Self, Other, Positive, and Negative Affect Scales of the Self-Confrontation Method: factorial structure and unidimensionality
In the self-confrontation method, the rows of a grid consist of valuations (i.e. summaries of important personal narratives), while the columns contain affects grouped into four scales (see title). These affects (varying from 16 to 30) are rated on a 0–5 scale of intensity, resulting in an affect pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Personality and individual differences 2003-12, Vol.35 (8), p.1833-1847 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1847 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1833 |
container_title | Personality and individual differences |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | van Geel, Rolf De Mey, Hubert |
description | In the self-confrontation method, the rows of a grid consist of valuations (i.e. summaries of important personal narratives), while the columns contain affects grouped into four scales (see title). These affects (varying from 16 to 30) are rated on a 0–5 scale of intensity, resulting in an affect profile for each valuation. Principal components analysis on the affect profiles of a client sample, using a list of 30 affects, yielded a 3-factor solution, with 2 unipolar and 1 bipolar factor, in accordance with the four scales. On the basis of this analysis, a list of 24 affects was derived with six affects per scale. This list was then applied to a student sample to cross-validate the results. Unidimensionality of the four scales was found at the level of single grids, and across both client and student samples. It was concluded that the four scales of the 24-affect list appeared to be psychometrically sound and optimally suited for use in research and practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00033-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57167512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0191886903000333</els_id><sourcerecordid>57167512</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-edfd67cd55028510953cea7e7a943f15340eebf9a02c48d9e4ec8c62329c99033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1PHCEUhonRpOvWn9CEG5s22akwDDODN81mo7aJH022vSYIB6WZBQXGxAv_e5ldYy-9ApLnPe_hQegTJd8ooe3JmlBBq75vxRfCvhJCGKvYHprRvisX3oh9NHtDPqDDlP4WiPNazNDLGga7wDf5HuIC_wrJZfcEC6y8wddwp6YXXloLOuO1VgMkHCwuNJ6C1Sp4G4PPhQseX0G-D-YUW6VziE4NOOU46jxG2A4cvTNuAz4VWA0uP39EB1YNCY5ezzn6c372e_Wjury5-LlaXlaatX2uwFjTdtpwTuqeUyI406A66JRomKWcNQTg1gpFat30RkADutdtzWqhhSg65ujzbu5DDI8jpCw3LmkYBuUhjEnyjrYdp3UB-Q7UMaQUwcqH6DYqPktK5CRbbmXLyaQkTG5ly6ng-LVApWLJRuW1S__DnJVwWXuOvu84KL99chBl0g68BuNiUSxNcO80_QOD8JTj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57167512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self, Other, Positive, and Negative Affect Scales of the Self-Confrontation Method: factorial structure and unidimensionality</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>van Geel, Rolf ; De Mey, Hubert</creator><creatorcontrib>van Geel, Rolf ; De Mey, Hubert</creatorcontrib><description>In the self-confrontation method, the rows of a grid consist of valuations (i.e. summaries of important personal narratives), while the columns contain affects grouped into four scales (see title). These affects (varying from 16 to 30) are rated on a 0–5 scale of intensity, resulting in an affect profile for each valuation. Principal components analysis on the affect profiles of a client sample, using a list of 30 affects, yielded a 3-factor solution, with 2 unipolar and 1 bipolar factor, in accordance with the four scales. On the basis of this analysis, a list of 24 affects was derived with six affects per scale. This list was then applied to a student sample to cross-validate the results. Unidimensionality of the four scales was found at the level of single grids, and across both client and student samples. It was concluded that the four scales of the 24-affect list appeared to be psychometrically sound and optimally suited for use in research and practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-8869</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3549</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00033-3</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PEIDD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Affects ; Agency ; Biological and medical sciences ; Communion ; Dimensional analysis ; Factor structures ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Methodology. Experimentation ; Negative affect ; Positive affect ; Psychological tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology ; Self-confrontation method ; Selfconfrontation ; Valuation theory</subject><ispartof>Personality and individual differences, 2003-12, Vol.35 (8), p.1833-1847</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-edfd67cd55028510953cea7e7a943f15340eebf9a02c48d9e4ec8c62329c99033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-edfd67cd55028510953cea7e7a943f15340eebf9a02c48d9e4ec8c62329c99033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00033-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,30981,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15310195$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Geel, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Mey, Hubert</creatorcontrib><title>Self, Other, Positive, and Negative Affect Scales of the Self-Confrontation Method: factorial structure and unidimensionality</title><title>Personality and individual differences</title><description>In the self-confrontation method, the rows of a grid consist of valuations (i.e. summaries of important personal narratives), while the columns contain affects grouped into four scales (see title). These affects (varying from 16 to 30) are rated on a 0–5 scale of intensity, resulting in an affect profile for each valuation. Principal components analysis on the affect profiles of a client sample, using a list of 30 affects, yielded a 3-factor solution, with 2 unipolar and 1 bipolar factor, in accordance with the four scales. On the basis of this analysis, a list of 24 affects was derived with six affects per scale. This list was then applied to a student sample to cross-validate the results. Unidimensionality of the four scales was found at the level of single grids, and across both client and student samples. It was concluded that the four scales of the 24-affect list appeared to be psychometrically sound and optimally suited for use in research and practice.</description><subject>Affects</subject><subject>Agency</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Communion</subject><subject>Dimensional analysis</subject><subject>Factor structures</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Methodology. Experimentation</subject><subject>Negative affect</subject><subject>Positive affect</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology</subject><subject>Self-confrontation method</subject><subject>Selfconfrontation</subject><subject>Valuation theory</subject><issn>0191-8869</issn><issn>1873-3549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF1PHCEUhonRpOvWn9CEG5s22akwDDODN81mo7aJH022vSYIB6WZBQXGxAv_e5ldYy-9ApLnPe_hQegTJd8ooe3JmlBBq75vxRfCvhJCGKvYHprRvisX3oh9NHtDPqDDlP4WiPNazNDLGga7wDf5HuIC_wrJZfcEC6y8wddwp6YXXloLOuO1VgMkHCwuNJ6C1Sp4G4PPhQseX0G-D-YUW6VziE4NOOU46jxG2A4cvTNuAz4VWA0uP39EB1YNCY5ezzn6c372e_Wjury5-LlaXlaatX2uwFjTdtpwTuqeUyI406A66JRomKWcNQTg1gpFat30RkADutdtzWqhhSg65ujzbu5DDI8jpCw3LmkYBuUhjEnyjrYdp3UB-Q7UMaQUwcqH6DYqPktK5CRbbmXLyaQkTG5ly6ng-LVApWLJRuW1S__DnJVwWXuOvu84KL99chBl0g68BuNiUSxNcO80_QOD8JTj</recordid><startdate>20031201</startdate><enddate>20031201</enddate><creator>van Geel, Rolf</creator><creator>De Mey, Hubert</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031201</creationdate><title>Self, Other, Positive, and Negative Affect Scales of the Self-Confrontation Method: factorial structure and unidimensionality</title><author>van Geel, Rolf ; De Mey, Hubert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-edfd67cd55028510953cea7e7a943f15340eebf9a02c48d9e4ec8c62329c99033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Affects</topic><topic>Agency</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Communion</topic><topic>Dimensional analysis</topic><topic>Factor structures</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Methodology. Experimentation</topic><topic>Negative affect</topic><topic>Positive affect</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology</topic><topic>Self-confrontation method</topic><topic>Selfconfrontation</topic><topic>Valuation theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Geel, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Mey, Hubert</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Personality and individual differences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Geel, Rolf</au><au>De Mey, Hubert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Self, Other, Positive, and Negative Affect Scales of the Self-Confrontation Method: factorial structure and unidimensionality</atitle><jtitle>Personality and individual differences</jtitle><date>2003-12-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1833</spage><epage>1847</epage><pages>1833-1847</pages><issn>0191-8869</issn><eissn>1873-3549</eissn><coden>PEIDD9</coden><abstract>In the self-confrontation method, the rows of a grid consist of valuations (i.e. summaries of important personal narratives), while the columns contain affects grouped into four scales (see title). These affects (varying from 16 to 30) are rated on a 0–5 scale of intensity, resulting in an affect profile for each valuation. Principal components analysis on the affect profiles of a client sample, using a list of 30 affects, yielded a 3-factor solution, with 2 unipolar and 1 bipolar factor, in accordance with the four scales. On the basis of this analysis, a list of 24 affects was derived with six affects per scale. This list was then applied to a student sample to cross-validate the results. Unidimensionality of the four scales was found at the level of single grids, and across both client and student samples. It was concluded that the four scales of the 24-affect list appeared to be psychometrically sound and optimally suited for use in research and practice.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00033-3</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0191-8869 |
ispartof | Personality and individual differences, 2003-12, Vol.35 (8), p.1833-1847 |
issn | 0191-8869 1873-3549 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57167512 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Affects Agency Biological and medical sciences Communion Dimensional analysis Factor structures Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Methodology. Experimentation Negative affect Positive affect Psychological tests Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology Self-confrontation method Selfconfrontation Valuation theory |
title | Self, Other, Positive, and Negative Affect Scales of the Self-Confrontation Method: factorial structure and unidimensionality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T16%3A54%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self,%20Other,%20Positive,%20and%20Negative%20Affect%20Scales%20of%20the%20Self-Confrontation%20Method:%20factorial%20structure%20and%20unidimensionality&rft.jtitle=Personality%20and%20individual%20differences&rft.au=van%20Geel,%20Rolf&rft.date=2003-12-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1833&rft.epage=1847&rft.pages=1833-1847&rft.issn=0191-8869&rft.eissn=1873-3549&rft.coden=PEIDD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00033-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57167512%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57167512&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0191886903000333&rfr_iscdi=true |