Development and Validation of a Collectivist Coping Styles Inventory
This research consisted of 3 studies, with a sample of over 3,000 Taiwanese college students, aimed at developing and validating a situation-specific Collectivist Coping Styles (CCS) inventory from an Asian perspective. The results from the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a st...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of counseling psychology 2006-01, Vol.53 (1), p.107-125 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 125 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 107 |
container_title | Journal of counseling psychology |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Heppner, P. Paul Heppner, Mary J Lee, Dong-gwi Wang, Yu-Wei Park, Hyun-joo Wang, Li-fei |
description | This research consisted of 3 studies, with a sample of over 3,000 Taiwanese college students, aimed at developing and validating a situation-specific Collectivist Coping Styles (CCS) inventory from an Asian perspective. The results from the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a stable 5-factor structure of the CCS: (a) Acceptance, Reframing, and Striving; (b) Family Support; (c) Religion-Spirituality; (d) Avoidance and Detachment; and (e) Private Emotional Outlets. These factors reflected Asians' use of a combination of primary and secondary control efforts and represented different constellations of items than typically found on coping-problem solving inventories in Western countries. Estimates of concurrent and construct validity suggest the CCS is related to a problem solving inventory, an overall problem resolution index, 2 psychological distress measures, and an index of how much the trauma interfered with the lives of participants in conceptually expected directions but is not strongly related to social desirability. Overall, the CCS was found to be a useful and psychometrically sound measure of collectivistic coping. Limitations and future directions are also discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.107 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57156480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ734397</ericid><sourcerecordid>614444935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a448t-c7a24b11d1956ac26757789e3bbf423a3f3a03740295b1d9a40bca09be1710123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVoIds0f6D0YEqbS_FGI8mWdSybjyYEeujHVYy1clHQWq5kL-y_j8yGJA0hugjNPO87o5eQD0CXQLk8pZSxkkItlxVfQq7JA7IAxVXJoG7ekMUDcEjepXRLKQjeqAU5O7Nb68Owsf1YYL8u_qB3axxd6IvQFVisgvfWjG7r0pgfg-v_Fj_HnbepuOq3WRXi7j1526FP9vj-PiK_L85_rb6XNz8ur1bfbkoUohlLI5GJFmANqqrRsFpWUjbK8rbtBOPIO475M4IyVbWwVihoa5Cq1oIECowfkZO97xDDv8mmUW9cMtZ77G2Ykq4kVLVoaAY_PQNvwxT7vJuuQeSjePUaxHhdA1cUMsT2kIkhpWg7PUS3wbjTQPUcvZ6T1XOyuuIack1m0Zd7Z0wGfRexNy49KqXgSol5g497zkZnHtrn15JnYLb5um_jgHpIO4NxdCYnb6YYc_LahOnp0M8v0_9jd6Fzpjc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614444935</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and Validation of a Collectivist Coping Styles Inventory</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Heppner, P. Paul ; Heppner, Mary J ; Lee, Dong-gwi ; Wang, Yu-Wei ; Park, Hyun-joo ; Wang, Li-fei</creator><contributor>Mallinckrodt, Brent</contributor><creatorcontrib>Heppner, P. Paul ; Heppner, Mary J ; Lee, Dong-gwi ; Wang, Yu-Wei ; Park, Hyun-joo ; Wang, Li-fei ; Mallinckrodt, Brent</creatorcontrib><description>This research consisted of 3 studies, with a sample of over 3,000 Taiwanese college students, aimed at developing and validating a situation-specific Collectivist Coping Styles (CCS) inventory from an Asian perspective. The results from the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a stable 5-factor structure of the CCS: (a) Acceptance, Reframing, and Striving; (b) Family Support; (c) Religion-Spirituality; (d) Avoidance and Detachment; and (e) Private Emotional Outlets. These factors reflected Asians' use of a combination of primary and secondary control efforts and represented different constellations of items than typically found on coping-problem solving inventories in Western countries. Estimates of concurrent and construct validity suggest the CCS is related to a problem solving inventory, an overall problem resolution index, 2 psychological distress measures, and an index of how much the trauma interfered with the lives of participants in conceptually expected directions but is not strongly related to social desirability. Overall, the CCS was found to be a useful and psychometrically sound measure of collectivistic coping. Limitations and future directions are also discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0167</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2168</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.107</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLCPAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Asian Culture ; Asian People ; Asians ; Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Case Studies ; Collective Behavior ; Collectivization ; College Students ; Construct Validity ; Coping ; Coping Behavior ; Coping Style ; Emotional Trauma ; Factor Analysis ; Factor Structure ; Family Involvement ; Female ; Five Factor Model ; Foreign Countries ; Human ; Inventories ; Male ; Measures (Individuals) ; Medical sciences ; Personality Measures ; Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ; Problem Solving ; Psychological Evaluation ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reliability ; Sensory perception ; Social Desirability ; Taiwan ; Techniques and methods ; Test Construction ; Test Validity ; Trauma ; Tropical medicine ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of counseling psychology, 2006-01, Vol.53 (1), p.107-125</ispartof><rights>2006 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2006</rights><rights>2006, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a448t-c7a24b11d1956ac26757789e3bbf423a3f3a03740295b1d9a40bca09be1710123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a448t-c7a24b11d1956ac26757789e3bbf423a3f3a03740295b1d9a40bca09be1710123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27904,27905,27906,30980,30981</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ734397$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17439945$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mallinckrodt, Brent</contributor><creatorcontrib>Heppner, P. Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heppner, Mary J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dong-gwi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yu-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hyun-joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Li-fei</creatorcontrib><title>Development and Validation of a Collectivist Coping Styles Inventory</title><title>Journal of counseling psychology</title><description>This research consisted of 3 studies, with a sample of over 3,000 Taiwanese college students, aimed at developing and validating a situation-specific Collectivist Coping Styles (CCS) inventory from an Asian perspective. The results from the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a stable 5-factor structure of the CCS: (a) Acceptance, Reframing, and Striving; (b) Family Support; (c) Religion-Spirituality; (d) Avoidance and Detachment; and (e) Private Emotional Outlets. These factors reflected Asians' use of a combination of primary and secondary control efforts and represented different constellations of items than typically found on coping-problem solving inventories in Western countries. Estimates of concurrent and construct validity suggest the CCS is related to a problem solving inventory, an overall problem resolution index, 2 psychological distress measures, and an index of how much the trauma interfered with the lives of participants in conceptually expected directions but is not strongly related to social desirability. Overall, the CCS was found to be a useful and psychometrically sound measure of collectivistic coping. Limitations and future directions are also discussed.</description><subject>Asian Culture</subject><subject>Asian People</subject><subject>Asians</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Collective Behavior</subject><subject>Collectivization</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Construct Validity</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Coping Behavior</subject><subject>Coping Style</subject><subject>Emotional Trauma</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Factor Structure</subject><subject>Family Involvement</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Five Factor Model</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Inventories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Personality Measures</subject><subject>Posttraumatic Stress Disorder</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Psychological Evaluation</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Social Desirability</subject><subject>Taiwan</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Tropical medicine</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0022-0167</issn><issn>1939-2168</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVoIds0f6D0YEqbS_FGI8mWdSybjyYEeujHVYy1clHQWq5kL-y_j8yGJA0hugjNPO87o5eQD0CXQLk8pZSxkkItlxVfQq7JA7IAxVXJoG7ekMUDcEjepXRLKQjeqAU5O7Nb68Owsf1YYL8u_qB3axxd6IvQFVisgvfWjG7r0pgfg-v_Fj_HnbepuOq3WRXi7j1526FP9vj-PiK_L85_rb6XNz8ur1bfbkoUohlLI5GJFmANqqrRsFpWUjbK8rbtBOPIO475M4IyVbWwVihoa5Cq1oIECowfkZO97xDDv8mmUW9cMtZ77G2Ykq4kVLVoaAY_PQNvwxT7vJuuQeSjePUaxHhdA1cUMsT2kIkhpWg7PUS3wbjTQPUcvZ6T1XOyuuIack1m0Zd7Z0wGfRexNy49KqXgSol5g497zkZnHtrn15JnYLb5um_jgHpIO4NxdCYnb6YYc_LahOnp0M8v0_9jd6Fzpjc</recordid><startdate>200601</startdate><enddate>200601</enddate><creator>Heppner, P. Paul</creator><creator>Heppner, Mary J</creator><creator>Lee, Dong-gwi</creator><creator>Wang, Yu-Wei</creator><creator>Park, Hyun-joo</creator><creator>Wang, Li-fei</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200601</creationdate><title>Development and Validation of a Collectivist Coping Styles Inventory</title><author>Heppner, P. Paul ; Heppner, Mary J ; Lee, Dong-gwi ; Wang, Yu-Wei ; Park, Hyun-joo ; Wang, Li-fei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a448t-c7a24b11d1956ac26757789e3bbf423a3f3a03740295b1d9a40bca09be1710123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Asian Culture</topic><topic>Asian People</topic><topic>Asians</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Collective Behavior</topic><topic>Collectivization</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Construct Validity</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Coping Behavior</topic><topic>Coping Style</topic><topic>Emotional Trauma</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Factor Structure</topic><topic>Family Involvement</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Five Factor Model</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Inventories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Personality Measures</topic><topic>Posttraumatic Stress Disorder</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Psychological Evaluation</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Social Desirability</topic><topic>Taiwan</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Tropical medicine</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heppner, P. Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heppner, Mary J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dong-gwi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yu-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hyun-joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Li-fei</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of counseling psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heppner, P. Paul</au><au>Heppner, Mary J</au><au>Lee, Dong-gwi</au><au>Wang, Yu-Wei</au><au>Park, Hyun-joo</au><au>Wang, Li-fei</au><au>Mallinckrodt, Brent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ734397</ericid><atitle>Development and Validation of a Collectivist Coping Styles Inventory</atitle><jtitle>Journal of counseling psychology</jtitle><date>2006-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>125</epage><pages>107-125</pages><issn>0022-0167</issn><eissn>1939-2168</eissn><coden>JLCPAT</coden><abstract>This research consisted of 3 studies, with a sample of over 3,000 Taiwanese college students, aimed at developing and validating a situation-specific Collectivist Coping Styles (CCS) inventory from an Asian perspective. The results from the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a stable 5-factor structure of the CCS: (a) Acceptance, Reframing, and Striving; (b) Family Support; (c) Religion-Spirituality; (d) Avoidance and Detachment; and (e) Private Emotional Outlets. These factors reflected Asians' use of a combination of primary and secondary control efforts and represented different constellations of items than typically found on coping-problem solving inventories in Western countries. Estimates of concurrent and construct validity suggest the CCS is related to a problem solving inventory, an overall problem resolution index, 2 psychological distress measures, and an index of how much the trauma interfered with the lives of participants in conceptually expected directions but is not strongly related to social desirability. Overall, the CCS was found to be a useful and psychometrically sound measure of collectivistic coping. Limitations and future directions are also discussed.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.107</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0167 |
ispartof | Journal of counseling psychology, 2006-01, Vol.53 (1), p.107-125 |
issn | 0022-0167 1939-2168 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57156480 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Asian Culture Asian People Asians Behavior Biological and medical sciences Case Studies Collective Behavior Collectivization College Students Construct Validity Coping Coping Behavior Coping Style Emotional Trauma Factor Analysis Factor Structure Family Involvement Female Five Factor Model Foreign Countries Human Inventories Male Measures (Individuals) Medical sciences Personality Measures Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Problem Solving Psychological Evaluation Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems Psychopathology. Psychiatry Reliability Sensory perception Social Desirability Taiwan Techniques and methods Test Construction Test Validity Trauma Tropical medicine Validity |
title | Development and Validation of a Collectivist Coping Styles Inventory |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T03%3A39%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20Validation%20of%20a%20Collectivist%20Coping%20Styles%20Inventory&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20counseling%20psychology&rft.au=Heppner,%20P.%20Paul&rft.date=2006-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=125&rft.pages=107-125&rft.issn=0022-0167&rft.eissn=1939-2168&rft.coden=JLCPAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614444935%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614444935&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ734397&rfr_iscdi=true |