Identification and Diagnostic Evaluation of Possible Dementia in General Practice

Objective. To investigate the rate of diagnostic evaluation of dementia for patients in whom a suspicion of dementia was raised, & to investigate reasons why a diagnostic evaluation was not always being performed. Design. A prospective study among elderly patients aged 65+, & a follow-up stu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian journal of primary health care 2005-12, Vol.23 (4), p.221-226
Hauptverfasser: Waldorff, Frans Boch, Rishoj, Susanne, Waldemar, Gunhild
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 226
container_issue 4
container_start_page 221
container_title Scandinavian journal of primary health care
container_volume 23
creator Waldorff, Frans Boch
Rishoj, Susanne
Waldemar, Gunhild
description Objective. To investigate the rate of diagnostic evaluation of dementia for patients in whom a suspicion of dementia was raised, & to investigate reasons why a diagnostic evaluation was not always being performed. Design. A prospective study among elderly patients aged 65+, & a follow-up study. Setting. In all, 17 general practices in Copenhagen with 40 865 patients on their lists of whom 2934 were aged 65+. Subjects. A total of 793 patients consulting their GP regardless of reason of encounter, in October & November 2002. Main outcome measures. MMSE score=23, GP clinical impression of dementia, laboratory-screening tests prescribed by the GPs & referral status after 6 months, & follow-up questionnaire. Results. Of 793 patients a total of 138 patients were identified with possible dementia. Among the identified patients 26 (20%) were referred for further evaluation within 6 months, & 4 (3%) were treated for depression or referred for another condition. A total of 6 patients were lost to follow up. In the remaining 102 undiagnosed patients the main reasons for not performing a diagnostic evaluation of dementia were patient/relative hesitation (34%), the GP thought that it would not have any consequences for the patient, or the GP estimated that the patient was too fragile (21%). Conclusion. In 17% of elderly patients in general practice a suspicion of dementia could be raised based on the clinical impression of the GP or MMSE score. However, only 23% of this group were evaluated by their GP or referred to a memory clinic within a subsequent period of 6 months. 3 Tables, 1 Figure, 16 References. Adapted from the source document.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/0281343050031324
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57144165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57144165</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_571441653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi7sOgkAQRbfQxGdvuZUdOsuCYi346DCxNyMOZs26qwz4_Ur0A6xucu45QkwUzBQkMIcwUTrSEANopcOoI_otCj4s7IkB8w1AJbDSfXHYX8jVpjQF1sY7ie4iU4NX57k2hcxeaJvv40uZe2ZztiRTurcVSuPklhxVaGVeYfFJaCS6JVqm8W-HYrrJjutd8Kj8syGuT3fDBVmLjnzDp3ipokgtYv23-Ab5tEar</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57144165</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identification and Diagnostic Evaluation of Possible Dementia in General Practice</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Waldorff, Frans Boch ; Rishoj, Susanne ; Waldemar, Gunhild</creator><creatorcontrib>Waldorff, Frans Boch ; Rishoj, Susanne ; Waldemar, Gunhild</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Objective. To investigate the rate of diagnostic evaluation of dementia for patients in whom a suspicion of dementia was raised, & to investigate reasons why a diagnostic evaluation was not always being performed. Design. A prospective study among elderly patients aged 65+, & a follow-up study. Setting. In all, 17 general practices in Copenhagen with 40 865 patients on their lists of whom 2934 were aged 65+. Subjects. A total of 793 patients consulting their GP regardless of reason of encounter, in October & November 2002. Main outcome measures. MMSE score=23, GP clinical impression of dementia, laboratory-screening tests prescribed by the GPs & referral status after 6 months, & follow-up questionnaire. Results. Of 793 patients a total of 138 patients were identified with possible dementia. Among the identified patients 26 (20%) were referred for further evaluation within 6 months, & 4 (3%) were treated for depression or referred for another condition. A total of 6 patients were lost to follow up. In the remaining 102 undiagnosed patients the main reasons for not performing a diagnostic evaluation of dementia were patient/relative hesitation (34%), the GP thought that it would not have any consequences for the patient, or the GP estimated that the patient was too fragile (21%). Conclusion. In 17% of elderly patients in general practice a suspicion of dementia could be raised based on the clinical impression of the GP or MMSE score. However, only 23% of this group were evaluated by their GP or referred to a memory clinic within a subsequent period of 6 months. 3 Tables, 1 Figure, 16 References. Adapted from the source document.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0281-3432</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0281343050031324</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SJPCD7</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Dementia ; Diagnosis ; General practice ; Health care ; Quality of care</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2005-12, Vol.23 (4), p.221-226</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30977</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Waldorff, Frans Boch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rishoj, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldemar, Gunhild</creatorcontrib><title>Identification and Diagnostic Evaluation of Possible Dementia in General Practice</title><title>Scandinavian journal of primary health care</title><description><![CDATA[Objective. To investigate the rate of diagnostic evaluation of dementia for patients in whom a suspicion of dementia was raised, & to investigate reasons why a diagnostic evaluation was not always being performed. Design. A prospective study among elderly patients aged 65+, & a follow-up study. Setting. In all, 17 general practices in Copenhagen with 40 865 patients on their lists of whom 2934 were aged 65+. Subjects. A total of 793 patients consulting their GP regardless of reason of encounter, in October & November 2002. Main outcome measures. MMSE score=23, GP clinical impression of dementia, laboratory-screening tests prescribed by the GPs & referral status after 6 months, & follow-up questionnaire. Results. Of 793 patients a total of 138 patients were identified with possible dementia. Among the identified patients 26 (20%) were referred for further evaluation within 6 months, & 4 (3%) were treated for depression or referred for another condition. A total of 6 patients were lost to follow up. In the remaining 102 undiagnosed patients the main reasons for not performing a diagnostic evaluation of dementia were patient/relative hesitation (34%), the GP thought that it would not have any consequences for the patient, or the GP estimated that the patient was too fragile (21%). Conclusion. In 17% of elderly patients in general practice a suspicion of dementia could be raised based on the clinical impression of the GP or MMSE score. However, only 23% of this group were evaluated by their GP or referred to a memory clinic within a subsequent period of 6 months. 3 Tables, 1 Figure, 16 References. Adapted from the source document.]]></description><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>General practice</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><issn>0281-3432</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNi7sOgkAQRbfQxGdvuZUdOsuCYi346DCxNyMOZs26qwz4_Ur0A6xucu45QkwUzBQkMIcwUTrSEANopcOoI_otCj4s7IkB8w1AJbDSfXHYX8jVpjQF1sY7ie4iU4NX57k2hcxeaJvv40uZe2ZztiRTurcVSuPklhxVaGVeYfFJaCS6JVqm8W-HYrrJjutd8Kj8syGuT3fDBVmLjnzDp3ipokgtYv23-Ab5tEar</recordid><startdate>20051201</startdate><enddate>20051201</enddate><creator>Waldorff, Frans Boch</creator><creator>Rishoj, Susanne</creator><creator>Waldemar, Gunhild</creator><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051201</creationdate><title>Identification and Diagnostic Evaluation of Possible Dementia in General Practice</title><author>Waldorff, Frans Boch ; Rishoj, Susanne ; Waldemar, Gunhild</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_571441653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>General practice</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Waldorff, Frans Boch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rishoj, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldemar, Gunhild</creatorcontrib><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of primary health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Waldorff, Frans Boch</au><au>Rishoj, Susanne</au><au>Waldemar, Gunhild</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identification and Diagnostic Evaluation of Possible Dementia in General Practice</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of primary health care</jtitle><date>2005-12-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>226</epage><pages>221-226</pages><issn>0281-3432</issn><coden>SJPCD7</coden><abstract><![CDATA[Objective. To investigate the rate of diagnostic evaluation of dementia for patients in whom a suspicion of dementia was raised, & to investigate reasons why a diagnostic evaluation was not always being performed. Design. A prospective study among elderly patients aged 65+, & a follow-up study. Setting. In all, 17 general practices in Copenhagen with 40 865 patients on their lists of whom 2934 were aged 65+. Subjects. A total of 793 patients consulting their GP regardless of reason of encounter, in October & November 2002. Main outcome measures. MMSE score=23, GP clinical impression of dementia, laboratory-screening tests prescribed by the GPs & referral status after 6 months, & follow-up questionnaire. Results. Of 793 patients a total of 138 patients were identified with possible dementia. Among the identified patients 26 (20%) were referred for further evaluation within 6 months, & 4 (3%) were treated for depression or referred for another condition. A total of 6 patients were lost to follow up. In the remaining 102 undiagnosed patients the main reasons for not performing a diagnostic evaluation of dementia were patient/relative hesitation (34%), the GP thought that it would not have any consequences for the patient, or the GP estimated that the patient was too fragile (21%). Conclusion. In 17% of elderly patients in general practice a suspicion of dementia could be raised based on the clinical impression of the GP or MMSE score. However, only 23% of this group were evaluated by their GP or referred to a memory clinic within a subsequent period of 6 months. 3 Tables, 1 Figure, 16 References. Adapted from the source document.]]></abstract><doi>10.1080/0281343050031324</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0281-3432
ispartof Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2005-12, Vol.23 (4), p.221-226
issn 0281-3432
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57144165
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Dementia
Diagnosis
General practice
Health care
Quality of care
title Identification and Diagnostic Evaluation of Possible Dementia in General Practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A33%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identification%20and%20Diagnostic%20Evaluation%20of%20Possible%20Dementia%20in%20General%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20primary%20health%20care&rft.au=Waldorff,%20Frans%20Boch&rft.date=2005-12-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=226&rft.pages=221-226&rft.issn=0281-3432&rft.coden=SJPCD7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0281343050031324&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E57144165%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57144165&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true