The impact of managed care on the substance abuse treatment patterns and outcomes of Medicaid beneficiaries: Maryland's HealthChoice program

The introduction of Medicaid managed care raises concern that profit motives lead to the undersupply of substance abuse (SA) services. To test effects of the Maryland Medicaid HealthChoice program on SA treatment patterns and outcomes, Medicaid eligibility files were linked to treatment provider rec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of behavioral health services & research 2003-01, Vol.30 (1), p.41-62
Hauptverfasser: Ettner, Susan L, Denmead, Gabrielle, Dilonardo, Joan, Cao, Hui, Belanger, Albert J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 62
container_issue 1
container_start_page 41
container_title The journal of behavioral health services & research
container_volume 30
creator Ettner, Susan L
Denmead, Gabrielle
Dilonardo, Joan
Cao, Hui
Belanger, Albert J
description The introduction of Medicaid managed care raises concern that profit motives lead to the undersupply of substance abuse (SA) services. To test effects of the Maryland Medicaid HealthChoice program on SA treatment patterns and outcomes, Medicaid eligibility files were linked to treatment provider records and two study designs were used to estimate program impact: a quasi-experimental design with matched comparison groups and a natural experiment. Patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were adjusted using multiple regression. Under managed care, there was a shift from residential, correctional-only, and detoxification-only treatment toward outpatient-only treatment. Among beneficiaries entering treatment, those enrolled in managed care organizations (MCOs) had similar utilization and outcomes to those in Medicaid fee-for-service; those enrolling in MCOs during treatment had longer and more intensive episodes and, as a result, better outcomes. Thus, the study disclosed no empirical evidence that health plans respond to capitation by reducing SA services.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02287812
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57115677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57115677</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p265t-60f0834fa1b2e6b7e4d5c87efdecdf7037a5a74ad56da8afb8fb7ceb95eceaca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1PGzEQhq0K1KS0l_6AyuLQnhb8sV5vuEFUCBJRL-l5NbbHxFH2A9t74D_wo-uq6YXTjDSPnnlnCPnK2RVnTF_f3TMhWt1y8YEsuVJNJSVrz0rPVnUlay4W5FNKB8ZYXUv9kSy4aArC5JK87fZIQz-BzXT0tIcBntFRCxHpONBcpmk2KcNgkYKZE9IcEXKPQ6YT5IxxSBQGR8c527HH9FezRRcsBEcNDuiDDRADphu6hfh6LPCPRDcIx7xf78dQxFMcnyP0n8m5h2PCL6d6QX7f_9ytN9XTr4fH9e1TNYlG5aphnrWy9sCNwMZorJ2yrUbv0DqvmdSgQNfgVOOgBW9ab7RFs1JoESzIC_L9n7fsfZkx5a4PyeKxRMNxTp3SnKtG6wJevgMP4xyHkq0TTAmxkrUs0LcTNJseXTfF0Jc7u_9Pln8ADL-AwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205229343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of managed care on the substance abuse treatment patterns and outcomes of Medicaid beneficiaries: Maryland's HealthChoice program</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Ettner, Susan L ; Denmead, Gabrielle ; Dilonardo, Joan ; Cao, Hui ; Belanger, Albert J</creator><creatorcontrib>Ettner, Susan L ; Denmead, Gabrielle ; Dilonardo, Joan ; Cao, Hui ; Belanger, Albert J</creatorcontrib><description>The introduction of Medicaid managed care raises concern that profit motives lead to the undersupply of substance abuse (SA) services. To test effects of the Maryland Medicaid HealthChoice program on SA treatment patterns and outcomes, Medicaid eligibility files were linked to treatment provider records and two study designs were used to estimate program impact: a quasi-experimental design with matched comparison groups and a natural experiment. Patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were adjusted using multiple regression. Under managed care, there was a shift from residential, correctional-only, and detoxification-only treatment toward outpatient-only treatment. Among beneficiaries entering treatment, those enrolled in managed care organizations (MCOs) had similar utilization and outcomes to those in Medicaid fee-for-service; those enrolling in MCOs during treatment had longer and more intensive episodes and, as a result, better outcomes. Thus, the study disclosed no empirical evidence that health plans respond to capitation by reducing SA services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-3412</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-3308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02287812</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12633003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Beneficiaries ; Capitation ; Clinical outcomes ; Cost reduction ; Drug abuse ; Drug abusers ; Economic theory ; Eligibility Determination ; Female ; Health care access ; Health maintenance organizations ; Health Services Research ; HMOs ; Hospital costs ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Impact analysis ; Incentives ; Insurance Coverage ; Managed care ; Managed Care Programs - organization &amp; administration ; Managed Care Programs - utilization ; Maryland ; Medicaid ; Medicaid - organization &amp; administration ; Mental health services ; Mental Health Services - organization &amp; administration ; Mental Health Services - utilization ; Middle Aged ; Monetary incentives ; Patients ; Program Evaluation ; Public expenditure ; Regression analysis ; State Health Plans ; States ; Studies ; Substance abuse treatment ; Substance-Related Disorders - economics ; Substance-Related Disorders - ethnology ; Substance-Related Disorders - rehabilitation ; Treatment Outcome ; United States ; USA ; Welfare</subject><ispartof>The journal of behavioral health services &amp; research, 2003-01, Vol.30 (1), p.41-62</ispartof><rights>Copyright Aspen Publishers, Inc. Jan/Feb 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,27901,27902,30976,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12633003$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ettner, Susan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denmead, Gabrielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dilonardo, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belanger, Albert J</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of managed care on the substance abuse treatment patterns and outcomes of Medicaid beneficiaries: Maryland's HealthChoice program</title><title>The journal of behavioral health services &amp; research</title><addtitle>J Behav Health Serv Res</addtitle><description>The introduction of Medicaid managed care raises concern that profit motives lead to the undersupply of substance abuse (SA) services. To test effects of the Maryland Medicaid HealthChoice program on SA treatment patterns and outcomes, Medicaid eligibility files were linked to treatment provider records and two study designs were used to estimate program impact: a quasi-experimental design with matched comparison groups and a natural experiment. Patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were adjusted using multiple regression. Under managed care, there was a shift from residential, correctional-only, and detoxification-only treatment toward outpatient-only treatment. Among beneficiaries entering treatment, those enrolled in managed care organizations (MCOs) had similar utilization and outcomes to those in Medicaid fee-for-service; those enrolling in MCOs during treatment had longer and more intensive episodes and, as a result, better outcomes. Thus, the study disclosed no empirical evidence that health plans respond to capitation by reducing SA services.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Capitation</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Cost reduction</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Drug abusers</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Eligibility Determination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Health maintenance organizations</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>HMOs</subject><subject>Hospital costs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Insurance Coverage</subject><subject>Managed care</subject><subject>Managed Care Programs - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Managed Care Programs - utilization</subject><subject>Maryland</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medicaid - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Mental health services</subject><subject>Mental Health Services - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Mental Health Services - utilization</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monetary incentives</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Public expenditure</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>State Health Plans</subject><subject>States</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Substance abuse treatment</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - economics</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - ethnology</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><issn>1094-3412</issn><issn>1556-3308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1PGzEQhq0K1KS0l_6AyuLQnhb8sV5vuEFUCBJRL-l5NbbHxFH2A9t74D_wo-uq6YXTjDSPnnlnCPnK2RVnTF_f3TMhWt1y8YEsuVJNJSVrz0rPVnUlay4W5FNKB8ZYXUv9kSy4aArC5JK87fZIQz-BzXT0tIcBntFRCxHpONBcpmk2KcNgkYKZE9IcEXKPQ6YT5IxxSBQGR8c527HH9FezRRcsBEcNDuiDDRADphu6hfh6LPCPRDcIx7xf78dQxFMcnyP0n8m5h2PCL6d6QX7f_9ytN9XTr4fH9e1TNYlG5aphnrWy9sCNwMZorJ2yrUbv0DqvmdSgQNfgVOOgBW9ab7RFs1JoESzIC_L9n7fsfZkx5a4PyeKxRMNxTp3SnKtG6wJevgMP4xyHkq0TTAmxkrUs0LcTNJseXTfF0Jc7u_9Pln8ADL-AwA</recordid><startdate>200301</startdate><enddate>200301</enddate><creator>Ettner, Susan L</creator><creator>Denmead, Gabrielle</creator><creator>Dilonardo, Joan</creator><creator>Cao, Hui</creator><creator>Belanger, Albert J</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200301</creationdate><title>The impact of managed care on the substance abuse treatment patterns and outcomes of Medicaid beneficiaries: Maryland's HealthChoice program</title><author>Ettner, Susan L ; Denmead, Gabrielle ; Dilonardo, Joan ; Cao, Hui ; Belanger, Albert J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p265t-60f0834fa1b2e6b7e4d5c87efdecdf7037a5a74ad56da8afb8fb7ceb95eceaca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Capitation</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Cost reduction</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Drug abusers</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Eligibility Determination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Health maintenance organizations</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>HMOs</topic><topic>Hospital costs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Insurance Coverage</topic><topic>Managed care</topic><topic>Managed Care Programs - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Managed Care Programs - utilization</topic><topic>Maryland</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medicaid - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Mental health services</topic><topic>Mental Health Services - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Mental Health Services - utilization</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monetary incentives</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Public expenditure</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>State Health Plans</topic><topic>States</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Substance abuse treatment</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - economics</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - ethnology</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ettner, Susan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denmead, Gabrielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dilonardo, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belanger, Albert J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The journal of behavioral health services &amp; research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ettner, Susan L</au><au>Denmead, Gabrielle</au><au>Dilonardo, Joan</au><au>Cao, Hui</au><au>Belanger, Albert J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of managed care on the substance abuse treatment patterns and outcomes of Medicaid beneficiaries: Maryland's HealthChoice program</atitle><jtitle>The journal of behavioral health services &amp; research</jtitle><addtitle>J Behav Health Serv Res</addtitle><date>2003-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>41-62</pages><issn>1094-3412</issn><eissn>1556-3308</eissn><abstract>The introduction of Medicaid managed care raises concern that profit motives lead to the undersupply of substance abuse (SA) services. To test effects of the Maryland Medicaid HealthChoice program on SA treatment patterns and outcomes, Medicaid eligibility files were linked to treatment provider records and two study designs were used to estimate program impact: a quasi-experimental design with matched comparison groups and a natural experiment. Patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were adjusted using multiple regression. Under managed care, there was a shift from residential, correctional-only, and detoxification-only treatment toward outpatient-only treatment. Among beneficiaries entering treatment, those enrolled in managed care organizations (MCOs) had similar utilization and outcomes to those in Medicaid fee-for-service; those enrolling in MCOs during treatment had longer and more intensive episodes and, as a result, better outcomes. Thus, the study disclosed no empirical evidence that health plans respond to capitation by reducing SA services.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>12633003</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF02287812</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1094-3412
ispartof The journal of behavioral health services & research, 2003-01, Vol.30 (1), p.41-62
issn 1094-3412
1556-3308
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57115677
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Beneficiaries
Capitation
Clinical outcomes
Cost reduction
Drug abuse
Drug abusers
Economic theory
Eligibility Determination
Female
Health care access
Health maintenance organizations
Health Services Research
HMOs
Hospital costs
Humans
Hypotheses
Impact analysis
Incentives
Insurance Coverage
Managed care
Managed Care Programs - organization & administration
Managed Care Programs - utilization
Maryland
Medicaid
Medicaid - organization & administration
Mental health services
Mental Health Services - organization & administration
Mental Health Services - utilization
Middle Aged
Monetary incentives
Patients
Program Evaluation
Public expenditure
Regression analysis
State Health Plans
States
Studies
Substance abuse treatment
Substance-Related Disorders - economics
Substance-Related Disorders - ethnology
Substance-Related Disorders - rehabilitation
Treatment Outcome
United States
USA
Welfare
title The impact of managed care on the substance abuse treatment patterns and outcomes of Medicaid beneficiaries: Maryland's HealthChoice program
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T09%3A35%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20managed%20care%20on%20the%20substance%20abuse%20treatment%20patterns%20and%20outcomes%20of%20Medicaid%20beneficiaries:%20Maryland's%20HealthChoice%20program&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20behavioral%20health%20services%20&%20research&rft.au=Ettner,%20Susan%20L&rft.date=2003-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=41-62&rft.issn=1094-3412&rft.eissn=1556-3308&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02287812&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E57115677%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205229343&rft_id=info:pmid/12633003&rfr_iscdi=true