger</topic><topic>Antisocial Behavior</topic><topic>At Risk Persons</topic><topic>Automobile drivers</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Drivers</topic><topic>Driving Behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Group therapy</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Impulsiveness</topic><topic>Individual Characteristics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Motor Vehicles</topic><topic>Psychological Patterns</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Self Control</topic><topic>Social behavior disorders. Criminal behavior. Delinquency</topic><topic>State-Trait theory</topic><topic>Traffic Safety</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deffenbacher, Jerry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filetti, Linda B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Tracy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Rebekah S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oetting, Eugene R</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of counseling psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deffenbacher, Jerry L</au><au>Filetti, Linda B</au><au>Richards, Tracy L</au><au>Lynch, Rebekah S</au><au>Oetting, Eugene R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ775267</ericid><atitle>Characteristics of Two Groups of Angry Drivers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of counseling psychology</jtitle><date>2003-04-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>123-132</pages><issn>0022-0167</issn><eissn>1939-2168</eissn><coden>JLCPAT</coden><abstract>High anger drivers acknowledging problems with driving anger and interest in counseling (high anger/problem [HP] drivers) were compared with high and low anger drivers not acknowledging problems with driving anger and seeking counseling (high and low/nonproblem [HNP and LNP, respectively] drivers). High anger groups reported more anger while driving; aggressive expression of driving anger; aggression and risky behavior; trait anger; impulsiveness; and aggressive, less controlled forms of general anger expression and less adaptive/constructive coping than LNP drivers. HP drivers received more tickets and experienced more minor accidents than LNP drivers. Although high anger drivers did not differ on reported anger, risky behavior, and impulsiveness, HP drivers reported greater aggression on 1 measure, greater aggressiveness on 3 measures of driving anger expression, greater trait anger, and more aggressive and less controlled forms of general anger expression, suggesting HP drivers are somewhat more aggressive than the HNP group. Results supported the state-trait model of anger. Implications for intervention were drawn.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0022-0167.50.2.123</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0167 |
ispartof | Journal of counseling psychology, 2003-04, Vol.50 (2), p.123-132 |
issn | 0022-0167 1939-2168 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57187785 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCO_PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Adult and adolescent clinical studies Aggression Aggressiveness Anger Antisocial Behavior At Risk Persons Automobile drivers Biological and medical sciences Comparative Analysis Coping Counseling Drivers Driving Behavior Female Group therapy Human Impulsiveness Individual Characteristics Male Medical sciences Motor Vehicles Psychological Patterns Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Risk Factors Self Control Social behavior disorders. Criminal behavior. Delinquency State-Trait theory Traffic Safety USA |
title | Characteristics of Two Groups of Angry Drivers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T10%3A44%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characteristics%20of%20Two%20Groups%20of%20Angry%20Drivers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20counseling%20psychology&rft.au=Deffenbacher,%20Jerry%20L&rft.date=2003-04-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=123-132&rft.issn=0022-0167&rft.eissn=1939-2168&rft.coden=JLCPAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-0167.50.2.123&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E677736701%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614411002&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ775267&rfr_iscdi=true |