Re-Designing State Mental Health Policy to Prevent the Use of Seclusion and Restraint
The members of the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) believe that seclusion & restraint, including "chemical restraints," are safety interventions of last resort & are not treatment interventions. Seclusion & restraint should never be used...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research 2006-07, Vol.33 (4), p.482-491 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 491 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 482 |
container_title | Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Huckshorn, Kevin Ann |
description | The members of the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) believe that seclusion & restraint, including "chemical restraints," are safety interventions of last resort & are not treatment interventions. Seclusion & restraint should never be used for the purposes of discipline, coercion, or staff convenience, or as a replacement for adequate levels of staff or active treatment. The use of seclusion & restraint creates significant risks for people with psychiatric disabilities. These risks include serious injury or death, retraumatization of people who have a history of trauma, & loss of dignity & other psychological harm. In light of these potential serious consequences, seclusion & restraint should be used only when there exists an imminent risk of danger to the individual or others & no other safe & effective intervention is possible. (Endorsed by the State Mental Health Directors, July 13, 1999). (NASMHPD 1999, NASMHPD Position Statement on Seclusion & Restraint. Alexandria, VA: National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning.). References. Adapted from the source document. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10488-006-0011-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57101644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57101644</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_571016443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNirkKAjEUAFMoeH6A3avsoi-6l7UHNsLiAXYS1qdGYqL7soJ_7xZ-gMUwxYwQA4UjhZiOWWGUZRIxqVFKxg3RxmwWyThLjy3RYb4j4ixJJ21x2JJcEJurM-4Ku6ADwYZc0BbWpG24Qe6tKT4QPOQlvesE4UZwYAJ_gR0VtmLjHWh3hi1xKLVxoSeaF22Z-j93xXC13M_X8ln6V1Vfp4fhgqzVjnzFpzhVqJIomv49fgE29EgC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57101644</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Re-Designing State Mental Health Policy to Prevent the Use of Seclusion and Restraint</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Huckshorn, Kevin Ann</creator><creatorcontrib>Huckshorn, Kevin Ann</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The members of the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) believe that seclusion & restraint, including "chemical restraints," are safety interventions of last resort & are not treatment interventions. Seclusion & restraint should never be used for the purposes of discipline, coercion, or staff convenience, or as a replacement for adequate levels of staff or active treatment. The use of seclusion & restraint creates significant risks for people with psychiatric disabilities. These risks include serious injury or death, retraumatization of people who have a history of trauma, & loss of dignity & other psychological harm. In light of these potential serious consequences, seclusion & restraint should be used only when there exists an imminent risk of danger to the individual or others & no other safe & effective intervention is possible. (Endorsed by the State Mental Health Directors, July 13, 1999). (NASMHPD 1999, NASMHPD Position Statement on Seclusion & Restraint. Alexandria, VA: National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning.). References. Adapted from the source document.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-587X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10488-006-0011-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APMHEM</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Ethics ; Mental health policy ; Restraints ; Seclusion</subject><ispartof>Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research, 2006-07, Vol.33 (4), p.482-491</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30979</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huckshorn, Kevin Ann</creatorcontrib><title>Re-Designing State Mental Health Policy to Prevent the Use of Seclusion and Restraint</title><title>Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research</title><description><![CDATA[The members of the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) believe that seclusion & restraint, including "chemical restraints," are safety interventions of last resort & are not treatment interventions. Seclusion & restraint should never be used for the purposes of discipline, coercion, or staff convenience, or as a replacement for adequate levels of staff or active treatment. The use of seclusion & restraint creates significant risks for people with psychiatric disabilities. These risks include serious injury or death, retraumatization of people who have a history of trauma, & loss of dignity & other psychological harm. In light of these potential serious consequences, seclusion & restraint should be used only when there exists an imminent risk of danger to the individual or others & no other safe & effective intervention is possible. (Endorsed by the State Mental Health Directors, July 13, 1999). (NASMHPD 1999, NASMHPD Position Statement on Seclusion & Restraint. Alexandria, VA: National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning.). References. Adapted from the source document.]]></description><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Mental health policy</subject><subject>Restraints</subject><subject>Seclusion</subject><issn>0894-587X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNirkKAjEUAFMoeH6A3avsoi-6l7UHNsLiAXYS1qdGYqL7soJ_7xZ-gMUwxYwQA4UjhZiOWWGUZRIxqVFKxg3RxmwWyThLjy3RYb4j4ixJJ21x2JJcEJurM-4Ku6ADwYZc0BbWpG24Qe6tKT4QPOQlvesE4UZwYAJ_gR0VtmLjHWh3hi1xKLVxoSeaF22Z-j93xXC13M_X8ln6V1Vfp4fhgqzVjnzFpzhVqJIomv49fgE29EgC</recordid><startdate>20060701</startdate><enddate>20060701</enddate><creator>Huckshorn, Kevin Ann</creator><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060701</creationdate><title>Re-Designing State Mental Health Policy to Prevent the Use of Seclusion and Restraint</title><author>Huckshorn, Kevin Ann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_571016443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Mental health policy</topic><topic>Restraints</topic><topic>Seclusion</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huckshorn, Kevin Ann</creatorcontrib><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huckshorn, Kevin Ann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Re-Designing State Mental Health Policy to Prevent the Use of Seclusion and Restraint</atitle><jtitle>Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research</jtitle><date>2006-07-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>482</spage><epage>491</epage><pages>482-491</pages><issn>0894-587X</issn><coden>APMHEM</coden><abstract><![CDATA[The members of the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) believe that seclusion & restraint, including "chemical restraints," are safety interventions of last resort & are not treatment interventions. Seclusion & restraint should never be used for the purposes of discipline, coercion, or staff convenience, or as a replacement for adequate levels of staff or active treatment. The use of seclusion & restraint creates significant risks for people with psychiatric disabilities. These risks include serious injury or death, retraumatization of people who have a history of trauma, & loss of dignity & other psychological harm. In light of these potential serious consequences, seclusion & restraint should be used only when there exists an imminent risk of danger to the individual or others & no other safe & effective intervention is possible. (Endorsed by the State Mental Health Directors, July 13, 1999). (NASMHPD 1999, NASMHPD Position Statement on Seclusion & Restraint. Alexandria, VA: National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning.). References. Adapted from the source document.]]></abstract><doi>10.1007/s10488-006-0011-5</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-587X |
ispartof | Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research, 2006-07, Vol.33 (4), p.482-491 |
issn | 0894-587X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57101644 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Ethics Mental health policy Restraints Seclusion |
title | Re-Designing State Mental Health Policy to Prevent the Use of Seclusion and Restraint |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A51%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Re-Designing%20State%20Mental%20Health%20Policy%20to%20Prevent%20the%20Use%20of%20Seclusion%20and%20Restraint&rft.jtitle=Administration%20and%20policy%20in%20mental%20health%20and%20mental%20health%20services%20research&rft.au=Huckshorn,%20Kevin%20Ann&rft.date=2006-07-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=482&rft.epage=491&rft.pages=482-491&rft.issn=0894-587X&rft.coden=APMHEM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10488-006-0011-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E57101644%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57101644&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |