Cognitive load and the imagination effect

When presented with a procedure or concept to learn, imagining the procedure or concept may be an effective instructional technique compared to conventional studying, thus generating an imagination effect. However, it was hypothesized that the importance of learning through imagining as an instructi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied cognitive psychology 2004-11, Vol.18 (7), p.857-875
Hauptverfasser: Leahy, Wayne, Sweller, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 875
container_issue 7
container_start_page 857
container_title Applied cognitive psychology
container_volume 18
creator Leahy, Wayne
Sweller, John
description When presented with a procedure or concept to learn, imagining the procedure or concept may be an effective instructional technique compared to conventional studying, thus generating an imagination effect. However, it was hypothesized that the importance of learning through imagining as an instructional technique depends on modes of presentation. Experiment 1 tested adults studying or imagining contour maps as participants and was designed to verify the generality of the imagination effect. Imagination instructions were superior to study instructions on subsequent test questions. Experiment 2 further investigated the effect by comparing much younger students (Grade 4), studying or imagining temperature/time graphs presented in either a split‐attention (spatially separated diagram and text) or an integrated (spatially combined diagram and text) format. Results on a subsequent test indicated that the Grade 4 students found imagining beneficial to their learning, compared with studying the material but the effect was only obtained using an integrated rather than a split‐attention format. Experiment 3 was conducted to obtain verbal protocols from Grade 4 imagination and study groups using the same instructional materials to throw light on the cognitive mechanisms behind the imagination effect. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acp.1061
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57098751</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>781989661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4201-526d86fabcac32a83368d627c512c3e267f863b5e4b56a8653c9db35e20685363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0FFLwzAQB_AgCs4p-BGKoOhD9XJZ0vRRipvC0D0oii8hS9OZ2bWz6dR9ezM2FATx6e7hx5-7PyGHFM4pAF5oMw-LoFukQyFNY0gQtkkHpJRxDyTskj3vpwCQCoodcpbVk8q17t1GZa3zSFd51L7YyM30xFW6dXUV2aKwpt0nO4UuvT3YzC556F_dZ9fx8G5wk10OY9NDoDFHkUtR6LHRhqGWjAmZC0wMp2iYRZEUUrAxt70xF1oKzkyajxm3CEJyJliXnKxz5039trC-VTPnjS1LXdl64RVPIJUJp_9CBIk8kavEo19wWi-aKjyhkFLsyXBUQKdrZJra-8YWat6EEpqloqBWzarQrFo1G-jxJk97o8ui0ZVx_scLZClFDC5euw9X2uWfeeoyG21yN9751n5-e928qnBgwtXj7UA9S9p_GtGRYuwLkTaSCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211248267</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cognitive load and the imagination effect</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Leahy, Wayne ; Sweller, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Leahy, Wayne ; Sweller, John</creatorcontrib><description>When presented with a procedure or concept to learn, imagining the procedure or concept may be an effective instructional technique compared to conventional studying, thus generating an imagination effect. However, it was hypothesized that the importance of learning through imagining as an instructional technique depends on modes of presentation. Experiment 1 tested adults studying or imagining contour maps as participants and was designed to verify the generality of the imagination effect. Imagination instructions were superior to study instructions on subsequent test questions. Experiment 2 further investigated the effect by comparing much younger students (Grade 4), studying or imagining temperature/time graphs presented in either a split‐attention (spatially separated diagram and text) or an integrated (spatially combined diagram and text) format. Results on a subsequent test indicated that the Grade 4 students found imagining beneficial to their learning, compared with studying the material but the effect was only obtained using an integrated rather than a split‐attention format. Experiment 3 was conducted to obtain verbal protocols from Grade 4 imagination and study groups using the same instructional materials to throw light on the cognitive mechanisms behind the imagination effect. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-4080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0720</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acp.1061</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACPSED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive processes ; Educational psychology ; Experiments ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Imagination ; Learning ; Learning strategies ; Memory load ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychopedagogics. Didactics</subject><ispartof>Applied cognitive psychology, 2004-11, Vol.18 (7), p.857-875</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Nov 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4201-526d86fabcac32a83368d627c512c3e267f863b5e4b56a8653c9db35e20685363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4201-526d86fabcac32a83368d627c512c3e267f863b5e4b56a8653c9db35e20685363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Facp.1061$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Facp.1061$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,30977,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16239122$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leahy, Wayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweller, John</creatorcontrib><title>Cognitive load and the imagination effect</title><title>Applied cognitive psychology</title><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><description>When presented with a procedure or concept to learn, imagining the procedure or concept may be an effective instructional technique compared to conventional studying, thus generating an imagination effect. However, it was hypothesized that the importance of learning through imagining as an instructional technique depends on modes of presentation. Experiment 1 tested adults studying or imagining contour maps as participants and was designed to verify the generality of the imagination effect. Imagination instructions were superior to study instructions on subsequent test questions. Experiment 2 further investigated the effect by comparing much younger students (Grade 4), studying or imagining temperature/time graphs presented in either a split‐attention (spatially separated diagram and text) or an integrated (spatially combined diagram and text) format. Results on a subsequent test indicated that the Grade 4 students found imagining beneficial to their learning, compared with studying the material but the effect was only obtained using an integrated rather than a split‐attention format. Experiment 3 was conducted to obtain verbal protocols from Grade 4 imagination and study groups using the same instructional materials to throw light on the cognitive mechanisms behind the imagination effect. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive processes</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Imagination</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning strategies</subject><subject>Memory load</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychopedagogics. Didactics</subject><issn>0888-4080</issn><issn>1099-0720</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0FFLwzAQB_AgCs4p-BGKoOhD9XJZ0vRRipvC0D0oii8hS9OZ2bWz6dR9ezM2FATx6e7hx5-7PyGHFM4pAF5oMw-LoFukQyFNY0gQtkkHpJRxDyTskj3vpwCQCoodcpbVk8q17t1GZa3zSFd51L7YyM30xFW6dXUV2aKwpt0nO4UuvT3YzC556F_dZ9fx8G5wk10OY9NDoDFHkUtR6LHRhqGWjAmZC0wMp2iYRZEUUrAxt70xF1oKzkyajxm3CEJyJliXnKxz5039trC-VTPnjS1LXdl64RVPIJUJp_9CBIk8kavEo19wWi-aKjyhkFLsyXBUQKdrZJra-8YWat6EEpqloqBWzarQrFo1G-jxJk97o8ui0ZVx_scLZClFDC5euw9X2uWfeeoyG21yN9751n5-e928qnBgwtXj7UA9S9p_GtGRYuwLkTaSCA</recordid><startdate>200411</startdate><enddate>200411</enddate><creator>Leahy, Wayne</creator><creator>Sweller, John</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200411</creationdate><title>Cognitive load and the imagination effect</title><author>Leahy, Wayne ; Sweller, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4201-526d86fabcac32a83368d627c512c3e267f863b5e4b56a8653c9db35e20685363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive processes</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Imagination</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning strategies</topic><topic>Memory load</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychopedagogics. Didactics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leahy, Wayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweller, John</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leahy, Wayne</au><au>Sweller, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cognitive load and the imagination effect</atitle><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><date>2004-11</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>857</spage><epage>875</epage><pages>857-875</pages><issn>0888-4080</issn><eissn>1099-0720</eissn><coden>ACPSED</coden><abstract>When presented with a procedure or concept to learn, imagining the procedure or concept may be an effective instructional technique compared to conventional studying, thus generating an imagination effect. However, it was hypothesized that the importance of learning through imagining as an instructional technique depends on modes of presentation. Experiment 1 tested adults studying or imagining contour maps as participants and was designed to verify the generality of the imagination effect. Imagination instructions were superior to study instructions on subsequent test questions. Experiment 2 further investigated the effect by comparing much younger students (Grade 4), studying or imagining temperature/time graphs presented in either a split‐attention (spatially separated diagram and text) or an integrated (spatially combined diagram and text) format. Results on a subsequent test indicated that the Grade 4 students found imagining beneficial to their learning, compared with studying the material but the effect was only obtained using an integrated rather than a split‐attention format. Experiment 3 was conducted to obtain verbal protocols from Grade 4 imagination and study groups using the same instructional materials to throw light on the cognitive mechanisms behind the imagination effect. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/acp.1061</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-4080
ispartof Applied cognitive psychology, 2004-11, Vol.18 (7), p.857-875
issn 0888-4080
1099-0720
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57098751
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive processes
Educational psychology
Experiments
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Imagination
Learning
Learning strategies
Memory load
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychopedagogics. Didactics
title Cognitive load and the imagination effect
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T03%3A22%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cognitive%20load%20and%20the%20imagination%20effect&rft.jtitle=Applied%20cognitive%20psychology&rft.au=Leahy,%20Wayne&rft.date=2004-11&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=857&rft.epage=875&rft.pages=857-875&rft.issn=0888-4080&rft.eissn=1099-0720&rft.coden=ACPSED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acp.1061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E781989661%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211248267&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true