Burnout among employees in human service work: design and baseline findings of the PUMA study

Aim: To present the theoretical framework, design, methods, and baseline findings of the first Danish study on determinants and consequences of burnout, and the impact of workplace interventions in human service work organizations. Method: A 5-year prospective intervention study comprising 2,391 emp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian journal of public health 2006, Vol.34 (1), p.49-58
Hauptverfasser: BORRITZ, MARIANNE, RUGULIES, REINER, BJORNER, JAKOB B., VILLADSEN, EBBE, MIKKELSEN, OLE A., KRISTENSEN, TAGE S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 58
container_issue 1
container_start_page 49
container_title Scandinavian journal of public health
container_volume 34
creator BORRITZ, MARIANNE
RUGULIES, REINER
BJORNER, JAKOB B.
VILLADSEN, EBBE
MIKKELSEN, OLE A.
KRISTENSEN, TAGE S.
description Aim: To present the theoretical framework, design, methods, and baseline findings of the first Danish study on determinants and consequences of burnout, and the impact of workplace interventions in human service work organizations. Method: A 5-year prospective intervention study comprising 2,391 employees from different organizations in the human service sector: social security offices, psychiatric prison, institutions for severely disabled, hospitals, and homecare services. Data were collected at baseline and at two follow-ups. The authors developed a new burnout tool (the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory) covering workrelated, client-related, and personal burnout. The study includes potential determinants of burnout (e.g. the psychosocial work environment, social relations outside work, lifestyle factors, and personality aspects) and consequences of burnout (e.g. poor health, low job satisfaction, turnover, and absenteeism). Here, the focus is on the description of the study population at baseline, including associations of work burnout with psychosocial work environment scales and absence. Results: Response rate at baseline was 80.1%. Midwives and homecare workers had high levels on both work- and client-related burnout. Prison officers had the highest level on client-related burnout. Supervisors and office assistants had low levels on both scales. Work burnout showed the highest correlations with job satisfaction (r=—0.51), quantitative demands (r=0.48), role-conflicts (r=0.44), and emotional demands (r=0.42). Sickness absence was 13.9 vs 6.0 days among participants in the highest and lowest work burnout quartile, respectively. Conclusion: The findings indicate that study design and methods are adequate for the upcoming prospective analyses of aetiology and consequences of burnout and of the impact of workplace interventions.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/14034940510032275
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57179607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45149709</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1080_14034940510032275</sage_id><sourcerecordid>45149709</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-d886b7dc5d7659b8e59886798501e942ee6e7cef55cc8939dc70399ea7e4c91d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0Eou3CB-AA8oXe0o43dmxzKxX_pFZwoEcUee3JNktibz0J1X57jHZFD5XgNKPx772R3zD2SsCZAAPnQkItrQQlAOrlUqsn7Fg0SlTCgnpa-vJeFcAcsROiDQA0cmmesyPRSGlBymP24_2cY5on7sYU1xzH7ZB2iMT7yG_n0UVOmH_1Hvl9yj_f8YDUryN3MfCVIxz6iLzrY-jjmnjq-HSL_NvN9QWnaQ67F-xZ5wbCl4e6YDcfP3y__Fxdff305fLiqvJKiqkKxjQrHbwKulF2ZVDZMtHWKBBo5RKxQe2xU8p7Y2sbvIbaWnQapbci1At2uvfd5nQ3I03t2JPHYXAR00yt0kLbBvR_QWEVgDamgGIP-pyIMnbtNvejy7tWQPsn_PZR-EXz5mA-r0YMD4pD2gV4ewAceTd02UXf0wOnZQOqfG3BzvYcuTW2m1ROVNL75-bXe8GGppT_GkolpNVg699vFqHl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19500788</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Burnout among employees in human service work: design and baseline findings of the PUMA study</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>BORRITZ, MARIANNE ; RUGULIES, REINER ; BJORNER, JAKOB B. ; VILLADSEN, EBBE ; MIKKELSEN, OLE A. ; KRISTENSEN, TAGE S.</creator><creatorcontrib>BORRITZ, MARIANNE ; RUGULIES, REINER ; BJORNER, JAKOB B. ; VILLADSEN, EBBE ; MIKKELSEN, OLE A. ; KRISTENSEN, TAGE S.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: To present the theoretical framework, design, methods, and baseline findings of the first Danish study on determinants and consequences of burnout, and the impact of workplace interventions in human service work organizations. Method: A 5-year prospective intervention study comprising 2,391 employees from different organizations in the human service sector: social security offices, psychiatric prison, institutions for severely disabled, hospitals, and homecare services. Data were collected at baseline and at two follow-ups. The authors developed a new burnout tool (the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory) covering workrelated, client-related, and personal burnout. The study includes potential determinants of burnout (e.g. the psychosocial work environment, social relations outside work, lifestyle factors, and personality aspects) and consequences of burnout (e.g. poor health, low job satisfaction, turnover, and absenteeism). Here, the focus is on the description of the study population at baseline, including associations of work burnout with psychosocial work environment scales and absence. Results: Response rate at baseline was 80.1%. Midwives and homecare workers had high levels on both work- and client-related burnout. Prison officers had the highest level on client-related burnout. Supervisors and office assistants had low levels on both scales. Work burnout showed the highest correlations with job satisfaction (r=—0.51), quantitative demands (r=0.48), role-conflicts (r=0.44), and emotional demands (r=0.42). Sickness absence was 13.9 vs 6.0 days among participants in the highest and lowest work burnout quartile, respectively. Conclusion: The findings indicate that study design and methods are adequate for the upcoming prospective analyses of aetiology and consequences of burnout and of the impact of workplace interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1403-4948</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1651-1905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14034940510032275</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16449044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Allied Health Personnel - psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Burnout ; Burnout, Professional - epidemiology ; Burnout, Professional - etiology ; Burnout, Professional - psychology ; Denmark - epidemiology ; Female ; Health Personnel - psychology ; Home Health Aides - psychology ; Humans ; Job Satisfaction ; Life Style ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Nurse Midwives - psychology ; Occupational Exposure - adverse effects ; Occupational Health ; ORIGINAL ARTICLES ; Professional-Patient Relations ; Prospective Studies ; Psychiatric Aides - psychology ; Psychosocial Factors ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Sick Leave ; Social Environment ; Social Services ; Social Work ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Workplace</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of public health, 2006, Vol.34 (1), p.49-58</ispartof><rights>2006 Taylor &amp; Francis</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-d886b7dc5d7659b8e59886798501e942ee6e7cef55cc8939dc70399ea7e4c91d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-d886b7dc5d7659b8e59886798501e942ee6e7cef55cc8939dc70399ea7e4c91d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45149709$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45149709$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4024,21819,27923,27924,27925,31000,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17460570$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16449044$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BORRITZ, MARIANNE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUGULIES, REINER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BJORNER, JAKOB B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VILLADSEN, EBBE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIKKELSEN, OLE A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRISTENSEN, TAGE S.</creatorcontrib><title>Burnout among employees in human service work: design and baseline findings of the PUMA study</title><title>Scandinavian journal of public health</title><addtitle>Scand J Public Health</addtitle><description>Aim: To present the theoretical framework, design, methods, and baseline findings of the first Danish study on determinants and consequences of burnout, and the impact of workplace interventions in human service work organizations. Method: A 5-year prospective intervention study comprising 2,391 employees from different organizations in the human service sector: social security offices, psychiatric prison, institutions for severely disabled, hospitals, and homecare services. Data were collected at baseline and at two follow-ups. The authors developed a new burnout tool (the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory) covering workrelated, client-related, and personal burnout. The study includes potential determinants of burnout (e.g. the psychosocial work environment, social relations outside work, lifestyle factors, and personality aspects) and consequences of burnout (e.g. poor health, low job satisfaction, turnover, and absenteeism). Here, the focus is on the description of the study population at baseline, including associations of work burnout with psychosocial work environment scales and absence. Results: Response rate at baseline was 80.1%. Midwives and homecare workers had high levels on both work- and client-related burnout. Prison officers had the highest level on client-related burnout. Supervisors and office assistants had low levels on both scales. Work burnout showed the highest correlations with job satisfaction (r=—0.51), quantitative demands (r=0.48), role-conflicts (r=0.44), and emotional demands (r=0.42). Sickness absence was 13.9 vs 6.0 days among participants in the highest and lowest work burnout quartile, respectively. Conclusion: The findings indicate that study design and methods are adequate for the upcoming prospective analyses of aetiology and consequences of burnout and of the impact of workplace interventions.</description><subject>Allied Health Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Burnout</subject><subject>Burnout, Professional - epidemiology</subject><subject>Burnout, Professional - etiology</subject><subject>Burnout, Professional - psychology</subject><subject>Denmark - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Home Health Aides - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Life Style</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Nurse Midwives - psychology</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>Occupational Health</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject><subject>Professional-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Psychiatric Aides - psychology</subject><subject>Psychosocial Factors</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Sick Leave</subject><subject>Social Environment</subject><subject>Social Services</subject><subject>Social Work</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Workplace</subject><issn>1403-4948</issn><issn>1651-1905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0Eou3CB-AA8oXe0o43dmxzKxX_pFZwoEcUee3JNktibz0J1X57jHZFD5XgNKPx772R3zD2SsCZAAPnQkItrQQlAOrlUqsn7Fg0SlTCgnpa-vJeFcAcsROiDQA0cmmesyPRSGlBymP24_2cY5on7sYU1xzH7ZB2iMT7yG_n0UVOmH_1Hvl9yj_f8YDUryN3MfCVIxz6iLzrY-jjmnjq-HSL_NvN9QWnaQ67F-xZ5wbCl4e6YDcfP3y__Fxdff305fLiqvJKiqkKxjQrHbwKulF2ZVDZMtHWKBBo5RKxQe2xU8p7Y2sbvIbaWnQapbci1At2uvfd5nQ3I03t2JPHYXAR00yt0kLbBvR_QWEVgDamgGIP-pyIMnbtNvejy7tWQPsn_PZR-EXz5mA-r0YMD4pD2gV4ewAceTd02UXf0wOnZQOqfG3BzvYcuTW2m1ROVNL75-bXe8GGppT_GkolpNVg699vFqHl</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>BORRITZ, MARIANNE</creator><creator>RUGULIES, REINER</creator><creator>BJORNER, JAKOB B.</creator><creator>VILLADSEN, EBBE</creator><creator>MIKKELSEN, OLE A.</creator><creator>KRISTENSEN, TAGE S.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Sage Publications</general><general>Sage</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Burnout among employees in human service work: design and baseline findings of the PUMA study</title><author>BORRITZ, MARIANNE ; RUGULIES, REINER ; BJORNER, JAKOB B. ; VILLADSEN, EBBE ; MIKKELSEN, OLE A. ; KRISTENSEN, TAGE S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-d886b7dc5d7659b8e59886798501e942ee6e7cef55cc8939dc70399ea7e4c91d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Allied Health Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Burnout</topic><topic>Burnout, Professional - epidemiology</topic><topic>Burnout, Professional - etiology</topic><topic>Burnout, Professional - psychology</topic><topic>Denmark - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Home Health Aides - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Life Style</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Nurse Midwives - psychology</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>Occupational Health</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</topic><topic>Professional-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Psychiatric Aides - psychology</topic><topic>Psychosocial Factors</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Sick Leave</topic><topic>Social Environment</topic><topic>Social Services</topic><topic>Social Work</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Workplace</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BORRITZ, MARIANNE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUGULIES, REINER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BJORNER, JAKOB B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VILLADSEN, EBBE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIKKELSEN, OLE A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRISTENSEN, TAGE S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BORRITZ, MARIANNE</au><au>RUGULIES, REINER</au><au>BJORNER, JAKOB B.</au><au>VILLADSEN, EBBE</au><au>MIKKELSEN, OLE A.</au><au>KRISTENSEN, TAGE S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Burnout among employees in human service work: design and baseline findings of the PUMA study</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of public health</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Public Health</addtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>49-58</pages><issn>1403-4948</issn><eissn>1651-1905</eissn><abstract>Aim: To present the theoretical framework, design, methods, and baseline findings of the first Danish study on determinants and consequences of burnout, and the impact of workplace interventions in human service work organizations. Method: A 5-year prospective intervention study comprising 2,391 employees from different organizations in the human service sector: social security offices, psychiatric prison, institutions for severely disabled, hospitals, and homecare services. Data were collected at baseline and at two follow-ups. The authors developed a new burnout tool (the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory) covering workrelated, client-related, and personal burnout. The study includes potential determinants of burnout (e.g. the psychosocial work environment, social relations outside work, lifestyle factors, and personality aspects) and consequences of burnout (e.g. poor health, low job satisfaction, turnover, and absenteeism). Here, the focus is on the description of the study population at baseline, including associations of work burnout with psychosocial work environment scales and absence. Results: Response rate at baseline was 80.1%. Midwives and homecare workers had high levels on both work- and client-related burnout. Prison officers had the highest level on client-related burnout. Supervisors and office assistants had low levels on both scales. Work burnout showed the highest correlations with job satisfaction (r=—0.51), quantitative demands (r=0.48), role-conflicts (r=0.44), and emotional demands (r=0.42). Sickness absence was 13.9 vs 6.0 days among participants in the highest and lowest work burnout quartile, respectively. Conclusion: The findings indicate that study design and methods are adequate for the upcoming prospective analyses of aetiology and consequences of burnout and of the impact of workplace interventions.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>16449044</pmid><doi>10.1080/14034940510032275</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1403-4948
ispartof Scandinavian journal of public health, 2006, Vol.34 (1), p.49-58
issn 1403-4948
1651-1905
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57179607
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Allied Health Personnel - psychology
Biological and medical sciences
Burnout
Burnout, Professional - epidemiology
Burnout, Professional - etiology
Burnout, Professional - psychology
Denmark - epidemiology
Female
Health Personnel - psychology
Home Health Aides - psychology
Humans
Job Satisfaction
Life Style
Male
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous
Nurse Midwives - psychology
Occupational Exposure - adverse effects
Occupational Health
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Professional-Patient Relations
Prospective Studies
Psychiatric Aides - psychology
Psychosocial Factors
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Sick Leave
Social Environment
Social Services
Social Work
Socioeconomic Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires
Workplace
title Burnout among employees in human service work: design and baseline findings of the PUMA study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T05%3A45%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Burnout%20among%20employees%20in%20human%20service%20work:%20design%20and%20baseline%20findings%20of%20the%20PUMA%20study&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=BORRITZ,%20MARIANNE&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=49-58&rft.issn=1403-4948&rft.eissn=1651-1905&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14034940510032275&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45149709%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19500788&rft_id=info:pmid/16449044&rft_jstor_id=45149709&rft_sage_id=10.1080_14034940510032275&rfr_iscdi=true