Self, Other, Positive, and Negative Affect Scales of the Self-Confrontation Method: factorial structure and unidimensionality

In the self-confrontation method, the rows of a grid consist of valuations (i.e. summaries of important personal narratives), while the columns contain affects grouped into four scales (see title). These affects (varying from 16 to 30) are rated on a 0–5 scale of intensity, resulting in an affect pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Personality and individual differences 2003-12, Vol.35 (8), p.1833-1847
Hauptverfasser: van Geel, Rolf, De Mey, Hubert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1847
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1833
container_title Personality and individual differences
container_volume 35
creator van Geel, Rolf
De Mey, Hubert
description In the self-confrontation method, the rows of a grid consist of valuations (i.e. summaries of important personal narratives), while the columns contain affects grouped into four scales (see title). These affects (varying from 16 to 30) are rated on a 0–5 scale of intensity, resulting in an affect profile for each valuation. Principal components analysis on the affect profiles of a client sample, using a list of 30 affects, yielded a 3-factor solution, with 2 unipolar and 1 bipolar factor, in accordance with the four scales. On the basis of this analysis, a list of 24 affects was derived with six affects per scale. This list was then applied to a student sample to cross-validate the results. Unidimensionality of the four scales was found at the level of single grids, and across both client and student samples. It was concluded that the four scales of the 24-affect list appeared to be psychometrically sound and optimally suited for use in research and practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00033-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57167512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0191886903000333</els_id><sourcerecordid>57167512</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-edfd67cd55028510953cea7e7a943f15340eebf9a02c48d9e4ec8c62329c99033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1PHCEUhonRpOvWn9CEG5s22akwDDODN81mo7aJH022vSYIB6WZBQXGxAv_e5ldYy-9ApLnPe_hQegTJd8ooe3JmlBBq75vxRfCvhJCGKvYHprRvisX3oh9NHtDPqDDlP4WiPNazNDLGga7wDf5HuIC_wrJZfcEC6y8wddwp6YXXloLOuO1VgMkHCwuNJ6C1Sp4G4PPhQseX0G-D-YUW6VziE4NOOU46jxG2A4cvTNuAz4VWA0uP39EB1YNCY5ezzn6c372e_Wjury5-LlaXlaatX2uwFjTdtpwTuqeUyI406A66JRomKWcNQTg1gpFat30RkADutdtzWqhhSg65ujzbu5DDI8jpCw3LmkYBuUhjEnyjrYdp3UB-Q7UMaQUwcqH6DYqPktK5CRbbmXLyaQkTG5ly6ng-LVApWLJRuW1S__DnJVwWXuOvu84KL99chBl0g68BuNiUSxNcO80_QOD8JTj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57167512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self, Other, Positive, and Negative Affect Scales of the Self-Confrontation Method: factorial structure and unidimensionality</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>van Geel, Rolf ; De Mey, Hubert</creator><creatorcontrib>van Geel, Rolf ; De Mey, Hubert</creatorcontrib><description>In the self-confrontation method, the rows of a grid consist of valuations (i.e. summaries of important personal narratives), while the columns contain affects grouped into four scales (see title). These affects (varying from 16 to 30) are rated on a 0–5 scale of intensity, resulting in an affect profile for each valuation. Principal components analysis on the affect profiles of a client sample, using a list of 30 affects, yielded a 3-factor solution, with 2 unipolar and 1 bipolar factor, in accordance with the four scales. On the basis of this analysis, a list of 24 affects was derived with six affects per scale. This list was then applied to a student sample to cross-validate the results. Unidimensionality of the four scales was found at the level of single grids, and across both client and student samples. It was concluded that the four scales of the 24-affect list appeared to be psychometrically sound and optimally suited for use in research and practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-8869</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3549</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00033-3</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PEIDD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Affects ; Agency ; Biological and medical sciences ; Communion ; Dimensional analysis ; Factor structures ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Methodology. Experimentation ; Negative affect ; Positive affect ; Psychological tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology ; Self-confrontation method ; Selfconfrontation ; Valuation theory</subject><ispartof>Personality and individual differences, 2003-12, Vol.35 (8), p.1833-1847</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-edfd67cd55028510953cea7e7a943f15340eebf9a02c48d9e4ec8c62329c99033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-edfd67cd55028510953cea7e7a943f15340eebf9a02c48d9e4ec8c62329c99033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00033-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,30981,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15310195$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Geel, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Mey, Hubert</creatorcontrib><title>Self, Other, Positive, and Negative Affect Scales of the Self-Confrontation Method: factorial structure and unidimensionality</title><title>Personality and individual differences</title><description>In the self-confrontation method, the rows of a grid consist of valuations (i.e. summaries of important personal narratives), while the columns contain affects grouped into four scales (see title). These affects (varying from 16 to 30) are rated on a 0–5 scale of intensity, resulting in an affect profile for each valuation. Principal components analysis on the affect profiles of a client sample, using a list of 30 affects, yielded a 3-factor solution, with 2 unipolar and 1 bipolar factor, in accordance with the four scales. On the basis of this analysis, a list of 24 affects was derived with six affects per scale. This list was then applied to a student sample to cross-validate the results. Unidimensionality of the four scales was found at the level of single grids, and across both client and student samples. It was concluded that the four scales of the 24-affect list appeared to be psychometrically sound and optimally suited for use in research and practice.</description><subject>Affects</subject><subject>Agency</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Communion</subject><subject>Dimensional analysis</subject><subject>Factor structures</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Methodology. Experimentation</subject><subject>Negative affect</subject><subject>Positive affect</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology</subject><subject>Self-confrontation method</subject><subject>Selfconfrontation</subject><subject>Valuation theory</subject><issn>0191-8869</issn><issn>1873-3549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF1PHCEUhonRpOvWn9CEG5s22akwDDODN81mo7aJH022vSYIB6WZBQXGxAv_e5ldYy-9ApLnPe_hQegTJd8ooe3JmlBBq75vxRfCvhJCGKvYHprRvisX3oh9NHtDPqDDlP4WiPNazNDLGga7wDf5HuIC_wrJZfcEC6y8wddwp6YXXloLOuO1VgMkHCwuNJ6C1Sp4G4PPhQseX0G-D-YUW6VziE4NOOU46jxG2A4cvTNuAz4VWA0uP39EB1YNCY5ezzn6c372e_Wjury5-LlaXlaatX2uwFjTdtpwTuqeUyI406A66JRomKWcNQTg1gpFat30RkADutdtzWqhhSg65ujzbu5DDI8jpCw3LmkYBuUhjEnyjrYdp3UB-Q7UMaQUwcqH6DYqPktK5CRbbmXLyaQkTG5ly6ng-LVApWLJRuW1S__DnJVwWXuOvu84KL99chBl0g68BuNiUSxNcO80_QOD8JTj</recordid><startdate>20031201</startdate><enddate>20031201</enddate><creator>van Geel, Rolf</creator><creator>De Mey, Hubert</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031201</creationdate><title>Self, Other, Positive, and Negative Affect Scales of the Self-Confrontation Method: factorial structure and unidimensionality</title><author>van Geel, Rolf ; De Mey, Hubert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-edfd67cd55028510953cea7e7a943f15340eebf9a02c48d9e4ec8c62329c99033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Affects</topic><topic>Agency</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Communion</topic><topic>Dimensional analysis</topic><topic>Factor structures</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Methodology. Experimentation</topic><topic>Negative affect</topic><topic>Positive affect</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology</topic><topic>Self-confrontation method</topic><topic>Selfconfrontation</topic><topic>Valuation theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Geel, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Mey, Hubert</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Personality and individual differences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Geel, Rolf</au><au>De Mey, Hubert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Self, Other, Positive, and Negative Affect Scales of the Self-Confrontation Method: factorial structure and unidimensionality</atitle><jtitle>Personality and individual differences</jtitle><date>2003-12-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1833</spage><epage>1847</epage><pages>1833-1847</pages><issn>0191-8869</issn><eissn>1873-3549</eissn><coden>PEIDD9</coden><abstract>In the self-confrontation method, the rows of a grid consist of valuations (i.e. summaries of important personal narratives), while the columns contain affects grouped into four scales (see title). These affects (varying from 16 to 30) are rated on a 0–5 scale of intensity, resulting in an affect profile for each valuation. Principal components analysis on the affect profiles of a client sample, using a list of 30 affects, yielded a 3-factor solution, with 2 unipolar and 1 bipolar factor, in accordance with the four scales. On the basis of this analysis, a list of 24 affects was derived with six affects per scale. This list was then applied to a student sample to cross-validate the results. Unidimensionality of the four scales was found at the level of single grids, and across both client and student samples. It was concluded that the four scales of the 24-affect list appeared to be psychometrically sound and optimally suited for use in research and practice.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00033-3</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0191-8869
ispartof Personality and individual differences, 2003-12, Vol.35 (8), p.1833-1847
issn 0191-8869
1873-3549
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57167512
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Affects
Agency
Biological and medical sciences
Communion
Dimensional analysis
Factor structures
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Methodology. Experimentation
Negative affect
Positive affect
Psychological tests
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology
Self-confrontation method
Selfconfrontation
Valuation theory
title Self, Other, Positive, and Negative Affect Scales of the Self-Confrontation Method: factorial structure and unidimensionality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T16%3A54%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self,%20Other,%20Positive,%20and%20Negative%20Affect%20Scales%20of%20the%20Self-Confrontation%20Method:%20factorial%20structure%20and%20unidimensionality&rft.jtitle=Personality%20and%20individual%20differences&rft.au=van%20Geel,%20Rolf&rft.date=2003-12-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1833&rft.epage=1847&rft.pages=1833-1847&rft.issn=0191-8869&rft.eissn=1873-3549&rft.coden=PEIDD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00033-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57167512%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57167512&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0191886903000333&rfr_iscdi=true