Development and Validation of a Collectivist Coping Styles Inventory

This research consisted of 3 studies, with a sample of over 3,000 Taiwanese college students, aimed at developing and validating a situation-specific Collectivist Coping Styles (CCS) inventory from an Asian perspective. The results from the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of counseling psychology 2006-01, Vol.53 (1), p.107-125
Hauptverfasser: Heppner, P. Paul, Heppner, Mary J, Lee, Dong-gwi, Wang, Yu-Wei, Park, Hyun-joo, Wang, Li-fei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 125
container_issue 1
container_start_page 107
container_title Journal of counseling psychology
container_volume 53
creator Heppner, P. Paul
Heppner, Mary J
Lee, Dong-gwi
Wang, Yu-Wei
Park, Hyun-joo
Wang, Li-fei
description This research consisted of 3 studies, with a sample of over 3,000 Taiwanese college students, aimed at developing and validating a situation-specific Collectivist Coping Styles (CCS) inventory from an Asian perspective. The results from the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a stable 5-factor structure of the CCS: (a) Acceptance, Reframing, and Striving; (b) Family Support; (c) Religion-Spirituality; (d) Avoidance and Detachment; and (e) Private Emotional Outlets. These factors reflected Asians' use of a combination of primary and secondary control efforts and represented different constellations of items than typically found on coping-problem solving inventories in Western countries. Estimates of concurrent and construct validity suggest the CCS is related to a problem solving inventory, an overall problem resolution index, 2 psychological distress measures, and an index of how much the trauma interfered with the lives of participants in conceptually expected directions but is not strongly related to social desirability. Overall, the CCS was found to be a useful and psychometrically sound measure of collectivistic coping. Limitations and future directions are also discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.107
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57156480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ734397</ericid><sourcerecordid>614444935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a448t-c7a24b11d1956ac26757789e3bbf423a3f3a03740295b1d9a40bca09be1710123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVoIds0f6D0YEqbS_FGI8mWdSybjyYEeujHVYy1clHQWq5kL-y_j8yGJA0hugjNPO87o5eQD0CXQLk8pZSxkkItlxVfQq7JA7IAxVXJoG7ekMUDcEjepXRLKQjeqAU5O7Nb68Owsf1YYL8u_qB3axxd6IvQFVisgvfWjG7r0pgfg-v_Fj_HnbepuOq3WRXi7j1526FP9vj-PiK_L85_rb6XNz8ur1bfbkoUohlLI5GJFmANqqrRsFpWUjbK8rbtBOPIO475M4IyVbWwVihoa5Cq1oIECowfkZO97xDDv8mmUW9cMtZ77G2Ykq4kVLVoaAY_PQNvwxT7vJuuQeSjePUaxHhdA1cUMsT2kIkhpWg7PUS3wbjTQPUcvZ6T1XOyuuIack1m0Zd7Z0wGfRexNy49KqXgSol5g497zkZnHtrn15JnYLb5um_jgHpIO4NxdCYnb6YYc_LahOnp0M8v0_9jd6Fzpjc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614444935</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and Validation of a Collectivist Coping Styles Inventory</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Heppner, P. Paul ; Heppner, Mary J ; Lee, Dong-gwi ; Wang, Yu-Wei ; Park, Hyun-joo ; Wang, Li-fei</creator><contributor>Mallinckrodt, Brent</contributor><creatorcontrib>Heppner, P. Paul ; Heppner, Mary J ; Lee, Dong-gwi ; Wang, Yu-Wei ; Park, Hyun-joo ; Wang, Li-fei ; Mallinckrodt, Brent</creatorcontrib><description>This research consisted of 3 studies, with a sample of over 3,000 Taiwanese college students, aimed at developing and validating a situation-specific Collectivist Coping Styles (CCS) inventory from an Asian perspective. The results from the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a stable 5-factor structure of the CCS: (a) Acceptance, Reframing, and Striving; (b) Family Support; (c) Religion-Spirituality; (d) Avoidance and Detachment; and (e) Private Emotional Outlets. These factors reflected Asians' use of a combination of primary and secondary control efforts and represented different constellations of items than typically found on coping-problem solving inventories in Western countries. Estimates of concurrent and construct validity suggest the CCS is related to a problem solving inventory, an overall problem resolution index, 2 psychological distress measures, and an index of how much the trauma interfered with the lives of participants in conceptually expected directions but is not strongly related to social desirability. Overall, the CCS was found to be a useful and psychometrically sound measure of collectivistic coping. Limitations and future directions are also discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0167</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2168</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.107</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLCPAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Asian Culture ; Asian People ; Asians ; Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Case Studies ; Collective Behavior ; Collectivization ; College Students ; Construct Validity ; Coping ; Coping Behavior ; Coping Style ; Emotional Trauma ; Factor Analysis ; Factor Structure ; Family Involvement ; Female ; Five Factor Model ; Foreign Countries ; Human ; Inventories ; Male ; Measures (Individuals) ; Medical sciences ; Personality Measures ; Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ; Problem Solving ; Psychological Evaluation ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reliability ; Sensory perception ; Social Desirability ; Taiwan ; Techniques and methods ; Test Construction ; Test Validity ; Trauma ; Tropical medicine ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of counseling psychology, 2006-01, Vol.53 (1), p.107-125</ispartof><rights>2006 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2006</rights><rights>2006, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a448t-c7a24b11d1956ac26757789e3bbf423a3f3a03740295b1d9a40bca09be1710123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a448t-c7a24b11d1956ac26757789e3bbf423a3f3a03740295b1d9a40bca09be1710123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27904,27905,27906,30980,30981</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ734397$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17439945$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mallinckrodt, Brent</contributor><creatorcontrib>Heppner, P. Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heppner, Mary J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dong-gwi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yu-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hyun-joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Li-fei</creatorcontrib><title>Development and Validation of a Collectivist Coping Styles Inventory</title><title>Journal of counseling psychology</title><description>This research consisted of 3 studies, with a sample of over 3,000 Taiwanese college students, aimed at developing and validating a situation-specific Collectivist Coping Styles (CCS) inventory from an Asian perspective. The results from the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a stable 5-factor structure of the CCS: (a) Acceptance, Reframing, and Striving; (b) Family Support; (c) Religion-Spirituality; (d) Avoidance and Detachment; and (e) Private Emotional Outlets. These factors reflected Asians' use of a combination of primary and secondary control efforts and represented different constellations of items than typically found on coping-problem solving inventories in Western countries. Estimates of concurrent and construct validity suggest the CCS is related to a problem solving inventory, an overall problem resolution index, 2 psychological distress measures, and an index of how much the trauma interfered with the lives of participants in conceptually expected directions but is not strongly related to social desirability. Overall, the CCS was found to be a useful and psychometrically sound measure of collectivistic coping. Limitations and future directions are also discussed.</description><subject>Asian Culture</subject><subject>Asian People</subject><subject>Asians</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Collective Behavior</subject><subject>Collectivization</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Construct Validity</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Coping Behavior</subject><subject>Coping Style</subject><subject>Emotional Trauma</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Factor Structure</subject><subject>Family Involvement</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Five Factor Model</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Inventories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Personality Measures</subject><subject>Posttraumatic Stress Disorder</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Psychological Evaluation</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Social Desirability</subject><subject>Taiwan</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Tropical medicine</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0022-0167</issn><issn>1939-2168</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVoIds0f6D0YEqbS_FGI8mWdSybjyYEeujHVYy1clHQWq5kL-y_j8yGJA0hugjNPO87o5eQD0CXQLk8pZSxkkItlxVfQq7JA7IAxVXJoG7ekMUDcEjepXRLKQjeqAU5O7Nb68Owsf1YYL8u_qB3axxd6IvQFVisgvfWjG7r0pgfg-v_Fj_HnbepuOq3WRXi7j1526FP9vj-PiK_L85_rb6XNz8ur1bfbkoUohlLI5GJFmANqqrRsFpWUjbK8rbtBOPIO475M4IyVbWwVihoa5Cq1oIECowfkZO97xDDv8mmUW9cMtZ77G2Ykq4kVLVoaAY_PQNvwxT7vJuuQeSjePUaxHhdA1cUMsT2kIkhpWg7PUS3wbjTQPUcvZ6T1XOyuuIack1m0Zd7Z0wGfRexNy49KqXgSol5g497zkZnHtrn15JnYLb5um_jgHpIO4NxdCYnb6YYc_LahOnp0M8v0_9jd6Fzpjc</recordid><startdate>200601</startdate><enddate>200601</enddate><creator>Heppner, P. Paul</creator><creator>Heppner, Mary J</creator><creator>Lee, Dong-gwi</creator><creator>Wang, Yu-Wei</creator><creator>Park, Hyun-joo</creator><creator>Wang, Li-fei</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200601</creationdate><title>Development and Validation of a Collectivist Coping Styles Inventory</title><author>Heppner, P. Paul ; Heppner, Mary J ; Lee, Dong-gwi ; Wang, Yu-Wei ; Park, Hyun-joo ; Wang, Li-fei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a448t-c7a24b11d1956ac26757789e3bbf423a3f3a03740295b1d9a40bca09be1710123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Asian Culture</topic><topic>Asian People</topic><topic>Asians</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Collective Behavior</topic><topic>Collectivization</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Construct Validity</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Coping Behavior</topic><topic>Coping Style</topic><topic>Emotional Trauma</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Factor Structure</topic><topic>Family Involvement</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Five Factor Model</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Inventories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Personality Measures</topic><topic>Posttraumatic Stress Disorder</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Psychological Evaluation</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Social Desirability</topic><topic>Taiwan</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Tropical medicine</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heppner, P. Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heppner, Mary J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dong-gwi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yu-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hyun-joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Li-fei</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of counseling psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heppner, P. Paul</au><au>Heppner, Mary J</au><au>Lee, Dong-gwi</au><au>Wang, Yu-Wei</au><au>Park, Hyun-joo</au><au>Wang, Li-fei</au><au>Mallinckrodt, Brent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ734397</ericid><atitle>Development and Validation of a Collectivist Coping Styles Inventory</atitle><jtitle>Journal of counseling psychology</jtitle><date>2006-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>125</epage><pages>107-125</pages><issn>0022-0167</issn><eissn>1939-2168</eissn><coden>JLCPAT</coden><abstract>This research consisted of 3 studies, with a sample of over 3,000 Taiwanese college students, aimed at developing and validating a situation-specific Collectivist Coping Styles (CCS) inventory from an Asian perspective. The results from the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a stable 5-factor structure of the CCS: (a) Acceptance, Reframing, and Striving; (b) Family Support; (c) Religion-Spirituality; (d) Avoidance and Detachment; and (e) Private Emotional Outlets. These factors reflected Asians' use of a combination of primary and secondary control efforts and represented different constellations of items than typically found on coping-problem solving inventories in Western countries. Estimates of concurrent and construct validity suggest the CCS is related to a problem solving inventory, an overall problem resolution index, 2 psychological distress measures, and an index of how much the trauma interfered with the lives of participants in conceptually expected directions but is not strongly related to social desirability. Overall, the CCS was found to be a useful and psychometrically sound measure of collectivistic coping. Limitations and future directions are also discussed.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.107</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0167
ispartof Journal of counseling psychology, 2006-01, Vol.53 (1), p.107-125
issn 0022-0167
1939-2168
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57156480
source APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Asian Culture
Asian People
Asians
Behavior
Biological and medical sciences
Case Studies
Collective Behavior
Collectivization
College Students
Construct Validity
Coping
Coping Behavior
Coping Style
Emotional Trauma
Factor Analysis
Factor Structure
Family Involvement
Female
Five Factor Model
Foreign Countries
Human
Inventories
Male
Measures (Individuals)
Medical sciences
Personality Measures
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Problem Solving
Psychological Evaluation
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Reliability
Sensory perception
Social Desirability
Taiwan
Techniques and methods
Test Construction
Test Validity
Trauma
Tropical medicine
Validity
title Development and Validation of a Collectivist Coping Styles Inventory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T03%3A39%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20Validation%20of%20a%20Collectivist%20Coping%20Styles%20Inventory&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20counseling%20psychology&rft.au=Heppner,%20P.%20Paul&rft.date=2006-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=125&rft.pages=107-125&rft.issn=0022-0167&rft.eissn=1939-2168&rft.coden=JLCPAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614444935%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614444935&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ734397&rfr_iscdi=true